SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States)
Comments
-
If you have 2 or 3 compromised that taints and delegitimizes the entire court. How many 5-4 decisions could have gone the other way if Thomas wasn't receiving gifts from people?Halifax2TheMax said:
No, certain justices are corrupt as hell as well as ethically challenged. Very ethically challenged. Not surprising given who nominated them.gimmesometruth27 said:
because he isn't accountable to anybody for anything, other than the person giving him all that money.Gern Blansten said:This is fucking insane....how does Thomas not resign?
the supreme court is corrupt as hell."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
True but justices are individuals and not all of them are corrupt. The libs on the court should be shaming the cons at every opportunity, whether in hearings, deliberations or interactions within chambers. If you had a POS colleague like Clarence in your place of employment whereas you knew the largess being showered upon them and how certain business decisions were made, would you smile and be collegial?gimmesometruth27 said:
If you have 2 or 3 compromised that taints and delegitimizes the entire court. How many 5-4 decisions could have gone the other way if Thomas wasn't receiving gifts from people?Halifax2TheMax said:
No, certain justices are corrupt as hell as well as ethically challenged. Very ethically challenged. Not surprising given who nominated them.gimmesometruth27 said:
because he isn't accountable to anybody for anything, other than the person giving him all that money.Gern Blansten said:This is fucking insane....how does Thomas not resign?
the supreme court is corrupt as hell.
Only god is their witness and their god is an evangelical god. Good luck with that. ‘Murikkka is no better off than any other country with a non-existent or corrupt judicial system. Welcome to the third world.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
I don’t think anyone is or should be surprised by the whole CT ethical discoveries. First and once again a woman is not taken seriously so we end up with a pervert and a liar in the SC. He needs to resign. Kavanaugh’s day is coming.0
-
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
And here I thought John Roberts was so concerned about the optics of the supreme court. If he gave a rat's ass, he'd compel this guy to pack his shit and get out now, or call for an investigation immediately and put him on suspension for the duration.Gern Blansten said:This is fucking insane....how does Thomas not resign?'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
Yeah...honestly I don't understand why the media and dems in congress aren't lighting themselves on fire. Imagine if this shit came out about Kagan or Sotomayorbenjs said:
And here I thought John Roberts was so concerned about the optics of the supreme court. If he gave a rat's ass, he'd compel this guy to pack his shit and get out now, or call for an investigation immediately and put him on suspension for the duration.Gern Blansten said:This is fucking insane....how does Thomas not resign?Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
The media and the dems know that every SCOTUS member has their own baggage. Speaking of Sotomayor, https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/04/politics/sonia-sotomayor-neil-gorsuch-book-recusal-supreme-court-cases/index.htmlGern Blansten said:
Yeah...honestly I don't understand why the media and dems in congress aren't lighting themselves on fire. Imagine if this shit came out about Kagan or Sotomayorbenjs said:
And here I thought John Roberts was so concerned about the optics of the supreme court. If he gave a rat's ass, he'd compel this guy to pack his shit and get out now, or call for an investigation immediately and put him on suspension for the duration.Gern Blansten said:This is fucking insane....how does Thomas not resign?
"Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who joined the court in 2009 and has been paid millions of dollars from the publisher over the years, declined to recuse herself in all three instances."
I can only imagine there are plenty more stories like this from the SCOTUS but hearsay does not count. It's pretty pathetic that people still believe the stories about Kavanaugh. If you have proof, let's see it. Believing all women is a crock of shit. Funny how those that believe the Kavanaugh accusations don't believe the accusations against Biden. You can't have it both ways. If we have to believe one woman, we have to believe all women.
0 -
These are public disclosures in plain view. Thomas was neither declaring them or recusing himself. You don't see the difference?JB16057 said:
The media and the dems know that every SCOTUS member has their own baggage. Speaking of Sotomayor, https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/04/politics/sonia-sotomayor-neil-gorsuch-book-recusal-supreme-court-cases/index.htmlGern Blansten said:
Yeah...honestly I don't understand why the media and dems in congress aren't lighting themselves on fire. Imagine if this shit came out about Kagan or Sotomayorbenjs said:
And here I thought John Roberts was so concerned about the optics of the supreme court. If he gave a rat's ass, he'd compel this guy to pack his shit and get out now, or call for an investigation immediately and put him on suspension for the duration.Gern Blansten said:This is fucking insane....how does Thomas not resign?
"Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who joined the court in 2009 and has been paid millions of dollars from the publisher over the years, declined to recuse herself in all three instances."
I can only imagine there are plenty more stories like this from the SCOTUS but hearsay does not count. It's pretty pathetic that people still believe the stories about Kavanaugh. If you have proof, let's see it. Believing all women is a crock of shit. Funny how those that believe the Kavanaugh accusations don't believe the accusations against Biden. You can't have it both ways. If we have to believe one woman, we have to believe all women.0 -
There are no code of ethics for the SCOTUS so there's problem number one. I have no idea why that is but I know it is above my paygrade.mrussel1 said:
These are public disclosures in plain view. Thomas was neither declaring them or recusing himself. You don't see the difference?JB16057 said:
The media and the dems know that every SCOTUS member has their own baggage. Speaking of Sotomayor, https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/04/politics/sonia-sotomayor-neil-gorsuch-book-recusal-supreme-court-cases/index.htmlGern Blansten said:
Yeah...honestly I don't understand why the media and dems in congress aren't lighting themselves on fire. Imagine if this shit came out about Kagan or Sotomayorbenjs said:
And here I thought John Roberts was so concerned about the optics of the supreme court. If he gave a rat's ass, he'd compel this guy to pack his shit and get out now, or call for an investigation immediately and put him on suspension for the duration.Gern Blansten said:This is fucking insane....how does Thomas not resign?
"Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who joined the court in 2009 and has been paid millions of dollars from the publisher over the years, declined to recuse herself in all three instances."
I can only imagine there are plenty more stories like this from the SCOTUS but hearsay does not count. It's pretty pathetic that people still believe the stories about Kavanaugh. If you have proof, let's see it. Believing all women is a crock of shit. Funny how those that believe the Kavanaugh accusations don't believe the accusations against Biden. You can't have it both ways. If we have to believe one woman, we have to believe all women.
Yes, I see the difference but that doesn't change the fact that Sotomayor should have recused herself like any judge below SCOTUS would of had to do.0 -
First, yes there are. These are barred attorneys that follow a very specific code. Second, there are federal disclosure requirements and it seems plainly obvious that Thomas violated them. But it's up to Roberts to enforce them,. Congress can only censure or Impeach. The DOJ could file federal charges but that's unlikely.JB16057 said:
There are no code of ethics for the SCOTUS so there's problem number one. I have no idea why that is but I know it is above my paygrade.mrussel1 said:
These are public disclosures in plain view. Thomas was neither declaring them or recusing himself. You don't see the difference?JB16057 said:
The media and the dems know that every SCOTUS member has their own baggage. Speaking of Sotomayor, https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/04/politics/sonia-sotomayor-neil-gorsuch-book-recusal-supreme-court-cases/index.htmlGern Blansten said:
Yeah...honestly I don't understand why the media and dems in congress aren't lighting themselves on fire. Imagine if this shit came out about Kagan or Sotomayorbenjs said:
And here I thought John Roberts was so concerned about the optics of the supreme court. If he gave a rat's ass, he'd compel this guy to pack his shit and get out now, or call for an investigation immediately and put him on suspension for the duration.Gern Blansten said:This is fucking insane....how does Thomas not resign?
"Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who joined the court in 2009 and has been paid millions of dollars from the publisher over the years, declined to recuse herself in all three instances."
I can only imagine there are plenty more stories like this from the SCOTUS but hearsay does not count. It's pretty pathetic that people still believe the stories about Kavanaugh. If you have proof, let's see it. Believing all women is a crock of shit. Funny how those that believe the Kavanaugh accusations don't believe the accusations against Biden. You can't have it both ways. If we have to believe one woman, we have to believe all women.
