Fidel Castro tells Ahmadinejad: Stop denying the holocaust

1246

Comments

  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    the goal is to prevent war.



    isnt' that the worst possible outcome? what we fear so much that iran will do?



    war is killing little kids by the thousands, it is humanity at its worst. and any mention of iran is an attempt to demonize them or their leader......what is the point of that talk? do you want to see an invasion?
  • JOEJOEJOEJOEJOEJOE Posts: 10,619
    yosi wrote:
    It constantly amazes me how eager people on this board are to be apologists for Iran. It's really amazing.

    Do you think they are apologizing for Iran, or automatically taking the anti-Israel stance?
  • yosiyosi NYC Posts: 3,069
    I do not want to see an invasion. But the way things are going, it looks more and more like Iran is bent on forcing a conflict. Either that, or they are delusional, and have utterly misread how other countries will react to their provocations.
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • yosiyosi NYC Posts: 3,069
    Joe, I don't think there is much of a practical difference.
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    yosi wrote:
    Joe, I don't think there is much of a practical difference.
    yeah as you automatically take the pro-israel stand :roll:
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • yosiyosi NYC Posts: 3,069
    What does that mean, the "pro-Israel" stand?
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • JOEJOEJOEJOEJOEJOE Posts: 10,619
    yosi wrote:
    Joe, I don't think there is much of a practical difference.

    I know, but some people here are just so clever in disguising their true feelings, it is difficult to recognize the difference :).

    Enjoy your special status, my brother!
  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    yosi wrote:
    I do not want to see an invasion. But the way things are going, it looks more and more like Iran is bent on forcing a conflict. Either that, or they are delusional, and have utterly misread how other countries will react to their provocations.
    your logic is flawed.


    few countries, i would say none ever in the history of countries, would do something knowing it would lead to their destruction.

    these are human beings in Iran, just like everybody else.
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    yosi wrote:
    What does that mean, the "pro-Israel" stand?
    i am not taking your bait, but i said that because you and others foolishly assume that people like me "automatically take the anti-israel side" which is utterly and completely false.

    i do not support netanyahu or most of his policies. i am entitled to my opinion. and as long as he is committing human rights violations (or allowing them to happen, blockade, flotilla, etc) and screwing around with the peace negotiations by asking for one of OUR prisoners, a spy for israel, to be freed in order to stop the settlements, he is wide open to criticism.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • yosiyosi NYC Posts: 3,069
    You are certainly entitled to your opinions. But that wasn't meant as bait. I would like to know what you meant when you said that I am always "pro-Israel"?
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • JOEJOEJOE wrote:
    yosi wrote:
    Joe, I don't think there is much of a practical difference.

    I know, but some people here are just so clever in disguising their true feelings, it is difficult to recognize the difference :).

    true feelings = defending Palestinians basic human rights and being critical of the Israeli government for the role they play in absuing those rights and defending an invasion of Iran which would see thousands of innocent people killed, including children.

    or are you another one who thinks you can get away with wrongly accusing someone of being antisemetic in a sly, gutless, devious way?

    because i'm making it known im sick to death of it. if it doesn't stop, and the mods continue to sit back and let it happen any longer, i'll take it further.
  • yosiyosi NYC Posts: 3,069
    Commy, you're assuming that the Iranian regime is rational. The entire fear is that they aren't rational, that they actually believe their apocalyptic ideology/theology, and would be willing to act on it.
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    yosi wrote:
    Commy, you're assuming that the Iranian regime is rational. The entire fear is that they aren't rational, that they actually believe their apocalyptic ideology/theology, and would be willing to act on it.
    where did that idea come from"?



    iran's crime is being outside the empire.....as was Iraq's, as was afghanistans. it is being demonized and people led to believe they are irrational because they aren't under washington's jurisdiction, washington want's to change that.



    (the axis of evil comment from junior bush included 3 countries outside the empire as well)
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    yosi wrote:
    I do not want to see an invasion. But the way things are going, it looks more and more like Iran is bent on forcing a conflict. Either that, or they are delusional, and have utterly misread how other countries will react to their provocations.

    And Israel isn't bent on forcing a conflict? Let's be honest: all the talk of war has come from Israel. In fact the Israeli leadership talks of war with Iran on an almost daily basis. But I can see how it may look to be the other way around if you turn reality on it's head.
  • JOEJOEJOEJOEJOEJOE Posts: 10,619
    JOEJOEJOE wrote:
    yosi wrote:
    Joe, I don't think there is much of a practical difference.

    I know, but some people here are just so clever in disguising their true feelings, it is difficult to recognize the difference :).

    true feelings = defending Palestinians basic human rights and being critical of the Israeli government for the role they play in absuing those rights and defending an invasion of Iran which would see thousands of innocent people killed, including children.

    or are you another one who thinks you can get away with wrongly accusing someone of being antisemetic in a sly, gutless, devious way?

    because i'm making it known im sick to death of it. if it doesn't stop, and the mods continue to sit back and let it happen any longer, i'll take it further.

    Sly, gutless & devious, eh? Now I have 3 words that best describe myself in case I am asked that question at a job interview!

