KAMALA HARRIS FOR PRESIDENT -PART DEUX

gimmesometruth27 · August 2024

Halifax2TheMax said:

Steve Kerr, the coach of the U.S. men’s basketball team, invoked the team’s recent gold medal victory as he endorsed the presidential ticket Monday at the DNC.
“The joy, the compassion, the commitment to our country that we saw at the Olympics — that is what Tim Walz and Kamala Harris have,” Kerr said.
Kerr ended his speech with a reference to a well-known celebration gesture by one of the players he coaches on the Golden State Warriors.
“After the results are tallied that night, we can, in the words of the great Stephen Curry ... tell Donald Trump, ‘Night night,’” Kerr said.

dislike.

not mean enough.

lol

mickeyrat · August 2024

video....

https://www.threads.net/@adamparkhomenko/post/C-3_tomsBHF/?xmt=AQGzCidzeR_BcGhXPztG4H65lO1vev3iWOhlImcE7fIirw

Philly NJ · August 2024

Harris is an empty suit. Without her teleprompter she is lost in the woods. Right now, she is an actress, the same way Obama was an actor (as he as admitted to). The low informed voters may fall for it, but most people won't. Hence, her huge unfavourability rating before she was anointed and the propaganda operation began.

As a prosecutor, Harris too often abused her office in just the way she decried as a campaigner.

When she talks about framing the innocent and hiding exculpatory evidence, Harris is either projecting or engaging in rank hypocrisy.

Some of Harris’ prosecutorial shenanigans are well-known by now. In 2010, a California Superior Court judge blistered Harris’ DA office for violating defendants’ rights by covering up detrimental information about a drug-lab technician. The judge concluded that prosecutors working under Harris had failed to fulfill their constitutional duty to tell defense attorneys information about prosecution witnesses that might challenge their credibility. The failure of Harris’ prosecutors led to the dismissal of more than 600 drug cases.

Hiding information, indeed.

As California attorney general, Harris appealed a judge’s decision to remove the Orange County district attorney’s office from a death penalty trial after evidence emerged that the sheriff’s department had been operating an unconstitutional jailhouse snitch program. The program tainted more than a dozen criminal cases, several of them murder trials.

Gern Blansten · August 2024

Philly NJ said:

Harris is an empty suit. Without her teleprompter she is lost in the woods. Right now, she is an actress, the same way Obama was an actor (as he as admitted to). The low informed voters may fall for it, but most people won't. Hence, her huge unfavourability rating before she was anointed and the propaganda operation began.
As a prosecutor, Harris too often abused her office in just the way she decried as a campaigner.
When she talks about framing the innocent and hiding exculpatory evidence, Harris is either projecting or engaging in rank hypocrisy.
Some of Harris’ prosecutorial shenanigans are well-known by now. In 2010, a California Superior Court judge blistered Harris’ DA office for violating defendants’ rights by covering up detrimental information about a drug-lab technician. The judge concluded that prosecutors working under Harris had failed to fulfill their constitutional duty to tell defense attorneys information about prosecution witnesses that might challenge their credibility. The failure of Harris’ prosecutors led to the dismissal of more than 600 drug cases.
Hiding information, indeed.
As California attorney general, Harris appealed a judge’s decision to remove the Orange County district attorney’s office from a death penalty trial after evidence emerged that the sheriff’s department had been operating an unconstitutional jailhouse snitch program. The program tainted more than a dozen criminal cases, several of them murder trials.

lol...you know you don't have anything to argue about when the teleprompter thing comes up. Maga has been pushing that since Obama was president. Your guy uses teleprompters...and when he doesn't use teleprompters he equates the medal of honor to medals given to rich old ladies. Go to bed.

benjs · August 2024

Philly NJ said:

Harris is an empty suit. Without her teleprompter she is lost in the woods. Right now, she is an actress, the same way Obama was an actor (as he as admitted to). The low informed voters may fall for it, but most people won't. Hence, her huge unfavourability rating before she was anointed and the propaganda operation began.
As a prosecutor, Harris too often abused her office in just the way she decried as a campaigner.
When she talks about framing the innocent and hiding exculpatory evidence, Harris is either projecting or engaging in rank hypocrisy.
Some of Harris’ prosecutorial shenanigans are well-known by now. In 2010, a California Superior Court judge blistered Harris’ DA office for violating defendants’ rights by covering up detrimental information about a drug-lab technician. The judge concluded that prosecutors working under Harris had failed to fulfill their constitutional duty to tell defense attorneys information about prosecution witnesses that might challenge their credibility. The failure of Harris’ prosecutors led to the dismissal of more than 600 drug cases.
Hiding information, indeed.
As California attorney general, Harris appealed a judge’s decision to remove the Orange County district attorney’s office from a death penalty trial after evidence emerged that the sheriff’s department had been operating an unconstitutional jailhouse snitch program. The program tainted more than a dozen criminal cases, several of them murder trials.

