Canadian Politics Redux

DarthMaeglin · April 15

Seriously, why is it ok to selectively denigrate our fellow citizens for the simple reason of disagreement and especially to then protest when someone else does the same? I don’t see how that ends in anything other than further division.

I hope I’ve personally been consistent in shitting on the politicians, parties and other public entities.

erebus · April 16

Ah, can’t make this stuff up.

I guess Brookfield isn’t so bad after all if 6 conservatives, including Ms. Lantsman have holdings in it.

All parties are hypocritical. Why sling shit so hard when you know you are going to be found out in this day and age.

dignin · April 16

PP is afraid to have an interview with national treasure Nardwaur.

Makes him unelectable as far as I'm concerned.

DarthMaeglin · April 16

erebus said:

Ah, can’t make this stuff up.

I guess Brookfield isn’t so bad after all if 6 conservatives, including Ms. Lantsman have holdings in it.

All parties are hypocritical. Why sling shit so hard when you know you are going to be found out in this day and age.

Having holdings is worlds away from sitting on the board and making decisions that cost Canadian taxpayers revenue.

Poilievre’s camp has stated (as far as I know no proof was presented however) that when Trump began his nonsense Poilievre sold his international investments and reinvested exclusively in Canadian funds. I’m not aware of any of the other party leaders making such a claim.

Parksy · April 16

dignin said:

PP is afraid to have an interview with national treasure Nardwaur.

Makes him unelectable as far as I'm concerned.

lol

HughFreakingDillon · April 16

I'm guessing PP wouldn't have had a clue how to pull this off:

https://www.wallawallademocrats.com/other-voices/carneys-checkmates

PJ_Soul · April 16

HughFreakingDillon said:

I'm guessing PP wouldn't have had a clue how to pull this off:

https://www.wallawallademocrats.com/other-voices/carneys-checkmates

I'm guessing you're right. But if he had, you know everyone and their dog would have heard about it.

DarthMaeglin · April 17

HughFreakingDillon said:

I'm guessing PP wouldn't have had a clue how to pull this off:

https://www.wallawallademocrats.com/other-voices/carneys-checkmates

Couldn’t get past the first paragraph when it turned “Carney saved the world from Trump” in tone, sorry. I’ll try and give it another read later.

The last sentence makes it another opinion piece. The reason I saw that sentence was because I had to scroll down to the bottom to see who wrote it, I guess Substacks are legitimate news sources but the chain of Sun newspapers aren’t?

DarthMaeglin · April 17

HughFreakingDillon said:

I'm guessing PP wouldn't have had a clue how to pull this off:

https://www.wallawallademocrats.com/other-voices/carneys-checkmates

Made it through most of the article before it became obvious that while all this might sound good, it sounds like it FAR, FAR exceeds the caretaker duties he took on when he killed the sitting (or rather, not sitting so the Liberals could choose a new leader) Parliament.

But the caretaker provisions allow for such actions during a crisis, you say. How much debt is Carney incurring when all he’s supposed to be doing is keeping the lights on? Isn’t that why he called the shortest campaign possible, not so people find out what a crotchety asshole he is or he has to disclose his financials?

And what is the true story anyways, was Carney ghosting Trump or was it the other way around?

dignin · April 17

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

I'm guessing PP wouldn't have had a clue how to pull this off:

https://www.wallawallademocrats.com/other-voices/carneys-checkmates

Made it through most of the article before it became obvious that while all this might sound good, it sounds like it FAR, FAR exceeds the caretaker duties he took on when he killed the sitting (or rather, not sitting so the Liberals could choose a new leader) Parliament.

But the caretaker provisions allow for such actions during a crisis, you say. How much debt is Carney incurring when all he’s supposed to be doing is keeping the lights on? Isn’t that why he called the shortest campaign possible, not so people find out what a crotchety asshole he is or he has to disclose his financials?

And what is the true story anyways, was Carney ghosting Trump or was it the other way around?

Read something else other than Sun media and you might figure it out.

