Baltimore
Comments
-
Awesome! Post of the daymuskydan said:
that was simply preciousIndifference71 said:
Wow. Just wow.callen said:This thread a perfect example of whites living their lucky ass lives and looking down at the poor and weak and getting the superiority bug.
Again you aren't special. You aren't smarter. Your definitely not more aware or enlightened. Your just lucky.
Rather than looking at things and saying hmmm what the FK and why and how to change things you sit behind your keyboards in your safe little white neighborhoods and stroke yourselves
Think of the human condition along with some history of human behavior, and whites as well, and you will not only understand "Baltimore" but maybe think what we can do as humans to prevent situations such as this.
But alas stroking ones insecurities is easier and I expect from observing human behavior that the stroking and stroking each other will continue. Just get your hanky and windex before hand.0 -
Who's justifying Thirty.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
I find the ones justifying the riot infinitely more interesting.dignin said:To make it clear, I have no problem with the subject of the thread. It's the comments within it that are so over the top with outrage that I find interesting.
10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG0 -
You for one. Waving your finger at everyone. Are you serious?callen said:
Who's justifying Thirty.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
I find the ones justifying the riot infinitely more interesting.dignin said:To make it clear, I have no problem with the subject of the thread. It's the comments within it that are so over the top with outrage that I find interesting.
"My brain's a good brain!"0 -
No. The offence of rioting is definitely more palatable.dignin said:
I don't see people who loot and burn property on the same plain as child rapists.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
I understand that.dignin said:
Justifying and empathizing are completely different things.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
I find the ones justifying the riot infinitely more interesting.dignin said:To make it clear, I have no problem with the subject of the thread. It's the comments within it that are so over the top with outrage that I find interesting.
Let's not be ultra selective with whom we choose to 'empathize' with then. We can explain every behavior, but doing so doesn't make the behavior any less deplorable when the behavior is deplorable. For the people lashing out at others outraged over rioting in Baltimore, be consistent: also lash out at people who express outrage for, say, the next pedophile to creep on to the MT- he was abused as a child.
Its definitely easier to get behind a bunch of rioters than it is a pedophile. You gotta draw the line somewhere."My brain's a good brain!"0 -
More parents beating their children would equal less rioting? Seems counter intuitive to me.Dirtie_Frank said:
I believe she is doing the right thing. Maybe if there were more parents involved in Baltimore there would be less rioting?dignin said:
Yeah, mother of the year here. All mothers should punch their sons in the face repeatedly. Has a real Jerry Springer quality to it.Dirtie_Frank said:Best video of all from yesterday.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q16QY7xtCnw
Great Mother!!!
I do not believe punching your child in the face is the right thing to do.
That video is awful.
0 -
No one is getting behind anybody. You are way out on a limb thirty, but carry on.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
No. The offence of rioting is definitely more palatable.dignin said:
I don't see people who loot and burn property on the same plain as child rapists.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
I understand that.dignin said:
Justifying and empathizing are completely different things.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
I find the ones justifying the riot infinitely more interesting.dignin said:To make it clear, I have no problem with the subject of the thread. It's the comments within it that are so over the top with outrage that I find interesting.
Let's not be ultra selective with whom we choose to 'empathize' with then. We can explain every behavior, but doing so doesn't make the behavior any less deplorable when the behavior is deplorable. For the people lashing out at others outraged over rioting in Baltimore, be consistent: also lash out at people who express outrage for, say, the next pedophile to creep on to the MT- he was abused as a child.
Its definitely easier to get behind a bunch of rioters than it is a pedophile. You gotta draw the line somewhere.
0 -
I think it is natural (and from what I am seeing in this and many discussions on this board) to try to understand why things happen. We are all just coming from a different place of understanding.
Perhaps this need to loot and destroy is a fuck you to the power structure that leaves certain groups out? When you have little social, political, or economic power then protecting it or trying to preserve it is completely unimportant to the people who are looting. Perhaps they see the police, the businesses, the homes as symbolic of things they don't have, can never have. It doesn't justify it but understanding why people do things might lead to change.Are we getting something out of this all-encompassing trip?
