They don't understand the importance guns play in keeping people free, and only see the cost of that freedom on display when people do bad things with guns.
They don't understand the importance guns play in keeping people free, and only see the cost of that freedom on display when people do bad things with guns.
if guns kept people safe wouldn't America be the safest place in the world considering you do have the most guns?
...
Question: Who wants to outlaw guns?
Answer: Not me.
...
Question: Who wants to try to do something... anything to keep guns out of the hands of crazy fucks?
Answer: Me.
...
Question: How?
Answer: I have no fucking idea.
Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
Hail, Hail!!!
I think reducing the amount of hand guns would greatly reduce the number of shooting deaths due to murder.
And before one says 'reducing the amount of cars would reduce driving deaths', it would. But wouldn't comparing car accidents to gun accidents be more apt... I could see comparing vehicular homicide to gun murder however.
Outlawing completely isn't the answer, but stupidly strict controls on hand guns? I could get behind that.
Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
Is there a large push to outlaw guns? Maybe in some quarters but I don't believe that is the goal of many who would like to see gun laws strengthened. I have no problem if someone wants to own a gun or two guns or five guns, but I do think we should be able to set a limit on how many guns anyone citizen can possess at any one time. The 2nd Amendment never ever intended to make it legal for you to have an arsenal in your basement. Setting a limit on how many guns can be owned would not infringe upon anyone's right to bare arms, and it wouldn't outlaw guns in the US.
This thread isn't really going the way I intended. I would really like to hear people's ultimate motivations for banning guns.
I am not into banning all guns, i just want to make them very hard to get. I think we have seen that there needs to be tougher rules for people to get them.
I don't see the point, I guess. I've never owned a gun, never fired a gun, don't hunt, and never felt unsafe, whether I was living in the suburbs or the city. Plus I listened to a lot of PJ and 311 growing up.
Virginia Beach 2000; Pittsburgh 2000; Columbus 2003; D.C. 2003; Pittsburgh 2006; Virginia Beach 2008; Cleveland 2010; PJ20 2011; Pittsburgh 2013; Baltimore 2013; Charlottesville 2013; Charlotte 2013; Lincoln 2014; Moline 2014; St. Paul 2014; Greenville 2016; Hampton 2016; Lexington 2016; Wrigley 2016; Prague 2018; Krakow 2018; Berlin 2018; Fenway 2018; Camden 2022; St. Paul 2023; MSG 1 2024; Baltimore 2024
I can't answer that question as I've never tried to buy a gun. I read a lot more about people accidentally killing other people with a gun than accidentally saving someone.
To be clear, I don't think guns should be banned.
Virginia Beach 2000; Pittsburgh 2000; Columbus 2003; D.C. 2003; Pittsburgh 2006; Virginia Beach 2008; Cleveland 2010; PJ20 2011; Pittsburgh 2013; Baltimore 2013; Charlottesville 2013; Charlotte 2013; Lincoln 2014; Moline 2014; St. Paul 2014; Greenville 2016; Hampton 2016; Lexington 2016; Wrigley 2016; Prague 2018; Krakow 2018; Berlin 2018; Fenway 2018; Camden 2022; St. Paul 2023; MSG 1 2024; Baltimore 2024
So would you say it's harder to get cigarettes or guns? Alcohol or guns? Illegal drugs or guns?
Would you say the motivation is to save lives?
where I live in toronto Canada it is easier to buy cigarettes than anything else but when i travel to america i see places that sell all the above so I don't know.
So would you say it's harder to get cigarettes or guns? Alcohol or guns? Illegal drugs or guns?
Would you say the motivation is to save lives?
I think there's a self harm principle at stake here as well. If you want to kill yourself with cigarettes, that's on you (same with booze) but don't get behind the wheel drunk or smoke indoors with other people around you.
That would be my argument against that argument. Guns are designed to kill other people/animals.
Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
So would you say it's harder to get cigarettes or guns? Alcohol or guns? Illegal drugs or guns?
Would you say the motivation is to save lives?
I think there's a self harm principle at stake here as well. If you want to kill yourself with cigarettes, that's on you (same with booze) but don't get behind the wheel drunk or smoke indoors with other people around you.
That would be my argument against that argument. Guns are designed to kill other people/animals.
Is it safe to assume then you want guns banned because you feel it would save lives?
I don't want to ban guns but I sure want to restrict access. Each day I encounter my fellow citizens in passing by and I wouldn't trust the majority to safely operate a wiffle ball bat, less yet a handgun.
Testing and training need to be prerequisites to owning a handgun. Assault rifles should be banned from the general public. And high-capacity clips should be banned as well. In my opinion.
So would you say it's harder to get cigarettes or guns? Alcohol or guns? Illegal drugs or guns?
Would you say the motivation is to save lives?
