Options

Background check defeated...Obama pissed.

24

Comments

  • Options
    Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    fife wrote:
    unsung wrote:
    But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ---Rachel Maddow, Aug 2010

    This quote doesn't fit due to the fact that no one is taking your rights away.

    no but they keep trying.

    Godfather.
  • Options
    riotgrlriotgrl LOUISVILLE Posts: 1,892
    Godfather. wrote:
    fife wrote:
    unsung wrote:
    But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ---Rachel Maddow, Aug 2010

    This quote doesn't fit due to the fact that no one is taking your rights away.

    no but they keep trying.

    Godfather.

    Personally, I think corporations are doing more to take away our rights than anything the government is doing. Where's the tyranny against Big Ag, Big Pharma, Big Banks?
    Are we getting something out of this all-encompassing trip?

    Seems my preconceptions are what should have been burned...

    I AM MINE
  • Options
    fifefife Posts: 3,327
    Godfather. wrote:
    fife wrote:
    unsung wrote:
    But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ---Rachel Maddow, Aug 2010

    This quote doesn't fit due to the fact that no one is taking your rights away.

    no but they keep trying.

    Godfather.

    i don't see that concerning gun ownership, i do agree that the government does try to take rights away. for example the R who apparently care about rights are trying to take rights away from the LGBT community.
  • Options
    josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 28,314
    You guys read Gabby Gifford's editorial that came out last night?

    Powerful stuff...

    A Senate in the Gun Lobby’s Grip
    By GABRIELLE GIFFORDS
    Published: April 17, 2013

    SENATORS say they fear the N.R.A. and the gun lobby. But I think that fear must be nothing compared to the fear the first graders in Sandy Hook Elementary School felt as their lives ended in a hail of bullets. The fear that those children who survived the massacre must feel every time they remember their teachers stacking them into closets and bathrooms, whispering that they loved them, so that love would be the last thing the students heard if the gunman found them.

    On Wednesday, a minority of senators gave into fear and blocked common-sense legislation that would have made it harder for criminals and people with dangerous mental illnesses to get hold of deadly firearms — a bill that could prevent future tragedies like those in Newtown, Conn., Aurora, Colo., Blacksburg, Va., and too many communities to count.

    Some of the senators who voted against the background-check amendments have met with grieving parents whose children were murdered at Sandy Hook, in Newtown. Some of the senators who voted no have also looked into my eyes as I talked about my experience being shot in the head at point-blank range in suburban Tucson two years ago, and expressed sympathy for the 18 other people shot besides me, 6 of whom died. These senators have heard from their constituents — who polls show overwhelmingly favored expanding background checks. And still these senators decided to do nothing. Shame on them.

    I watch TV and read the papers like everyone else. We know what we’re going to hear: vague platitudes like “tough vote” and “complicated issue.” I was elected six times to represent southern Arizona, in the State Legislature and then in Congress. I know what a complicated issue is; I know what it feels like to take a tough vote. This was neither. These senators made their decision based on political fear and on cold calculations about the money of special interests like the National Rifle Association, which in the last election cycle spent around $25 million on contributions, lobbying and outside spending.

    Speaking is physically difficult for me. But my feelings are clear: I’m furious. I will not rest until we have righted the wrong these senators have done, and until we have changed our laws so we can look parents in the face and say: We are trying to keep your children safe. We cannot allow the status quo — desperately protected by the gun lobby so that they can make more money by spreading fear and misinformation — to go on.

    I am asking every reasonable American to help me tell the truth about the cowardice these senators demonstrated. I am asking for mothers to stop these lawmakers at the grocery store and tell them: You’ve lost my vote. I am asking activists to unsubscribe from these senators’ e-mail lists and to stop giving them money. I’m asking citizens to go to their offices and say: You’ve disappointed me, and there will be consequences.

    People have told me that I’m courageous, but I have seen greater courage. Gabe Zimmerman, my friend and staff member in whose honor we dedicated a room in the United States Capitol this week, saw me shot in the head and saw the shooter turn his gunfire on others. Gabe ran toward me as I lay bleeding. Toward gunfire. And then the gunman shot him, and then Gabe died. His body lay on the pavement in front of the Safeway for hours.

