BLM! we don't want Hillary sending them off to die in a desert AGAIN because Netanyahu wants everlasting war.
0
Options
Kat
There's a lot to be said for nowhere. Posts: 4,777
Closed for review.
Falling down,...not staying down
0
Options
Kat
There's a lot to be said for nowhere. Posts: 4,777
edited September 2016
Using the word whore, or any similar wording, to describe Elizabeth Warren, Secretary Clinton, or any other woman here is considered sexist and will result in your account being read-only. Do not use it but be prepared if you do, the result with your forum account will be your choice. Admin
"HughFreakingDillon">People are missing a little tidbit here. If indeed HC started the birther movement, which I think is a stretch, Trump believed it without any proof whatsoever and made it his mission to smear a sitting president. Do you realky want a guy who is willing to do so much damage just to firce his own agenda without so much as a fucking google search? The guy, in my opinion, just made himself look like a stupid sheep who is easily playable by the other side.
Wait, but if she did start it what does that make her?
And who started this whole birther discussion again?
It's crazy how most of the time spent around here is about defending Clinton. It's one excuse after another... Non-stop. And the clintonite army doesn't see a single issue with Clinton.
It's the world against a good, honest, hard working woman (according to the clintonites) .... You guys are doing a great job making excuse after excuse after excuse... I'm sure she's completely innocent and the rest of us are just angry Bernie bros
Sidney Blumenthal
Such a stupid argument on so many levels. To compare what Blumenthal allegedly told an ex-Mclatchey person with what Trump has clearly done on TV and Twitter for 6 years is beyond the scope of bizarre and straight into realm of retarded. Only out and out morons would fall for such a blatant lie (flip over to Breitbart.com for them). Only the type of people that believe that Hillary had JFK Jr. killed would believe such a thing AND draw equivalency between the candidates because of it. Pathetic. Keep peddling it though, it's a real compliment to all that do.
It's pretty clear that you don't understand how a "whisper campaign" works. Blumenthal doesn't act on his own.
It's pretty clear you don't have any true evidence, ergo a 'whisper campaign'. And even if there is a shred of truth, isn't Trump the one that made it a spectacle for for six years? As I said, it's total false equivalency.
The Blumenthal report is evidence. There is no false equivalency. They were both participants in the nonsense. Trump was a jerk for it and so was Hillary. The difference is that Hillary and her supporters want to take some kind of moral high ground that they have not earned.
What Blumenthal report? There is a tweet from an ex McC newswire person that claims it.
"There is no evidence that the campaign or Hillary had direct knowledge of or supported the efforts of Blummie." To paraphrase a key fucking sentence buried in the article.
Shhhhhhhhhhh, hear the whisper.
Only a fool would believe that Blumethal just acted on his own. He is a Clinton operative through and through. Shortly after the election Clinton tried to get him a position at the State Department but was shut out by the Obama administration due to his burning of bridges in the campaign. No worries though...the Clinton Foundation then hired him at a salay of $10,000.00 a month to feed her intelligence on Libya. You can try to keep up the appearance of plausible deniability if you like but people just aren't buying it.
And you can continue to try and escape the matrix, professor.
Do you have a source for why Bloomy was hired for $10K a month? Or is it just one more thing you want it to be?
Does anyone have a source for why he was hired for $10k a month? Is it because of his amazing contribution to Haitian relief efforts or for the delivery of HIV medications in Africa? Do people who donate to the Clinton Foundation know that a large percentage of their charitable dollars go towards keeping the Blumenthal Libyan Intelligence agency in business?
What % seeing that you seem to know?
Well let's see...
Only 5.7% went to actual charity so you can try to figure out the math
Check the politifact on the Clinton foundation bullshit. That 5.7 percent is a complete lie. How can we believe your other information when you are peddling something so easily disproved?
Hmmm...so if politifact is right and the Clinton Foundation shouldn't be judged the same as other charities because it generally doesn't give grants and does most of it's charitable work "in-house" then where does the $10k per month to Blumenthal factor in? What in house charitable related work is he providing?
Are you familiar with the term non-sequitur? One unsubstantiated statement does not validate the unrelated other. You are basically saying that Blumenthal must have been the one typing Donald Trump's twitter and media campaign re: birtherism since he is somehow paid 10k per month by the Clinton Foundation. Got it. You really nailed it there. All those things explain why Donald Trump was the head birther. Got it.