Yes, I see the difference but that doesn't change the fact that Sotomayor should have recused herself like any judge below SCOTUS would of had to do.
Third, you keep forgetting about Gorsuch in your criticism. Just a simple oversight?0 -
All of government is corrupt. Just pile this on top because nothing is going to change.mrussel1 said:
First, yes there are. These are barred attorneys that follow a very specific code. Second, there are federal disclosure requirements and it seems plainly obvious that Thomas violated them. But it's up to Roberts to enforce them,. Congress can only censure or Impeach. The DOJ could file federal charges but that's unlikely.JB16057 said:
There are no code of ethics for the SCOTUS so there's problem number one. I have no idea why that is but I know it is above my paygrade.mrussel1 said:
These are public disclosures in plain view. Thomas was neither declaring them or recusing himself. You don't see the difference?JB16057 said:
The media and the dems know that every SCOTUS member has their own baggage. Speaking of Sotomayor, https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/04/politics/sonia-sotomayor-neil-gorsuch-book-recusal-supreme-court-cases/index.htmlGern Blansten said:
Yeah...honestly I don't understand why the media and dems in congress aren't lighting themselves on fire. Imagine if this shit came out about Kagan or Sotomayorbenjs said:
And here I thought John Roberts was so concerned about the optics of the supreme court. If he gave a rat's ass, he'd compel this guy to pack his shit and get out now, or call for an investigation immediately and put him on suspension for the duration.Gern Blansten said:This is fucking insane....how does Thomas not resign?
"Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who joined the court in 2009 and has been paid millions of dollars from the publisher over the years, declined to recuse herself in all three instances."
I can only imagine there are plenty more stories like this from the SCOTUS but hearsay does not count. It's pretty pathetic that people still believe the stories about Kavanaugh. If you have proof, let's see it. Believing all women is a crock of shit. Funny how those that believe the Kavanaugh accusations don't believe the accusations against Biden. You can't have it both ways. If we have to believe one woman, we have to believe all women.
Yes, I see the difference but that doesn't change the fact that Sotomayor should have recused herself like any judge below SCOTUS would of had to do.
Third, you keep forgetting about Gorsuch in your criticism. Just a simple oversight?0 -
anyone: (this democrat) is corrupt
cons: THROW THE BOOK AT THEM! ALL DEMS ARE CORRUPT LIARS!
anyone: (this conservative) is corrupt
cons: they're all corrupt! who cares!Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
Oh okay. Well there you go. Nothing to do about it. I guess other justices have their sposes collecting 80k payments with the note "don't mention Ginnie, if course". Sure.JB16057 said:
All of government is corrupt. Just pile this on top because nothing is going to change.mrussel1 said:
First, yes there are. These are barred attorneys that follow a very specific code. Second, there are federal disclosure requirements and it seems plainly obvious that Thomas violated them. But it's up to Roberts to enforce them,. Congress can only censure or Impeach. The DOJ could file federal charges but that's unlikely.JB16057 said:
There are no code of ethics for the SCOTUS so there's problem number one. I have no idea why that is but I know it is above my paygrade.mrussel1 said:
These are public disclosures in plain view. Thomas was neither declaring them or recusing himself. You don't see the difference?JB16057 said:
The media and the dems know that every SCOTUS member has their own baggage. Speaking of Sotomayor, https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/04/politics/sonia-sotomayor-neil-gorsuch-book-recusal-supreme-court-cases/index.htmlGern Blansten said:
Yeah...honestly I don't understand why the media and dems in congress aren't lighting themselves on fire. Imagine if this shit came out about Kagan or Sotomayorbenjs said:
And here I thought John Roberts was so concerned about the optics of the supreme court. If he gave a rat's ass, he'd compel this guy to pack his shit and get out now, or call for an investigation immediately and put him on suspension for the duration.Gern Blansten said:This is fucking insane....how does Thomas not resign?
"Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who joined the court in 2009 and has been paid millions of dollars from the publisher over the years, declined to recuse herself in all three instances."
