Lets not skip right over this. I don't trust a random teacher with a firearm around my children. This is precisely why my kids will end up being home schooled if this plays out.
Lets not skip right over this. I don't trust a random teacher with a firearm around my children. This is precisely why my kids will end up being home schooled if this plays out.
And from the reporting, “great teacher,” “well liked.” Just another “responsible” gun owner until they’re not.
The exchange when Trump told Toomey he was afraid of the nra was fun to watch. lol
Detroit 2000, Detroit 2003 1-2, Grand Rapids VFC 2004, Philly 2005, Grand Rapids 2006, Detroit 2006, Cleveland 2006, Lollapalooza 2007, Detroit Eddie Solo 2011, Detroit 2014, Chicago 2016 1-2, Chicago 2018 1-2, Ohana Encore 2021 1-2, Chicago Eddie/Earthlings 2022 1-2, Nashville 2022, St. Louis 2022
I would put in an express lane for abortions... AND take away all of your guns
I'm you're libtard snowflake nightmare
60 million babies aborted in the United States since 1973 you're cool with that? I'd say the express lane has been open for a long time. So don't pretend that you care about life, and children and all that jazz. No you don't.
I've found in my experience that libertarians oppose abortion more often then not. I believe it's because the dominant trait of libertarian ideology is a blanket form of anti-left fervor. The more the divide in this country grows, the more I see that the right stands for very little of its own ideology, and spends 99% of it's time standing against the left, or more accurately, the boogeyman they've created to represent the left.
Not Libertarians who have actually thought about the philosophy. I'm not an expert in it but I don't see how you can be a libertarian and not be pro choice. I know a few and they could care less if someone has an abortion or not. They see it as one less drag on society.
I always thought libertarians were anti-choice because they needed to be to get some support from mainstream Republicans.
1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine 2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
Detroit 2000, Detroit 2003 1-2, Grand Rapids VFC 2004, Philly 2005, Grand Rapids 2006, Detroit 2006, Cleveland 2006, Lollapalooza 2007, Detroit Eddie Solo 2011, Detroit 2014, Chicago 2016 1-2, Chicago 2018 1-2, Ohana Encore 2021 1-2, Chicago Eddie/Earthlings 2022 1-2, Nashville 2022, St. Louis 2022
Wait a minute....the "libertarian" is also pro life? Dude, you are a walking contradiction.
In one breath you say that children are the future, in the next you support ending that potential before birth.
You are holding that hypocrisy, I will defend life.
The NRA hasn't ended any life, the NRA is supported with zero taxpayer dollars.
Planned Parenthood (irony there) ends life every day, and it is funded to the tune of $500M annually by taxpayers.
I know which is a greater threat to life.
***it angers me that I have to defend the NRA***
A true libertarian wouldn't give two shits what some woman does with her body.
Plain and simple: you're a fraud.
I'm not a true libertarian.
I also don't care what anyone does to their body. But that body inside her body isn't hers.
I can appreciate that perspective, while it’s in her, a woman has an obligation to nourish it for nine months. Once it’s out of her, she has to nourish it until it is self-sufficient. To me, when a woman recognizes her family/self’s inability to nourish a child (either now or when it is out of the womb), it seems she is doing it as a pain preventative. I understand the child doesn’t have an ability to object, but parents ignore a child’s objection stating that they know best on a regular basis. The stakes certainly aren’t as high, but the logic is the same.
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
Oh man - on to the abortion debate huh? For a few years before, I was a 1 issue voter on this issue. But it didn't help. Hoping my new 1 issue voter stance has any sort of an impact. I do find a lot of hypocrisy around people's views on abortion and their views on other things...but this is a gun thread. And guns don't kill people, people will much too easy access to high powered guns with high capacity magazines kill lots of people at once and as most have pointed out people with easy access to handguns kill the most people.
You know just as well that was him yesterday that won’t be his message today ..
He has no positions. That's the problem. Whatever he thinks works for him in the short term, is always the way he will lean.
REALLY wish someone would have asked him, if he really believes this way now, why he rolled back Obama's EO that discouraged mentally ill folks from obtaining guns in the first place. Why didn't anyone bring that up?
Canadian owned Mountain Equipment Co-op (of which I am a member) has decided to sever ties with Vista Outdoor Inc., a sporting goods company that manufacturers firearms. (MEC itself has never sold guns)
would it solve all problems? No. But we need to take steps to keep guns out of the wrong hands and protect people, especially children. There needs to be a standard national background check that is comprehensive and have it include any private gun sales/gun shows. You want to sell a gun to your neighbor, fine. But you have to go to a licensed FFL dealer to do so and buyer should pay a fee for that test. We also need medical professionals to actually update a registry for people who have been seen or diagnosed with a mental illness. Perhaps even instituting a "no gun" list, like the no fly list. If you've been convicted of assault, especially domestic violence, you can't buy a gun ever or at least for a certain time frame. These are some of my other suggestions: Raise the age restriction to purchase all guns and ammo to 21. Revolvers, shotguns and non-semi auto rifles/guns are ok to buy for anyone who can pass a background check but ONLY after you pass a basic safety course. Any semi-auto handgun you must obtain a license/permit to purchase those weapons with stipulations above. Possible ban on AR or AK style or any semi-auto rifle. If not a ban, add an additional license/permit fee for these on top of everything above. Ban large capacity magazines and bump stocks. You don't need them. Create a standard Concealed Carry curriculum that includes both shooting and written tests for those that wish to get one.(my CC class included both written and shooting test, along with gun safety and laws pertaining to carrying).
these are just some of my thoughts on the subject. I don't really see any of the above infringing on the 2nd Amendment, but does make it tougher to buy a gun. While I own several semi-auto handguns, I don't really need them. I like them better than my revolvers, and enjoy shooting them more at the range, but I would be willing to pay a fee for a license/permit to have one. AR/AK's are fun to shoot, but do we really need them? I don't see the purpose for them other than they look cool. Agree or disagree. I'm interested to hear your thoughts.
