Waterboarding-thanks GW-and Obama

2456

Comments

  • FiveB247xFiveB247x Posts: 2,330
    Really, is that why it took us a decade to get Osama even though he was in the same place for roughly 6 years? And in a very open area like 20-30 miles outside of the capital of Pakistan? Was that because of the help of the Pakistan government? Yeah, didn't think so. Your notion is not in line with what our policies and practical/realist conditions are in the world. It's an idiot game of whack-a-mole, and guess what, you can't ever win. You can keep playing if you're an idiot or find a new strategy.
    My NOTION is what we are practicing....homeboy
    CONservative governMENt

    Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. - Louis Brandeis
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    the attitude of american exceptionalism has gotten us nowhere in the war on terror. perhaps this is why pakistan did not reveal bin laden's hiding place. they had to have known he was staying a few minutes away from the pakistani equivalent of west point. but that is another thread entirely.

    i know that i never wanted to help an arrogant prick when i was a bartender, so maybe if we softened the american exceptionalism attitude for 10 minutes we might actually get somewhere diplomatically.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • usamamasan1usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    They must not have tipped well
  • usamamasan1usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    America is exceptional .
    This is why you don't really get it. Sorry. Try to keep on trucking, you'll catch on I hope.
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    They must not have tipped well
    that was irrelevent.

    the point is people are less willing to help people that think that they are superior to everyone else. hence the term american exceptionalism.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • usamamasan1usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    Sp. :D
  • usamamasan1usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    People love Kobe
  • FiveB247xFiveB247x Posts: 2,330
    See that's why you're wrong. Simply because we have so many great things in our nation, the most money or allow the most freedoms, doesn't mean we should be acting this way in the world. In fact, we should be trying to be a shining example to the rest of the world of how to be, but as you put it, we're just looking out for ourselves, and guess what, so does everyone else. Then one day it arrives on your door and everyone says, hey, welcome to our world, you're not isolated and the smug attitude compounds others from helping. We were a great experiment created to be a beacon in the world... your posts greatly describe how we have undone that because of self-interest and loosing site of good and bad. And yea, we're still better than the rest, but I doubt you send your child to school to get a grade of C so they can edge out all the D students.. right?
    America is exceptional .
    This is why you don't really get it. Sorry. Try to keep on trucking, you'll catch on I hope.
    CONservative governMENt

    Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. - Louis Brandeis
  • satansbedsatansbed Posts: 2,139
    Intelligence garnered from waterboarded detainees was used to track down al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden and kill him, CIA Chief Leon Panetta told NBC News on Tuesday.

    :D

    "The road to bin Laden began with waterboarding," Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., House Homeland Security Chairman, said in an NBC News interview in which he asserted that waterboarding is a "moral imperative" that "saves lives."

    awkward how this is wrong

    "The bottom line is this: If we had some kind of smoking-gun intelligence from waterboarding in 2003, we would have taken out Osama bin Laden in 2003,” said Tommy Vietor, spokesman for the National Security Council. “It took years of collection and analysis from many different sources to develop the case that enabled us to identify this compound, and reach a judgment that Bin Laden was likely to be living there.” "

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/04/us/po ... &seid=auto
  • Chip McFlenniganChip McFlennigan Posts: 1,162
    MrAbraham wrote:
    Intelligence garnered from waterboarded detainees was used to track down al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden and kill him, CIA Chief Leon Panetta told NBC News on Tuesday.

    :D

    "The road to bin Laden began with waterboarding," Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., House Homeland Security Chairman, said in an NBC News interview in which he asserted that waterboarding is a "moral imperative" that "saves lives."

    Now ask yourself, how many more terrorists has waterboarding and other forms of torture created?

    Still smiling?

    Haters gon' hate.
    I knew it all along, see?
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    haha ... sooooo ... dude's been living in a fucking mansion in a well to do neighbourhood and apparently waterboarding was the only way your INTELLIGENCE community could find him!?? ... well ... ok then ...
  • usamamasan1usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    Well, apparently Obama has known his hideout since August but has been voting "present" until a few days ago....
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    Well, apparently Obama has known his hideout since August but has been voting "present" until a few days ago....
    they were not sure if it was him until days before the raid. would you have had them go in and kill someone on the hunch that it was him or wait for confirmation?
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • mikepegg44mikepegg44 Posts: 3,353
    Well, apparently Obama has known his hideout since August but has been voting "present" until a few days ago....
    they were not sure if it was him until days before the raid. would you have had them go in and kill someone on the hunch that it was him or wait for confirmation?