I think there's a self harm principle at stake here as well. If you want to kill yourself with cigarettes, that's on you (same with booze) but don't get behind the wheel drunk or smoke indoors with other people around you.
That would be my argument against that argument. Guns are designed to kill other people/animals.
Is it safe to assume then you want guns banned because you feel it would save lives?
Overly simplistic.
What are your thoughts on the alcohol/cigarette self harm aspect of it?
Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
Of all the insane discussions we've had here, I think i've only seen maybe 1-2 folks say we should completely ban guns. I fucking hate guns, but I dont think an all out ban is even worthy of talking about.
Im with JasonP here -- I do think guns should be harder to get, smaller magazine capacities, and longer background checks. I dont think 50 caliber sniper rifles should be available to the public because its just not necessary. No online sales with zero background check -- I was amazed to learn how easy it was to get a gun. There should also be mandatory classes. (I know, I know, what criminal with a filed off serial number is going to blah, blah blah...) I dont think these things is too much to ask, just to see if we can reduce the amounts of senseless killings and accidents.
Depends on what you mean by how easy it is to get a gun compared to alcohol, cigs, etc... Anyone can get a gun online pretty easily. Absolutely anyone.
I don't want to ban guns but I sure want to restrict access. Each day I encounter my fellow citizens in passing by and I wouldn't trust the majority to safely operate a wiffle ball bat, less yet a handgun.
Testing and training need to be prerequisites to owning a handgun. Assault rifles should be banned from the general public. And high-capacity clips should be banned as well. In my opinion.
...
Agree.
Ever been to the Department of Motor Vehicles?
Would anyone feel safer if all of those people in line that owns or drives a car... carried a gun. Please, raise you hand.
Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
Hail, Hail!!!
This thread isn't really going the way I intended. I would really like to hear people's ultimate motivations for banning guns.
most americans are not in favor of banning guns. that rumor is a right wing fear tactic to get out their vote.
True... different people want different levels of gun control, but you don't hear anyone (except in pro-gun strawmen arguments), actually want to outlaw all guns or take guns away from people.
But, I would guess for most people who want to restrict gun access, the motivation is safety. I'm not sure what else there would be (that isn't a crazy tin foil conspiracy theory thought up by paranoid gun-obsessed people).
I am a gun owner, so I guess that makes me "pro gun", but I see stories everyday where there are people who shouldn't own guns. How we as a society decides that, and weeds them out, I have no idea.
On this subject, with recent shootings, you keep hearing people say, "Guns don't kill people, people kill people", basically disavowing any capability or power that the gun had in the situation, but then in the next breath, say that guns have the capacity to "keep our freedom" and "make us safer". How can it be so powerless in one situation, and so powerful in another?
My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
Is it safe to assume then you want guns banned because you feel it would save lives?
Overly simplistic.
What are your thoughts on the alcohol/cigarette self harm aspect of it?
I really don't think it's overly simplistic at all actually. I mean it seems people's concerns over guns is saving lives. Shouldn't they start higher on the list of things that may harm people than legally obtained weapons first?
I don't want to ban guns but I sure want to restrict access. Each day I encounter my fellow citizens in passing by and I wouldn't trust the majority to safely operate a wiffle ball bat, less yet a handgun.
Testing and training need to be prerequisites to owning a handgun. Assault rifles should be banned from the general public. And high-capacity clips should be banned as well. In my opinion.
...
Agree.
Ever been to the Department of Motor Vehicles?
Would anyone feel safer if all of those people in line that owns or drives a car... carried a gun. Please, raise you hand.
Wait, you mean they dont give out free guns at the DMV in your town?
Is it safe to assume then you want guns banned because you feel it would save lives?
Overly simplistic.
What are your thoughts on the alcohol/cigarette self harm aspect of it?
I really don't think it's overly simplistic at all actually. I mean it seems people's concerns over guns is saving lives. Shouldn't they start higher on the list of things that may harm people than legally obtained weapons first?
DS...you've clearly got a point in all this (starting the thread with an unproven assumption, suggesting reasons etc), which is fine. But just say it already. You think people who want to ban guns want to do so because X, Y, or Z, and you obviously think there's something faulty with that OR there's some other point you want to make. Again, that's all fine and good, but just spit it out already. What are you trying to get at!