No no no...ya don't got it. Blumenthal was pushing this nonsense all over town on behalf of Clinton and Donald was pushing it all over town on behalf of himself. The difference is that Clinton wanted to pretend she was keeping her hands clean while Trump was willing to own it for the spectacle of it all. Both of them looked terrible in behaving the way they did but at least some of us can say that honestly. You see I don't like Trump so I can call him out on the nonsense but the Hillary backers around here...well...they just can't handle the idea that she participated in any such thing. They see themselves as just better people in general and to admit that Hillary stirred the birther pot is just too injurious to the psyche.
Ever occur to you that some people might just be fine with the sleaze politics of hillary's campaign? Because, you know, if anyone other than a neocon does it, it's a travesty of justice and an outrage. Politics is a rough and tumble business and it's not all unicorns and rainbows. It must really damage your psyche that a woman can play just as dirty or dirtier. And apparently get away with it.
But nice way to deflect from trying to back your claim that a majority % of GCF funding goes to Bloomy old boy for Libyan Intel.
Shhhhhhhhhhh, it's a whisper to a scream.
Not a majority %...just $10,000 a month. That's the only claim ever made. And good on you to admit that you are fine with the sleaze. I have no problem with her playing that game at all. What I do have a problem with is people who claim to be all high and mighty after they play that way. That is the point of this conversation. The Clinton campaign cannot claim they are better then Trump when it comes to the birther issue.
Here's your claim:
Does anyone have a source for why he was hired for $10k a month? Is it because of his amazing contribution to Haitian relief efforts or for the delivery of HIV medications in Africa? Do people who donate to the Clinton Foundation know that a large percentage of their charitable dollars go towards keeping the Blumenthal Libyan Intelligence agency in business?
Not quite what you claim in your response, is it? Its the Neocon-alt-right way, say shit and count on people not fact checking it. What exactly is the large % going to Bloomy old boy? And if its so large, wouldn't that then be a majority %? Try again, professor.
"HughFreakingDillon">People are missing a little tidbit here. If indeed HC started the birther movement, which I think is a stretch, Trump believed it without any proof whatsoever and made it his mission to smear a sitting president. Do you realky want a guy who is willing to do so much damage just to firce his own agenda without so much as a fucking google search? The guy, in my opinion, just made himself look like a stupid sheep who is easily playable by the other side.
Wait, but if she did start it what does that make her?
And who started this whole birther discussion again?
It's crazy how most of the time spent around here is about defending Clinton. It's one excuse after another... Non-stop. And the clintonite army doesn't see a single issue with Clinton.
It's the world against a good, honest, hard working woman (according to the clintonites) .... You guys are doing a great job making excuse after excuse after excuse... I'm sure she's completely innocent and the rest of us are just angry Bernie bros
Sidney Blumenthal
Such a stupid argument on so many levels. To compare what Blumenthal allegedly told an ex-Mclatchey person with what Trump has clearly done on TV and Twitter for 6 years is beyond the scope of bizarre and straight into realm of retarded. Only out and out morons would fall for such a blatant lie (flip over to Breitbart.com for them). Only the type of people that believe that Hillary had JFK Jr. killed would believe such a thing AND draw equivalency between the candidates because of it. Pathetic. Keep peddling it though, it's a real compliment to all that do.
It's pretty clear that you don't understand how a "whisper campaign" works. Blumenthal doesn't act on his own.
It's pretty clear you don't have any true evidence, ergo a 'whisper campaign'. And even if there is a shred of truth, isn't Trump the one that made it a spectacle for for six years? As I said, it's total false equivalency.
The Blumenthal report is evidence. There is no false equivalency. They were both participants in the nonsense. Trump was a jerk for it and so was Hillary. The difference is that Hillary and her supporters want to take some kind of moral high ground that they have not earned.
What Blumenthal report? There is a tweet from an ex McC newswire person that claims it.
"There is no evidence that the campaign or Hillary had direct knowledge of or supported the efforts of Blummie." To paraphrase a key fucking sentence buried in the article.
Shhhhhhhhhhh, hear the whisper.
Only a fool would believe that Blumethal just acted on his own. He is a Clinton operative through and through. Shortly after the election Clinton tried to get him a position at the State Department but was shut out by the Obama administration due to his burning of bridges in the campaign. No worries though...the Clinton Foundation then hired him at a salay of $10,000.00 a month to feed her intelligence on Libya. You can try to keep up the appearance of plausible deniability if you like but people just aren't buying it.