I can only imagine there are plenty more stories like this from the SCOTUS but hearsay does not count. It's pretty pathetic that people still believe the stories about Kavanaugh. If you have proof, let's see it. Believing all women is a crock of shit. Funny how those that believe the Kavanaugh accusations don't believe the accusations against Biden. You can't have it both ways. If we have to believe one woman, we have to believe all women.
Yes, I see the difference but that doesn't change the fact that Sotomayor should have recused herself like any judge below SCOTUS would of had to do.
Third, you keep forgetting about Gorsuch in your criticism. Just a simple oversight?0 -
Classic response.JB16057 said:
All of government is corrupt. Just pile this on top because nothing is going to change.mrussel1 said:
First, yes there are. These are barred attorneys that follow a very specific code. Second, there are federal disclosure requirements and it seems plainly obvious that Thomas violated them. But it's up to Roberts to enforce them,. Congress can only censure or Impeach. The DOJ could file federal charges but that's unlikely.JB16057 said:
There are no code of ethics for the SCOTUS so there's problem number one. I have no idea why that is but I know it is above my paygrade.mrussel1 said:
These are public disclosures in plain view. Thomas was neither declaring them or recusing himself. You don't see the difference?JB16057 said:
The media and the dems know that every SCOTUS member has their own baggage. Speaking of Sotomayor, https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/04/politics/sonia-sotomayor-neil-gorsuch-book-recusal-supreme-court-cases/index.htmlGern Blansten said:
Yeah...honestly I don't understand why the media and dems in congress aren't lighting themselves on fire. Imagine if this shit came out about Kagan or Sotomayorbenjs said:
And here I thought John Roberts was so concerned about the optics of the supreme court. If he gave a rat's ass, he'd compel this guy to pack his shit and get out now, or call for an investigation immediately and put him on suspension for the duration.Gern Blansten said:This is fucking insane....how does Thomas not resign?
"Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who joined the court in 2009 and has been paid millions of dollars from the publisher over the years, declined to recuse herself in all three instances."
I can only imagine there are plenty more stories like this from the SCOTUS but hearsay does not count. It's pretty pathetic that people still believe the stories about Kavanaugh. If you have proof, let's see it. Believing all women is a crock of shit. Funny how those that believe the Kavanaugh accusations don't believe the accusations against Biden. You can't have it both ways. If we have to believe one woman, we have to believe all women.
Yes, I see the difference but that doesn't change the fact that Sotomayor should have recused herself like any judge below SCOTUS would of had to do.
Third, you keep forgetting about Gorsuch in your criticism. Just a simple oversight?
Lazy & weak, too.0 -
Oh OK, and what are you going to do about it? Sit on a Pearl Jam forum all day and play keyboard warrior with your fellow democrats?Merkin Baller said:
Classic response.JB16057 said:
All of government is corrupt. Just pile this on top because nothing is going to change.mrussel1 said:
First, yes there are. These are barred attorneys that follow a very specific code. Second, there are federal disclosure requirements and it seems plainly obvious that Thomas violated them. But it's up to Roberts to enforce them,. Congress can only censure or Impeach. The DOJ could file federal charges but that's unlikely.JB16057 said:
There are no code of ethics for the SCOTUS so there's problem number one. I have no idea why that is but I know it is above my paygrade.mrussel1 said:
These are public disclosures in plain view. Thomas was neither declaring them or recusing himself. You don't see the difference?JB16057 said:
The media and the dems know that every SCOTUS member has their own baggage. Speaking of Sotomayor, https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/04/politics/sonia-sotomayor-neil-gorsuch-book-recusal-supreme-court-cases/index.htmlGern Blansten said:
Yeah...honestly I don't understand why the media and dems in congress aren't lighting themselves on fire. Imagine if this shit came out about Kagan or Sotomayorbenjs said:
And here I thought John Roberts was so concerned about the optics of the supreme court. If he gave a rat's ass, he'd compel this guy to pack his shit and get out now, or call for an investigation immediately and put him on suspension for the duration.Gern Blansten said:This is fucking insane....how does Thomas not resign?
"Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who joined the court in 2009 and has been paid millions of dollars from the publisher over the years, declined to recuse herself in all three instances."
I can only imagine there are plenty more stories like this from the SCOTUS but hearsay does not count. It's pretty pathetic that people still believe the stories about Kavanaugh. If you have proof, let's see it. Believing all women is a crock of shit. Funny how those that believe the Kavanaugh accusations don't believe the accusations against Biden. You can't have it both ways. If we have to believe one woman, we have to believe all women.
Yes, I see the difference but that doesn't change the fact that Sotomayor should have recused herself like any judge below SCOTUS would of had to do.
Third, you keep forgetting about Gorsuch in your criticism. Just a simple oversight?
Lazy & weak, too.
0 -
YO MAMA!JB16057 said:
Oh OK, and what are you going to do about it? Sit on a Pearl Jam forum all day and play keyboard warrior with your fellow democrats?Merkin Baller said:
Classic response.JB16057 said:
All of government is corrupt. Just pile this on top because nothing is going to change.mrussel1 said:
First, yes there are. These are barred attorneys that follow a very specific code. Second, there are federal disclosure requirements and it seems plainly obvious that Thomas violated them. But it's up to Roberts to enforce them,. Congress can only censure or Impeach. The DOJ could file federal charges but that's unlikely.JB16057 said:
There are no code of ethics for the SCOTUS so there's problem number one. I have no idea why that is but I know it is above my paygrade.mrussel1 said:
These are public disclosures in plain view. Thomas was neither declaring them or recusing himself. You don't see the difference?JB16057 said:
The media and the dems know that every SCOTUS member has their own baggage. Speaking of Sotomayor, https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/04/politics/sonia-sotomayor-neil-gorsuch-book-recusal-supreme-court-cases/index.htmlGern Blansten said:
Yeah...honestly I don't understand why the media and dems in congress aren't lighting themselves on fire. Imagine if this shit came out about Kagan or Sotomayorbenjs said:
And here I thought John Roberts was so concerned about the optics of the supreme court. If he gave a rat's ass, he'd compel this guy to pack his shit and get out now, or call for an investigation immediately and put him on suspension for the duration.Gern Blansten said:This is fucking insane....how does Thomas not resign?
"Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who joined the court in 2009 and has been paid millions of dollars from the publisher over the years, declined to recuse herself in all three instances."
I can only imagine there are plenty more stories like this from the SCOTUS but hearsay does not count. It's pretty pathetic that people still believe the stories about Kavanaugh. If you have proof, let's see it. Believing all women is a crock of shit. Funny how those that believe the Kavanaugh accusations don't believe the accusations against Biden. You can't have it both ways. If we have to believe one woman, we have to believe all women.
Yes, I see the difference but that doesn't change the fact that Sotomayor should have recused herself like any judge below SCOTUS would of had to do.
Third, you keep forgetting about Gorsuch in your criticism. Just a simple oversight?
Lazy & weak, too.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
Yep, exactly.HughFreakingDillon said:
YO MAMA!JB16057 said:
Oh OK, and what are you going to do about it? Sit on a Pearl Jam forum all day and play keyboard warrior with your fellow democrats?Merkin Baller said:
Classic response.JB16057 said:
All of government is corrupt. Just pile this on top because nothing is going to change.mrussel1 said:
First, yes there are. These are barred attorneys that follow a very specific code. Second, there are federal disclosure requirements and it seems plainly obvious that Thomas violated them. But it's up to Roberts to enforce them,. Congress can only censure or Impeach. The DOJ could file federal charges but that's unlikely.JB16057 said:
There are no code of ethics for the SCOTUS so there's problem number one. I have no idea why that is but I know it is above my paygrade.mrussel1 said:
These are public disclosures in plain view. Thomas was neither declaring them or recusing himself. You don't see the difference?JB16057 said:
The media and the dems know that every SCOTUS member has their own baggage. Speaking of Sotomayor, https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/04/politics/sonia-sotomayor-neil-gorsuch-book-recusal-supreme-court-cases/index.htmlGern Blansten said:
Yeah...honestly I don't understand why the media and dems in congress aren't lighting themselves on fire. Imagine if this shit came out about Kagan or Sotomayorbenjs said:
And here I thought John Roberts was so concerned about the optics of the supreme court. If he gave a rat's ass, he'd compel this guy to pack his shit and get out now, or call for an investigation immediately and put him on suspension for the duration.Gern Blansten said:This is fucking insane....how does Thomas not resign?
"Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who joined the court in 2009 and has been paid millions of dollars from the publisher over the years, declined to recuse herself in all three instances."
I can only imagine there are plenty more stories like this from the SCOTUS but hearsay does not count. It's pretty pathetic that people still believe the stories about Kavanaugh. If you have proof, let's see it. Believing all women is a crock of shit. Funny how those that believe the Kavanaugh accusations don't believe the accusations against Biden. You can't have it both ways. If we have to believe one woman, we have to believe all women.
Yes, I see the difference but that doesn't change the fact that Sotomayor should have recused herself like any judge below SCOTUS would of had to do.
Third, you keep forgetting about Gorsuch in your criticism. Just a simple oversight?
Lazy & weak, too.0 -
Not a democrat.JB16057 said:
Oh OK, and what are you going to do about it? Sit on a Pearl Jam forum all day and play keyboard warrior with your fellow democrats?Merkin Baller said:
Classic response.JB16057 said:
All of government is corrupt. Just pile this on top because nothing is going to change.mrussel1 said:
First, yes there are. These are barred attorneys that follow a very specific code. Second, there are federal disclosure requirements and it seems plainly obvious that Thomas violated them. But it's up to Roberts to enforce them,. Congress can only censure or Impeach. The DOJ could file federal charges but that's unlikely.JB16057 said:
There are no code of ethics for the SCOTUS so there's problem number one. I have no idea why that is but I know it is above my paygrade.mrussel1 said:
These are public disclosures in plain view. Thomas was neither declaring them or recusing himself. You don't see the difference?JB16057 said:
The media and the dems know that every SCOTUS member has their own baggage. Speaking of Sotomayor, https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/04/politics/sonia-sotomayor-neil-gorsuch-book-recusal-supreme-court-cases/index.htmlGern Blansten said:
Yeah...honestly I don't understand why the media and dems in congress aren't lighting themselves on fire. Imagine if this shit came out about Kagan or Sotomayorbenjs said:
And here I thought John Roberts was so concerned about the optics of the supreme court. If he gave a rat's ass, he'd compel this guy to pack his shit and get out now, or call for an investigation immediately and put him on suspension for the duration.Gern Blansten said:This is fucking insane....how does Thomas not resign?
"Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who joined the court in 2009 and has been paid millions of dollars from the publisher over the years, declined to recuse herself in all three instances."
I can only imagine there are plenty more stories like this from the SCOTUS but hearsay does not count. It's pretty pathetic that people still believe the stories about Kavanaugh. If you have proof, let's see it. Believing all women is a crock of shit. Funny how those that believe the Kavanaugh accusations don't believe the accusations against Biden. You can't have it both ways. If we have to believe one woman, we have to believe all women.
Yes, I see the difference but that doesn't change the fact that Sotomayor should have recused herself like any judge below SCOTUS would of had to do.
Third, you keep forgetting about Gorsuch in your criticism. Just a simple oversight?
Lazy & weak, too.