    I have thought a lot about why Gabe ran toward me when he could have run away. Service was part of his life, but it was also his job. The senators who voted against background checks for online and gun-show sales, and those who voted against checks to screen out would-be gun buyers with mental illness, failed to do their job.

    They looked at these most benign and practical of solutions, offered by moderates from each party, and then they looked over their shoulder at the powerful, shadowy gun lobby — and brought shame on themselves and our government itself by choosing to do nothing.

    They will try to hide their decision behind grand talk, behind willfully false accounts of what the bill might have done — trust me, I know how politicians talk when they want to distract you — but their decision was based on a misplaced sense of self-interest. I say misplaced, because to preserve their dignity and their legacy, they should have heeded the voices of their constituents. They should have honored the legacy of the thousands of victims of gun violence and their families, who have begged for action, not because it would bring their loved ones back, but so that others might be spared their agony.

    This defeat is only the latest chapter of what I’ve always known would be a long, hard haul. Our democracy’s history is littered with names we neither remember nor celebrate — people who stood in the way of progress while protecting the powerful. On Wednesday, a number of senators voted to join that list.

    Mark my words: if we cannot make our communities safer with the Congress we have now, we will use every means available to make sure we have a different Congress, one that puts communities’ interests ahead of the gun lobby’s. To do nothing while others are in danger is not the American way.

    Yeap good advice from her ..
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • Options
    cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,126
    Its a failure of common sense. 90% of America wanted it.
    our system is broken.

    when 90% of the population supports something, it should be reflected in congress. it should be a no brainer.

    it just shows that lobbyist power is out of control. the nra lied and said that this bill would pave the way to a federal gun owner database, when the actual text of the bill made such a registry illegal.

    :fp:

    I see where you are going with this and I agree with you on this issue. But just because people are for it doesn't directly mean it must be law carried out by Congress. Congress has to take things into effect like say...the constitution, that the general public does not.

    Then again, maybe they shouldnt. Maybe they should pass laws based on majority rule and let the courts sort it out.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • Options
    How can any educated person in the US still vote for the Republicans?
    They shit on peoples opinion and just deliver to lobby groups.
    Insulting for such a great nation!
  • Options
    polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    riotgrl wrote:
    Personally, I think corporations are doing more to take away our rights than anything the government is doing. Where's the tyranny against Big Ag, Big Pharma, Big Banks?

    this is the crux of the majority of problems ...

    it's sad that it takes kids dying in a suburban school to have people engaged but the reality is this coat tailing to corporations has been going on for years ...
  • Options
    gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 22,179
    I see where you are going with this and I agree with you on this issue. But just because people are for it doesn't directly mean it must be law carried out by Congress. Congress has to take things into effect like say...the constitution, that the general public does not.

    Then again, maybe they shouldnt. Maybe they should pass laws based on majority rule and let the courts sort it out.
    i see what you are saying, but the congress has a duty to vote according to what the people want. they are the representatives of the people. 90% of americans are astonished by how easily their opinions are disregarded.
    There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self.- Hemingway

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • Options
    gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 22,179
    i will just come out and say it.

    obama wanted this passed. i promise you that that is one of the reasons those that opposed it actually opposed it.
    There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self.- Hemingway

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • Options
    mickeyratmickeyrat up my ass, like Chadwick was up his Posts: 35,881
    I see where you are going with this and I agree with you on this issue. But just because people are for it doesn't directly mean it must be law carried out by Congress. Congress has to take things into effect like say...the constitution, that the general public does not.

    Then again, maybe they shouldnt. Maybe they should pass laws based on majority rule and let the courts sort it out.
    i see what you are saying, but the congress has a duty to vote according to what the people want. they aresupposed to be the representatives of the people. 90% of americans are astonished by how easily their opinions are disregarded.
    fixed that for you.

    Cincy? This would have simply included some other sales in what is ALREADY law?
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • Options
    fifefife Posts: 3,327
    Its a failure of common sense. 90% of America wanted it.
    our system is broken.

    when 90% of the population supports something, it should be reflected in congress. it should be a no brainer.

    it just shows that lobbyist power is out of control. the nra lied and said that this bill would pave the way to a federal gun owner database, when the actual text of the bill made such a registry illegal.

    :fp:

    I see where you are going with this and I agree with you on this issue. But just because people are for it doesn't directly mean it must be law carried out by Congress. Congress has to take things into effect like say...the constitution, that the general public does not.