And you can continue to try and escape the matrix, professor.
Do you have a source for why Bloomy was hired for $10K a month? Or is it just one more thing you want it to be?
Does anyone have a source for why he was hired for $10k a month? Is it because of his amazing contribution to Haitian relief efforts or for the delivery of HIV medications in Africa? Do people who donate to the Clinton Foundation know that a large percentage of their charitable dollars go towards keeping the Blumenthal Libyan Intelligence agency in business?
What % seeing that you seem to know?
Well let's see...
Only 5.7% went to actual charity so you can try to figure out the math
Check the politifact on the Clinton foundation bullshit. That 5.7 percent is a complete lie. How can we believe your other information when you are peddling something so easily disproved?
Hmmm...so if politifact is right and the Clinton Foundation shouldn't be judged the same as other charities because it generally doesn't give grants and does most of it's charitable work "in-house" then where does the $10k per month to Blumenthal factor in? What in house charitable related work is he providing?
Are you familiar with the term non-sequitur? One unsubstantiated statement does not validate the unrelated other. You are basically saying that Blumenthal must have been the one typing Donald Trump's twitter and media campaign re: birtherism since he is somehow paid 10k per month by the Clinton Foundation. Got it. You really nailed it there. All those things explain why Donald Trump was the head birther. Got it.
No no no...ya don't got it. Blumenthal was pushing this nonsense all over town on behalf of Clinton and Donald was pushing it all over town on behalf of himself. The difference is that Clinton wanted to pretend she was keeping her hands clean while Trump was willing to own it for the spectacle of it all. Both of them looked terrible in behaving the way they did but at least some of us can say that honestly. You see I don't like Trump so I can call him out on the nonsense but the Hillary backers around here...well...they just can't handle the idea that she participated in any such thing. They see themselves as just better people in general and to admit that Hillary stirred the birther pot is just too injurious to the psyche.
Ever occur to you that some people might just be fine with the sleaze politics of hillary's campaign? Because, you know, if anyone other than a neocon does it, it's a travesty of justice and an outrage. Politics is a rough and tumble business and it's not all unicorns and rainbows. It must really damage your psyche that a woman can play just as dirty or dirtier. And apparently get away with it.
But nice way to deflect from trying to back your claim that a majority % of GCF funding goes to Bloomy old boy for Libyan Intel.
Shhhhhhhhhhh, it's a whisper to a scream.
Not a majority %...just $10,000 a month. That's the only claim ever made. And good on you to admit that you are fine with the sleaze. I have no problem with her playing that game at all. What I do have a problem with is people who claim to be all high and mighty after they play that way. That is the point of this conversation. The Clinton campaign cannot claim they are better then Trump when it comes to the birther issue.
Here's your claim:
Does anyone have a source for why he was hired for $10k a month? Is it because of his amazing contribution to Haitian relief efforts or for the delivery of HIV medications in Africa? Do people who donate to the Clinton Foundation know that a large percentage of their charitable dollars go towards keeping the Blumenthal Libyan Intelligence agency in business?
Not quite what you claim in your response, is it? Its the Neocon-alt-right way, say shit and count on people not fact checking it. What exactly is the large % going to Bloomy old boy? And if its so large, wouldn't that then be a majority %? Try again, professor.
I shall try but you are a difficult one to educate young padawan. Large does not equal majority...it never has. $10,000.00 per month or $120,000.00 per year would be considered to be a "large" salary regardless of how you break that down in percentage terms. If it is 1/10th of 1% well that would be large depending on what services Blumenthal provided. Again I would love to see which aspects of the Clinton Foundation he participated in to earn that salary.
Define "large %", professor. Is it 10%, 20%, 25% or north of 50%? Or is it between 25% and 50%? I wonder what % of Trump's Russian oligarch investment is huuuuuuuuuuuge? Oh, we might never know because Trump has refused to release his tax returns. Silly me.
And if one donor gave $110,000 to the CF, and it all went to Bloomy old boy, I'd agree with you. But I don't think you know nor can you back up your claim.
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said that “these new emails suggest that the Obama State Department knew about the Clinton email problem at least three years but covered it up. Any criminal investigation of the Clinton email scandal must include officials in the Obama administration.”
Hahaha, voting for Hillary because she is a woman is like eating a turd because it looks like a snickers!
