The Donald for President

Gern Blansten · January 2016

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/primary-forecast/iowa-republican/

Nate Silver still gives Cruz a 52% chance of winning Iowa. Trump has a 31% chance.

Not that it really matters but this is an unusual situation with the blowhard Trump....if he loses Iowa his whole mantra (constantly bragging about polls, his greatness, etc.) will go to shit.

Wobbie · January 2016

callen said:

Gern Blansten said:
I certainly didn't mean to insult anyone. I didn't really think our posts were that offensive but if someone took offense then I apologize.

Let's move on to the topic at hand which is what a disaster Donald Trump and his hair are.
And how Palin's endorsement added to the carnage.

apparently, her son's arrest is Obama's fault.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/sarah-palin-blames-obama-son-track-legal-problems-article-1.2503589

rr165892 · January 2016

Was talking to someone who really likes trump the other night.They think of Trump as a socially liberal Capitolist who is doing nothing more than playing to the base right now,but when the general comes he will revert back to his usual schtick.Hes not religious,he could care less about guns and evangelical voters after this.He is a moderate who is a great delegater and is very talented in putting the right people in the right places.His strong point would be his fiscal knowledge.
I kinda agree.

Kat · January 2016

rr165892 said:

ldent42 said:
commenting on the fuckablity of a woman is belittling women.
If stated as bluntly I would agree.But hinting the same in a g rated manor is not.

The bottom line is no more sexist comments...whether stated bluntly or thinly veiled, it's sexist and unacceptable here. Thank you for understanding this in this new century and not doing it again.
Admin

callen · January 2016

Kat said:

rr165892 said:

ldent42 said:
commenting on the fuckablity of a woman is belittling women.
If stated as bluntly I would agree.But hinting the same in a g rated manor is not.

The bottom line is no more sexist comments...whether stated bluntly or thinly veiled, it's sexist and unacceptable here. Thank you for understanding this in this new century and not doing it again.
Admin

Kat,

I get it but do feel there's a bit of a double standard when we have threads dedicated to how Hot Ed is.

Peace

PJ_Soul · January 2016

callen said:

Kat said:

rr165892 said:

ldent42 said:
commenting on the fuckablity of a woman is belittling women.
If stated as bluntly I would agree.But hinting the same in a g rated manor is not.

The bottom line is no more sexist comments...whether stated bluntly or thinly veiled, it's sexist and unacceptable here. Thank you for understanding this in this new century and not doing it again.
Admin
Kat,

I get it but do feel there's a bit of a double standard when we have threads dedicated to how Hot Ed is.

Peace

Dude, you just don't get it.

callen · January 2016

PJ_Soul said:

callen said:

Kat said:

rr165892 said:

ldent42 said:
commenting on the fuckablity of a woman is belittling women.
If stated as bluntly I would agree.But hinting the same in a g rated manor is not.

The bottom line is no more sexist comments...whether stated bluntly or thinly veiled, it's sexist and unacceptable here. Thank you for understanding this in this new century and not doing it again.
Admin
Kat,

I get it but do feel there's a bit of a double standard when we have threads dedicated to how Hot Ed is.

Peace
Dude, you just don't get it.

Probably don't. Help me out.

Empty Glass · January 2016

jeffbr · January 2016

callen said:

Kat said:

rr165892 said:

ldent42 said:
commenting on the fuckablity of a woman is belittling women.
If stated as bluntly I would agree.But hinting the same in a g rated manor is not.

The bottom line is no more sexist comments...whether stated bluntly or thinly veiled, it's sexist and unacceptable here. Thank you for understanding this in this new century and not doing it again.
Admin
Kat,

I get it but do feel there's a bit of a double standard when we have threads dedicated to how Hot Ed is.

Peace

Yup, not into objectification or belittling based on either gender, and it sure is strange to see the hot ed picture threads and talk of his tight white pants. If that is somehow different than saying some woman is hot, I would love to hear the distinction.

Not trying to derail this thread, or debate with mods - if there's a rule we're expected to follow, it is important that the rule is understood, and that the rule applies to all parts of the board.

Gern Blansten · January 2016

Let's not get this thread locked please. Time to move on.

Gern Blansten · January 2016

jeffbr said:

callen said:

Kat said:

rr165892 said:

ldent42 said:
commenting on the fuckablity of a woman is belittling women.
If stated as bluntly I would agree.But hinting the same in a g rated manor is not.

The bottom line is no more sexist comments...whether stated bluntly or thinly veiled, it's sexist and unacceptable here. Thank you for understanding this in this new century and not doing it again.
Admin
Kat,

I get it but do feel there's a bit of a double standard when we have threads dedicated to how Hot Ed is.

Peace
Yup, not into objectification or belittling based on either gender, and it sure is strange to see the hot ed picture threads and talk of his tight white pants. If that is somehow different than saying some woman is hot, I would love to hear the distinction.

Not trying to derail this thread, or debate with mods - if there's a rule we're expected to follow, it is important that the rule is understood, and that the rule applies to all parts of the board.

I can see a difference between saying someone is "hot" and saying you want to have sex with someone.

Let's move on

jeffbr · January 2016

Gern Blansten said:

jeffbr said:

callen said:

Kat said:

rr165892 said:

ldent42 said:
commenting on the fuckablity of a woman is belittling women.
If stated as bluntly I would agree.But hinting the same in a g rated manor is not.

The bottom line is no more sexist comments...whether stated bluntly or thinly veiled, it's sexist and unacceptable here. Thank you for understanding this in this new century and not doing it again.
Admin
Kat,

I get it but do feel there's a bit of a double standard when we have threads dedicated to how Hot Ed is.

Peace
Yup, not into objectification or belittling based on either gender, and it sure is strange to see the hot ed picture threads and talk of his tight white pants. If that is somehow different than saying some woman is hot, I would love to hear the distinction.