Wait a minute....the "libertarian" is also pro life? Dude, you are a walking contradiction.
In one breath you say that children are the future, in the next you support ending that potential before birth.
You are holding that hypocrisy, I will defend life.
The NRA hasn't ended any life, the NRA is supported with zero taxpayer dollars.
Planned Parenthood (irony there) ends life every day, and it is funded to the tune of $500M annually by taxpayers.
I know which is a greater threat to life.
***it angers me that I have to defend the NRA***
A true libertarian wouldn't give two shits what some woman does with her body.
Plain and simple: you're a fraud.
I'm not a true libertarian.
I also don't care what anyone does to their body. But that body inside her body isn't hers.
Yes it is. For all technical purposes it's a parasite, cannot survive without a host.
Actually, no, embryos do not meet the technical scientific definition of a parasite. Might want to do some research there...But there is another thread on this topic that is more relevant than this one.
Comments
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Detroit 2000, Detroit 2003 1-2, Grand Rapids VFC 2004, Philly 2005, Grand Rapids 2006, Detroit 2006, Cleveland 2006, Lollapalooza 2007, Detroit Eddie Solo 2011, Detroit 2014, Chicago 2016 1-2, Chicago 2018 1-2, Ohana Encore 2021 1-2, Chicago Eddie/Earthlings 2022 1-2, Nashville 2022, St. Louis 2022
I'd say the express lane has been open for a long time. So don't pretend that you care about life, and children and all that jazz.
No you don't.
Shall I rephrase...people can do what they want with their bodies as long as they aren't harming others.
We should be for the defense of life.
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
Are you saying you see zero difference between a terminated pregnancy at 14 weeks and the shooting death of a Sandy Hook kindergartener?
Detroit 2000, Detroit 2003 1-2, Grand Rapids VFC 2004, Philly 2005, Grand Rapids 2006, Detroit 2006, Cleveland 2006, Lollapalooza 2007, Detroit Eddie Solo 2011, Detroit 2014, Chicago 2016 1-2, Chicago 2018 1-2, Ohana Encore 2021 1-2, Chicago Eddie/Earthlings 2022 1-2, Nashville 2022, St. Louis 2022
Goo isn't 'others' in my mind... so pro choice is cool and allows women to do what they want with their bodies given they aren't harming others!
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
Great couple ha ..
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
They are the family spat turned murder/suicide type though.
"TAKE THE GUNS FIRST...GO THROUGH DUE PROCESS SECOND."
-Republican President, Donald J. Trump.
He has no positions. That's the problem. Whatever he thinks works for him in the short term, is always the way he will lean.
REALLY wish someone would have asked him, if he really believes this way now, why he rolled back Obama's EO that discouraged mentally ill folks from obtaining guns in the first place. Why didn't anyone bring that up?
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2018/03/01/mec-vista-outdoor-florida-shooting_a_23374340/?utm_hp_ref=ca-homepage
Yes it is. For all technical purposes it's a parasite, cannot survive without a host.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/02/gun-control-republicans-consider-grvo/
would it solve all problems? No. But we need to take steps to keep guns out of the wrong hands and protect people, especially children. There needs to be a standard national background check that is comprehensive and have it include any private gun sales/gun shows. You want to sell a gun to your neighbor, fine. But you have to go to a licensed FFL dealer to do so and buyer should pay a fee for that test. We also need medical professionals to actually update a registry for people who have been seen or diagnosed with a mental illness. Perhaps even instituting a "no gun" list, like the no fly list. If you've been convicted of assault, especially domestic violence, you can't buy a gun ever or at least for a certain time frame. These are some of my other suggestions:
Raise the age restriction to purchase all guns and ammo to 21.
Revolvers, shotguns and non-semi auto rifles/guns are ok to buy for anyone who can pass a background check but ONLY after you pass a basic safety course.
Any semi-auto handgun you must obtain a license/permit to purchase those weapons with stipulations above.
Possible ban on AR or AK style or any semi-auto rifle. If not a ban, add an additional license/permit fee for these on top of everything above.
Ban large capacity magazines and bump stocks. You don't need them.
Create a standard Concealed Carry curriculum that includes both shooting and written tests for those that wish to get one.(my CC class included both written and shooting test, along with gun safety and laws pertaining to carrying).
these are just some of my thoughts on the subject. I don't really see any of the above infringing on the 2nd Amendment, but does make it tougher to buy a gun. While I own several semi-auto handguns, I don't really need them. I like them better than my revolvers, and enjoy shooting them more at the range, but I would be willing to pay a fee for a license/permit to have one. AR/AK's are fun to shoot, but do we really need them? I don't see the purpose for them other than they look cool. Agree or disagree. I'm interested to hear your thoughts.