Background check defeated...Obama pissed.

124»

Comments

  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    Godfather. wrote:
    You are correct. Guns are fun and safe in the hands of law abiding citizens who have been properly trained in the use of the firearm.

    your banging your head aginst a well with this group :lol: they think banning firearms will save the world :lol:


    Godfather.

    who's talking about banning firearms....?
  • pandora wrote:
    The use of polling numbers in this thread is funny. Does anyone even know where these polls came from? What were the exact questions asked? Who was asked? I know I have never been polled on this issue. This is like saying...90% of the people on this board votes for who Eddie Vedder wants them to vote for.

    Why don't they try to enforce the current laws on the books instead of trying to create new ones? A felon who goes into a gun store and tries to buy a gun is suppose to be prosecuted. In 2010, apparently some 15000+ felons attempted to buy a gun and were denied with a background check. Only 44 were prosecuted...
    thank you for your good common sense ...
    Everytime I hear our President say 90% of Americans, and it's been a helluva lot of times,
    I have to talk back to him. Nothing naughty just :wtf:
    why don't you google the most recent polls in the last 3 months regarding gun legislation? in nearly all of them 75-91% support mandatory background checks.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • inmytree wrote:

    who's talking about banning firearms....?
    thank you!

    though fox news and republicans would have you believe otherwise. fact is most people who oppose this bill get their news from fox news, belong to the nra, or are republican.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,038
    inmytree wrote:

    who's talking about banning firearms....?
    thank you!

    Exactly. And this is why people are pissed. The measure was reasonable and rational and the majority wanted it but the lobbyists and money won out over common sense. We should all be pissed, even gun owners.
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • brianlux wrote:
    inmytree wrote:

    who's talking about banning firearms....?
    thank you!

    Exactly. And this is why people are pissed. The measure was reasonable and rational and the majority wanted it but the lobbyists and money won out over common sense. We should all be pissed, even gun owners.
    the nra outright fucking lied and said that this bill contained language laying groundwork for a national gun registry. this false claim was repeated by the republicans who voted against it. fact is, the bill stated in plain english that a national gun registry would be illegal.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • Godfather. wrote:
    You are correct. Guns are fun and safe in the hands of law abiding citizens who have been properly trained in the use of the firearm.

    your banging your head aginst a well with this group :lol: they think banning firearms will save the world :lol:


    Godfather.

    LOL! Oh I know it. But enough is enough. I'm tired this big government assult. Even Genius Joe Biden said they don't have the time to enforce the laws they have now...so lets make more!
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    Godfather. wrote:
    You are correct. Guns are fun and safe in the hands of law abiding citizens who have been properly trained in the use of the firearm.

    your banging your head aginst a well with this group :lol: they think banning firearms will save the world :lol:


    Godfather.

    LOL! Oh I know it. But enough is enough. I'm tired this big government assult. Even Genius Joe Biden said they don't have the time to enforce the laws they have now...so lets make more!


    still waiting: tell me, how do you define "properly trained"....?

    :corn:
  • Thorns2010Thorns2010 Posts: 2,201
    edited April 2013
    I'm still confused as to how a bill can be voted as 54-45 in support and still not pass. I've heard something about needing 60, and that meaning its filibuster proof?

    When did all that happen? I don't remember be taught in school that you need 60 votes to pass a bill.

    Also if the one main job of the Vice President is to cast a deciding vote if the Senate is tied, doesn't this 60 vote thing mean that the VP is completely useless?

    EDIT:

    I just found this

    http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2 ... filibuster

    WTF?? Seriously, I knew the US Gov was stupid, but really?? So basically for the rest of time for anything to pass in any way shape or form it will need to be 60% of the vote? :fp:
    Post edited by Thorns2010 on
  • Thorns2010 wrote:
    I'm still confused as to how a bill can be voted as 54-45 in support and still not pass. I've heard something about needing 60, and that meaning its filibuster proof?

    When did all that happen? I don't remember be taught in school that you need 60 votes to pass a bill.

    Also if the one main job of the Vice President is to cast a deciding vote if the Senate is tied, doesn't this 60 vote thing mean that the VP is completely useless?

    You are correct. The VP is completely useless.
  • Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    still waiting: tell me, how do you define "properly trained"....?

    gun training and classes...using both hands and being able to hit your target. ;)

    Godfather.
  • Godfather. wrote:
    still waiting: tell me, how do you define "properly trained"....?

    gun training and classes...using both hands and being able to hit your target. ;)

    Godfather.

    Most important of all...use common sense.
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    Godfather. wrote:
    still waiting: tell me, how do you define "properly trained"....?

    gun training and classes...using both hands and being able to hit your target. ;)

    Godfather.

    So I can assume that every responsible gun owner has taken a class...?

    good news...I feel safer...thanks, GF...!!!
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    Godfather. wrote:
    still waiting: tell me, how do you define "properly trained"....?

    gun training and classes...using both hands and being able to hit your target. ;)

    Godfather.