But do go on.Post edited by Kat on0 -
That was directed at your "what are you going to do about it?" nonsense.JB16057 said:
Yep, exactly.HughFreakingDillon said:
YO MAMA!JB16057 said:
Oh OK, and what are you going to do about it? Sit on a Pearl Jam forum all day and play keyboard warrior with your fellow democrats?Merkin Baller said:
Classic response.JB16057 said:
All of government is corrupt. Just pile this on top because nothing is going to change.mrussel1 said:
First, yes there are. These are barred attorneys that follow a very specific code. Second, there are federal disclosure requirements and it seems plainly obvious that Thomas violated them. But it's up to Roberts to enforce them,. Congress can only censure or Impeach. The DOJ could file federal charges but that's unlikely.JB16057 said:
There are no code of ethics for the SCOTUS so there's problem number one. I have no idea why that is but I know it is above my paygrade.mrussel1 said:
These are public disclosures in plain view. Thomas was neither declaring them or recusing himself. You don't see the difference?JB16057 said:
The media and the dems know that every SCOTUS member has their own baggage. Speaking of Sotomayor, https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/04/politics/sonia-sotomayor-neil-gorsuch-book-recusal-supreme-court-cases/index.htmlGern Blansten said:
Yeah...honestly I don't understand why the media and dems in congress aren't lighting themselves on fire. Imagine if this shit came out about Kagan or Sotomayorbenjs said:
And here I thought John Roberts was so concerned about the optics of the supreme court. If he gave a rat's ass, he'd compel this guy to pack his shit and get out now, or call for an investigation immediately and put him on suspension for the duration.Gern Blansten said:This is fucking insane....how does Thomas not resign?
"Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who joined the court in 2009 and has been paid millions of dollars from the publisher over the years, declined to recuse herself in all three instances."
I can only imagine there are plenty more stories like this from the SCOTUS but hearsay does not count. It's pretty pathetic that people still believe the stories about Kavanaugh. If you have proof, let's see it. Believing all women is a crock of shit. Funny how those that believe the Kavanaugh accusations don't believe the accusations against Biden. You can't have it both ways. If we have to believe one woman, we have to believe all women.
Yes, I see the difference but that doesn't change the fact that Sotomayor should have recused herself like any judge below SCOTUS would of had to do.
Third, you keep forgetting about Gorsuch in your criticism. Just a simple oversight?
Lazy & weak, too.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
Classic response, name calling.Merkin Baller said:
Not a democrat.JB16057 said:
Oh OK, and what are you going to do about it? Sit on a Pearl Jam forum all day and play keyboard warrior with your fellow democrats?Merkin Baller said:
Classic response.JB16057 said:
All of government is corrupt. Just pile this on top because nothing is going to change.mrussel1 said:
First, yes there are. These are barred attorneys that follow a very specific code. Second, there are federal disclosure requirements and it seems plainly obvious that Thomas violated them. But it's up to Roberts to enforce them,. Congress can only censure or Impeach. The DOJ could file federal charges but that's unlikely.JB16057 said:
There are no code of ethics for the SCOTUS so there's problem number one. I have no idea why that is but I know it is above my paygrade.mrussel1 said:
These are public disclosures in plain view. Thomas was neither declaring them or recusing himself. You don't see the difference?JB16057 said:
The media and the dems know that every SCOTUS member has their own baggage. Speaking of Sotomayor, https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/04/politics/sonia-sotomayor-neil-gorsuch-book-recusal-supreme-court-cases/index.htmlGern Blansten said:
Yeah...honestly I don't understand why the media and dems in congress aren't lighting themselves on fire. Imagine if this shit came out about Kagan or Sotomayorbenjs said:
And here I thought John Roberts was so concerned about the optics of the supreme court. If he gave a rat's ass, he'd compel this guy to pack his shit and get out now, or call for an investigation immediately and put him on suspension for the duration.Gern Blansten said:This is fucking insane....how does Thomas not resign?
"Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who joined the court in 2009 and has been paid millions of dollars from the publisher over the years, declined to recuse herself in all three instances."
I can only imagine there are plenty more stories like this from the SCOTUS but hearsay does not count. It's pretty pathetic that people still believe the stories about Kavanaugh. If you have proof, let's see it. Believing all women is a crock of shit. Funny how those that believe the Kavanaugh accusations don't believe the accusations against Biden. You can't have it both ways. If we have to believe one woman, we have to believe all women.
Yes, I see the difference but that doesn't change the fact that Sotomayor should have recused herself like any judge below SCOTUS would of had to do.
Third, you keep forgetting about Gorsuch in your criticism. Just a simple oversight?
Lazy & weak, too.
But do go on.
Lazy & weak, too.
Post edited by Kat on0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help