Seems my preconceptions are what should have been burned...
I AM MINE0 -
It is sad that the riots are taking away from the conversation that a kid was likely murdered by police. No way you can claim self defense on this one.0
-
Far from that.dignin said:
No one is getting behind anybody. You are way out on a limb thirty, but carry on.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
No. The offence of rioting is definitely more palatable.dignin said:
I don't see people who loot and burn property on the same plain as child rapists.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
I understand that.dignin said:
Justifying and empathizing are completely different things.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
I find the ones justifying the riot infinitely more interesting.dignin said:To make it clear, I have no problem with the subject of the thread. It's the comments within it that are so over the top with outrage that I find interesting.
Let's not be ultra selective with whom we choose to 'empathize' with then. We can explain every behavior, but doing so doesn't make the behavior any less deplorable when the behavior is deplorable. For the people lashing out at others outraged over rioting in Baltimore, be consistent: also lash out at people who express outrage for, say, the next pedophile to creep on to the MT- he was abused as a child.
Its definitely easier to get behind a bunch of rioters than it is a pedophile. You gotta draw the line somewhere.
I am reading several- including some from you- posts that, whether you care to admit it or not, seek to rationalize poor behavior (and admonish others in the process).
I come from the mindset where there is no justification for poor behavior. Of course I can understand why some people or communities might act as they do, but that still doesn't excuse brutal behaviour. Find another way.
I know- easier said than done."My brain's a good brain!"0 -
Again, you are reading them that way because it is the way you choose to. The same issue has happened in other threads.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
Far from that.dignin said:
No one is getting behind anybody. You are way out on a limb thirty, but carry on.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
No. The offence of rioting is definitely more palatable.dignin said:
I don't see people who loot and burn property on the same plain as child rapists.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
I understand that.dignin said:
Justifying and empathizing are completely different things.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
I find the ones justifying the riot infinitely more interesting.dignin said:To make it clear, I have no problem with the subject of the thread. It's the comments within it that are so over the top with outrage that I find interesting.
Let's not be ultra selective with whom we choose to 'empathize' with then. We can explain every behavior, but doing so doesn't make the behavior any less deplorable when the behavior is deplorable. For the people lashing out at others outraged over rioting in Baltimore, be consistent: also lash out at people who express outrage for, say, the next pedophile to creep on to the MT- he was abused as a child.
Its definitely easier to get behind a bunch of rioters than it is a pedophile. You gotta draw the line somewhere.
I am reading several- including some from you- posts that, whether you care to admit it or not, seek to rationalize poor behavior (and admonish others in the process).
I come from the mindset where there is no justification for poor behavior. Of course I can understand why some people or communities might act as they do, but that still doesn't excuse brutal behaviour. Find another way.
I know- easier said than done.
Seeking to understand is not excusing.Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
If posts are being misread/misinterpreted then some responsibility falls on the author, too. With all due respect, this does read like you are excusing:rgambs said:
Again, you are reading them that way because it is the way you choose to. The same issue has happened in other threads.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
Far from that.dignin said:
No one is getting behind anybody. You are way out on a limb thirty, but carry on.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
No. The offence of rioting is definitely more palatable.dignin said:
I don't see people who loot and burn property on the same plain as child rapists.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
I understand that.dignin said:
Justifying and empathizing are completely different things.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
I find the ones justifying the riot infinitely more interesting.dignin said:To make it clear, I have no problem with the subject of the thread. It's the comments within it that are so over the top with outrage that I find interesting.
Let's not be ultra selective with whom we choose to 'empathize' with then. We can explain every behavior, but doing so doesn't make the behavior any less deplorable when the behavior is deplorable. For the people lashing out at others outraged over rioting in Baltimore, be consistent: also lash out at people who express outrage for, say, the next pedophile to creep on to the MT- he was abused as a child.
Its definitely easier to get behind a bunch of rioters than it is a pedophile. You gotta draw the line somewhere.