    no one can ever do anything right...this was a gutsy call by Obama and he needs all the credit in the world for making it. Did he do all the work, no...but he deserves our respect for making a tough call...
    Personally i would of rather it taken 10 more years than lowering ourselves by torturing people...it isn't okay
    that’s right! Can’t we all just get together and focus on our real enemies: monogamous gays and stem cells… - Ned Flanders
    It is terrifying when you are too stupid to know who is dumb
    - Joe Rogan
  • usamamasan1usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    enhanced interrogation techniques.
    btw, I do give credit to BO for having some nads in this instance.
  • Jason PJason P Posts: 19,158
    It's seems that reports and statements from the White House have noted that conventional and unconventional methods were used to gather the intelligence to find Bin Laden. I'm sure the W.H. won't want / like to admit it, but E.I.T.'s appear to have helped connect the dots on the importance of the couriers.
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    mikepegg44 wrote:
    Well, apparently Obama has known his hideout since August but has been voting "present" until a few days ago....
    they were not sure if it was him until days before the raid. would you have had them go in and kill someone on the hunch that it was him or wait for confirmation?



    no one can ever do anything right...this was a gutsy call by Obama and he needs all the credit in the world for making it. Did he do all the work, no...but he deserves our respect for making a tough call...
    Personally i would of rather it taken 10 more years than lowering ourselves by torturing people...it isn't okay
    i agree with you on every point you made, mike.

    at least we waited long enough to make sure it was really him instead of our usual policy of shoot first then ask questions.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    and by the way, i do not have the greatest faith in our intelligence gathering/sharing system since we have had so many failures in the past, ie. trusting curveball, etc. but i still do not and will not condone advanced interrogation techniques.

    nobody has said exactly how much info gleaned from torture was correct and how much of it was bollocks to make the torture stop.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • usamamasan1usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    I have just obtained photgraphic evidence that clearly shows Obama should get credit for the kill!

    obama.jpg
  • wolfamongwolveswolfamongwolves Posts: 2,414
    I was wondering when this specious reasoning was going to surface. Waterboarding may have gotten the information, but it by no means follows that it was the only, or even the most effective way to get that information. It would be just as likely to produce false information, and I will bet you that the vast majority of information gleaned through torture, from someone who will tell you any old bullshit they think you want to hear just to get you to stop abusing them, is utterly worthless.

    It was inevitable that this event was going to be used to justify torture or back up the agenda of those who have a vested interest in keeping Guantánamo open, but don't be under any illusions that it is a valid justification. It is not.
    93: Slane
    96: Cork, Dublin
    00: Dublin
    06: London, Dublin
    07: London, Copenhagen, Nijmegen
    09: Manchester, London
    10: Dublin, Belfast, London & Berlin
    11: San José
    12: Isle of Wight, Copenhagen, Ed in Manchester & London x2
  • usamamasan1usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    nah,
    pitp.jpg
    war is war. i have no time for politcal correctness, or whatever that is.
  • butterjambutterjam Posts: 215
    I believe the first question that you needs to be asked is "Do you consider waterboarding torture?" Personally, I do not. We do it to our own special ops. I am lucky to personally know a handful of green berets and rangers. I've discussed this at length with them back when all this hit the news. They said it sucked, but were adamant that we do it to our soldiers and certain captives. I believe that if we do it to our own we can do it to our enemies. That is where I draw the line.

    But that's my line and that really doesn't mean sh*t. It is what our gov't and int'l law decide is torture.

    To me the larger issue is our foreign policy itself. If we want to "spread democracy", we need to act like a true and fair democracy. This includes closing Gitmo, giving all captives fair and humane treatment, quit starting unjust wars, bombing and occupying countries,etc.

    I truly believe that all of the blowback from these horrific things that we do, in the name of democracy and protecting the citizens, is far worse than if we did do what I suggested above.

    There will always be evil in this world, you can't put an end to it, but you can minimize it. Evil begets evil.
  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,437
    311jj wrote:
    I believe the first question that you needs to be asked is "Do you consider waterboarding torture?" Personally, I do not. We do it to our own special ops. I am lucky to personally know a handful of green berets and rangers. I've discussed this at length with them back when all this hit the news. They said it sucked, but were adamant that we do it to our soldiers and certain captives. I believe that if we do it to our own we can do it to our enemies. That is where I draw the line.

    But that's my line and that really doesn't mean sh*t. It is what our gov't and int'l law decide is torture.

    To me the larger issue is our foreign policy itself. If we want to "spread democracy", we need to act like a true and fair democracy. This includes closing Gitmo, giving all captives fair and humane treatment, quit starting unjust wars, bombing and occupying countries,etc.

    I truly believe that all of the blowback from these horrific things that we do, in the name of democracy and protecting the citizens, is far worse than if we did do what I suggested above.

    There will always be evil in this world, you can't put an end to it, but you can minimize it. Evil begets evil.


    Waterboarding not torutre? That's the first time I've heard that. I don't know about you, but I'm not in a hurry to try it.
    "Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!"
    -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"

    "Try to not spook the horse."
    -Neil Young













  • usamamasan1usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    is keeping someone awake for a few days torture too?
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    is keeping someone awake for a few days torture too?
    sleep deprivation is a form of torture and violates the geneva convention


    http://www.slate.com/features/whatistor ... vation.htm

    Name: "Sleep adjustment"; "Sleep deprivation"

    Source: DOD Working Group memo, March 2003; DOD memo, April 16, 2003

    Description: According to the Pentagon, "sleep adjustment" means altering the sleep cycles of detainees by reversing day and night to induce disorientation similar to jet lag. Commanders at Abu Ghraib were authorized to implement sleep-adjustment techniques for up to 72 hours. The DOD Working Group defined "sleep deprivation" as "keeping the detainee awake for an extended period of time (allowing individual to rest briefly and then awakening him, repeatedly) NOT to exceed four days in succession."