Not trying to derail this thread, or debate with mods - if there's a rule we're expected to follow, it is important that the rule is understood, and that the rule applies to all parts of the board.
I can see a difference between saying someone is "hot" and saying you want to have sex with someone.

Let's move on

Ha, a rebuttal and then a call to end. I'll just say I see the difference too. One is more thinly veiled.

Kat · January 2016

There's a line. If someone says [political figure] is hot, that's one thing and not usually a problem. If someone makes noise about doing something to Ed that crosses a line, flag it for me if you see if first, ok? It's NOT ok and that has been communicated when it has happened before. Without explaining every little nuance, a problem post is usually pretty clear so just check yourself before hitting Submit.

usamamasan1 · January 2016

Donald Trump is poised for the strongest primary performance in modern history

http://theweek.com/articles/600335/donald-trump-poised-strongest-primary-performance-modern-history

I hope I don't have to hear a bunch of liberal banter in Wrigley from Ed, but hope is not a strategy (unless you are BHO). So I guess the banter will be my new piss break song.

rr165892 · January 2016

Thanks for seeing I wasn't trying to offend,and that there is double standards around here sometimes.

Gern Blansten · January 2016

usamamasan1 said:
Donald Trump is poised for the strongest primary performance in modern history

http://theweek.com/articles/600335/donald-trump-poised-strongest-primary-performance-modern-history

I hope I don't have to hear a bunch of liberal banter in Wrigley from Ed, but hope is not a strategy (unless you are BHO). So I guess the banter will be my new piss break song.

And if Cruz does win, it's worth noting that Iowa frequently doesn't vote for the nominee. It voted for Bush in 1980, Dole in 1988, Huckabee in 2008 and Santorum in 2012. There's a common assumption that a narrow Cruz victory would puncture the Trump hype balloon — and it might. But that's not the way Iowa has ever played out before.

rr165892 · January 2016

You're talking about Iowa here guys.whtcha expect.Other then Chadwick and Slipknot/Corey Taylor not much to say.

Bentleyspop · January 2016

imalive said:

callen said:

Gern Blansten said:
I certainly didn't mean to insult anyone. I didn't really think our posts were that offensive but if someone took offense then I apologize.

Let's move on to the topic at hand which is what a disaster Donald Trump and his hair are.
And how Palin's endorsement added to the carnage.
apparently, her son's arrest is Obama's fault.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/sarah-palin-blames-obama-son-track-legal-problems-article-1.2503589

D'uh everything is President Obamas fault from before the crucifixion all the way up to and including the recent drop in the stock market.

And how do I know this?

Easy.....foxnews told me

josevolution · January 2016

So she's blaming Obama for her son's post traumatic syndrome, how about blaming the bafoons from her own party that started the whole destabilization of the Region .....what a disgrace this bimbo turned ou to be .....

usamamasan1 · January 2016

its W's fault still right

PJ_Soul · January 2016

usamamasan1 said:
its W's fault still right

No, it's her son's fault. And possibly hers, just for feeding her kids so much bullshit all these years.
Does anyone actually believe he did this because of PTSD? Why? Because Sarah Palin said so?? Her entire family display terrible behaviour all the time, so I don't see why this isn't just the result of being a Palin.

usamamasan1 · January 2016

“Yeah! Hell yeah,” he exclaims of Trump 2016. “That shit is the real deal. Listen: I’m a black motherfucker from the poorest town in the country. I’ve been through a lot in life. And I know him. When I see him, he shakes my hand and respects my family. None of them—Barack, whoever—nobody else does that. They’re gonna be who they are and disregard me, my family. So I’m voting for him. If I can get 20,000 people or more to vote for him, I’m gonna do it.”

eddiec · January 2016

usamamasan1 said:

“Yeah! Hell yeah,” he exclaims of Trump 2016. “That shit is the real deal. Listen: I’m a black motherfucker from the poorest town in the country. I’ve been through a lot in life. And I know him. When I see him, he shakes my hand and respects my family. None of them—Barack, whoever—nobody else does that. They’re gonna be who they are and disregard me, my family. So I’m voting for him. If I can get 20,000 people or more to vote for him, I’m gonna do it.”

So Tyson the Muslim is voting for Trump.

usamamasan1 · January 2016

Woot

josevolution · January 2016

usamamasan1 said:
its W's fault still right

Yep the fiasco of the region is all W's fault all of it and it will all be written in to American history....I've asked you a couple of times what will you do if your boy doesn't get the nod who will you hang your hat on ...

PJ_Soul · January 2016

eddiec said:

usamamasan1 said:

“Yeah! Hell yeah,” he exclaims of Trump 2016. “That shit is the real deal. Listen: I’m a black motherfucker from the poorest town in the country. I’ve been through a lot in life. And I know him. When I see him, he shakes my hand and respects my family. None of them—Barack, whoever—nobody else does that. They’re gonna be who they are and disregard me, my family. So I’m voting for him. If I can get 20,000 people or more to vote for him, I’m gonna do it.”

So Tyson the Muslim is voting for Trump.

Isn't Tyson's IQ somewhere around 70?

eddiec · January 2016

PJ_Soul said:

eddiec said:

usamamasan1 said:

“Yeah! Hell yeah,” he exclaims of Trump 2016. “That shit is the real deal. Listen: I’m a black motherfucker from the poorest town in the country. I’ve been through a lot in life. And I know him. When I see him, he shakes my hand and respects my family. None of them—Barack, whoever—nobody else does that. They’re gonna be who they are and disregard me, my family. So I’m voting for him. If I can get 20,000 people or more to vote for him, I’m gonna do it.”

So Tyson the Muslim is voting for Trump.
Isn't Tyson's IQ somewhere around 70?