I am reading several- including some from you- posts that, whether you care to admit it or not, seek to rationalize poor behavior (and admonish others in the process).
I come from the mindset where there is no justification for poor behavior. Of course I can understand why some people or communities might act as they do, but that still doesn't excuse brutal behaviour. Find another way.
I know- easier said than done.
Seeking to understand is not excusing.rgambs said:It's not hard to understand if you just step outside of your own experience. If you feel like authority has no respect for you, why would you have respect for authority?
___________________________________________
"...I changed by not changing at all..."0 -
How about a little more discipline in today's youth and a little bit more respect. She caught her son throwing rocks at police. By the way she smacked him upside the head it was not like she was throwing Mike Tyson knock out punches.dignin said:
More parents beating their children would equal less rioting? Seems counter intuitive to me.Dirtie_Frank said:
I believe she is doing the right thing. Maybe if there were more parents involved in Baltimore there would be less rioting?dignin said:
Yeah, mother of the year here. All mothers should punch their sons in the face repeatedly. Has a real Jerry Springer quality to it.Dirtie_Frank said:Best video of all from yesterday.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q16QY7xtCnw
Great Mother!!!
I do not believe punching your child in the face is the right thing to do.
That video is awful.
96 Randall's Island II
98 CAA
00 Virginia Beach;Camden I; Jones Beach III
05 Borgata Night I; Wachovia Center
06 Letterman Show; Webcast (guy in blue shirt), Camden I; DC
08 Camden I; Camden II; DC
09 Phillie III
10 MSG II
13 Wrigley Field
16 Phillie II0 -
If we don't want to condone punching a child, fine, but I do hope any parent who found their child throwing rocks at police would do more than just give them a timeout.___________________________________________
"...I changed by not changing at all..."0 -
I also meant maybe it there were more parents involved with their children's life there would be less rioting going on, but maybe that is just my white privilege getting the best of medignin said:
More parents beating their children would equal less rioting? Seems counter intuitive to me.Dirtie_Frank said:
I believe she is doing the right thing. Maybe if there were more parents involved in Baltimore there would be less rioting?dignin said:
Yeah, mother of the year here. All mothers should punch their sons in the face repeatedly. Has a real Jerry Springer quality to it.Dirtie_Frank said:Best video of all from yesterday.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q16QY7xtCnw
Great Mother!!!
I do not believe punching your child in the face is the right thing to do.
That video is awful.96 Randall's Island II
98 CAA
00 Virginia Beach;Camden I; Jones Beach III
05 Borgata Night I; Wachovia Center
06 Letterman Show; Webcast (guy in blue shirt), Camden I; DC
08 Camden I; Camden II; DC
09 Phillie III
10 MSG II
13 Wrigley Field
16 Phillie II0 -
Maybe better parenting would also teach some cops that it isn't okay to murder handcuffed civilians.Dirtie_Frank said:
I also meant maybe it there were more parents involved with their children's life there would be less rioting going on, but maybe that is just my white privilege getting the best of medignin said:
More parents beating their children would equal less rioting? Seems counter intuitive to me.Dirtie_Frank said:
I believe she is doing the right thing. Maybe if there were more parents involved in Baltimore there would be less rioting?dignin said:
Yeah, mother of the year here. All mothers should punch their sons in the face repeatedly. Has a real Jerry Springer quality to it.Dirtie_Frank said:Best video of all from yesterday.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q16QY7xtCnw
Great Mother!!!
I do not believe punching your child in the face is the right thing to do.
That video is awful.
The rioting is wrong and they are fucking up what should be a much bigger conversation0 -
Thought my post was pretty clear. May not be comfortable for some but good.JimmyV said:
If posts are being misread/misinterpreted then some responsibility falls on the author, too. With all due respect, this does read like you are excusing:rgambs said:
Again, you are reading them that way because it is the way you choose to. The same issue has happened in other threads.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
Far from that.dignin said:
No one is getting behind anybody. You are way out on a limb thirty, but carry on.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
No. The offence of rioting is definitely more palatable.dignin said:
I don't see people who loot and burn property on the same plain as child rapists.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
I understand that.dignin said:
Justifying and empathizing are completely different things.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
I find the ones justifying the riot infinitely more interesting.dignin said:To make it clear, I have no problem with the subject of the thread. It's the comments within it that are so over the top with outrage that I find interesting.