HughFreakingDillon · April 17

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

I'm guessing PP wouldn't have had a clue how to pull this off:

https://www.wallawallademocrats.com/other-voices/carneys-checkmates

Couldn’t get past the first paragraph when it turned “Carney saved the world from Trump” in tone, sorry. I’ll try and give it another read later.

The last sentence makes it another opinion piece. The reason I saw that sentence was because I had to scroll down to the bottom to see who wrote it, I guess Substacks are legitimate news sources but the chain of Sun newspapers aren’t?

I don't know why you keep ragging on all these "legit news sources" complaints. Yes, if an opinion piece is being passed off as a news article, I'm going to call it out. I didn't pass this off as either one. It is blatantly obvious it's opinion based on true events.

The problem with many right wing media sources is, the news pieces are often so blatantly skewed anti-liberal, that they often come off as opinion articles. And yes, I'm aware you see it the opposite way. And that's fine. If the piece being presented is more fact driven than opinion, then I'll give it some credence. But some of the links you post is just trudeau/liberal bashing that is too subjective to be taken seriously. Others aren't. I only call out the ones I've read and found to be extremely biased. But for some reason you keep beating this dead horse of "well I guess you're allowed to post opinion pieces and I'm not". It comes across as whining and self-victimization.

DarthMaeglin · April 17

dignin said:

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

I'm guessing PP wouldn't have had a clue how to pull this off:

https://www.wallawallademocrats.com/other-voices/carneys-checkmates

Made it through most of the article before it became obvious that while all this might sound good, it sounds like it FAR, FAR exceeds the caretaker duties he took on when he killed the sitting (or rather, not sitting so the Liberals could choose a new leader) Parliament.

But the caretaker provisions allow for such actions during a crisis, you say. How much debt is Carney incurring when all he’s supposed to be doing is keeping the lights on? Isn’t that why he called the shortest campaign possible, not so people find out what a crotchety asshole he is or he has to disclose his financials?

And what is the true story anyways, was Carney ghosting Trump or was it the other way around?

Read something else other than Sun media and you might figure it out.

Sorry to disappoint but I do read multiple sources that represent different editorial slants. I will admit to mainly informing myself through “traditional” media and am very leery of internet sources that aren’t tied to the established media organizations.

DarthMaeglin · April 17

HughFreakingDillon said:

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

I'm guessing PP wouldn't have had a clue how to pull this off:

https://www.wallawallademocrats.com/other-voices/carneys-checkmates

Couldn’t get past the first paragraph when it turned “Carney saved the world from Trump” in tone, sorry. I’ll try and give it another read later.

The last sentence makes it another opinion piece. The reason I saw that sentence was because I had to scroll down to the bottom to see who wrote it, I guess Substacks are legitimate news sources but the chain of Sun newspapers aren’t?

I don't know why you keep ragging on all these "legit news sources" complaints. Yes, if an opinion piece is being passed off as a news article, I'm going to call it out. I didn't pass this off as either one. It is blatantly obvious it's opinion based on true events.

The problem with many right wing media sources is, the news pieces are often so blatantly skewed anti-liberal, that they often come off as opinion articles. And yes, I'm aware you see it the opposite way. And that's fine. If the piece being presented is more fact driven than opinion, then I'll give it some credence. But some of the links you post is just trudeau/liberal bashing that is too subjective to be taken seriously. Others aren't. I only call out the ones I've read and found to be extremely biased. But for some reason you keep beating this dead horse of "well I guess you're allowed to post opinion pieces and I'm not". It comes across as whining and self-victimization.

Ok, you’ve put me down, now what about Carney likely overstepping/abusing the caretaker status?

Actually, as I was typing I realized he didn’t. He did all this during his 9 or so days as a quasi-legitimate Prime Minister. Then he called the election at the last possible moment before he faced the task of actually governing and letting us see how he actually did.

And now anytime campaigning gets tough Carney runs off and plays Prime Minister for a day or two.

