US Marshals: 1 Man Dead During Arrest Attempt in Minneapolis
The shooting happened shortly after 2 p.m. Thursday. The U.S. Marshals said preliminary information indicates task force members were attempting to arrest a man wanted on a state warrant for being a felon in possession of a firearm.
The man, who was in a parked car, didn't comply with law enforcement and “produced a handgun resulting in task force members firing upon the subject,” the U.S. Marshals said in a statement. Task force members attempted life-saving measures, but he died at the scene, they said.
“She should have complied!” Well, she did. She did exactly what the state textbook said she should do. She knew the law, and the cop didn’t.
1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine 2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
Now there’s some great context! She looked like the most violent person I’ve ever seen. Now I get it. CONTEXT truly does matter. Shows what egotistical asses most of these cops are.
Now there’s some great context! She looked like the most violent person I’ve ever seen. Now I get it. CONTEXT truly does matter. Shows what egotistical asses most of these cops are.
Now there’s some great context! She looked like the most violent person I’ve ever seen. Now I get it. CONTEXT truly does matter. Shows what egotistical asses most of these cops are.
They aren't all like this...
You’re right...usually the cop kills the disobedient citizen
Now there’s some great context! She looked like the most violent person I’ve ever seen. Now I get it. CONTEXT truly does matter. Shows what egotistical asses most of these cops are.
They aren't all like this...
You’re right...usually the cop kills the disobedient citizen
Now there’s some great context! She looked like the most violent person I’ve ever seen. Now I get it. CONTEXT truly does matter. Shows what egotistical asses most of these cops are.
Context does matter. Nice to see you pop back into the “context “ discussion a week later when it’s convenient.
Now there’s some great context! She looked like the most violent person I’ve ever seen. Now I get it. CONTEXT truly does matter. Shows what egotistical asses most of these cops are.
They aren't all like this...
You’re right...usually the cop kills the disobedient citizen
Wondering your thoughts on gun ownership?
I’m fine with the 2nd amendment but it needs updated. Now is that possible, probably not. Too many guns out there to try and get them back voluntarily and too many that are illegal. what does that question have to do with cops who take advantage of their power? Or are you just asking for general purposes and genuine curiosity?
Now there’s some great context! She looked like the most violent person I’ve ever seen. Now I get it. CONTEXT truly does matter. Shows what egotistical asses most of these cops are.
Context does matter. Nice to see you pop back into the “context “ discussion a week later when it’s convenient.
Wow! You have no fucking clue what I’ve been doing the past week and try not to flatter yourself that much ....responding to YOU was not exactly top priority and I don’t visit daily.
So when did you get your PJ job monitoring the forum -and when did posting deadlines become part of the rules of membership? You’re just upset you got one-upped.
Now there’s some great context! She looked like the most violent person I’ve ever seen. Now I get it. CONTEXT truly does matter. Shows what egotistical asses most of these cops are.
Context does matter. Nice to see you pop back into the “context “ discussion a week later when it’s convenient.
Wow! You have no fucking clue what I’ve been doing the past week and try not to flatter yourself that much ....responding to YOU was not exactly top priority and I don’t visit daily.
So when did you get your PJ job monitoring the forum -and when did posting deadlines become part of the rules of membership? You’re just upset you got one-upped.
This is insane. Upset I got one upped? Who’s keeping score? Pretty sad statement honestly. Judging from the tone of your post it seems you’re the one who is upset. Why? I have no clue.
Now there’s some great context! She looked like the most violent person I’ve ever seen. Now I get it. CONTEXT truly does matter. Shows what egotistical asses most of these cops are.
Context does matter. Nice to see you pop back into the “context “ discussion a week later when it’s convenient.
Wow! You have no fucking clue what I’ve been doing the past week and try not to flatter yourself that much ....responding to YOU was not exactly top priority and I don’t visit daily.
So when did you get your PJ job monitoring the forum -and when did posting deadlines become part of the rules of membership? You’re just upset you got one-upped.
This is insane. Upset I got one upped? Who’s keeping score? Pretty sad statement honestly. Judging from the tone of your post it seems you’re the one who is upset. Why? I have no clue.
