backspacer.....meh

24567

Comments

  • SolarWorld
    SolarWorld Posts: 1,902
    Jeremys Spoken wrote:
    SolarWorld wrote:
    I dont understand why people feel it's ok to steal fucking music. Dirt Bag...
    Seriously?

    LOL.

    A leak is not the person who is dowloading's fault.

    That has to be the most moronic statement about downloading music illegally I have ever seen.
  • the wolf
    the wolf Posts: 7,027
    chris32482 wrote:
    bullshit


    told ya'. ;)
    Peace, Love.

    "To question your government is not unpatriotic --
    to not question your government is unpatriotic."
    -- Sen. Chuck Hagel
  • Jeremys Spoken
    Jeremys Spoken Posts: 7,578
    SolarWorld wrote:
    Jeremys Spoken wrote:
    SolarWorld wrote:
    I dont understand why people feel it's ok to steal fucking music. Dirt Bag...
    Seriously?

    LOL.

    A leak is not the person who is dowloading's fault.

    That has to be the most moronic statement about downloading music illegally I have ever seen.
    No.
    Not if it's available.

    The person WHO MADE IT AVAILABLE should be held responsible.
    2008 - MSG 6/24-6/25
    2010 - Newark 5/18 MSG 5/21
    2011 - PJ20 9/3-9/4
    2012 - MIA Festival 9/2
    2013 - Wrigley Field 7/19 Brooklyn 10/18-10/19 Philly 10/22
    2015 - Colbert show - 9/23 Global Citizens Festival 9/26
    2016 - Philly 4/28-4/29 MSG 5/1-5/2



  • SolarWorld
    SolarWorld Posts: 1,902
    DS114969 wrote:
    facepollution wrote:
    SolarWorld wrote:
    I dont understand why people feel it's ok to steal fucking music. Dirt Bag...

    Well that's because you're choosing to view it as a black or white situation.


    What if I have bought the CD through 10C and will also buy the vinyl version. Then I'll also pay 2 bucks for track through the Rock Band store. Does that also make me a dirt bag if I download a leaked version?

    In a word. Yes. If they wanted you to have it now, you would have it now. This selfish entitlement attitude is ridiculous. Not to mention most music and everything else these days uses bittorrent. The minute you have downloaded enough you are then seeding to the next person and so on and so on. How do you know if those people "pre-ordered". You don't and you end up contributing to the distribution. Grow up and wait for the release. If you can't afford $10 for an album you have bigger problems you should be dealing with.
  • SolarWorld
    SolarWorld Posts: 1,902
    Jeremys Spoken wrote:
    No.
    Not if it's available.

    The person WHO MADE IT AVAILABLE should be held responsible.

    I have nothing further for this infantile train of thought. Move along.
  • benjs
    benjs Toronto, ON Posts: 9,400
    Jeremys Spoken wrote:
    SolarWorld wrote:
    Jeremys Spoken wrote:
    Seriously?

    LOL.

    A leak is not the person who is dowloading's fault.

    That has to be the most moronic statement about downloading music illegally I have ever seen.
    No.
    Not if it's available.

    The person WHO MADE IT AVAILABLE should be held responsible.
    Agree to disagree. This is like saying torrent sites are responsible for the fact that I steal music, and should be held accountable. Your free will is always around, even when you're given a choice to do wrong. Who's at fault? Both the uploader of the illegal content, and those of us who choose to download said content.
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • AllNiteThing
    AllNiteThing Posts: 1,115
    edited September 2009
    SolarWorld wrote:

    In a word. Yes. If they wanted you to have it now, you would have it now. This selfish entitlement attitude is ridiculous. Not to mention most music and everything else these days uses bittorrent. The minute you have downloaded enough you are then seeding to the next person and so on and so on. How do you know if those people "pre-ordered". You don't and you end up contributing to the distribution. Grow up and wait for the release. If you can't afford $10 for an album you have bigger problems you should be dealing with.


    You sound like a real joy to hang out with. :rolleyes:
    Post edited by AllNiteThing on
    24 years old, mid-life crisis
    nowadays hits you when you're young
  • Ok
    Ok Posts: 2,146
    cdp1223 wrote:
    This "review".....meh. ;)

    +1 :D
  • AllNiteThing
    AllNiteThing Posts: 1,115
    SolarWorld wrote:
    Jeremys Spoken wrote:
    No.
    Not if it's available.

    The person WHO MADE IT AVAILABLE should be held responsible.

    I have nothing further for this infantile train of thought. Move along.


    That's funny considering you've managed to call someone 'moronic' and a 'dirt bag' all in the same thread. Hello kettle, I'm pot.
    24 years old, mid-life crisis
    nowadays hits you when you're young
  • Better Dan
    Better Dan Posts: 5,684
    SolarWorld wrote:
    DS114969 wrote:


    What if I have bought the CD through 10C and will also buy the vinyl version. Then I'll also pay 2 bucks for track through the Rock Band store. Does that also make me a dirt bag if I download a leaked version?

    In a word. Yes. If they wanted you to have it now, you would have it now. This selfish entitlement attitude is ridiculous. Not to mention most music and everything else these days uses bittorrent. The minute you have downloaded enough you are then seeding to the next person and so on and so on. How do you know if those people "pre-ordered". You don't and you end up contributing to the distribution. Grow up and wait for the release. If you can't afford $10 for an album you have bigger problems you should be dealing with.