I’d say the empty shell is the person who gets told to ramble about Hannibal Lector on a teleprompter and reads it. I’m Ron Burgundy?

PS, the above garbage is stolen from the New York Post - https://nypost.com/2020/09/03/kamala-harris-rampant-prosecutorial-abuses/

Philly NJ · August 2024

Attention all intellectually honest people: I have noticed that if you present facts of incompetence, wrong-doing, bad policy, etc, of Harris/Biden, expect their supporters to deflect, deny or minimize. Also, if you present facts from the 3.5 years Harris/Biden have held the White House, expect their supporters to say that is “old” news unless it is favorable to Harris/Biden. But they will go back to the beginning of time with their comments. Hilarious.

Denial is a defense mechanism that can describe when someone refuses to accept objective facts or experiences, especially when it's difficult to integrate them into their current thinking. It's an unconscious process that can protect people from anxiety or discomfort. Denial can be as simple as not believing someone is being truthful, or as complex as avoiding acknowledging weaknesses or desires.

In psychology, denialism is when someone chooses to deny reality to avoid believing in an uncomfortable truth. It can be an irrational action that prevents someone from validating a historical event or reality that can be empirically verified.

Gern Blansten · August 2024

Philly NJ said:

Attention all intellectually honest people: I have noticed that if you present facts of incompetence, wrong-doing, bad policy, etc, of Harris/Biden, expect their supporters to deflect, deny or minimize. Also, if you present facts from the 3.5 years Harris/Biden have held the White House, expect their supporters to say that is “old” news unless it is favorable to Harris/Biden. But they will go back to the beginning of time with their comments. Hilarious.
Denial is a defense mechanism that can describe when someone refuses to accept objective facts or experiences, especially when it's difficult to integrate them into their current thinking. It's an unconscious process that can protect people from anxiety or discomfort. Denial can be as simple as not believing someone is being truthful, or as complex as avoiding acknowledging weaknesses or desires.
In psychology, denialism is when someone chooses to deny reality to avoid believing in an uncomfortable truth. It can be an irrational action that prevents someone from validating a historical event or reality that can be empirically verified.

You didn't post your source...that would be intellectually honest.

No one is denying anything. Just don't come here with teleprompter crap. It's ignorant and doesn't fly.

mickeyrat · August 2024

Philly NJ said:

Attention all intellectually honest people: I have noticed that if you present facts of incompetence, wrong-doing, bad policy, etc, of Harris/Biden, expect their supporters to deflect, deny or minimize. Also, if you present facts from the 3.5 years Harris/Biden have held the White House, expect their supporters to say that is “old” news unless it is favorable to Harris/Biden. But they will go back to the beginning of time with their comments. Hilarious.
Denial is a defense mechanism that can describe when someone refuses to accept objective facts or experiences, especially when it's difficult to integrate them into their current thinking. It's an unconscious process that can protect people from anxiety or discomfort. Denial can be as simple as not believing someone is being truthful, or as complex as avoiding acknowledging weaknesses or desires.
In psychology, denialism is when someone chooses to deny reality to avoid believing in an uncomfortable truth. It can be an irrational action that prevents someone from validating a historical event or reality that can be empirically verified.

Attention post your fucking sources

Merkin Baller · August 2024

If you blame the Biden administration for the post pandemic inflation that impacted the entire world, you’re not in a position to lecture anyone about intellectual honesty.

Go Beavers · August 2024

Philly NJ said:

Attention all intellectually honest people: I have noticed that if you present facts of incompetence, wrong-doing, bad policy, etc, of Harris/Biden, expect their supporters to deflect, deny or minimize. Also, if you present facts from the 3.5 years Harris/Biden have held the White House, expect their supporters to say that is “old” news unless it is favorable to Harris/Biden. But they will go back to the beginning of time with their comments. Hilarious.
Denial is a defense mechanism that can describe when someone refuses to accept objective facts or experiences, especially when it's difficult to integrate them into their current thinking. It's an unconscious process that can protect people from anxiety or discomfort. Denial can be as simple as not believing someone is being truthful, or as complex as avoiding acknowledging weaknesses or desires.
In psychology, denialism is when someone chooses to deny reality to avoid believing in an uncomfortable truth. It can be an irrational action that prevents someone from validating a historical event or reality that can be empirically verified.