DarthMaeglin · April 17

HughFreakingDillon said:

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

I'm guessing PP wouldn't have had a clue how to pull this off:

https://www.wallawallademocrats.com/other-voices/carneys-checkmates

Couldn’t get past the first paragraph when it turned “Carney saved the world from Trump” in tone, sorry. I’ll try and give it another read later.

The last sentence makes it another opinion piece. The reason I saw that sentence was because I had to scroll down to the bottom to see who wrote it, I guess Substacks are legitimate news sources but the chain of Sun newspapers aren’t?

I don't know why you keep ragging on all these "legit news sources" complaints. Yes, if an opinion piece is being passed off as a news article, I'm going to call it out. I didn't pass this off as either one. It is blatantly obvious it's opinion based on true events.

The problem with many right wing media sources is, the news pieces are often so blatantly skewed anti-liberal, that they often come off as opinion articles. And yes, I'm aware you see it the opposite way. And that's fine. If the piece being presented is more fact driven than opinion, then I'll give it some credence. But some of the links you post is just trudeau/liberal bashing that is too subjective to be taken seriously. Others aren't. I only call out the ones I've read and found to be extremely biased. But for some reason you keep beating this dead horse of "well I guess you're allowed to post opinion pieces and I'm not". It comes across as whining and self-victimization.

Your thoughts on the button fiasco?

HughFreakingDillon · April 17

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

I'm guessing PP wouldn't have had a clue how to pull this off:

https://www.wallawallademocrats.com/other-voices/carneys-checkmates

Couldn’t get past the first paragraph when it turned “Carney saved the world from Trump” in tone, sorry. I’ll try and give it another read later.

The last sentence makes it another opinion piece. The reason I saw that sentence was because I had to scroll down to the bottom to see who wrote it, I guess Substacks are legitimate news sources but the chain of Sun newspapers aren’t?

I don't know why you keep ragging on all these "legit news sources" complaints. Yes, if an opinion piece is being passed off as a news article, I'm going to call it out. I didn't pass this off as either one. It is blatantly obvious it's opinion based on true events.

The problem with many right wing media sources is, the news pieces are often so blatantly skewed anti-liberal, that they often come off as opinion articles. And yes, I'm aware you see it the opposite way. And that's fine. If the piece being presented is more fact driven than opinion, then I'll give it some credence. But some of the links you post is just trudeau/liberal bashing that is too subjective to be taken seriously. Others aren't. I only call out the ones I've read and found to be extremely biased. But for some reason you keep beating this dead horse of "well I guess you're allowed to post opinion pieces and I'm not". It comes across as whining and self-victimization.

Ok, you’ve put me down, now what about Carney likely overstepping/abusing the caretaker status?

Actually, as I was typing I realized he didn’t. He did all this during his 9 or so days as a quasi-legitimate Prime Minister. Then he called the election at the last possible moment before he faced the task of actually governing and letting us see how he actually did.

And now anytime campaigning gets tough Carney runs off and plays Prime Minister for a day or two.

how did I put you down? I told you how I feel some of your posts come across.

HughFreakingDillon · April 17

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

I'm guessing PP wouldn't have had a clue how to pull this off:

https://www.wallawallademocrats.com/other-voices/carneys-checkmates

Couldn’t get past the first paragraph when it turned “Carney saved the world from Trump” in tone, sorry. I’ll try and give it another read later.

The last sentence makes it another opinion piece. The reason I saw that sentence was because I had to scroll down to the bottom to see who wrote it, I guess Substacks are legitimate news sources but the chain of Sun newspapers aren’t?

I don't know why you keep ragging on all these "legit news sources" complaints. Yes, if an opinion piece is being passed off as a news article, I'm going to call it out. I didn't pass this off as either one. It is blatantly obvious it's opinion based on true events.

