My guess (and that's all it is) is that it probably isn't illegal to have a hit list. I didn't see where he made any threats (unless you count the letter mentioned, but that might not have been specific enough, who knows). And a bunch of guns without any real threats and just a list of names amounts to illegal gun possession charges. But he's facing 31 years of drugs and weapons charges. It would probably take a specific threat (time and place planned) to amount to terrorism, not just a racist letter and some names. Not saying I agree with the outcome, but that's my guess on what happened.
My guess (and that's all it is) is that it probably isn't illegal to have a hit list. I didn't see where he made any threats (unless you count the letter mentioned, but that might not have been specific enough, who knows). And a bunch of guns without any real threats and just a list of names amounts to illegal gun possession charges. But he's facing 31 years of drugs and weapons charges. It would probably take a specific threat (time and place planned) to amount to terrorism, not just a racist letter and some names. Not saying I agree with the outcome, but that's my guess on what happened.
TLDR: "not be white"
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
My guess (and that's all it is) is that it probably isn't illegal to have a hit list. I didn't see where he made any threats (unless you count the letter mentioned, but that might not have been specific enough, who knows). And a bunch of guns without any real threats and just a list of names amounts to illegal gun possession charges. But he's facing 31 years of drugs and weapons charges. It would probably take a specific threat (time and place planned) to amount to terrorism, not just a racist letter and some names. Not saying I agree with the outcome, but that's my guess on what happened.
TLDR: "not be white"
I apologize if my 1 paragraph was too much to read. Feel free to not get involved in the discussion next time.
My guess (and that's all it is) is that it probably isn't illegal to have a hit list. I didn't see where he made any threats (unless you count the letter mentioned, but that might not have been specific enough, who knows). And a bunch of guns without any real threats and just a list of names amounts to illegal gun possession charges. But he's facing 31 years of drugs and weapons charges. It would probably take a specific threat (time and place planned) to amount to terrorism, not just a racist letter and some names. Not saying I agree with the outcome, but that's my guess on what happened.
My guess (and that's all it is) is that it probably isn't illegal to have a hit list. I didn't see where he made any threats (unless you count the letter mentioned, but that might not have been specific enough, who knows). And a bunch of guns without any real threats and just a list of names amounts to illegal gun possession charges. But he's facing 31 years of drugs and weapons charges. It would probably take a specific threat (time and place planned) to amount to terrorism, not just a racist letter and some names. Not saying I agree with the outcome, but that's my guess on what happened.
A hit list itself is a threat by definition.
sure, if his list was titled "people I will kill" followed by a list of names. But I believe the article just said it was a list of names (I think a spreadsheet of names actually), simply having a list of names I don't think would hold up as a hit list in court. I mean if thats all it takes I'll never carry around a list of names and addresses of people I'm mailing Christmas cards to. I'm not saying I agree with the outcome, but I could see how a DA could look at this and say terrorist charges wouldn't stick based on what I saw in the one article. Maybe there's more to it, and this is just my guess.
My guess (and that's all it is) is that it probably isn't illegal to have a hit list. I didn't see where he made any threats (unless you count the letter mentioned, but that might not have been specific enough, who knows). And a bunch of guns without any real threats and just a list of names amounts to illegal gun possession charges. But he's facing 31 years of drugs and weapons charges. It would probably take a specific threat (time and place planned) to amount to terrorism, not just a racist letter and some names. Not saying I agree with the outcome, but that's my guess on what happened.
A hit list itself is a threat by definition.
sure, if his list was titled "people I will kill" followed by a list of names. But I believe the article just said it was a list of names (I think a spreadsheet of names actually), simply having a list of names I don't think would hold up as a hit list in court. I mean if thats all it takes I'll never carry around a list of names and addresses of people I'm mailing Christmas cards to. I'm not saying I agree with the outcome, but I could see how a DA could look at this and say terrorist charges wouldn't stick based on what I saw in the one article. Maybe there's more to it, and this is just my guess.
My guess (and that's all it is) is that it probably isn't illegal to have a hit list. I didn't see where he made any threats (unless you count the letter mentioned, but that might not have been specific enough, who knows). And a bunch of guns without any real threats and just a list of names amounts to illegal gun possession charges. But he's facing 31 years of drugs and weapons charges. It would probably take a specific threat (time and place planned) to amount to terrorism, not just a racist letter and some names. Not saying I agree with the outcome, but that's my guess on what happened.
TLDR: "not be white"
I apologize if my 1 paragraph was too much to read. Feel free to not get involved in the discussion next time.
I apologize if my attempt at a clever comment went over your head. Feel free to laugh, even if just to be polite, next time.
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
Jeebus, can’t get your groceries? ‘Murica! Get that guy a gun! In fact, get him two! And give him a concealed carry permit! And while you’re at it? Deputize him and allow him to patrol your kids school or the border! ‘Murica!
My guess (and that's all it is) is that it probably isn't illegal to have a hit list. I didn't see where he made any threats (unless you count the letter mentioned, but that might not have been specific enough, who knows). And a bunch of guns without any real threats and just a list of names amounts to illegal gun possession charges. But he's facing 31 years of drugs and weapons charges. It would probably take a specific threat (time and place planned) to amount to terrorism, not just a racist letter and some names. Not saying I agree with the outcome, but that's my guess on what happened.
A hit list itself is a threat by definition.
sure, if his list was titled "people I will kill" followed by a list of names. But I believe the article just said it was a list of names (I think a spreadsheet of names actually), simply having a list of names I don't think would hold up as a hit list in court. I mean if thats all it takes I'll never carry around a list of names and addresses of people I'm mailing Christmas cards to. I'm not saying I agree with the outcome, but I could see how a DA could look at this and say terrorist charges wouldn't stick based on what I saw in the one article. Maybe there's more to it, and this is just my guess.
It would hold up in court if intent can be proven. I understand what you're getting at though, and I agree to an extent, but the absence of a title at the top doesn't totally dismiss it either.
I don’t consider that dumb stuff. I don’t agree that we need to tailor gun control legislation to fit the Boy Scout camp plans, and children are still children, with the brain immaturity of children, regardless of training.
Post edited by oftenreading on
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
Comments
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/14/us/gun-diaper-bag-chuck-e-cheese-daughter/index.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Gun owners do kill/shoot/injure people
Their children do as well
Their friends do too
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/14/us/oakland-family-gunfire/index.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
The children of gun owners do
What would it take to call this nut job a terrorist
It would probably take a specific threat (time and place planned) to amount to terrorism, not just a racist letter and some names.
Not saying I agree with the outcome, but that's my guess on what happened.
I'm not saying I agree with the outcome, but I could see how a DA could look at this and say terrorist charges wouldn't stick based on what I saw in the one article. Maybe there's more to it, and this is just my guess.
NM governor tells militia they're not well-regulated
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna996516
So they have to relinquish their guns now, right?
https://www.boston.com/news/local-news/2019/04/19/connecticut-stop-and-shop-shooting-threat
Maybe they ran out of ham or he really, really hates unions?
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://apple.news/AcYA1vmpwQ56rUbTsG6hrOg
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
NRA is imploding
New York to Join Handful of States That Mandate Locking Guns Away From Children
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/25/nyregion/ny-gun-owner-laws.html
A small step forward.
Over/under on white guy?
Dont look for NBC to mention that tho, demonizing white men has become popular
Something something good guy with a gun
A racist anachronism