Weinergate
SatansFuton
Posts: 5,399
I didn't see a topic about this, and I searched. How did Rep. Weiner's dick not get a topic? And does anybody else think that Weiner is being crafty? He's getting all of these "cut unnecessary spending" types to demand that the FBI investigate this, an unnecessary investigation if there ever was one. Whatever happened to his Twitter account or not, I think he's using the situation to make some Republicans look like hypocrites. They want to spend taxpayer money to figure out of that's his dick, and for the sole purpose of crucifying a democrat.
"See a broad to get dat booty yak 'em, leg 'er down, a smack 'em yak 'em!"
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
Tres Mts. Gramercy Theatre 3/26/11
*formerly manutd3581
Yeah. It is kind of funny. But doesn't a guy named Weiner getting caught showing his wiener on Twitter just seem a little too scripted?
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Exactly. But all these people who want to cut funding to this and that, and say we are spending too much money, want to fund an investigation into a Twitter/Penis incident. I just don't see how they justify that, and I almost think that the reason Weiner hasn't squashed the whole thing is because some of these clowns are tying their own noose with it.
Or maybe he just photographed his junk and is embarrassed. I do think it has (purposely or not) shown just how much resolve these people really have towards cutting unnecessary spending.
I think they are questioning why he hasn't asked for it...the point being that as he skitskatskoots all over the answer to all these questions and cannot confirm, deny or whatever else...i think it would be a big concern and in fact a federal crime if someone was able to target and hack into a US Reps social networking sites and share pictures of that individual that were not public domain...
And we all know weiner has no problem spending money, so the fact that he is trying to spin it as he was just trying to be a good steward of public funds is rather humorous. In fact this whole situation is rather humorous...personally i don't care if he did it or not, he should just come out and say he did it and put it behind him...to say he got hacked but then not want to figure out how is rather fishy don't you think?
It is terrifying when you are too stupid to know who is dumb
- Joe Rogan
either they are for cutting spending or they are not. the ones calling for him to be investigated are not for cutting spending... this just proves it.
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_O_GRkMZJn4
Same reason nobody here is talking about the John Edwards indictment, they are Democrats.
I had no idea on whether this guy was a dem or repub when the story broke .... but I knew he was a dumbass.
He super defensive approach to the pic did not do him any favors whatsoever.
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Yes. the GOP is above the witch hunts. see Clinton. see Obama.
http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episod ... -tim-tebow
hillarious.
weiner's a douche
-bill maher
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
How many of you guys have never sexted pictures of your junk to anyone?
I mean, I send my friends pictures of the little prince often, usually when I know they're having lunch with their moms or at business meetings.
Us gay guys have iPhone apps which are pretty much specifically meant to just sext pictures to nearby guys who wanna see it.
Seriously, everyone likes to get a little naughty from time to time... What's the big deal?
Tres Mts. Gramercy Theatre 3/26/11
*formerly manutd3581
I don't do Twitter so it was my impression that its purpose is to send short messages to a bazillion people at once. I wasn't aware you could do individual messages.
Why? Just this stupid thing?
never liked him. he's an attention whore.
There's such a double standard when it comes to liberal Democrats and Republicans when it comes to issues like this,. I don’t think this is a scandal, but the selective standards of the MSM drive me nuts. Not that long ago there was a congressman that was forced to resign for sending a picture to some chic with his shirt off. But when a Liberal D. Does it its like they play the victim card and then they attack the people who ask questions.
I would think people would be more concerned about this as far as a national security issue if anything.
And didn't Weiner say that "he coudn't say with certitude that it wasn't his photo"? :roll:
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
The stories aren't that cut and dry.
With the Republican guy, he was touting his "family values" and attacking gay families while he was out trolling for dates on Craig's list, telling women he was single, sending them beef cake face pics.
We're not sure if (a) that's Weiner's wiener and (b) if he sent it to anyone. The only person who claims to have seen it on his Twitter feed is a guy who's job it was to dig up dirt on Weiner... and has since deleted his Twitter account. What's that tell you?
The woman he supposedly sent it to says that no... he didn't.
And the only proof of it's existence is a screen shot that appears photoshopped.
So until anyone knows what happened, it's kinda pointless to be comparing the two. And really... nobody cares. I sure don't.
I sent pictures of my junk to people all the time.
I checked Wiki and Weiner married a long time aid of Hillary Clinton just one year ago ... based on what she went through assisting Hilary, she probably didn't even raise an eyebrow when the story broke.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_congressman_twitter_photo
However, I have to say - if I were in a boat and Breitbart and Weiner were drowning in front of me and I could only save one of them... bye bye Breitbart.
(Why do men behave like this?)
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/06/06/rep-weiner-to-address-media-following-new-reports-revealing-images/