Yeah she might look like a turd but Trump is a giant pile of elephant turd ...
A skyscraper pile of elephant turd.
The very best and greatest skyscraper of elephant turd ever!
0
Options
g under p
Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,127
*We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
Comments
Admin
Weak men are threatened by strong women.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Wait, but if she did start it what does that make her?
And who started this whole birther discussion again?
It's crazy how most of the time spent around here is about defending Clinton. It's one excuse after another... Non-stop. And the clintonite army doesn't see a single issue with Clinton.
It's the world against a good, honest, hard working woman (according to the clintonites) .... You guys are doing a great job making excuse after excuse after excuse... I'm sure she's completely innocent and the rest of us are just angry Bernie bros
Sidney Blumenthal
Such a stupid argument on so many levels. To compare what Blumenthal allegedly told an ex-Mclatchey person with what Trump has clearly done on TV and Twitter for 6 years is beyond the scope of bizarre and straight into realm of retarded. Only out and out morons would fall for such a blatant lie (flip over to Breitbart.com for them). Only the type of people that believe that Hillary had JFK Jr. killed would believe such a thing AND draw equivalency between the candidates because of it. Pathetic. Keep peddling it though, it's a real compliment to all that do.
It's pretty clear that you don't understand how a "whisper campaign" works. Blumenthal doesn't act on his own.
It's pretty clear you don't have any true evidence, ergo a 'whisper campaign'. And even if there is a shred of truth, isn't Trump the one that made it a spectacle for for six years? As I said, it's total false equivalency.
The Blumenthal report is evidence. There is no false equivalency. They were both participants in the nonsense. Trump was a jerk for it and so was Hillary. The difference is that Hillary and her supporters want to take some kind of moral high ground that they have not earned.
What Blumenthal report? There is a tweet from an ex McC newswire person that claims it.
A little more then a tweet
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article102354777.html
They actually sent an investigator to Kenya based on Blumenthal pushing them the story
How fucking daft are you? Did you even read the article you linked? Oh professor you're slipping.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article102354777.html
"There is no evidence that the campaign or Hillary had direct knowledge of or supported the efforts of Blummie." To paraphrase a key fucking sentence buried in the article.
Shhhhhhhhhhh, hear the whisper.
Only a fool would believe that Blumethal just acted on his own. He is a Clinton operative through and through. Shortly after the election Clinton tried to get him a position at the State Department but was shut out by the Obama administration due to his burning of bridges in the campaign. No worries though...the Clinton Foundation then hired him at a salay of $10,000.00 a month to feed her intelligence on Libya. You can try to keep up the appearance of plausible deniability if you like but people just aren't buying it.
And you can continue to try and escape the matrix, professor.
Do you have a source for why Bloomy was hired for $10K a month? Or is it just one more thing you want it to be?
Does anyone have a source for why he was hired for $10k a month? Is it because of his amazing contribution to Haitian relief efforts or for the delivery of HIV medications in Africa? Do people who donate to the Clinton Foundation know that a large percentage of their charitable dollars go towards keeping the Blumenthal Libyan Intelligence agency in business?
What % seeing that you seem to know?
Well let's see...
Only 5.7% went to actual charity so you can try to figure out the math
http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/16/just-5-7-percent-of-clinton-foundation-budget-actually-went-to-charity/
Also here's some corroboration on Blumenthal for the deniers out there
http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/79319/confessions-hillary-insider/
Check the politifact on the Clinton foundation bullshit. That 5.7 percent is a complete lie. How can we believe your other information when you are peddling something so easily disproved?
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/aug/25/reince-priebus/reince-priebus-false-claim-80-clinton-foundation-c/
Hmmm...so if politifact is right and the Clinton Foundation shouldn't be judged the same as other charities because it generally doesn't give grants and does most of it's charitable work "in-house" then where does the $10k per month to Blumenthal factor in? What in house charitable related work is he providing?
Are you familiar with the term non-sequitur? One unsubstantiated statement does not validate the unrelated other. You are basically saying that Blumenthal must have been the one typing Donald Trump's twitter and media campaign re: birtherism since he is somehow paid 10k per month by the Clinton Foundation. Got it. You really nailed it there. All those things explain why Donald Trump was the head birther. Got it.