The problem with many right wing media sources is, the news pieces are often so blatantly skewed anti-liberal, that they often come off as opinion articles. And yes, I'm aware you see it the opposite way. And that's fine. If the piece being presented is more fact driven than opinion, then I'll give it some credence. But some of the links you post is just trudeau/liberal bashing that is too subjective to be taken seriously. Others aren't. I only call out the ones I've read and found to be extremely biased. But for some reason you keep beating this dead horse of "well I guess you're allowed to post opinion pieces and I'm not". It comes across as whining and self-victimization.

Your thoughts on the button fiasco?

it's a couple idiots. Carney apologized. Nothingburger. If there's more proof later on that it originated higher up in the campaign, heads should roll. But I very much doubt it did. Carney is obviously no dope. That shit isn't acceptable. But I'm not going to hold the president of a company responsible for the individual actions of a couple of idiots in the mail room.

DarthMaeglin · April 17

HughFreakingDillon said:

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

I'm guessing PP wouldn't have had a clue how to pull this off:

https://www.wallawallademocrats.com/other-voices/carneys-checkmates

Couldn’t get past the first paragraph when it turned “Carney saved the world from Trump” in tone, sorry. I’ll try and give it another read later.

The last sentence makes it another opinion piece. The reason I saw that sentence was because I had to scroll down to the bottom to see who wrote it, I guess Substacks are legitimate news sources but the chain of Sun newspapers aren’t?

I don't know why you keep ragging on all these "legit news sources" complaints. Yes, if an opinion piece is being passed off as a news article, I'm going to call it out. I didn't pass this off as either one. It is blatantly obvious it's opinion based on true events.

The problem with many right wing media sources is, the news pieces are often so blatantly skewed anti-liberal, that they often come off as opinion articles. And yes, I'm aware you see it the opposite way. And that's fine. If the piece being presented is more fact driven than opinion, then I'll give it some credence. But some of the links you post is just trudeau/liberal bashing that is too subjective to be taken seriously. Others aren't. I only call out the ones I've read and found to be extremely biased. But for some reason you keep beating this dead horse of "well I guess you're allowed to post opinion pieces and I'm not". It comes across as whining and self-victimization.

Your thoughts on the button fiasco?

it's a couple idiots. Carney apologized. Nothingburger. If there's more proof later on that it originated higher up in the campaign, heads should roll. But I very much doubt it did. Carney is obviously no dope. That shit isn't acceptable. But I'm not going to hold the president of a company responsible for the individual actions of a couple of idiots in the mail room.

Shouldn’t the president of the company be able to clearly fire the “couple idiots” with cause, especially given it likely broke election laws (regardless of whether or not charges are laid?

“Reassigning” them and calling it a joke is acceptable, got it. Except…

The party seemingly immediately knew who was responsible (why don’t we know the names? CBC likely does.), which strongly implies that it did go up the chain. How high? Who knows? The Liberals ask us again to trust them.

I think I’m supposed to say I think Carney personally signed off on it. I won’t, but I’m quite confident it went beyond a “couple idiots”. But Carney hid and the media moved on.

But it’s a nothingburger in the midst of an election? Ffs, we will get the fucking government we deserve, but keep hating Conservatives, Palpatine’s right, “Your hate makes you strong.” Back up by De La Rocha: “Your anger is a gift.”

PJ_Soul · April 17

I don't think of a political campaign as a company at all. I don't think it is comparable at all. The people supporting a political campaign are dedicated, emotional, and flawed. I think Carney has made it clear so far that he is not the type to fire people for one misdeed, and he had also shown that he will clearly state how much he disapproves of the misdeeds, and also thinks thise people should accept responsibility in their own. So far, we haven't seen if he tolerates patterns of bad behavior. If we see that he does, i will certainly wonder. But if he is just a guy who is willing to give people a second chance, while being clear about his disapproval, then that just seems compassionate and reasonable to me. Time will tell. My impression is that Carney is extremely reasonable and measured, and someone who specifically does not react to things emotionally, but still works with understanding for people. Also, he doesn't seem to be full of shit, or a blowhard. That's pretty good. The more i see of Carney the more I like him, compared to PP in particular... it definitely does not hurt that he is not actually a politician... at least not yet.