    :roll: I did say I was purchasing the album at least three times so don't know where your $10 comment comes from. You do have a point on the bittorrent seeding though.....
    2003: San Antonio, Houston, Dallas, Seattle; 2005: Monterrey; 2006: Chicago 1 & 2, Grand Rapids, Cleveland, Detroit; 2008: West Palm Beach, Tampa; 2009: Austin, LA 3 & 4, San Diego; 2010: Kansas City, St. Louis, Columbus, Indianapolis; 2011: PJ20 1 & 2; 2012: Missoula; 2013: Dallas, Oklahoma City, Seattle; 2014: Tulsa; 2016: Columbia, New York City 1 & 2; 2018: London, Seattle 1 & 2; 2021: Ohana; 2022: Oklahoma City
  • facepollution
    facepollution Posts: 6,834
    SolarWorld wrote:
    In a word. Yes. If they wanted you to have it now, you would have it now. This selfish entitlement attitude is ridiculous. Not to mention most music and everything else these days uses bittorrent. The minute you have downloaded enough you are then seeding to the next person and so on and so on. How do you know if those people "pre-ordered". You don't and you end up contributing to the distribution. Grow up and wait for the release. If you can't afford $10 for an album you have bigger problems you should be dealing with.

    At the end of the day, you will have those who will download AND pay, and those who will just download. The date it leaks doesn't make a blind bit of difference because it will be available for free when the album gets released anyway. Your views are as antiquated as the music industry's.
  • SomethingCreative
    SomethingCreative Kazoo, MI Posts: 3,413
    EVERYBODY FIGHT!!!! :roll:
    "Well, I think this band is incapable of sucking."
    -my dad after hearing Not for You for the first time on SNL .
  • benjs
    benjs Toronto, ON Posts: 9,400
    AllNiteThing wrote:
    SolarWorld wrote:

    I have nothing further for this infantile train of thought. Move along.


    That's funny considering you've managed to call someone 'moronic' and a 'dirt bag' all in the same thread. Hello kettle, I'm pot.
    +1. SolarWorld - people have called you out on this before, I believe.. putting people down with juvenile words like 'dirt bag' do nothing but detract from your credibility around here, as well as take away people's respect for you. There are much better ways to get a point across.
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • capecodriot
    capecodriot Posts: 340
    i got it from a friend from college i cant tell you where he works cause then he'd get in trouble, and no i dont have a copy, just heard his and i cant burn it because i dont have a burner, sorry.
  • Better Dan
    Better Dan Posts: 5,684
    What's funny about that is Solar is the one calling other people infantile. :lol:
    2003: San Antonio, Houston, Dallas, Seattle; 2005: Monterrey; 2006: Chicago 1 & 2, Grand Rapids, Cleveland, Detroit; 2008: West Palm Beach, Tampa; 2009: Austin, LA 3 & 4, San Diego; 2010: Kansas City, St. Louis, Columbus, Indianapolis; 2011: PJ20 1 & 2; 2012: Missoula; 2013: Dallas, Oklahoma City, Seattle; 2014: Tulsa; 2016: Columbia, New York City 1 & 2; 2018: London, Seattle 1 & 2; 2021: Ohana; 2022: Oklahoma City
  • Gmoney
    Gmoney Posts: 1,618
    capecodriot wrote:
    i got it from a friend from college i cant tell you where he works cause then he'd get in trouble, and no i dont have a copy, just heard his and i cant burn it because i dont have a burner, sorry.
    does he work at... TARGET?
    :?:
    Further back and forth a wave will break on me, today...
  • benjs
    benjs Toronto, ON Posts: 9,400
    capecodriot wrote:
    i got it from a friend from college i cant tell you where he works cause then he'd get in trouble, and no i dont have a copy, just heard his and i cant burn it because i dont have a burner, sorry.
    Sorry you don't like it. I hope I have a different impression!
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • SolarWorld
    SolarWorld Posts: 1,902
    AllNiteThing wrote:
    SolarWorld wrote:
    Jeremys Spoken wrote:
    No.
    Not if it's available.

    The person WHO MADE IT AVAILABLE should be held responsible.

    I have nothing further for this infantile train of thought. Move along.


    That's funny considering you've managed to call someone 'moronic' and a 'dirt bag' all in the same thread. Hello kettle, I'm pot.

    Its just "punctuation" to my points. Don't cry. I swear everyone around here is so quick to pull out the tissues these days. It aint personal.

    P.S. Dont steal fucking music, its a dirt bag thing to do.
  • SolarWorld
    SolarWorld Posts: 1,902
    edited September 2009
    benjs wrote:
    AllNiteThing wrote:
    SolarWorld wrote:

    I have nothing further for this infantile train of thought. Move along.


    That's funny considering you've managed to call someone 'moronic' and a 'dirt bag' all in the same thread. Hello kettle, I'm pot.
    +1. SolarWorld - people have called you out on this before, I believe.. putting people down with juvenile words like 'dirt bag' do nothing but detract from your credibility around here, as well as take away people's respect for you. There are much better ways to get a point across.

    Like I give a flying fuck what you people "think" of me. Seriously.

    1. People who steal music ---> Dirt Bags
    2. People who defend stealing music ---> Morons

    /story
  • cdp1223
    cdp1223 Posts: 1,131
    SomethingCreative wrote:
    EVERYBODY FIGHT!!!! :roll:

    They should really figure out a way to get an emoticon of two cats fighting.....
This discussion has been closed.

Categories