No no no...ya don't got it. Blumenthal was pushing this nonsense all over town on behalf of Clinton and Donald was pushing it all over town on behalf of himself. The difference is that Clinton wanted to pretend she was keeping her hands clean while Trump was willing to own it for the spectacle of it all. Both of them looked terrible in behaving the way they did but at least some of us can say that honestly. You see I don't like Trump so I can call him out on the nonsense but the Hillary backers around here...well...they just can't handle the idea that she participated in any such thing. They see themselves as just better people in general and to admit that Hillary stirred the birther pot is just too injurious to the psyche.
Ever occur to you that some people might just be fine with the sleaze politics of hillary's campaign? Because, you know, if anyone other than a neocon does it, it's a travesty of justice and an outrage. Politics is a rough and tumble business and it's not all unicorns and rainbows. It must really damage your psyche that a woman can play just as dirty or dirtier. And apparently get away with it.
But nice way to deflect from trying to back your claim that a majority % of GCF funding goes to Bloomy old boy for Libyan Intel.
Shhhhhhhhhhh, it's a whisper to a scream.
Not a majority %...just $10,000 a month. That's the only claim ever made. And good on you to admit that you are fine with the sleaze. I have no problem with her playing that game at all. What I do have a problem with is people who claim to be all high and mighty after they play that way. That is the point of this conversation. The Clinton campaign cannot claim they are better then Trump when it comes to the birther issue.
Here's your claim:
Does anyone have a source for why he was hired for $10k a month? Is it because of his amazing contribution to Haitian relief efforts or for the delivery of HIV medications in Africa? Do people who donate to the Clinton Foundation know that a large percentage of their charitable dollars go towards keeping the Blumenthal Libyan Intelligence agency in business?
Not quite what you claim in your response, is it? Its the Neocon-alt-right way, say shit and count on people not fact checking it. What exactly is the large % going to Bloomy old boy? And if its so large, wouldn't that then be a majority %? Try again, professor.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2016/09/19/the-gop-died-this-weekend/?utm_term=.6eea730c9759&wpisrc=nl_most-draw10&wpmm=1
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/256147/bernie-sanders/p23
And who started this whole birther discussion again?
It's crazy how most of the time spent around here is about defending Clinton. It's one excuse after another... Non-stop. And the clintonite army doesn't see a single issue with Clinton.
It's the world against a good, honest, hard working woman (according to the clintonites) .... You guys are doing a great job making excuse after excuse after excuse... I'm sure she's completely innocent and the rest of us are just angry Bernie bros
Sidney Blumenthal
Such a stupid argument on so many levels. To compare what Blumenthal allegedly told an ex-Mclatchey person with what Trump has clearly done on TV and Twitter for 6 years is beyond the scope of bizarre and straight into realm of retarded. Only out and out morons would fall for such a blatant lie (flip over to Breitbart.com for them). Only the type of people that believe that Hillary had JFK Jr. killed would believe such a thing AND draw equivalency between the candidates because of it. Pathetic. Keep peddling it though, it's a real compliment to all that do.
It's pretty clear that you don't understand how a "whisper campaign" works. Blumenthal doesn't act on his own.
It's pretty clear you don't have any true evidence, ergo a 'whisper campaign'. And even if there is a shred of truth, isn't Trump the one that made it a spectacle for for six years? As I said, it's total false equivalency.
The Blumenthal report is evidence. There is no false equivalency. They were both participants in the nonsense. Trump was a jerk for it and so was Hillary. The difference is that Hillary and her supporters want to take some kind of moral high ground that they have not earned.
What Blumenthal report? There is a tweet from an ex McC newswire person that claims it.
A little more then a tweet
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article102354777.html
They actually sent an investigator to Kenya based on Blumenthal pushing them the story
How fucking daft are you? Did you even read the article you linked? Oh professor you're slipping.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article102354777.html
"There is no evidence that the campaign or Hillary had direct knowledge of or supported the efforts of Blummie." To paraphrase a key fucking sentence buried in the article.
Shhhhhhhhhhh, hear the whisper.
Only a fool would believe that Blumethal just acted on his own. He is a Clinton operative through and through. Shortly after the election Clinton tried to get him a position at the State Department but was shut out by the Obama administration due to his burning of bridges in the campaign. No worries though...the Clinton Foundation then hired him at a salay of $10,000.00 a month to feed her intelligence on Libya. You can try to keep up the appearance of plausible deniability if you like but people just aren't buying it.
And you can continue to try and escape the matrix, professor.