HughFreakingDillon · April 17

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

I'm guessing PP wouldn't have had a clue how to pull this off:

https://www.wallawallademocrats.com/other-voices/carneys-checkmates

Couldn’t get past the first paragraph when it turned “Carney saved the world from Trump” in tone, sorry. I’ll try and give it another read later.

The last sentence makes it another opinion piece. The reason I saw that sentence was because I had to scroll down to the bottom to see who wrote it, I guess Substacks are legitimate news sources but the chain of Sun newspapers aren’t?

I don't know why you keep ragging on all these "legit news sources" complaints. Yes, if an opinion piece is being passed off as a news article, I'm going to call it out. I didn't pass this off as either one. It is blatantly obvious it's opinion based on true events.

The problem with many right wing media sources is, the news pieces are often so blatantly skewed anti-liberal, that they often come off as opinion articles. And yes, I'm aware you see it the opposite way. And that's fine. If the piece being presented is more fact driven than opinion, then I'll give it some credence. But some of the links you post is just trudeau/liberal bashing that is too subjective to be taken seriously. Others aren't. I only call out the ones I've read and found to be extremely biased. But for some reason you keep beating this dead horse of "well I guess you're allowed to post opinion pieces and I'm not". It comes across as whining and self-victimization.

Your thoughts on the button fiasco?

it's a couple idiots. Carney apologized. Nothingburger. If there's more proof later on that it originated higher up in the campaign, heads should roll. But I very much doubt it did. Carney is obviously no dope. That shit isn't acceptable. But I'm not going to hold the president of a company responsible for the individual actions of a couple of idiots in the mail room.

Shouldn’t the president of the company be able to clearly fire the “couple idiots” with cause, especially given it likely broke election laws (regardless of whether or not charges are laid?

“Reassigning” them and calling it a joke is acceptable, got it. Except…

The party seemingly immediately knew who was responsible (why don’t we know the names? CBC likely does.), which strongly implies that it did go up the chain. How high? Who knows? The Liberals ask us again to trust them.

I think I’m supposed to say I think Carney personally signed off on it. I won’t, but I’m quite confident it went beyond a “couple idiots”. But Carney hid and the media moved on.

But it’s a nothingburger in the midst of an election? Ffs, we will get the fucking government we deserve, but keep hating Conservatives, Palpatine’s right, “Your hate makes you strong.” Back up by De La Rocha: “Your anger is a gift.”

My first reaction to the reassignment was an admitted “meh”. But then I watched a cbc round table discussing it, and I agreed with them the “liberal operatives” should have been relieved of their duties. (As an aside, I chuckle at “liberal operatives” like they are some sort of top secret military group).

I 100% do NOT agree that their identities should be made known. You want to talk cancel culture? You’re advocating for it right there. I have never been about public shaming and ruining people’s lives over something so minor.

The cbc round table thought that it’s likely “someone” higher up than these “operatives” knew about this. If so, Carney can deal with that internally.

I’m gonna say 99.9% positive Carney knew nothing about this. I don’t know much about him, but I absolutely agree with PJSoul that this doesn’t jive eith his style. Just using logic, why would a couple buttons at one campaign meeting be on the radar of the PM? If this “operation” had been more widespread, it would be more likely.

Any potential consequence will be felt on election day. I just don’t think this will move the needle much, and it shouldn’t.

DarthMaeglin · April 17

If the Conservatives ever get caught engaging in a clear disinformation campaign against any of the other parties, remember this then, and hold your criticism.

Just like Blackface, the standard has been set here and now all must abide by it.

I feel badly for most of you here. If all had gone to plan there would have been all kinds of criticism of the Trumpian buttons the Conservatives were sporting. It’s too bad the truth came out, now you need to sweep it under the rug and defend the indefensible.

Buy Hugh’s right in calling them a “couple idiots” not for their act but for their bragging about it loudly after the fact.

Canadian Politics Redux

Comments

Categories