    Then again, maybe they shouldnt. Maybe they should pass laws based on majority rule and let the courts sort it out.
    While i understand what you are saying here but I don't think Congress really cares about the constitution as they are breaking that with their votes on gay marriage. I think this really boils down to them trying to save their asses from the NRA and the like.
  • Options
    polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    i will just come out and say it.

    obama wanted this passed. i promise you that that is one of the reasons those that opposed it actually opposed it.

    how do you explain the 5 democrats who voted no?
  • Options
    JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    i will just come out and say it.

    obama wanted this passed. i promise you that that is one of the reasons those that opposed it actually opposed it.

    Maybe Obama should start exercising reverse psychology on the spiteful congressmen.
  • Options
    JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    polaris_x wrote:
    i will just come out and say it.

    obama wanted this passed. i promise you that that is one of the reasons those that opposed it actually opposed it.

    how do you explain the 5 democrats who voted no?

    Why do you think? Just curious.
  • Options
    Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    i will just come out and say it.

    obama wanted this passed. i promise you that that is one of the reasons those that opposed it actually opposed it.

    actually one of the reasons we/I didn't want this to go thru is that it would just be another step closer to the next bill and the next till someday they try and abolish publicly owned guns all together so to me it was nipping it in the bud right away.

    Godfather.
  • Options
    Jason PJason P Posts: 19,123
    Jeanwah wrote:
    polaris_x wrote:
    i will just come out and say it.

    obama wanted this passed. i promise you that that is one of the reasons those that opposed it actually opposed it.

    how do you explain the 5 democrats who voted no?

    Why do you think? Just curious.
    They all face re-election next year in red states.
  • Options
    mickeyratmickeyrat up my ass, like Chadwick was up his Posts: 35,881
    Godfather. wrote:
    i will just come out and say it.

    obama wanted this passed. i promise you that that is one of the reasons those that opposed it actually opposed it.

    actually one of the reasons we/I didn't want this to go thru is that it would just be another step closer to the next bill and the next till someday they try and abolish publicly owned guns all together so to me it was nipping it in the bud right away.

    Godfather.
    which is another way of saying, I'm just fine with 40% of guns sold TODAY are sold at a gun show that largely only requires an ID to show proof of age only to enter/purchase. After I buy a duffel bag full I can go down to the hood and make a fortune.
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • Options
    JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    Meet the 45 Senators Who Blocked Background Checks

    An amendment proposed by Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) to require background checks for commercial gun sales (but not for sales between "friends and neighbors") was shot down Wednesday afternoon in a 54-46 vote, failing to capture the 60 votes it needed to advance. The bill would have been a modest victory for gun control advocates, while ceding numerous concessions to the gun lobby (the NRA initially called it a "positive development.") Nevertheless, only four Republicans voted for the proposal, with 41 voting against it. Five Democrats rejected the proposal as well (Reid was a special case; see below). Standing with families of Sandy Hook victims, President Obama said that "there was no coherent argument for why we wouldn't do this. It came down to politics."

    Here's a list so you can see how your Senator voted:

    REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED FOR THE PROPOSAL

    Susan Collins (R-ME)
    Mark Kirk (R-IL)
    John McCain (R-AZ)
    Pat Toomey (R-PA)

    DEMOCRATS WHO VOTED AGAINST THE PROPOSAL

    Max Baucus (D-MT)
    Mark Begich (D-AK)
    Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND)
    Mark Pryor (D-AR)
    Harry Reid (D-NV) (Voted "no" as a procedural move to preserve option to reintroduce the bill.)

    REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED AGAINST THE PROPOSAL

    Lamar Alexander (R-TN)
    Kelly Ayotte (R-NH)
    John Barrasso (R-WY)
    Roy Blunt (R-MO)
    John Boozman (R-AR)
    Richard Burr (R-NC)
    Saxby Chambliss (R-GA)
    Dan Coats (R-IN)
    Tom Coburn (R-OK)
    Thad Cochran (R-MS)
    Bob Corker (R-TN)
    John Cornyn (R-TX)
    Mike Crapo (R-ID)
    Ted Cruz (R-TX)
    Michael Enzi (R-WY)
    Deb Fischer (R-NE)
    Jeff Flake (R-AZ)
    Lindsey Graham (R-SC)
    Chuck Grassley (R-IA)
    Orrin Hatch (R-UT)
    Dean Heller (R-NV)
    John Hoeven (R-ND)
    Jim Inhofe (R-OK)
    Johnny Isakson (R-GA)
    Mike Johanns (R-NE)
    Ron Johnson (R-WI)
    Mike Lee (R-UT)
    Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
    Jerry Moran (R-KS)
    Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)
    Rand Paul (R-KY)
    Rob Portman (R-OH)
    James Risch (R-ID)
    Pat Roberts (R-KS)
    Marco Rubio (R-FL)
    Timothy Scott (R-SC)
    Jeff Sessions (R-AL)
    Richard Shelby (R-AL)
    John Thune (R-SD)
    David Vitter (R-LA)
    Roger Wicker (R-MS)

    DEMOCRATS WHO VOTED FOR THE PROPOSAL

    Tammy Baldwin (D-WI)
    Michael Bennet (D-CO)
    Richard Blumenthal (D-CT)
    Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
    Sherrod Brown (D-OH)
    Maria Cantwell (D-WA)
    Ben Cardin (D-MD)
    Thomas Carper (D-DE)
    Bob Casey (D-PA)
    Christopher Coons (D-DE)
    William "Mo" Cowan (D-MA)
    Joe Donnelly (D-IN)
    Richard Durbin (D-IL)
    Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
    Al Franken (D-MN)
    Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)
    Kay Hagan (D-NC)
    Tom Harkin (D-IA)
    Martin Heinrich (D-NM)
    Mazie Hirono (D-HI)
    Tim Johnson (D-SD)
    Timothy Kaine (D-VA)
    Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)
    Mary Landrieu (D-LA)
    Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ)
    Patrick Leahy (D-VT)
    Carl Levin (D-MI)
    Joe Manchin (D-WV)
    Claire McCaskill (D-MO)
    Robert Menendez (D-NJ)
    Jeff Merkley (D-OR)
    Barbara Mikulski (D-MD)
    Christopher Murphy (D-CT)
    Patty Murray (D-WA)
    Bill Nelson (D-FL)
    John Reed (D-RI)
    Jay Rockefeller (D-WV)
    Brian Schatz (D-HI)
    Charles Schumer (D-NY)
    Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH)
    Debbie Stabenow (D-MI)
    Jon Tester (D-MT)
    Mark Udall (D-CO)
    Tom Udall (D-NM)
    Mark Warner (D-VA)
    Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)
    Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)
    Ron Wyden (D-OR)
    INDEPENDENTS

    Angus King (I-ME): Yea
    Bernie Sanders (I-VT): Yea

    http://www.motherjones.com/politics/201 ... s-proposal
    In a statement, the NRA hailed the defeat of the amendment.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-22194299
  • Options
    polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    Jeanwah wrote:
    Why do you think? Just curious.

    i believe the senators were from more rural states (not many huge urban centres) where hunting and access to guns is seen as a litmus for freedoms ... i think the NRA targeted senators in these states and considered them vulnerable to their constituents ...
  • Options
    josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 28,314
    Godfather. wrote:
    i will just come out and say it.

    obama wanted this passed. i promise you that that is one of the reasons those that opposed it actually opposed it.

    actually one of the reasons we/I didn't want this to go thru is that it would just be another step closer to the next bill and the next till someday they try and abolish publicly owned guns all together so to me it was nipping it in the bud right away.

    Godfather.

    So you are ok with anybody purchasing weapons at any time , a felon just spent 10yrs in the slammer , a patient who just got discharged from a mental institute , a homegrown alqueda cell living next door to you ...

    Because that's what is happening now anybody can buy weapons anytime they wish with out anybody knwing about it ....
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • Options
    josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 28,314
    Jeanwah wrote:
    Meet the 45 Senators Who Blocked Background Checks

    An amendment proposed by Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) to require background checks for commercial gun sales (but not for sales between "friends and neighbors") was shot down Wednesday afternoon in a 54-46 vote, failing to capture the 60 votes it needed to advance. The bill would have been a modest victory for gun control advocates, while ceding numerous concessions to the gun lobby (the NRA initially called it a "positive development.") Nevertheless, only four Republicans voted for the proposal, with 41 voting against it. Five Democrats rejected the proposal as well (Reid was a special case; see below). Standing with families of Sandy Hook victims, President Obama said that "there was no coherent argument for why we wouldn't do this. It came down to politics."