Do you have a source for why Bloomy was hired for $10K a month? Or is it just one more thing you want it to be?
Does anyone have a source for why he was hired for $10k a month? Is it because of his amazing contribution to Haitian relief efforts or for the delivery of HIV medications in Africa? Do people who donate to the Clinton Foundation know that a large percentage of their charitable dollars go towards keeping the Blumenthal Libyan Intelligence agency in business?
What % seeing that you seem to know?
Well let's see...
Only 5.7% went to actual charity so you can try to figure out the math
http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/16/just-5-7-percent-of-clinton-foundation-budget-actually-went-to-charity/
Also here's some corroboration on Blumenthal for the deniers out there
http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/79319/confessions-hillary-insider/
Check the politifact on the Clinton foundation bullshit. That 5.7 percent is a complete lie. How can we believe your other information when you are peddling something so easily disproved?
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/aug/25/reince-priebus/reince-priebus-false-claim-80-clinton-foundation-c/
Hmmm...so if politifact is right and the Clinton Foundation shouldn't be judged the same as other charities because it generally doesn't give grants and does most of it's charitable work "in-house" then where does the $10k per month to Blumenthal factor in? What in house charitable related work is he providing?
Are you familiar with the term non-sequitur? One unsubstantiated statement does not validate the unrelated other. You are basically saying that Blumenthal must have been the one typing Donald Trump's twitter and media campaign re: birtherism since he is somehow paid 10k per month by the Clinton Foundation. Got it. You really nailed it there. All those things explain why Donald Trump was the head birther. Got it.
No no no...ya don't got it. Blumenthal was pushing this nonsense all over town on behalf of Clinton and Donald was pushing it all over town on behalf of himself. The difference is that Clinton wanted to pretend she was keeping her hands clean while Trump was willing to own it for the spectacle of it all. Both of them looked terrible in behaving the way they did but at least some of us can say that honestly. You see I don't like Trump so I can call him out on the nonsense but the Hillary backers around here...well...they just can't handle the idea that she participated in any such thing. They see themselves as just better people in general and to admit that Hillary stirred the birther pot is just too injurious to the psyche.
Ever occur to you that some people might just be fine with the sleaze politics of hillary's campaign? Because, you know, if anyone other than a neocon does it, it's a travesty of justice and an outrage. Politics is a rough and tumble business and it's not all unicorns and rainbows. It must really damage your psyche that a woman can play just as dirty or dirtier. And apparently get away with it.
But nice way to deflect from trying to back your claim that a majority % of GCF funding goes to Bloomy old boy for Libyan Intel.
Shhhhhhhhhhh, it's a whisper to a scream.
Not a majority %...just $10,000 a month. That's the only claim ever made. And good on you to admit that you are fine with the sleaze. I have no problem with her playing that game at all. What I do have a problem with is people who claim to be all high and mighty after they play that way. That is the point of this conversation. The Clinton campaign cannot claim they are better then Trump when it comes to the birther issue.
Here's your claim:
Does anyone have a source for why he was hired for $10k a month? Is it because of his amazing contribution to Haitian relief efforts or for the delivery of HIV medications in Africa? Do people who donate to the Clinton Foundation know that a large percentage of their charitable dollars go towards keeping the Blumenthal Libyan Intelligence agency in business?
Not quite what you claim in your response, is it? Its the Neocon-alt-right way, say shit and count on people not fact checking it. What exactly is the large % going to Bloomy old boy? And if its so large, wouldn't that then be a majority %? Try again, professor.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2016/09/19/the-gop-died-this-weekend/?utm_term=.6eea730c9759&wpisrc=nl_most-draw10&wpmm=1
I shall try but you are a difficult one to educate young padawan. Large does not equal majority...it never has. $10,000.00 per month or $120,000.00 per year would be considered to be a "large" salary regardless of how you break that down in percentage terms. If it is 1/10th of 1% well that would be large depending on what services Blumenthal provided. Again I would love to see which aspects of the Clinton Foundation he participated in to earn that salary.
And if one donor gave $110,000 to the CF, and it all went to Bloomy old boy, I'd agree with you. But I don't think you know nor can you back up your claim.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-state-department-documents-reveal-top-agency-officials-raised-questions-clinton-emails-early-august-2013/
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
What do you do when a SUBURBAN cant quite handle all of your medical equipment.
YOU GO HUGE AND TALL!
http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/19/hillary-clinton-the-big-banks-are-with-her/