I’m not upset about anything other than the topic which is police abuse. Let me know when I’m allowed to post again ok
Now there’s some great context! She looked like the most violent person I’ve ever seen. Now I get it. CONTEXT truly does matter. Shows what egotistical asses most of these cops are.
Context does matter. Nice to see you pop back into the “context “ discussion a week later when it’s convenient.
Wow! You have no fucking clue what I’ve been doing the past week and try not to flatter yourself that much ....responding to YOU was not exactly top priority and I don’t visit daily.
So when did you get your PJ job monitoring the forum -and when did posting deadlines become part of the rules of membership? You’re just upset you got one-upped.
This is insane. Upset I got one upped? Who’s keeping score? Pretty sad statement honestly. Judging from the tone of your post it seems you’re the one who is upset. Why? I have no clue.
I’m not upset about anything other than the topic which is police abuse. Let me know when I’m allowed to post again ok
Who said anything about you not being allowed? Wow. What an over reaction. You came back to this thread , conveniently, as soon as that other story was shared here and made a post talking about context. In bold might I add. And you’re throwing a fit when I respond.
Now there’s some great context! She looked like the most violent person I’ve ever seen. Now I get it. CONTEXT truly does matter. Shows what egotistical asses most of these cops are.
Context does matter. Nice to see you pop back into the “context “ discussion a week later when it’s convenient.
Wow! You have no fucking clue what I’ve been doing the past week and try not to flatter yourself that much ....responding to YOU was not exactly top priority and I don’t visit daily.
So when did you get your PJ job monitoring the forum -and when did posting deadlines become part of the rules of membership? You’re just upset you got one-upped.
This is insane. Upset I got one upped? Who’s keeping score? Pretty sad statement honestly. Judging from the tone of your post it seems you’re the one who is upset. Why? I have no clue.
I’m not upset about anything other than the topic which is police abuse. Let me know when I’m allowed to post again ok
Who said anything about you not being allowed? Wow. What an over reaction. You came back to this thread , conveniently, as soon as that other story was shared here and made a post talking about context. In bold might I add. And you’re throwing a fit when I respond.
I’m not throwing a fit - we have conflicting opinions about police abuse and again, you don’t know me so you can’t assume anything about me conveniently responding. I do believe my yearly membership allows me to respond when I want. Why are you attacking me when all I did was agree that context does matter, not for the reason you mentioned but a good reason nevertheless.
Here’s to hoping another black, white, brown person isn’t harassed (or killed) by a police officer today.
Now there’s some great context! She looked like the most violent person I’ve ever seen. Now I get it. CONTEXT truly does matter. Shows what egotistical asses most of these cops are.
They aren't all like this...
You’re right...usually the cop kills the disobedient citizen
Wondering your thoughts on gun ownership?
I’m fine with the 2nd amendment but it needs updated. Now is that possible, probably not. Too many guns out there to try and get them back voluntarily and too many that are illegal. what does that question have to do with cops who take advantage of their power? Or are you just asking for general purposes and genuine curiosity?
Generally curious. Had you pegged for a full ban type person.
Now there’s some great context! She looked like the most violent person I’ve ever seen. Now I get it. CONTEXT truly does matter. Shows what egotistical asses most of these cops are.
Context does matter. Nice to see you pop back into the “context “ discussion a week later when it’s convenient.
Wow! You have no fucking clue what I’ve been doing the past week and try not to flatter yourself that much ....responding to YOU was not exactly top priority and I don’t visit daily.
So when did you get your PJ job monitoring the forum -and when did posting deadlines become part of the rules of membership? You’re just upset you got one-upped.
This is insane. Upset I got one upped? Who’s keeping score? Pretty sad statement honestly. Judging from the tone of your post it seems you’re the one who is upset. Why? I have no clue.
I’m not upset about anything other than the topic which is police abuse. Let me know when I’m allowed to post again ok
Who said anything about you not being allowed? Wow. What an over reaction. You came back to this thread , conveniently, as soon as that other story was shared here and made a post talking about context. In bold might I add. And you’re throwing a fit when I respond.
I’m not throwing a fit - we have conflicting opinions about police abuse and again, you don’t know me so you can’t assume anything about me conveniently responding. I do believe my yearly membership allows me to respond when I want. Why are you attacking me when all I did was agree that context does matter, not for the reason you mentioned but a good reason nevertheless.