Present actual facts first, and my response will be “okay, I’ll still be voting for her despite that”.

Halifax2TheMax · August 2024

Philly NJ said:

Attention all intellectually honest people: I have noticed that if you present facts of incompetence, wrong-doing, bad policy, etc, of Harris/Biden, expect their supporters to deflect, deny or minimize. Also, if you present facts from the 3.5 years Harris/Biden have held the White House, expect their supporters to say that is “old” news unless it is favorable to Harris/Biden. But they will go back to the beginning of time with their comments. Hilarious.
Denial is a defense mechanism that can describe when someone refuses to accept objective facts or experiences, especially when it's difficult to integrate them into their current thinking. It's an unconscious process that can protect people from anxiety or discomfort. Denial can be as simple as not believing someone is being truthful, or as complex as avoiding acknowledging weaknesses or desires.
In psychology, denialism is when someone chooses to deny reality to avoid believing in an uncomfortable truth. It can be an irrational action that prevents someone from validating a historical event or reality that can be empirically verified.

If you were “intellectually honest,” you’d answer the two following, basic questions:

1. Did POOTWH legitimately lose the 2020 election? And,

2. In what year do you figure that you’ll be replaced?

Gern Blansten · August 2024

Merkin Baller said:

If you blame the Biden administration for the post pandemic inflation that impacted the entire world, you’re not in a position to lecture anyone about intellectual honesty.

exactly...please tell us oh great economic expert...is Biden responsible for global inflation too? Or just in the USA?

Halifax2TheMax · August 2024

Philly NJ said:

Harris is an empty suit. Without her teleprompter she is lost in the woods. Right now, she is an actress, the same way Obama was an actor (as he as admitted to). The low informed voters may fall for it, but most people won't. Hence, her huge unfavourability rating before she was anointed and the propaganda operation began.
As a prosecutor, Harris too often abused her office in just the way she decried as a campaigner.
When she talks about framing the innocent and hiding exculpatory evidence, Harris is either projecting or engaging in rank hypocrisy.
Some of Harris’ prosecutorial shenanigans are well-known by now. In 2010, a California Superior Court judge blistered Harris’ DA office for violating defendants’ rights by covering up detrimental information about a drug-lab technician. The judge concluded that prosecutors working under Harris had failed to fulfill their constitutional duty to tell defense attorneys information about prosecution witnesses that might challenge their credibility. The failure of Harris’ prosecutors led to the dismissal of more than 600 drug cases.
Hiding information, indeed.
As California attorney general, Harris appealed a judge’s decision to remove the Orange County district attorney’s office from a death penalty trial after evidence emerged that the sheriff’s department had been operating an unconstitutional jailhouse snitch program. The program tainted more than a dozen criminal cases, several of them murder trials.

From Letter From An American. We know it hurts:

And they talked about Trump’s crimes. Representative Crockett asked voters which of the two candidates they would hire. “Kamala Harris has a résumé,” she said. “Donald Trump has a rap sheet.” Representative Jamie Raskin (D-MD) noted that Trump’s vice president Mike Pence is the first vice president in more than 200 years “not to support the president he served with in a general election.” "Someone should've told Donald Trump that the president's job under Article 2 of the Constitution is to take care that the laws are faithfully executed, not that the vice president is executed…. J.D. Vance, do you understand why there was a sudden job opening for running mate on the [Republican] ticket? They tried to kill your predecessor!" Senator Laphonza Butler (D-CA) told the crowd: “We deserve a president…who shatters the boundaries of what's possible, not the boundaries of what's legal.”