    If someone can round up some parchment paper and a pair of trumpetors, we will have one heck of a cool proclomation scene! Maybe add in the term "here-by" to make it even sound more official! :)
  • JOEJOEJOE wrote:
    JOEJOEJOE wrote:
    I know, but some people here are just so clever in disguising their true feelings, it is difficult to recognize the difference :).

    true feelings = defending Palestinians basic human rights and being critical of the Israeli government for the role they play in absuing those rights and defending an invasion of Iran which would see thousands of innocent people killed, including children.

    or are you another one who thinks you can get away with wrongly accusing someone of being antisemetic in a sly, gutless, devious way?

    because i'm making it known im sick to death of it. if it doesn't stop, and the mods continue to sit back and let it happen any longer, i'll take it further.

    Sly, gutless & devious, eh? Now I have 3 words that best describe myself in case I am asked that question at a job interview!

    If someone can round up some parchment paper and a pair of trumpetors, we will have one heck of a cool proclomation scene! Maybe add in the term "here-by" to make it even sound more official! :)
    so you're sticking by what you said then? wrongful accusations of antisemetism?
  • yosiyosi NYC Posts: 3,069
    I don't think he was calling anyone antisemitic. I didn't take it that way.
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • yosi wrote:
    I don't think he was calling anyone antisemitic. I didn't take it that way.
    perhaps he can explain what he meant by 'disguising their true feelings' then.

    what did you think he meant by it seeming you have decided to offer your opinion?
  • JOEJOEJOEJOEJOEJOE Posts: 10,619
    yosi wrote:
    I don't think he was calling anyone antisemitic. I didn't take it that way.
    perhaps he can explain what he meant by 'disguising their true feelings' then.

    what did you think he meant by it seeming you have decided to offer your opinion?

    Are you saying that someone on the internet offered their opinion, even though they weren't asked to do so?
  • yosiyosi NYC Posts: 3,069
    Commy, I believe that Afghanistan, rather than being guilty of being "outside the empire," was actually guilty of sheltering the terrorist organization that, you know, flew a couple planes into a bunch of buildings and killed a whole lot of people.

    And yeah, B, you know it's really weird that Israel would be hostile towards a country whose leaders talk about the destruction of Israel, who fund, train, and arm not one, but two terrorist organizations that regularly threaten and/or attack Israel, and that is developing nuclear weapons. I really can't for the life of me understand that. :roll:
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • yosiyosi NYC Posts: 3,069
    I took it to be a reference to hostility towards Israel. I believe the discussion was about whether apologists for Iran are really motivated by hatred/dislike of Israel.
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • TriumphantAngelTriumphantAngel Posts: 1,760
    edited September 2010
    JOEJOEJOE wrote:

    Are you saying that someone on the internet offered their opinion, even though they weren't asked to do so?

    care to explain what you meant when you said "disguising their true feelings, and without having Yosi speak for you?

    that might be of some help.

    edit: because you did suggest people automatically take the anti-israel stance. right?

    meaning?
    Post edited by TriumphantAngel on
  • yosiyosi NYC Posts: 3,069
    You did ask for my take.
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • JOEJOEJOEJOEJOEJOE Posts: 10,619
    JOEJOEJOE wrote:

    Are you saying that someone on the internet offered their opinion, even though they weren't asked to do so?

    care to explain what you meant when you said "disguising their true feelings, and without having Yosi speak for you?

    that might be of some help.

    He isn't speaking for me..he answered your question.

    It is difficult to take you seriously when you take such a tone.
  • yosi wrote:
    You did ask for my take.

    which has changed in the last 2 hours. funny about that.
  • JOEJOEJOE wrote:
    JOEJOEJOE wrote:

    Are you saying that someone on the internet offered their opinion, even though they weren't asked to do so?

    care to explain what you meant when you said "disguising their true feelings, and without having Yosi speak for you?

    that might be of some help.

    He isn't speaking for me..he answered your question.

    It is difficult to take you seriously when you take such a tone.
    my tone is in response to something you said. i've asked for clarification which you have refused to give.
  • JOEJOEJOEJOEJOEJOE Posts: 10,619
    JOEJOEJOE wrote:

    Are you saying that someone on the internet offered their opinion, even though they weren't asked to do so?

    care to explain what you meant when you said "disguising their true feelings, and without having Yosi speak for you?

    that might be of some help.

    edit: because you did suggest people automatically take the anti-israel stance. right?

    meaning?

    It sounds as if you are an attorney trying to lead a witness!
  • just looking for clarification of what you meant.

    that's all. you silence on that speaks volumes.
  • JOEJOEJOEJOEJOEJOE Posts: 10,619
    just looking for clarification of what you meant.

    that's all. you silence on that speaks volumes.

    I am not being silent. I am just avoiding whatever little game you are playing.
  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    JOEJOEJOE wrote:

    care to explain what you meant when you said "disguising their true feelings, and without having Yosi speak for you?

    that might be of some help.

    edit: because you did suggest people automatically take the anti-israel stance. right?

    meaning?

    It sounds as if you are an attorney trying to lead a witness!


    it looks to me like you can't answer a simple fucking question.
Sign In or Register to comment.