Celtic and Lakers anyone

FenwayFaithful

dimitrispearljam wrote:

its 3-2 now for celtics,right?when is the next match?

3-2 Celtics. One more win and the Celtics have it. Next game is tomorrow at 9PM Boston time.

dimitrispearljam

FenwayFaithful wrote:

dimitrispearljam wrote:

its 3-2 now for celtics,right?when is the next match?

3-2 Celtics. One more win and the Celtics have it. Next game is tomorrow at 9PM Boston time.

yep, i know about 4 winning games,is in boston home,right?i guess is 3 am here,ill watch it..

Wilds

Sadly I think the Lakers take game six. If it was 3-2 Lakers then I would guarantee the Celtics take it.

The only way the league doesn't make this go seven, is if the Celtics dominate at such a level (a la 2008) that they can't stop it.

Then game seven is a tossup. I'll also predict that some technicals are thrown around and 1 or more of our big guys miss game 7 (and whatever portion of game six they are kicked out of).

g under p

Wilds wrote:

Sadly I think the Lakers take game six. If it was 3-2 Lakers then I would guarantee the Celtics take it.

The only way the league doesn't make this go seven, is if the Celtics dominate at such a level (a la 2008) that they can't stop it.

Then game seven is a tossup. I'll also predict that some technicals are thrown around and 1 or more of our big guys miss game 7 (and whatever portion of game six they are kicked out of).

I picked the Celtics in 7, a game 7 I'll have a tough time watching for sure. That said I'll find it incredible if the Lakers lose game 6, they would literally have to not show up to lose that game cause this thing is going 7 for sure. BTW quite surprised the Celtics are in this position to take this title, they need to win, it maybe the last one for quite some time.

peace

ed243421

g under p wrote:

Wilds wrote:

Sadly I think the Lakers take game six. If it was 3-2 Lakers then I would guarantee the Celtics take it.

The only way the league doesn't make this go seven, is if the Celtics dominate at such a level (a la 2008) that they can't stop it.

Then game seven is a tossup. I'll also predict that some technicals are thrown around and 1 or more of our big guys miss game 7 (and whatever portion of game six they are kicked out of).

I picked the Celtics in 7, a game 7 I'll have a tough time watching for sure. That said I'll find it incredible if the Lakers lose game 6, they would literally have to not show up to lose that game cause this thing is going 7 for sure. BTW quite surprised the Celtics are in this position to take this title, they need to win, it maybe the last one for quite some time.

rondo will win more rings than russell

peace

bigbadbill

Lakers in 1988 won in game 7 against Detroit after being down 3-2. In 2000, the Lakers beat Portland in game 7 after being down 15 points in the 4th quarter. (Of course, the Lakers did have a 3 games to 1 lead in that series before Portland won two straight and almost game 7. Just think, Portland Vs. Indiana in the 2000 NBA Finals - boring!!) In 2002, the Lakers were down 3-2 against Sacramento, and beat them in OT of game 7 up in Sacramento. It can be done, Lakers fans, it can be done.

jimed14

bigbadbill wrote:

Lakers in 1988 won in game 7 against Detroit after being down 3-2. In 2000, the Lakers beat Portland in game 7 after being down 15 points in the 4th quarter. (Of course, the Lakers did have a 3 games to 1 lead in that series before Portland won two straight and almost game 7. Just think, Portland Vs. Indiana in the 2000 NBA Finals - boring!!) In 2002, the Lakers were down 3-2 against Sacramento, and beat them in OT of game 7 up in Sacramento. It can be done, Lakers fans, it can be done.

And how many current Lakers were a part of these great wins in Laker history?

So here were two stats I've seen in the last week.

Phil Jackson has a 47 - 0 series record after winning game one in a playoff series.

The Celtics are 11 - 0 all time when leading 3 - 2 in the NBA finals.

Something's got to give ... and all these historical look back stats don't mean shit when you're talking about the CURRENT teams on the floor.

PJ_ROCKS

Shall I try this again, Lakers win game 6 tonight !!!

Wobbie

hoping for another no show from kobe's supporting cast.....especially from gasol aka ugliest dude on the planet.

FenwayFaithful

9 hours till tipoff. Oh man, I can't wait to hear the braintrust of Stu Scott, Wilbon, Barry and Magic during the pre-game. Does anybody in America take Stu Scott seriously anymore? They guy is a freakin cartoon character at this point.

Lizard

Go Dodgers!

jimed14

FenwayFaithful wrote:

Does anybody in America take Stu Scott seriously anymore?

Nope. Once the first episode of Stump the Schwab hit the airwaves, it was all over.

Wobbie

FenwayFaithful wrote:

Does anybody in America take Stu Scott seriously anymore?

i think not.

i do like watching how one eyebrow goes up, independent of the other.

walkunafraid

imalive wrote:

hoping for another no show from kobe's supporting cast.....especially from gasol aka ugliest dude on the planet.

Haha, dude is pretty ugly.

But I think the title of ugliest dude on the planet has to go to Sam Cassell.

And ugliest dude in this series is Kendrick Perkins.

Wobbie

walkunafraid wrote:

imalive wrote:

hoping for another no show from kobe's supporting cast.....especially from gasol aka ugliest dude on the planet.

Haha, dude is pretty ugly.

And ugliest dude in this series is Kendrick Perkins.

pau still has my vote.

that "beard"? :wtf:

eyedclaar

imalive wrote:

walkunafraid wrote:

imalive wrote:

hoping for another no show from kobe's supporting cast.....especially from gasol aka ugliest dude on the planet.

Haha, dude is pretty ugly.

And ugliest dude in this series is Kendrick Perkins.

pau still has my vote.

that "beard"? :wtf:

He's part billy goat. No self-respecting goat will be seen without its beard.

FenwayFaithful

Gasol looks like a mountain goat. And Kobe has that stupid thin rat face.

dcfaithful

FenwayFaithful wrote:

And Kobe has that stupid thin rat face.

Always seen that myself too.

Wobbie

dcfaithful wrote:

FenwayFaithful wrote:

And Kobe has that stupid thin rat face.

Always seen that myself too.

really? I'm not seeing it

jimed14

Who gives a shit how ugly guys are?

Bird, Parrish, McHale, Dennis Johnson ... they even added Bill Walton to enhance the ugly factor. Those fuckers were ugly as ugly gets ... but damn, were they good.