    Here's a list so you can see how your Senator voted:

    REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED FOR THE PROPOSAL

    Susan Collins (R-ME)
    Mark Kirk (R-IL)
    John McCain (R-AZ)
    Pat Toomey (R-PA)

    DEMOCRATS WHO VOTED AGAINST THE PROPOSAL

    Max Baucus (D-MT)
    Mark Begich (D-AK)
    Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND)
    Mark Pryor (D-AR)
    Harry Reid (D-NV) (Voted "no" as a procedural move to preserve option to reintroduce the bill.)

    REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED AGAINST THE PROPOSAL

    Lamar Alexander (R-TN)
    Kelly Ayotte (R-NH)
    John Barrasso (R-WY)
    Roy Blunt (R-MO)
    John Boozman (R-AR)
    Richard Burr (R-NC)
    Saxby Chambliss (R-GA)
    Dan Coats (R-IN)
    Tom Coburn (R-OK)
    Thad Cochran (R-MS)
    Bob Corker (R-TN)
    John Cornyn (R-TX)
    Mike Crapo (R-ID)
    Ted Cruz (R-TX)
    Michael Enzi (R-WY)
    Deb Fischer (R-NE)
    Jeff Flake (R-AZ)
    Lindsey Graham (R-SC)
    Chuck Grassley (R-IA)
    Orrin Hatch (R-UT)
    Dean Heller (R-NV)
    John Hoeven (R-ND)
    Jim Inhofe (R-OK)
    Johnny Isakson (R-GA)
    Mike Johanns (R-NE)
    Ron Johnson (R-WI)
    Mike Lee (R-UT)
    Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
    Jerry Moran (R-KS)
    Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)
    Rand Paul (R-KY)
    Rob Portman (R-OH)
    James Risch (R-ID)
    Pat Roberts (R-KS)
    Marco Rubio (R-FL)
    Timothy Scott (R-SC)
    Jeff Sessions (R-AL)
    Richard Shelby (R-AL)
    John Thune (R-SD)
    David Vitter (R-LA)
    Roger Wicker (R-MS)

    DEMOCRATS WHO VOTED FOR THE PROPOSAL

    Tammy Baldwin (D-WI)
    Michael Bennet (D-CO)
    Richard Blumenthal (D-CT)
    Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
    Sherrod Brown (D-OH)
    Maria Cantwell (D-WA)
    Ben Cardin (D-MD)
    Thomas Carper (D-DE)
    Bob Casey (D-PA)
    Christopher Coons (D-DE)
    William "Mo" Cowan (D-MA)
    Joe Donnelly (D-IN)
    Richard Durbin (D-IL)
    Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
    Al Franken (D-MN)
    Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)
    Kay Hagan (D-NC)
    Tom Harkin (D-IA)
    Martin Heinrich (D-NM)
    Mazie Hirono (D-HI)
    Tim Johnson (D-SD)
    Timothy Kaine (D-VA)
    Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)
    Mary Landrieu (D-LA)
    Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ)
    Patrick Leahy (D-VT)
    Carl Levin (D-MI)
    Joe Manchin (D-WV)
    Claire McCaskill (D-MO)
    Robert Menendez (D-NJ)
    Jeff Merkley (D-OR)
    Barbara Mikulski (D-MD)
    Christopher Murphy (D-CT)
    Patty Murray (D-WA)
    Bill Nelson (D-FL)
    John Reed (D-RI)
    Jay Rockefeller (D-WV)
    Brian Schatz (D-HI)
    Charles Schumer (D-NY)
    Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH)
    Debbie Stabenow (D-MI)
    Jon Tester (D-MT)
    Mark Udall (D-CO)
    Tom Udall (D-NM)
    Mark Warner (D-VA)
    Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)
    Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)
    Ron Wyden (D-OR)
    INDEPENDENTS

    Angus King (I-ME): Yea
    Bernie Sanders (I-VT): Yea

    http://www.motherjones.com/politics/201 ... s-proposal
    In a statement, the NRA hailed the defeat of the amendment.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-22194299

    Great now onto emailing these pricks ..
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • Options
    Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    mickeyrat wrote:
    Godfather. wrote:
    i will just come out and say it.

    obama wanted this passed. i promise you that that is one of the reasons those that opposed it actually opposed it.

    actually one of the reasons we/I didn't want this to go thru is that it would just be another step closer to the next bill and the next till someday they try and abolish publicly owned guns all together so to me it was nipping it in the bud right away.