Here’s to hoping another black, white, brown person isn’t harassed (or killed) by a police officer today.
Ok. Im sorry. I genuinely didn’t feel like I was attacking you. If you feel that way, that’s all that matters and I apologize
“She should have complied!” Well, she did. She did exactly what the state textbook said she should do. She knew the law, and the cop didn’t.
Saw that this morning. This is ridiculous. I’m surprised he doesn’t have to radio in and get permission to to the PIT to begin with.
She put her hazards on, clearly wasn’t speeding up to flee. I don’t feel safe pulling over on the side of the freeway like that and especially at night. She wasn’t a known violent offender trying to flee, no reason to do this, especially after only 10 seconds.
The problem with the law in this case is it’s subjective. What’s safe for the cop may not seem safe for the driver. I won’t be surprised to see laws like this changed to be more explicit and define unsafe conditions, like a shoulder less than x feet wide, etc. As I said above, still incredibly stupid thing for the cop to do.
The problem with the law in this case is it’s subjective. What’s safe for the cop may not seem safe for the driver. I won’t be surprised to see laws like this changed to be more explicit and define unsafe conditions, like a shoulder less than x feet wide, etc. As I said above, still incredibly stupid thing for the cop to do.
i wouldn't call doing a PIT move on a speeding vehicle that wasn't fleeing subjective. that is never necessary in that situation.
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
Now there’s some great context! She looked like the most violent person I’ve ever seen. Now I get it. CONTEXT truly does matter. Shows what egotistical asses most of these cops are.
They aren't all like this...
You’re right...usually the cop kills the disobedient citizen
Wondering your thoughts on gun ownership?
I’m fine with the 2nd amendment but it needs updated. Now is that possible, probably not. Too many guns out there to try and get them back voluntarily and too many that are illegal. what does that question have to do with cops who take advantage of their power? Or are you just asking for general purposes and genuine curiosity?
Generally curious. Had you pegged for a full ban type person.
I was wrong.
Well then I hope it was a good surprise. I sit in the middle or right more often than people think.
Now there’s some great context! She looked like the most violent person I’ve ever seen. Now I get it. CONTEXT truly does matter. Shows what egotistical asses most of these cops are.
Context does matter. Nice to see you pop back into the “context “ discussion a week later when it’s convenient.
Wow! You have no fucking clue what I’ve been doing the past week and try not to flatter yourself that much ....responding to YOU was not exactly top priority and I don’t visit daily.
So when did you get your PJ job monitoring the forum -and when did posting deadlines become part of the rules of membership? You’re just upset you got one-upped.
This is insane. Upset I got one upped? Who’s keeping score? Pretty sad statement honestly. Judging from the tone of your post it seems you’re the one who is upset. Why? I have no clue.
I’m not upset about anything other than the topic which is police abuse. Let me know when I’m allowed to post again ok
Who said anything about you not being allowed? Wow. What an over reaction. You came back to this thread , conveniently, as soon as that other story was shared here and made a post talking about context. In bold might I add. And you’re throwing a fit when I respond.
I’m not throwing a fit - we have conflicting opinions about police abuse and again, you don’t know me so you can’t assume anything about me conveniently responding. I do believe my yearly membership allows me to respond when I want. Why are you attacking me when all I did was agree that context does matter, not for the reason you mentioned but a good reason nevertheless.
Here’s to hoping another black, white, brown person isn’t harassed (or killed) by a police officer today.
Ok. Im sorry. I genuinely didn’t feel like I was attacking you. If you feel that way, that’s all that matters and I apologize
I’m sorry too. My writing is much more harsh than how I really feel.....trying to work on it. Again, my apologies!
Now there’s some great context! She looked like the most violent person I’ve ever seen. Now I get it. CONTEXT truly does matter. Shows what egotistical asses most of these cops are.
They aren't all like this...
You’re right...usually the cop kills the disobedient citizen
Wondering your thoughts on gun ownership?
I’m fine with the 2nd amendment but it needs updated. Now is that possible, probably not. Too many guns out there to try and get them back voluntarily and too many that are illegal. what does that question have to do with cops who take advantage of their power? Or are you just asking for general purposes and genuine curiosity?