Philly NJ · August 2024

Gern Blansten said:

Philly NJ said:

Attention all intellectually honest people: I have noticed that if you present facts of incompetence, wrong-doing, bad policy, etc, of Harris/Biden, expect their supporters to deflect, deny or minimize. Also, if you present facts from the 3.5 years Harris/Biden have held the White House, expect their supporters to say that is “old” news unless it is favorable to Harris/Biden. But they will go back to the beginning of time with their comments. Hilarious.
Denial is a defense mechanism that can describe when someone refuses to accept objective facts or experiences, especially when it's difficult to integrate them into their current thinking. It's an unconscious process that can protect people from anxiety or discomfort. Denial can be as simple as not believing someone is being truthful, or as complex as avoiding acknowledging weaknesses or desires.
In psychology, denialism is when someone chooses to deny reality to avoid believing in an uncomfortable truth. It can be an irrational action that prevents someone from validating a historical event or reality that can be empirically verified.

You didn't post your source...that would be intellectually honest.

No one is denying anything. Just don't come here with teleprompter crap. It's ignorant and doesn't fly.

Actually, the use of the teleprompter is important to me and many others. It goes to point that she is fake. She just reads words that someone else wrote. When she goes off prompter, which is very rare, we get to see the real Harris, uniformed and shallow.

Trump gets a lot of support for being real, flaws and all for everyone to see. He is not a politician, unlike Harris. Politicians are a dime a dozen. Leaders are needed. Trump can lead, Harris can read.

mrussel1 · August 2024

Philly NJ said:

Gern Blansten said:

Philly NJ said:

Attention all intellectually honest people: I have noticed that if you present facts of incompetence, wrong-doing, bad policy, etc, of Harris/Biden, expect their supporters to deflect, deny or minimize. Also, if you present facts from the 3.5 years Harris/Biden have held the White House, expect their supporters to say that is “old” news unless it is favorable to Harris/Biden. But they will go back to the beginning of time with their comments. Hilarious.
Denial is a defense mechanism that can describe when someone refuses to accept objective facts or experiences, especially when it's difficult to integrate them into their current thinking. It's an unconscious process that can protect people from anxiety or discomfort. Denial can be as simple as not believing someone is being truthful, or as complex as avoiding acknowledging weaknesses or desires.
In psychology, denialism is when someone chooses to deny reality to avoid believing in an uncomfortable truth. It can be an irrational action that prevents someone from validating a historical event or reality that can be empirically verified.

You didn't post your source...that would be intellectually honest.

No one is denying anything. Just don't come here with teleprompter crap. It's ignorant and doesn't fly.

Actually, the use of the teleprompter is important to me and many others. It goes to point that she is fake. She just reads words that someone else wrote. When she goes off prompter, which is very rare, we get to see the real Harris, uniformed and shallow.

Trump gets a lot of support for being real, flaws and all for everyone to see. He is not a politician, unlike Harris. Politicians are a dime a dozen. Leaders are needed. Trump can lead, Harris can read.

Going off- script might be a plus to you, a MAGA supporter, but every time he does he loses independent and women voters. The crap he says is absurd. Read it sometime. It's lies and gibberish

Gern Blansten · August 2024

Philly NJ said:

Gern Blansten said:

Philly NJ said:

Attention all intellectually honest people: I have noticed that if you present facts of incompetence, wrong-doing, bad policy, etc, of Harris/Biden, expect their supporters to deflect, deny or minimize. Also, if you present facts from the 3.5 years Harris/Biden have held the White House, expect their supporters to say that is “old” news unless it is favorable to Harris/Biden. But they will go back to the beginning of time with their comments. Hilarious.
Denial is a defense mechanism that can describe when someone refuses to accept objective facts or experiences, especially when it's difficult to integrate them into their current thinking. It's an unconscious process that can protect people from anxiety or discomfort. Denial can be as simple as not believing someone is being truthful, or as complex as avoiding acknowledging weaknesses or desires.
In psychology, denialism is when someone chooses to deny reality to avoid believing in an uncomfortable truth. It can be an irrational action that prevents someone from validating a historical event or reality that can be empirically verified.

You didn't post your source...that would be intellectually honest.

No one is denying anything. Just don't come here with teleprompter crap. It's ignorant and doesn't fly.

Actually, the use of the teleprompter is important to me and many others. It goes to point that she is fake. She just reads words that someone else wrote. When she goes off prompter, which is very rare, we get to see the real Harris, uniformed and shallow.

Trump gets a lot of support for being real, flaws and all for everyone to see. He is not a politician, unlike Harris. Politicians are a dime a dozen. Leaders are needed. Trump can lead, Harris can read.

LOL...trump is a politician. The worst kind. And if trump can lead so well why does no one from his administration support him?

Can you address that? Was it because he was such a great leader?

teskeinc · August 2024

Imagine running on the promise of fixing all the problems that you and your party created in the first place.