    Godfather.
    which is another way of saying, I'm just fine with 40% of guns sold TODAY are sold at a gun show that largely only requires an ID to show proof of age only to enter/purchase. After I buy a duffel bag full I can go down to the hood and make a fortune.


    really ? :lol::lol::lol: comon man, have you or anybody you know ever bought " a duffel bag" full of guns at a gun show for anywere from $200 to a few thousand bucks ea. and then sold them in the hood ???? not a real strong business move. :lol::lol:


    Godfather.
  • Options
    polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    Godfather. wrote:
    really ? :lol::lol::lol: comon man, have you or anybody you know ever bought " a duffel bag" full of guns at a gun show for anywere from $200 to a few thousand bucks ea. and then sold them in the hood ???? not a real strong business move. :lol::lol:


    Godfather.

    you can get a mark up of over 500% here in canada where there are stricter gun laws ...
  • Options
    Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    :clap::clap::clap::clap: :thumbup:
    thank you !

    REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED FOR THE PROPOSAL

    Susan Collins (R-ME)
    Mark Kirk (R-IL)
    John McCain (R-AZ)
    Pat Toomey (R-PA)

    DEMOCRATS WHO VOTED AGAINST THE PROPOSAL

    Max Baucus (D-MT)
    Mark Begich (D-AK)
    Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND)
    Mark Pryor (D-AR)
    Harry Reid (D-NV) (Voted "no" as a procedural move to preserve option to reintroduce the bill.)

    REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED AGAINST THE PROPOSAL

    Lamar Alexander (R-TN)
    Kelly Ayotte (R-NH)
    John Barrasso (R-WY)
    Roy Blunt (R-MO)
    John Boozman (R-AR)
    Richard Burr (R-NC)
    Saxby Chambliss (R-GA)
    Dan Coats (R-IN)
    Tom Coburn (R-OK)
    Thad Cochran (R-MS)
    Bob Corker (R-TN)
    John Cornyn (R-TX)
    Mike Crapo (R-ID)
    Ted Cruz (R-TX)
    Michael Enzi (R-WY)
    Deb Fischer (R-NE)
    Jeff Flake (R-AZ)
    Lindsey Graham (R-SC)
    Chuck Grassley (R-IA)
    Orrin Hatch (R-UT)
    Dean Heller (R-NV)
    John Hoeven (R-ND)
    Jim Inhofe (R-OK)
    Johnny Isakson (R-GA)
    Mike Johanns (R-NE)
    Ron Johnson (R-WI)
    Mike Lee (R-UT)
    Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
    Jerry Moran (R-KS)
    Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)
    Rand Paul (R-KY)
    Rob Portman (R-OH)
    James Risch (R-ID)
    Pat Roberts (R-KS)
    Marco Rubio (R-FL)
    Timothy Scott (R-SC)
    Jeff Sessions (R-AL)
    Richard Shelby (R-AL)
    John Thune (R-SD)
    David Vitter (R-LA)
    Roger Wicker (R-MS)