    Most important of all...use common sense.

    some would argue that it's common sense to be sure folks have a background check when attempting to purchase a gun....
  • josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 29,541
    Godfather. wrote:
    still waiting: tell me, how do you define "properly trained"....?

    gun training and classes...using both hands and being able to hit your target. ;)

    Godfather.


    You forgot make sure you have at least three 30 round clips so as to hit as many targets as possible , you know like in Newtown , Aurora and so many other massacres that have happened and the one's that are still to happen ...
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • pureocpureoc Posts: 2,383
    inmytree wrote:
    Godfather. wrote:
    still waiting: tell me, how do you define "properly trained"....?

    gun training and classes...using both hands and being able to hit your target. ;)

    Godfather.

    Most important of all...use common sense.

    some would argue that it's common sense to be sure folks have a background check when attempting to purchase a gun....


    :clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap: Sadly republicans lack this thing called common sense, as they only are out to help themselves.
    Alpine Valley 6/26/98, Alpine Valley 10/8/00, Champaign 4/23/03, Chicago 6/18/03, Alpine Valley 6/21/03, Grand Rapids 10/3/04
    Chicago 5/16/06, Chicago 5/17/06, Grand Rapids 5/19/06
    Milwaukee 6/29/06, Milwaukee 6/30/06, Lollapalooza 8/5/07
    Eddie Solo Milwaukee 8/19/08, Toronto 8/21/09, Chicago 8/23/09
    Chicago 8/24/09, Indianapolis 5/7/10, Ed Chicago 6/29/11, Alpine Valley 9/3/11 and 9/4/11, Wrigley 7/19/13, Moline 10/18/14, Milwaukee 10/20/14
  • Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    pureoc is this not your your comment ?

    "Torture him and force every possibly bit of info on why this happened out of him, then kill him."

    for a guy who is so worried about "background checks" you seem to have a strong hunger for blood not to mention the enjoyment or fantasy of torture on a FELLOW HUMAN.....maybe the FBI should do a profile on you,COMMON SENSE might say you harbor homosidal tendinsies...yea I know I wont win any spelling bee's :lol:

    Godfather.
  • pureocpureoc Posts: 2,383
    Godfather. wrote:
    pureoc is this not your your comment ?

    "Torture him and force every possibly bit of info on why this happened out of him, then kill him."

    for a guy who is so worried about "background checks" you seem to have a strong hunger for blood not to mention the enjoyment or fantasy of torture on a FELLOW HUMAN.....maybe the FBI should do a profile on you,COMMON SENSE might say you harbor homosidal tendinsies...yea I know I wont win any spelling bee's :lol:

    Godfather.

    Yes that is my comment and based on past terror suspects that probably is what will happen, correct? Fellow human? After what he did he is far from a fellow human. When their is video proof, and he is running from law enforcement and shooting at them, it's pretty safe to say he is guilty. I'm glad they got him alive so they can hopefully get info out of him, is anyone else involved and why he did it.
    Alpine Valley 6/26/98, Alpine Valley 10/8/00, Champaign 4/23/03, Chicago 6/18/03, Alpine Valley 6/21/03, Grand Rapids 10/3/04
    Chicago 5/16/06, Chicago 5/17/06, Grand Rapids 5/19/06
    Milwaukee 6/29/06, Milwaukee 6/30/06, Lollapalooza 8/5/07
    Eddie Solo Milwaukee 8/19/08, Toronto 8/21/09, Chicago 8/23/09
    Chicago 8/24/09, Indianapolis 5/7/10, Ed Chicago 6/29/11, Alpine Valley 9/3/11 and 9/4/11, Wrigley 7/19/13, Moline 10/18/14, Milwaukee 10/20/14
  • Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    pureoc wrote:
    Godfather. wrote:
    pureoc is this not your your comment ?

    "Torture him and force every possibly bit of info on why this happened out of him, then kill him."

    for a guy who is so worried about "background checks" you seem to have a strong hunger for blood not to mention the enjoyment or fantasy of torture on a FELLOW HUMAN.....maybe the FBI should do a profile on you,COMMON SENSE might say you harbor homosidal tendinsies...yea I know I wont win any spelling bee's :lol:

    Godfather.

    Yes that is my comment and based on past terror suspects that probably is what will happen, correct? Fellow human? After what he did he is far from a fellow human. When their is video proof, and he is running from law enforcement and shooting at them, it's pretty safe to say he is guilty. I'm glad they got him alive so they can hopefully get info out of him, is anyone else involved and why he did it.

    I agree with you about the bomber/terrorist 100%

    Godfather.
  • pureocpureoc Posts: 2,383
    Godfather. wrote:
    pureoc wrote:
    Godfather. wrote:
    pureoc is this not your your comment ?