And because Orange Man Bad, Suckers and Losers buy it hook, line and sinker.

Unreal

Gern Blansten · August 2024

teskeinc said:

Imagine running on the promise of fixing all the problems that you and your party created in the first place.

And because Orange Man Bad, Suckers and Losers buy it hook, line and sinker.

Unreal

Honest question. Why does no one from trump's admin support him?

Philly NJ · August 2024

Gern Blansten said:

Philly NJ said:

Gern Blansten said:

Philly NJ said:

Attention all intellectually honest people: I have noticed that if you present facts of incompetence, wrong-doing, bad policy, etc, of Harris/Biden, expect their supporters to deflect, deny or minimize. Also, if you present facts from the 3.5 years Harris/Biden have held the White House, expect their supporters to say that is “old” news unless it is favorable to Harris/Biden. But they will go back to the beginning of time with their comments. Hilarious.
Denial is a defense mechanism that can describe when someone refuses to accept objective facts or experiences, especially when it's difficult to integrate them into their current thinking. It's an unconscious process that can protect people from anxiety or discomfort. Denial can be as simple as not believing someone is being truthful, or as complex as avoiding acknowledging weaknesses or desires.
In psychology, denialism is when someone chooses to deny reality to avoid believing in an uncomfortable truth. It can be an irrational action that prevents someone from validating a historical event or reality that can be empirically verified.

You didn't post your source...that would be intellectually honest.

No one is denying anything. Just don't come here with teleprompter crap. It's ignorant and doesn't fly.

Actually, the use of the teleprompter is important to me and many others. It goes to point that she is fake. She just reads words that someone else wrote. When she goes off prompter, which is very rare, we get to see the real Harris, uniformed and shallow.

Trump gets a lot of support for being real, flaws and all for everyone to see. He is not a politician, unlike Harris. Politicians are a dime a dozen. Leaders are needed. Trump can lead, Harris can read.

LOL...trump is a politician. The worst kind. And if trump can lead so well why does no one from his administration support him?

Can you address that? Was it because he was such a great leader?

"no one". Who are you talking about? Trump got millions more votes in 2020 vs 2016, so lots of people liked his first term.

Gern Blansten · August 2024

Philly NJ said:

Gern Blansten said:

Philly NJ said:

Gern Blansten said:

Philly NJ said:

Attention all intellectually honest people: I have noticed that if you present facts of incompetence, wrong-doing, bad policy, etc, of Harris/Biden, expect their supporters to deflect, deny or minimize. Also, if you present facts from the 3.5 years Harris/Biden have held the White House, expect their supporters to say that is “old” news unless it is favorable to Harris/Biden. But they will go back to the beginning of time with their comments. Hilarious.
Denial is a defense mechanism that can describe when someone refuses to accept objective facts or experiences, especially when it's difficult to integrate them into their current thinking. It's an unconscious process that can protect people from anxiety or discomfort. Denial can be as simple as not believing someone is being truthful, or as complex as avoiding acknowledging weaknesses or desires.
In psychology, denialism is when someone chooses to deny reality to avoid believing in an uncomfortable truth. It can be an irrational action that prevents someone from validating a historical event or reality that can be empirically verified.

You didn't post your source...that would be intellectually honest.

No one is denying anything. Just don't come here with teleprompter crap. It's ignorant and doesn't fly.

Actually, the use of the teleprompter is important to me and many others. It goes to point that she is fake. She just reads words that someone else wrote. When she goes off prompter, which is very rare, we get to see the real Harris, uniformed and shallow.

Trump gets a lot of support for being real, flaws and all for everyone to see. He is not a politician, unlike Harris. Politicians are a dime a dozen. Leaders are needed. Trump can lead, Harris can read.

LOL...trump is a politician. The worst kind. And if trump can lead so well why does no one from his administration support him?

Can you address that? Was it because he was such a great leader?

"no one". Who are you talking about? Trump got millions more votes in 2020 vs 2016, so lots of people liked his first term.

Pence
Esper
Kelly
Mulvanney
Scaramucci
Bolton
Mattis
etc.

why?

KAMALA HARRIS FOR PRESIDENT -PART DEUX

Comments

Categories

** KAMALA HARRIS FOR PRESIDENT -PART DEUX **

Comments

Categories

KAMALA HARRIS FOR PRESIDENT -PART DEUX