1998-06-30 Minneapolis
2003-06-16 St. Paul
2006-06-26 St. Paul
2007-08-05 Chicago
2009-08-23 Chicago
2009-08-28 San Francisco
2010-05-01 NOLA (Jazz Fest)
2011-07-02 EV Minneapolis
2011-09-03 PJ20
2011-09-04 PJ20
2011-09-17 Winnipeg
2012-06-26 Amsterdam
2012-06-27 Amsterdam
2013-07-19 Wrigley
2013-11-21 San Diego
2013-11-23 Los Angeles
2013-11-24 Los Angeles
2014-07-08 Leeds, UK
2014-07-11 Milton Keynes, UK
2014-10-09 Lincoln
2014-10-19 St. Paul
2014-10-20 Milwaukee
2016-08-20 Wrigley 1
2016-08-22 Wrigley 2 2018-06-18 London 1 2018-08-18 Wrigley 1 2018-08-20 Wrigley 2 2022-09-16 Nashville 2023-08-31 St. Paul 2023-09-02 St. Paul 2023-09-05 Chicago 1 2024-08-31 Wrigley 2 2024-09-15 Fenway 1 2024-09-27 Ohana 1 2024-09-29 Ohana 2
DS...you've clearly got a point in all this (starting the thread with an unproven assumption, suggesting reasons etc), which is fine. But just say it already. You think people who want to ban guns want to do so because X, Y, or Z, and you obviously think there's something faulty with that OR there's some other point you want to make. Again, that's all fine and good, but just spit it out already. What are you trying to get at!
I'm just waiting for someone to ultimately give me the reason they feel why legal owned guns should be banned and if that ever happened what they feel will be the result?
Is it safe to assume then you want guns banned because you feel it would save lives?
Overly simplistic.
What are your thoughts on the alcohol/cigarette self harm aspect of it?
I really don't think it's overly simplistic at all actually. I mean it seems people's concerns over guns is saving lives. Shouldn't they start higher on the list of things that may harm people than legally obtained weapons first?
if you look at it, there are more restrictions around smoking than ever before. you are not allowed to smoke indoors now. You have to be 19 to buy smokes.
do you find it weird that people can't smoke in stores but in certain states people can have a concealed weapon.
DS...you've clearly got a point in all this (starting the thread with an unproven assumption, suggesting reasons etc), which is fine. But just say it already. You think people who want to ban guns want to do so because X, Y, or Z, and you obviously think there's something faulty with that OR there's some other point you want to make. Again, that's all fine and good, but just spit it out already. What are you trying to get at!
I'm just waiting for someone to ultimately give me the reason they feel why legal owned guns should be banned and if that ever happened what they feel will be the result?
the reason you are not getting what you are looking for is because no-one wants to ban guns. we just want more restrictions.
I don't want to ban guns but I sure want to restrict access. Each day I encounter my fellow citizens in passing by and I wouldn't trust the majority to safely operate a wiffle ball bat, less yet a handgun.
Testing and training need to be prerequisites to owning a handgun. Assault rifles should be banned from the general public. And high-capacity clips should be banned as well. In my opinion.
...
Agree.
Ever been to the Department of Motor Vehicles?
Would anyone feel safer if all of those people in line that owns or drives a car... carried a gun. Please, raise you hand.
People do accept a higher level of enforcement and monitoring with regards to driving, but why if more enforcement, regulation, and monitoring of guns is proposed, the alarm is sounded and now the dictatorial government is on its way to banning guns?
Packing my damned bags! j/k, overall, this is a good article and does reflect on how most are responsible. But I doubt those numbers matter when you consider how many accidental shooting we have in FL. I swear I see 2-3 a month where some kid is accidentally shot
Comments
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
if guns kept people safe wouldn't America be the safest place in the world considering you do have the most guns?
Question: Who wants to outlaw guns?
Answer: Not me.
...
Question: Who wants to try to do something... anything to keep guns out of the hands of crazy fucks?
Answer: Me.
...
Question: How?
Answer: I have no fucking idea.
Hail, Hail!!!
And before one says 'reducing the amount of cars would reduce driving deaths', it would. But wouldn't comparing car accidents to gun accidents be more apt... I could see comparing vehicular homicide to gun murder however.
Outlawing completely isn't the answer, but stupidly strict controls on hand guns? I could get behind that.
Sorry, but you don't get to pick how people answer or what direction they take the thread.
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
Question: Who wants to ban guns?
Answer: Not me.
...
etc, etc, etc...
Hail, Hail!!!
I am not into banning all guns, i just want to make them very hard to get. I think we have seen that there needs to be tougher rules for people to get them.
I don't see the point, I guess. I've never owned a gun, never fired a gun, don't hunt, and never felt unsafe, whether I was living in the suburbs or the city. Plus I listened to a lot of PJ and 311 growing up.
Would you say the motivation is to save lives?
To be clear, I don't think guns should be banned.
where I live in toronto Canada it is easier to buy cigarettes than anything else but when i travel to america i see places that sell all the above so I don't know.
That would be my argument against that argument. Guns are designed to kill other people/animals.
Is it safe to assume then you want guns banned because you feel it would save lives?
Testing and training need to be prerequisites to owning a handgun. Assault rifles should be banned from the general public. And high-capacity clips should be banned as well. In my opinion.