    "Torture him and force every possibly bit of info on why this happened out of him, then kill him."

    for a guy who is so worried about "background checks" you seem to have a strong hunger for blood not to mention the enjoyment or fantasy of torture on a FELLOW HUMAN.....maybe the FBI should do a profile on you,COMMON SENSE might say you harbor homosidal tendinsies...yea I know I wont win any spelling bee's :lol:

    Godfather.

    Yes that is my comment and based on past terror suspects that probably is what will happen, correct? Fellow human? After what he did he is far from a fellow human. When their is video proof, and he is running from law enforcement and shooting at them, it's pretty safe to say he is guilty. I'm glad they got him alive so they can hopefully get info out of him, is anyone else involved and why he did it.

    I agree with you about the bomber/terrorist 100%

    Godfather.


    Glad we can agree on something, along with who the best band in the world is.
    Alpine Valley 6/26/98, Alpine Valley 10/8/00, Champaign 4/23/03, Chicago 6/18/03, Alpine Valley 6/21/03, Grand Rapids 10/3/04
    Chicago 5/16/06, Chicago 5/17/06, Grand Rapids 5/19/06
    Milwaukee 6/29/06, Milwaukee 6/30/06, Lollapalooza 8/5/07
    Eddie Solo Milwaukee 8/19/08, Toronto 8/21/09, Chicago 8/23/09
    Chicago 8/24/09, Indianapolis 5/7/10, Ed Chicago 6/29/11, Alpine Valley 9/3/11 and 9/4/11, Wrigley 7/19/13, Moline 10/18/14, Milwaukee 10/20/14
  • josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 29,541
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/2 ... 31363.html

    No new laws in place something like this will happen again & again , but no we don't need any new laws ...
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • mcgruff10mcgruff10 Posts: 28,500
    well no shit they didn't have the guns legally. massachusetts has very tough gun laws, maybe those gun laws turned them away.
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • mcgruff10mcgruff10 Posts: 28,500
    here 's a sample of mass gun laws....no criminal or terrorist is going to do this to get a gun legally since what they're going to do is illegal:

    MASSACHUSETTS: The law here requires fingerprinting, safety training, background checks, and law enforcement involvement before a gun buyer can obtain a permit to own a firearm.

    what else do you want the state to do ? a criminal will get a gun...especially a damn criminal who's going to make bombs out of pressure cookers. so all those background checks you speak of are already being done in massachusetts. mass has the 3rd strictest gun laws in the u.s. i live in the state that as the 2nd strictest gun laws in the country.
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    Polls Plummet For Senators Who Voted No On Gun Background Checks

    http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013 ... checks.php
  • josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 29,541
    Jeanwah wrote:
    Polls Plummet For Senators Who Voted No On Gun Background Checks

    http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013 ... checks.php

    Great i can't wait till 2014 :clap: :thumbup: vote all the gun loving pricks out of office i don't care who they are and what party they represent if your not for changing gun laws you do not represent me ....
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    :lol::lol::lol::lol: I laughed so hard I farted :lol::lol:

    Godfather.
  • Bump, for BS. You asked for one. Here it is. I fully expect you to reply with how this wouldn't have prevented the latest but it's not about the past, it's about the future. Think about that, professor.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • PP193448PP193448 Posts: 4,281
    edited December 2015
    Purchasing a gun in OH is not difficult. Fill out paperwork for quick background check. As long as you have no criminal history you can get a gun. You can only purchase 1 hand gun within 1 week time, but there is no limit for rifles (even AR and AK styles). As long as you answer the questions "correctly" with no criminal history you're good. There has to be little bit more scrutiny than that IMO. Psychological background check, safety training or documentation that you know how to use a gun responsibly, etc
    2006 Clev,Pitt; 2008 NY MSGx2; 2010 Columbus; 2012 Missoula; 2013 Phoenix,Vancouver,Seattle; 2014 Cincy; 2016 Lex, Wrigley 1&2; 2018 Wrigley 1&2; 2022 Louisville
  • PP193448PP193448 Posts: 4,281
    Just seems to be the more extreme society becomes with overt political correctness, the more common sense it lost. Neither extreme liberalism or extreme conservatism is the answer...
    2006 Clev,Pitt; 2008 NY MSGx2; 2010 Columbus; 2012 Missoula; 2013 Phoenix,Vancouver,Seattle; 2014 Cincy; 2016 Lex, Wrigley 1&2; 2018 Wrigley 1&2; 2022 Louisville
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,038
    PP193448 said:

    Just seems to be the more extreme society becomes with overt political correctness, the more common sense it lost. Neither extreme liberalism or extreme conservatism is the answer...

    Maybe so. So I say let's go with extreme doing what makes sense and forget the useless labels.
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













Sign In or Register to comment.