A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s
deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source
of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking
attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was
made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of
National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal
Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment
was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence
community.
A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s
deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source
of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking
attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was
made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of
National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal
Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment
was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence
community.
A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s
deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source
of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking
attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was
made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of
National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal
Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment
was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence
community.
Who's making the correction?
The NYT.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s
deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source
of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking
attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was
made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of
National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal
Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment
was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence
community.
Who's making the correction?
The NYT.
I must be going blind as I didn't even see that in the original post. DOH!
A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s
deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source
of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking
attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was
made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of
National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal
Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment
was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence
community.
Who's making the correction?
failing new york times. remember when everyone including hilliary threw around the "17 intelligence agencies" bs.
1. Office of the Director of National Intelligence
2.Central Intelligence Agency
3. National Security Agency
4. Defense Intelligence Agency
5. Federal Bureau of Investigation
6. Department of State – Bureau of Intelligence and Research
7. Department of Homeland Security – Office of Intelligence and Analysis
8. Drug Enforcement Administration – Office of National Security Intelligence
9. Department of the Treasury – Office of Intelligence and Analysis
10. Department of Energy – Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence
11. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
12. National Reconnaissance Office
13. Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance
A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s
deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source
of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking
attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was
made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of
National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal
Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment
was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence
community.
Who's making the correction?
failing new york times. remember when everyone including hilliary threw around the "17 intelligence agencies" bs.
1. Office of the Director of National Intelligence
2.Central Intelligence Agency
3. National Security Agency
4. Defense Intelligence Agency
5. Federal Bureau of Investigation
6. Department of State – Bureau of Intelligence and Research
7. Department of Homeland Security – Office of Intelligence and Analysis
8. Drug Enforcement Administration – Office of National Security Intelligence
9. Department of the Treasury – Office of Intelligence and Analysis
10. Department of Energy – Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence
11. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
12. National Reconnaissance Office
13. Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance
14. Army Military Intelligence
15. Office of Naval Intelligence
16. Marine Corps Intelligence
17. Coast Guard Intelligence
Information available as of 29 December 2016 was used in the preparation of this product.
Scope
This report includes an analytic assessment drafted and coordinated among The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and The National Security Agency (NSA), which draws on intelligence information collected and disseminated by those three agencies. It covers the motivation and scope of Moscow’s intentions regarding US elections and Moscow’s use of cyber tools and media campaigns to influence US public opinion. The assessment focuses on activities aimed at the 2016 US presidential election and draws on our understanding of previous Russian influence operations. When we use the term "we" it refers to an assessment by all three agencies.
This report is a declassified version of a highly classified assessment. This document’s conclusions are identical to the highly classified assessment, but this document does not include the full supporting information, including specific intelligence on key elements of the influence campaign. Given the redactions, we made minor edits purely for readability and flow.
We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election. The US Intelligence Community is charged with monitoring and assessing the intentions, capabilities, and actions of foreign actors; it does not analyze US political processes or US public opinion.
New information continues to emerge, providing increased insight into Russian activities.
Sourcing
Many of the key judgments in this assessment rely on a body of reporting from multiple sources that are consistent with our understanding of Russian behavior. Insights into Russian efforts—including specific cyber operations—and Russian views of key US players derive from multiple corroborating sources.
Key Judgments
Russian efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election represent the most recent expression of Moscow’s longstanding desire to undermine the US-led liberal democratic order, but these activities demonstrated a significant escalation in directness, level of activity, and scope of effort compared to previous operations.
We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments. We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him. All three agencies agree with this judgment. CIA and FBI have high confidence in this judgment; NSA has moderate confidence.
https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdfSome of Meh, so they were off by 14? It doesn't negate what transpired.
A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s
deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source
of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking
attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was
made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of
National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal
Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment
was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence
community.
Who's making the correction?
failing new york times. remember when everyone including hilliary threw around the "17 intelligence agencies" bs.
Yeah, you'd think that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the CIA, the FBI, and the NSA would be plenty, lol.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s
deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source
of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking
attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was
made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of
National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal
Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment
was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence
community.
Who's making the correction?
failing new york times. remember when everyone including hilliary threw around the "17 intelligence agencies" bs.
Yeah, you'd think that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the CIA, the FBI, and the NSA would be plenty, lol.
I would think that the NSA Advisor and presidential candidate with a lifetime of political experience would know only 3 agencys made the assessment. I would also think the DNC would turn over all evidence of Russian "interference" to the FBI CIA and NSA but I also think national political parties wouldn't rig their own primaries or cheat the debates.
The Russians hacked and the trumpsters are ok with it but you can bet your bottom $ that if Russia hacked into our electricity grids they would be the 1st Americans crying how could this happen ! The Elections were just a trial run for Russia !
Truth or Propaganda?
Hey what has this administration done to make sure this kind of hacking doesn't happen again look it up and come back and show us thanks ..
Same as other administrations. Aren't you tired yet?
So we should just let it continue rather than learn from the consequences of previous inaction? That's all the pro-Truimpy's can ever say. "What about when...."
The Russians hacked and the trumpsters are ok with it but you can bet your bottom $ that if Russia hacked into our electricity grids they would be the 1st Americans crying how could this happen ! The Elections were just a trial run for Russia !
Truth or Propaganda?
Hey what has this administration done to make sure this kind of hacking doesn't happen again look it up and come back and show us thanks ..
Same as other administrations. Aren't you tired yet?