What are your thoughts on the alcohol/cigarette self harm aspect of it?
Im with JasonP here -- I do think guns should be harder to get, smaller magazine capacities, and longer background checks. I dont think 50 caliber sniper rifles should be available to the public because its just not necessary. No online sales with zero background check -- I was amazed to learn how easy it was to get a gun. There should also be mandatory classes. (I know, I know, what criminal with a filed off serial number is going to blah, blah blah...) I dont think these things is too much to ask, just to see if we can reduce the amounts of senseless killings and accidents.
Depends on what you mean by how easy it is to get a gun compared to alcohol, cigs, etc... Anyone can get a gun online pretty easily. Absolutely anyone.
Agree.
Ever been to the Department of Motor Vehicles?
Would anyone feel safer if all of those people in line that owns or drives a car... carried a gun. Please, raise you hand.
Hail, Hail!!!
True... different people want different levels of gun control, but you don't hear anyone (except in pro-gun strawmen arguments), actually want to outlaw all guns or take guns away from people.
But, I would guess for most people who want to restrict gun access, the motivation is safety. I'm not sure what else there would be (that isn't a crazy tin foil conspiracy theory thought up by paranoid gun-obsessed people).
I am a gun owner, so I guess that makes me "pro gun", but I see stories everyday where there are people who shouldn't own guns. How we as a society decides that, and weeds them out, I have no idea.
On this subject, with recent shootings, you keep hearing people say, "Guns don't kill people, people kill people", basically disavowing any capability or power that the gun had in the situation, but then in the next breath, say that guns have the capacity to "keep our freedom" and "make us safer". How can it be so powerless in one situation, and so powerful in another?
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
I really don't think it's overly simplistic at all actually. I mean it seems people's concerns over guns is saving lives. Shouldn't they start higher on the list of things that may harm people than legally obtained weapons first?
Wait, you mean they dont give out free guns at the DMV in your town?
DS...you've clearly got a point in all this (starting the thread with an unproven assumption, suggesting reasons etc), which is fine. But just say it already. You think people who want to ban guns want to do so because X, Y, or Z, and you obviously think there's something faulty with that OR there's some other point you want to make. Again, that's all fine and good, but just spit it out already. What are you trying to get at!
2003-06-16 St. Paul
2006-06-26 St. Paul
2007-08-05 Chicago
2009-08-23 Chicago
2009-08-28 San Francisco
2010-05-01 NOLA (Jazz Fest)
2011-07-02 EV Minneapolis
2011-09-03 PJ20
2011-09-04 PJ20
2011-09-17 Winnipeg
2012-06-26 Amsterdam
2012-06-27 Amsterdam
2013-07-19 Wrigley
2013-11-21 San Diego
2013-11-23 Los Angeles
2013-11-24 Los Angeles
2014-07-08 Leeds, UK
2014-07-11 Milton Keynes, UK
2014-10-09 Lincoln
2014-10-19 St. Paul
2014-10-20 Milwaukee
2016-08-20 Wrigley 1
2016-08-22 Wrigley 2
2018-06-18 London 1
2018-08-18 Wrigley 1
2018-08-20 Wrigley 2
2022-09-16 Nashville
2023-08-31 St. Paul
2023-09-02 St. Paul
2023-09-05 Chicago 1
2024-08-31 Wrigley 2
2024-09-15 Fenway 1
2024-09-27 Ohana 1
2024-09-29 Ohana 2
I'm just waiting for someone to ultimately give me the reason they feel why legal owned guns should be banned and if that ever happened what they feel will be the result?
if you look at it, there are more restrictions around smoking than ever before. you are not allowed to smoke indoors now. You have to be 19 to buy smokes.
do you find it weird that people can't smoke in stores but in certain states people can have a concealed weapon.
the reason you are not getting what you are looking for is because no-one wants to ban guns. we just want more restrictions.
People do accept a higher level of enforcement and monitoring with regards to driving, but why if more enforcement, regulation, and monitoring of guns is proposed, the alarm is sounded and now the dictatorial government is on its way to banning guns?
Florida concealed weapons permits soon to reach 1 million milestone, the most in the USA
http://www.postonpolitics.com/2012/12/f ... milestone/
Packing my damned bags! j/k, overall, this is a good article and does reflect on how most are responsible. But I doubt those numbers matter when you consider how many accidental shooting we have in FL. I swear I see 2-3 a month where some kid is accidentally shot
Fla man fatally shot roommate over dinner, Pissed at pork chop perparation
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/ap/ap/crim ... ner/nTTFy/
Woman tries to calm naked gunman before Palm Beach Shores police arrive
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/news/ ... g-i/nTS4p/
This man might be just a tad unbalanced.