Ya, Lester is the known single alt -right media guy on msnbc. lmao Dude, everyone is saying what a great job he did except ..... Gern.
and....Trump's people
Did you watch? Seriously....62% to 38%, that's not good moderating
That's trump being trump. He dominated the time- and there were several times when Clinton had zero responses to his comments. Such as when he called her out on spreading the images of Obama. She gave one of her smirks and that was it.
That's Trump not being properly moderated. Holt wasn't assertive enough. Megan Kelley was tougher.
I think that made him look more powerful and in control. Not saying it wasn't rude or out of control, but for those on the fence they might like someone who appears strong and in control to represent the country. Romney did the same during the first debate with Obama and he got a big boost.
Being out of control made him look more in control? Hmm. Well anyway, I don't think Trump lost anyone who was already supporting him. I don't think anything short of him kicking the bucket before the election will do that. But I don't think his horrible debate performance will have drawn in any significant number of fence-sitters either.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
It doesn't matter who won the debate anyway, but Hillary is no shoe-in.
What matters is how many people decided to vote for either candidate who are undecided.
Anyone who thinks Hilliary won't be president is ignorant naive or both. (True definition of ignorant not offensive)
... Because it's been rigged for a long time. It still doesn't negate the fact that anyone can vote for anyone of their choosing. And that should be without Nastiness from anyone else.
It doesn't matter who won the debate anyway, but Hillary is no shoe-in.
What matters is how many people decided to vote for either candidate who are undecided.
Anyone who thinks Hilliary won't be president is ignorant naive or both. (True definition of ignorant not offensive)
... Because it's been rigged for a long time. It still doesn't negate the fact that anyone can vote for anyone of their choosing. And that should be without Nastiness from anyone else.
no nastiness but rigged....got it
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
It doesn't matter who won the debate anyway, but Hillary is no shoe-in.
What matters is how many people decided to vote for either candidate who are undecided.
Anyone who thinks Hilliary won't be president is ignorant naive or both. (True definition of ignorant not offensive)
... Because it's been rigged for a long time. It still doesn't negate the fact that anyone can vote for anyone of their choosing. And that should be without Nastiness from anyone else.
It doesn't matter who won the debate anyway, but Hillary is no shoe-in.
What matters is how many people decided to vote for either candidate who are undecided.
Anyone who thinks Hilliary won't be president is ignorant naive or both. (True definition of ignorant not offensive)
... Because it's been rigged for a long time. It still doesn't negate the fact that anyone can vote for anyone of their choosing. And that should be without Nastiness from anyone else.
no nastiness but rigged....got it
Hahaha yep!
VOTE FOR ANYONE OF YOUR CHOOSING! *Clinton is corrupt and she rigged it*
Chelsea “We also have anecdotal evidence now from Colorado where some of the people who were taking marijuana for those purposes, the coroner believes, after they died, there was drug interactions with other things they were taking,” she said.
Although there is no documented evidence that marijuana has ever contributed to the death of a single human being in the thousands of years it has been used by civilizations across the globe, prohibitionists often dig deep into their sagging bags of propaganda to convince the average citizen that the effects of cannabis can be both devastating and deadly. But this is the first we have heard of marijuana potentially interacting with other drugs and causing people to suffer their untimely demise.
A recent article on InhaleMD indicates that while there can be some minor interactions when consuming cannabis in conjunction with other medications and food, there is no evidence to suggest that these types of concoctions can result in death.
Awwww. Looks like someone learned how to share photos. All of those things must be true, you can't put untrue statements in a meme. Everybody knows that.
When you can't win with policy debate, resort to the politics of personal destruction. I'm surprised Hillary wasn't listed as the founder of Boko Haram?
Former 5x VA Senator and elder statesman John Warner (also husband to Liz Taylor (very exclusive)) has endorsed Clinton. Not that VA was at risk, but this is a pretty substantial endorsement from a very respected senator.
A few things about this: 1. She was never indicted, tried or convicted 2. It has nothing to do with the fact that Trump clearly fat shamed her on national TV with reporters. 3. Trump has not denied any of it. When he went on Fox and Friends yesterday, he defended why he did it. He didn't deny.
Are you implying because of this situation (of which she wasn't indicted) that she deserved to be fat shamed? I'm not clear what you are trying to accomplish other than smearing someone for Trump's benefit.
A few things about this: 1. She was never indicted, tried or convicted 2. It has nothing to do with the fact that Trump clearly fat shamed her on national TV with reporters. 3. Trump has not denied any of it. When he went on Fox and Friends yesterday, he defended why he did it. He didn't deny.
Are you implying because of this situation (of which she wasn't indicted) that she deserved to be fat shamed? I'm not clear what you are trying to accomplish other than smearing someone for Trump's benefit.
"Since The Arizona Republic began publication in 1890, we have never endorsed a Democrat over a Republican for president. Never. This reflects a deep philosophical appreciation for conservative ideals and Republican principles.