Let's not be ultra selective with whom we choose to 'empathize' with then. We can explain every behavior, but doing so doesn't make the behavior any less deplorable when the behavior is deplorable. For the people lashing out at others outraged over rioting in Baltimore, be consistent: also lash out at people who express outrage for, say, the next pedophile to creep on to the MT- he was abused as a child.
Its definitely easier to get behind a bunch of rioters than it is a pedophile. You gotta draw the line somewhere.
I am reading several- including some from you- posts that, whether you care to admit it or not, seek to rationalize poor behavior (and admonish others in the process).
I come from the mindset where there is no justification for poor behavior. Of course I can understand why some people or communities might act as they do, but that still doesn't excuse brutal behaviour. Find another way.
I know- easier said than done.
Seeking to understand is not excusing.rgambs said:It's not hard to understand if you just step outside of your own experience. If you feel like authority has no respect for you, why would you have respect for authority?
10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG0 -
I don't understand what there is to argue about this.0
-
Oh, your posts have been pretty clear.callen said:
Thought my post was pretty clear. May not be comfortable for some but good.JimmyV said:
If posts are being misread/misinterpreted then some responsibility falls on the author, too. With all due respect, this does read like you are excusing:rgambs said:
Again, you are reading them that way because it is the way you choose to. The same issue has happened in other threads.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
Far from that.dignin said:
No one is getting behind anybody. You are way out on a limb thirty, but carry on.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
No. The offence of rioting is definitely more palatable.dignin said:
I don't see people who loot and burn property on the same plain as child rapists.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
I understand that.dignin said:
Justifying and empathizing are completely different things.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
I find the ones justifying the riot infinitely more interesting.dignin said:To make it clear, I have no problem with the subject of the thread. It's the comments within it that are so over the top with outrage that I find interesting.
Let's not be ultra selective with whom we choose to 'empathize' with then. We can explain every behavior, but doing so doesn't make the behavior any less deplorable when the behavior is deplorable. For the people lashing out at others outraged over rioting in Baltimore, be consistent: also lash out at people who express outrage for, say, the next pedophile to creep on to the MT- he was abused as a child.
Its definitely easier to get behind a bunch of rioters than it is a pedophile. You gotta draw the line somewhere.
I am reading several- including some from you- posts that, whether you care to admit it or not, seek to rationalize poor behavior (and admonish others in the process).
I come from the mindset where there is no justification for poor behavior. Of course I can understand why some people or communities might act as they do, but that still doesn't excuse brutal behaviour. Find another way.
I know- easier said than done.
Seeking to understand is not excusing.rgambs said:It's not hard to understand if you just step outside of your own experience. If you feel like authority has no respect for you, why would you have respect for authority?
___________________________________________
"...I changed by not changing at all..."0 -
"The Mayor's office said 202 arrests were made overnight, and that the city's fire department dealt with fires in 144 vehicles and 15 buildings."
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/baltimore-city/bs-md-ci-baltimore-riots-what-we-know-20150428-story.html___________________________________________
"...I changed by not changing at all..."0 -
You are correct. Yet the criminals who chose to riot made it pretty easy to forget what they were supposed to be out there protesting.Cliffy6745 said:It is sad that the riots are taking away from the conversation that a kid was likely murdered by police. No way you can claim self defense on this one.
And the best thing to come out of that shit last night was the one mother that cared enough to go out there and discipline her child for breaking the law and embarrassing her. Good for her. Better her slap her kid upside the head a couple of times than him help burn down buildings. I can't believe some of you here talk against that. It wasn't an 8 year old kid. It was a teenager. He deserved way worse than a couple of slaps.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help