    Physical, Psychological, or Other Effects: Moderate sleep deprivation can impair cognitive functions including memory, learning, logical reasoning, arithmetic skills, verbal processing, and decision-making. Prolonged sleep deprivation causes attention deficits, short-term memory problems, speech impairment, and other ailments. According to a study by Physicians for Human Rights, a group based in Cambridge, Mass., this tactic can also cause high blood pressure and cardiovascular disease and exacerbate existing ailments. Another study found that sleep deprivation can reduce an individual's tolerance for pain and ability to resist suggestion.

    Locations Used: Iraq, Guantanamo Bay, Afghanistan

    Legal Opinion: Interference with sleep likely violates the Geneva Conventions.

    FM 34-52 describes "abnormal sleep deprivation" as a form of mental torture.

    The European Court of Human Rights and the Supreme Court of Israel have ruled sleep deprivation inhumane and unlawful. The DOD Working Group noted these decisions in its March 2003 memo but concluded that they do not apply to American actions because they were not binding on the United States.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    here is conservative radio host mancow being waterboarded. he called it "absolutely torture".

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUkj9pjx3H0
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • usamamasan1usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    like i said, a few days.


    authorized to implement sleep-adjustment techniques for up to 72 hours

    sleep-adjustment techniques

    our govt does not and rightfully so believe this is torture. your "legal" opinions are

    irrelevant

    sweet jesus, you CutPasteSFcompetition.png long shit then post a video link? and expect people to go through that? :lol:

    •If a conservative sees a foreign threat, he thinks about how to defeat it.
    •If a liberal see an enemy he wonders what he can do to appease him.
  • wolfamongwolveswolfamongwolves Posts: 2,414
    war is war. i have no time for politcal correctness, or whatever that is.
    Ah, the old vacuous "political correctness" cop-out! How cliché!

    It's not political correctness, it's the application of reason, common-sense and basic human decency.

    Whatever "war is war" is supposed to mean (as a tautology, it is actually completely meaningless) there are principles and standards that apply to war also. One of those is that torture is never acceptable.
    93: Slane
    96: Cork, Dublin
    00: Dublin
    06: London, Dublin
    07: London, Copenhagen, Nijmegen
    09: Manchester, London
    10: Dublin, Belfast, London & Berlin
    11: San José
    12: Isle of Wight, Copenhagen, Ed in Manchester & London x2
  • wolfamongwolveswolfamongwolves Posts: 2,414
    edited May 2011
    our govt does not and rightfully so believe this is torture. your "legal" opinions are irrelevant
    Your government under Bush explicitly redefined the word "torture" so that it could say that it didn't consider as torture actions (such as waterboarding) that would be (and rightfully so) considered torture by the rest of the world. This despite the fact that the US State Dept designated sumbersion of the head in water as torture in its 2005 country report on Tunisia. This despite the fact that under Bush's governorship, a Texas sheriff was convicted and jailed for ten years for waterboarding a prisoner.

    And, since in 2009, Obama banned waterboarding, I would say you are wrong. Your government now does, and rightfully so, believe waterboarding to be torure.

    Unless you have something - anything - to back up your statement that "your 'legal' opinions are irrelevant" then I would have to say that your statement is itself irrelevant.
    sweet jesus, you cut & paste long shit then post a video link? and expect people to go through that?
    I would think that if you have any interest in being taken seriously, then yes, it's reasonable to expect you to go through that. Otherwise it just comes off like you're scared to face any facts that don't fit with your opinion.
    Post edited by wolfamongwolves on
    93: Slane
    96: Cork, Dublin
    00: Dublin
    06: London, Dublin
    07: London, Copenhagen, Nijmegen
    09: Manchester, London
    10: Dublin, Belfast, London & Berlin
    11: San José
    12: Isle of Wight, Copenhagen, Ed in Manchester & London x2
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    like i said, a few days.


    authorized to implement sleep-adjustment techniques for up to 72 hours

    sleep-adjustment techniques

    our govt does not and rightfully so believe this is torture. your "legal" opinions are

    irrelevant

    sweet jesus, you CutPasteSFcompetition.png long shit then post a video link? and expect people to go through that? :lol:

    •If a conservative sees a foreign threat, he thinks about how to defeat it.
    •If a liberal see an enemy he wonders what he can do to appease him.
    it doesn't matter what i post, you won't read it anyway.

    it is you with such profound responses as:
    "tldr" which you said means "too long. didn't read"....

    it is easy enough, don't read or reply to my posts if you don't like what i post. and you do not notice that i always comment on what i paste? or do you notice i paste things to back up my positions? because sometimes we have to present evidence other than opinion and conjecture.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Sign In or Register to comment.