This year is different.
The 2016 Republican candidate is not conservative and he is not qualified.
That’s why, for the first time in our history, The Arizona Republic will support a Democrat for president."
A few things about this: 1. She was never indicted, tried or convicted 2. It has nothing to do with the fact that Trump clearly fat shamed her on national TV with reporters. 3. Trump has not denied any of it. When he went on Fox and Friends yesterday, he defended why he did it. He didn't deny.
Are you implying because of this situation (of which she wasn't indicted) that she deserved to be fat shamed? I'm not clear what you are trying to accomplish other than smearing someone for Trump's benefit.
Simply FYI
Then you should post it in the FYI re: Alicia Machado thread. You know it's an irrelevant smear.
A few things about this: 1. She was never indicted, tried or convicted 2. It has nothing to do with the fact that Trump clearly fat shamed her on national TV with reporters. 3. Trump has not denied any of it. When he went on Fox and Friends yesterday, he defended why he did it. He didn't deny.
Are you implying because of this situation (of which she wasn't indicted) that she deserved to be fat shamed? I'm not clear what you are trying to accomplish other than smearing someone for Trump's benefit.
Simply FYI
Then you should post it in the FYI re: Alicia Machado thread. You know it's an irrelevant smear.
Okay. Now what if Ms Machado is linked to the Mexican drug cartel or what if she lied about the father of her child? Is that relevant?
A few things about this: 1. She was never indicted, tried or convicted 2. It has nothing to do with the fact that Trump clearly fat shamed her on national TV with reporters. 3. Trump has not denied any of it. When he went on Fox and Friends yesterday, he defended why he did it. He didn't deny.
Are you implying because of this situation (of which she wasn't indicted) that she deserved to be fat shamed? I'm not clear what you are trying to accomplish other than smearing someone for Trump's benefit.
Simply FYI
Then you should post it in the FYI re: Alicia Machado thread. You know it's an irrelevant smear.
Okay. Now what if Ms Machado is linked to the Mexican drug cartel or what if she lied about the father of her child? Is that relevant?
Not particularly. He clearly fat shamed her in 96 and did it again yesterday. We are not choosing between Trump and Machado for POTUS. No matter what she has done in her life, it's irrelevant to what he did on national tv.
A few things about this: 1. She was never indicted, tried or convicted 2. It has nothing to do with the fact that Trump clearly fat shamed her on national TV with reporters. 3. Trump has not denied any of it. When he went on Fox and Friends yesterday, he defended why he did it. He didn't deny.
Are you implying because of this situation (of which she wasn't indicted) that she deserved to be fat shamed? I'm not clear what you are trying to accomplish other than smearing someone for Trump's benefit.
Ok you're against fat shaming, me too, I'm alittle overweight myself. Do you have a position on slut shaming?
Comments
(True definition of ignorant not offensive)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
VOTE FOR ANYONE OF YOUR CHOOSING!
*Clinton is corrupt and she rigged it*
Chelsea
“We also have anecdotal evidence now from Colorado where some of the people who were taking marijuana for those purposes, the coroner believes, after they died, there was drug interactions with other things they were taking,” she said.
Although there is no documented evidence that marijuana has ever contributed to the death of a single human being in the thousands of years it has been used by civilizations across the globe, prohibitionists often dig deep into their sagging bags of propaganda to convince the average citizen that the effects of cannabis can be both devastating and deadly. But this is the first we have heard of marijuana potentially interacting with other drugs and causing people to suffer their untimely demise.
A recent article on InhaleMD indicates that while there can be some minor interactions when consuming cannabis in conjunction with other medications and food, there is no evidence to suggest that these types of concoctions can result in death.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
www.headstonesband.com
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/21/berta-caceres-name-honduran-military-hitlist-former-soldier
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/john-warner-hillary-clinton-228819
https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2199&dat=19980125&id=XZsyAAAAIBAJ&sjid=rugFAAAAIBAJ&pg=5145,3716746&hl=en
https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1310&dat=19980124&id=F1ZWAAAAIBAJ&sjid=xOsDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5843,5678705&hl=en
1. She was never indicted, tried or convicted
2. It has nothing to do with the fact that Trump clearly fat shamed her on national TV with reporters.
3. Trump has not denied any of it. When he went on Fox and Friends yesterday, he defended why he did it. He didn't deny.
Are you implying because of this situation (of which she wasn't indicted) that she deserved to be fat shamed? I'm not clear what you are trying to accomplish other than smearing someone for Trump's benefit.
This year is different.
The 2016 Republican candidate is not conservative and he is not qualified.
That’s why, for the first time in our history, The Arizona Republic will support a Democrat for president."
Now what if Ms Machado is linked to the Mexican drug cartel or what if she lied about the father of her child? Is that relevant?