So we should just let it continue rather than learn from the consequences of previous inaction? That's all the pro-Truimpy's can ever say. "What about when...."
The Russians hacked and the trumpsters are ok with it but you can bet your bottom $ that if Russia hacked into our electricity grids they would be the 1st Americans crying how could this happen ! The Elections were just a trial run for Russia !
Truth or Propaganda?
Hey what has this administration done to make sure this kind of hacking doesn't happen again look it up and come back and show us thanks ..
Same as other administrations. Aren't you tired yet?
So we should just let it continue rather than learn from the consequences of previous inaction? That's all the pro-Truimpy's can ever say. "What about when...."
To that, I say "What about NOW?"
It's great logic, isn't it?
"Obama didn't do anything, so why should Trump?"
The stupidity is breathtaking.
did we look investigate the dnc servers that were hacked?
The Russians hacked and the trumpsters are ok with it but you can bet your bottom $ that if Russia hacked into our electricity grids they would be the 1st Americans crying how could this happen ! The Elections were just a trial run for Russia !
Truth or Propaganda?
Hey what has this administration done to make sure this kind of hacking doesn't happen again look it up and come back and show us thanks ..
Same as other administrations. Aren't you tired yet?
So we should just let it continue rather than learn from the consequences of previous inaction? That's all the pro-Truimpy's can ever say. "What about when...."
To that, I say "What about NOW?"
It's great logic, isn't it?
"Obama didn't do anything, so why should Trump?"
The stupidity is breathtaking.
did we look investigate the dnc servers that were hacked?
Yes we did. Show me we didn't.
WI 6/27/98 WI 10/8/00 MO 10/11/00 IL 4/23/03 MN 6/26/06 MN 6/27/06 WI 6/30/06 IL 8/5/07 IL 8/21/08 (EV) IL 8/22/08 (EV) IL 8/23/09 IL 8/24/09 IN 5/7/10 IL 6/28/11 (EV) IL 6/29/11 (EV) WI 9/3/11 WI 9/4/11 IL 7/19/13 NE 10/09/14 IL 10/17/14 MN 10/19/14 FL 4/11/16 IL 8/20/16 IL 8/22/16 IL 08/18/18 IL 08/20/18 IT 07/05/2020AT 07/07/2020
The Russians hacked and the trumpsters are ok with it but you can bet your bottom $ that if Russia hacked into our electricity grids they would be the 1st Americans crying how could this happen ! The Elections were just a trial run for Russia !
Truth or Propaganda?
Hey what has this administration done to make sure this kind of hacking doesn't happen again look it up and come back and show us thanks ..
Same as other administrations. Aren't you tired yet?
So we should just let it continue rather than learn from the consequences of previous inaction? That's all the pro-Truimpy's can ever say. "What about when...."
To that, I say "What about NOW?"
It's great logic, isn't it?
"Obama didn't do anything, so why should Trump?"
The stupidity is breathtaking.
Actually it should state YOU didn't do anything before, so why now?
The Russians hacked and the trumpsters are ok with it but you can bet your bottom $ that if Russia hacked into our electricity grids they would be the 1st Americans crying how could this happen ! The Elections were just a trial run for Russia !
Truth or Propaganda?
Hey what has this administration done to make sure this kind of hacking doesn't happen again look it up and come back and show us thanks ..
Same as other administrations. Aren't you tired yet?
So we should just let it continue rather than learn from the consequences of previous inaction? That's all the pro-Truimpy's can ever say. "What about when...."
To that, I say "What about NOW?"
It's great logic, isn't it?
"Obama didn't do anything, so why should Trump?"
The stupidity is breathtaking.
did we look investigate the dnc servers that were hacked?
You've already jumped the shark with your pizza dangling from the handle bars like streamers on your bike.
Comments
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/27/us/politics/trump-campaign-chiefs-firm-got-17-million-from-pro-russia-party.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/amp/fbi-interviews-employees-russia-linked-cyber-security-firm-kasperky-lab-n777571
Edit: very weird
https://twitter.com/khanoisseur/status/842465006121771009
I'm sure it's just a coincidence though, and this story will be going away very soon.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://twitter.com/sethabramson/status/879750779673956353
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Correction: June 29, 2017
A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
1. Office of the Director of National Intelligence
2.Central Intelligence Agency
3. National Security Agency
4. Defense Intelligence Agency
5. Federal Bureau of Investigation
6. Department of State – Bureau of Intelligence and Research
7. Department of Homeland Security – Office of Intelligence and Analysis
8. Drug Enforcement Administration – Office of National Security Intelligence
9. Department of the Treasury – Office of Intelligence and Analysis
10. Department of Energy – Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence
11. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
12. National Reconnaissance Office
13. Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance
14. Army Military Intelligence
15. Office of Naval Intelligence
16. Marine Corps Intelligence
17. Coast Guard Intelligence
Meh, so they were off by 14? It doesn't negate what transpired.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://www.wsj.com/articles/gop-operative-sought-clinton-emails-from-hackers-implied-a-connection-to-flynn-1498770851
https://twitter.com/adamblickstein/status/880539769855332353
To that, I say "What about NOW?"
It's great logic, isn't it?
"Obama didn't do anything, so why should Trump?"
The stupidity is breathtaking.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://www.wsj.com/articles/gop-activist-who-sought-clinton-emails-cited-trump-campaign-officials-1498872923
his purpose isn’t clear and there’s no indication he asked for or received any coordination with them