Generally curious. Had you pegged for a full ban type person.
I was wrong.
Well then I hope it was a good surprise. I sit in the middle or right more often than people think.
I'm called a commie around my conservative friends and a republican around my liberal friends. I keep telling both sides that I am even keel, lol.
The problem with the law in this case is it’s subjective. What’s safe for the cop may not seem safe for the driver. I won’t be surprised to see laws like this changed to be more explicit and define unsafe conditions, like a shoulder less than x feet wide, etc. As I said above, still incredibly stupid thing for the cop to do.
i wouldn't call doing a PIT move on a speeding vehicle that wasn't fleeing subjective. that is never necessary in that situation.
Agree. I can only imagine how scared she must have been.....especially when the car flipped.
Now there’s some great context! She looked like the most violent person I’ve ever seen. Now I get it. CONTEXT truly does matter. Shows what egotistical asses most of these cops are.
Context does matter. Nice to see you pop back into the “context “ discussion a week later when it’s convenient.
Wow! You have no fucking clue what I’ve been doing the past week and try not to flatter yourself that much ....responding to YOU was not exactly top priority and I don’t visit daily.
So when did you get your PJ job monitoring the forum -and when did posting deadlines become part of the rules of membership? You’re just upset you got one-upped.
This is insane. Upset I got one upped? Who’s keeping score? Pretty sad statement honestly. Judging from the tone of your post it seems you’re the one who is upset. Why? I have no clue.
I’m not upset about anything other than the topic which is police abuse. Let me know when I’m allowed to post again ok
Who said anything about you not being allowed? Wow. What an over reaction. You came back to this thread , conveniently, as soon as that other story was shared here and made a post talking about context. In bold might I add. And you’re throwing a fit when I respond.
I’m not throwing a fit - we have conflicting opinions about police abuse and again, you don’t know me so you can’t assume anything about me conveniently responding. I do believe my yearly membership allows me to respond when I want. Why are you attacking me when all I did was agree that context does matter, not for the reason you mentioned but a good reason nevertheless.
Here’s to hoping another black, white, brown person isn’t harassed (or killed) by a police officer today.
Ok. Im sorry. I genuinely didn’t feel like I was attacking you. If you feel that way, that’s all that matters and I apologize
I’m sorry too. My writing is much more harsh than how I really feel.....trying to work on it. Again, my apologies!
The Power of an Apology. That would make a good book title. If everyone is chilling now, I'll reopen the thread. Some topics get too hot. It's important to discuss the topic, though, NOT each other. Please be chill so I don't have to make anyone read-only. No consequences = no change and forum environment suffers. Thank you for taking this guidance to heart.
Comments
US Marshals: 1 Man Dead During Arrest Attempt in Minneapolis
The shooting happened shortly after 2 p.m. Thursday. The U.S. Marshals said preliminary information indicates task force members were attempting to arrest a man wanted on a state warrant for being a felon in possession of a firearm.
The man, who was in a parked car, didn't comply with law enforcement and “produced a handgun resulting in task force members firing upon the subject,” the U.S. Marshals said in a statement. Task force members attempted life-saving measures, but he died at the scene, they said.
https://www.instagram.com/tv/CM2V92UFDRd/?utm_medium=copy_link
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://www.unilad.co.uk/news/police-officer-sued-for-flipping-pregnant-womans-car-when-she-didnt-stop-fast-enough/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
“She should have complied!” Well, she did. She did exactly what the state textbook said she should do. She knew the law, and the cop didn’t.
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
When he initially lit her up the spotlight went right on, wtf? Fire him and put him in prison.
what does that question have to do with cops who take advantage of their power? Or are you just asking for general purposes and genuine curiosity?
I was wrong.
As I said above, still incredibly stupid thing for the cop to do.
-EV 8/14/93
The Power of an Apology. That would make a good book title.
If everyone is chilling now, I'll reopen the thread. Some topics get too hot.
It's important to discuss the topic, though, NOT each other.
Please be chill so I don't have to make anyone read-only.
No consequences = no change and forum environment suffers.
Thank you for taking this guidance to heart.