    DEMOCRATS WHO VOTED FOR THE PROPOSAL

    Tammy Baldwin (D-WI)
    Michael Bennet (D-CO)
    Richard Blumenthal (D-CT)
    Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
    Sherrod Brown (D-OH)
    Maria Cantwell (D-WA)
    Ben Cardin (D-MD)
    Thomas Carper (D-DE)
    Bob Casey (D-PA)
    Christopher Coons (D-DE)
    William "Mo" Cowan (D-MA)
    Joe Donnelly (D-IN)
    Richard Durbin (D-IL)
    Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
    Al Franken (D-MN)
    Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)
    Kay Hagan (D-NC)
    Tom Harkin (D-IA)
    Martin Heinrich (D-NM)
    Mazie Hirono (D-HI)
    Tim Johnson (D-SD)
    Timothy Kaine (D-VA)
    Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)
    Mary Landrieu (D-LA)
    Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ)
    Patrick Leahy (D-VT)
    Carl Levin (D-MI)
    Joe Manchin (D-WV)
    Claire McCaskill (D-MO)
    Robert Menendez (D-NJ)
    Jeff Merkley (D-OR)
    Barbara Mikulski (D-MD)
    Christopher Murphy (D-CT)
    Patty Murray (D-WA)
    Bill Nelson (D-FL)
    John Reed (D-RI)
    Jay Rockefeller (D-WV)
    Brian Schatz (D-HI)
    Charles Schumer (D-NY)
    Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH)
    Debbie Stabenow (D-MI)
    Jon Tester (D-MT)
    Mark Udall (D-CO)
    Tom Udall (D-NM)
    Mark Warner (D-VA)
    Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)
    Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)
    Ron Wyden (D-OR)
    INDEPENDENTS

    Angus King (I-ME): Yea
    Bernie Sanders (I-VT): Yea

    sorry guys but this is something I believe strongly in.


    Godfather.
  • Options
    mickeyratmickeyrat up my ass, like Chadwick was up his Posts: 35,881
    Godfather. wrote:
    mickeyrat wrote:
    Godfather. wrote:
    actually one of the reasons we/I didn't want this to go thru is that it would just be another step closer to the next bill and the next till someday they try and abolish publicly owned guns all together so to me it was nipping it in the bud right away.

    Godfather.
    which is another way of saying, I'm just fine with 40% of guns sold TODAY are sold at a gun show that largely only requires an ID to show proof of age only to enter/purchase. After I buy a duffel bag full I can go down to the hood and make a fortune.


    really ? :lol::lol::lol: comon man, have you or anybody you know ever bought " a duffel bag" full of guns at a gun show for anywere from $200 to a few thousand bucks ea. and then sold them in the hood ???? not a real strong business move. :lol::lol:


    Godfather.
    Yes, I was exagerating a little but the point holds true , in any quantity.

    Please enlighten me then GF, just how do weapons make their way to the blackmarket?
    They cant ALL be from theft of the law=abiding responsible gun owner(you know, the ones who know how to handle and safely store their weapons) can they?
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • Options
    Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    polaris_x wrote:
    Godfather. wrote:
    really ? :lol::lol::lol: comon man, have you or anybody you know ever bought " a duffel bag" full of guns at a gun show for anywere from $200 to a few thousand bucks ea. and then sold them in the hood ???? not a real strong business move. :lol::lol:


    Godfather.

    you can get a mark up of over 500% here in canada where there are stricter gun laws ...

    are publicly owned guns illegal in Canada ?

    Godfather.
  • Options
    JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    Jason P wrote:
    Jeanwah wrote:
    polaris_x wrote:

    how do you explain the 5 democrats who voted no?

    Why do you think? Just curious.
    They all face re-election next year in red states.

    They actually don't.

    Heidi Heitkamp just voted in in January, term ends 2019
    Mark Pryor's term ends 2015
    Max Baucus is seeking re-election 2014 after 6 terms already (where's the limits??)
    Harry Reid is up for a 6th term in 2016 (again... limits?)
    Mark Begich term ends in 2016

    That's one person worried about re-election next year.
  • Options
    josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 28,314
    Godfather. wrote:
    :clap::clap::clap::clap: :thumbup:
    thank you !

    REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED FOR THE PROPOSAL

    Susan Collins (R-ME)
    Mark Kirk (R-IL)
    John McCain (R-AZ)
    Pat Toomey (R-PA)

    DEMOCRATS WHO VOTED AGAINST THE PROPOSAL

    Max Baucus (D-MT)
    Mark Begich (D-AK)
    Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND)
    Mark Pryor (D-AR)
    Harry Reid (D-NV) (Voted "no" as a procedural move to preserve option to reintroduce the bill.)

    REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED AGAINST THE PROPOSAL

    Lamar Alexander (R-TN)
    Kelly Ayotte (R-NH)
    John Barrasso (R-WY)
    Roy Blunt (R-MO)
    John Boozman (R-AR)
    Richard Burr (R-NC)
    Saxby Chambliss (R-GA)
    Dan Coats (R-IN)
    Tom Coburn (R-OK)
    Thad Cochran (R-MS)
    Bob Corker (R-TN)
    John Cornyn (R-TX)
    Mike Crapo (R-ID)
    Ted Cruz (R-TX)
    Michael Enzi (R-WY)
    Deb Fischer (R-NE)
    Jeff Flake (R-AZ)
    Lindsey Graham (R-SC)
    Chuck Grassley (R-IA)
    Orrin Hatch (R-UT)
    Dean Heller (R-NV)
    John Hoeven (R-ND)
    Jim Inhofe (R-OK)
    Johnny Isakson (R-GA)
    Mike Johanns (R-NE)
    Ron Johnson (R-WI)
    Mike Lee (R-UT)
    Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
    Jerry Moran (R-KS)
    Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)
    Rand Paul (R-KY)
    Rob Portman (R-OH)
    James Risch (R-ID)
    Pat Roberts (R-KS)
    Marco Rubio (R-FL)
    Timothy Scott (R-SC)
    Jeff Sessions (R-AL)
    Richard Shelby (R-AL)
    John Thune (R-SD)
    David Vitter (R-LA)
    Roger Wicker (R-MS)

    DEMOCRATS WHO VOTED FOR THE PROPOSAL

    Tammy Baldwin (D-WI)
    Michael Bennet (D-CO)
    Richard Blumenthal (D-CT)
    Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
    Sherrod Brown (D-OH)
    Maria Cantwell (D-WA)
    Ben Cardin (D-MD)
    Thomas Carper (D-DE)
    Bob Casey (D-PA)
    Christopher Coons (D-DE)
    William "Mo" Cowan (D-MA)
    Joe Donnelly (D-IN)
    Richard Durbin (D-IL)
    Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
    Al Franken (D-MN)
    Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)
    Kay Hagan (D-NC)
    Tom Harkin (D-IA)
    Martin Heinrich (D-NM)
    Mazie Hirono (D-HI)
    Tim Johnson (D-SD)
    Timothy Kaine (D-VA)
    Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)
    Mary Landrieu (D-LA)
    Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ)
    Patrick Leahy (D-VT)
    Carl Levin (D-MI)
    Joe Manchin (D-WV)
    Claire McCaskill (D-MO)
    Robert Menendez (D-NJ)
    Jeff Merkley (D-OR)
    Barbara Mikulski (D-MD)
    Christopher Murphy (D-CT)
    Patty Murray (D-WA)
    Bill Nelson (D-FL)
    John Reed (D-RI)
    Jay Rockefeller (D-WV)
    Brian Schatz (D-HI)
    Charles Schumer (D-NY)
    Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH)
    Debbie Stabenow (D-MI)
    Jon Tester (D-MT)
    Mark Udall (D-CO)
    Tom Udall (D-NM)
    Mark Warner (D-VA)
    Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)
    Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)
    Ron Wyden (D-OR)
    INDEPENDENTS

    Angus King (I-ME): Yea
    Bernie Sanders (I-VT): Yea

    sorry guys but this is something I believe strongly in.


    Godfather.

    I ask again you are ok with anybody buying weapons of all kinds at anytime , like a felon just spent 10yrs for armed robbery , a mental pt who just got discharged , an alqueda cell living amongst us because that is what you're applauding so just for the record you have no problem with this ? ..and if you don't believe that this is what's happening i'd say you are living in a hole ....
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • Options
    polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    Godfather. wrote:
    are publicly owned guns illegal in Canada ?

    Godfather.

    http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/cfp-pcaf/pol- ... fs-eng.htm

    you can buy guns here except you have to go through a background check and you have to hold a valid license that expires ... and needs to be updated ...

    i find it absolutely mind-boggling that people would be opposed to regulating the distribution and access to firearms ... heck, everyone needs a drivers license to drive but asking people to register their guns is bad!? ...
  • Options
    Jason PJason P Posts: 19,123
    Jeanwah wrote:
    They actually don't.

    Heidi Heitkamp just voted in in January, term ends 2019
    Mark Pryor's term ends 2015
    Max Baucus is seeking re-election 2014 after 6 terms already (where's the limits??)
    Harry Reid is up for a 6th term in 2016 (again... limits?)
    Mark Begich term ends in 2016

    That's one person worried about re-election next year.
    Hmm, I thought they were.

    Well, I guess they are representing their constituancy then.
Sign In or Register to comment.