It was probably the right decision. Plus it at least shows that some justices aren't making their decisions based on their feelings about one polarizing figure.
Stop freaking out, lefty! Get a fucking grip on yourself.
0
Options
mickeyrat
up my ass, like Chadwick was up his Posts: 35,802
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
0
Options
mickeyrat
up my ass, like Chadwick was up his Posts: 35,802
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
“Ginni Thomas has finished checking her messages. chuckling softly, she tucks herself back into the Spanx waistband, smoothes her cashmere sweater, and reaches for Condé Nast Traveler, envisioning luxury cabanas and mass executions”
I’m ok with the decision nothing to be surprised about considering the bought & payed for justices! The decision I’m most looking forward to is the immunity one which way do you think they will decide?
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
LMAO at the left. Everyday they prove how dumb they are.
Three liberal judges just ruled in favor of Trump. Grouping everyone "left" together never has and never will make any sense.
Why the meltdown on socials then? Lefts are trying to say they should all be kicked off the court....and they are traitors blah blah blah..
There was never any potential outcome then the one the court agreed upon unanimously. Anyone with half an education beyond a High School Diploma or GED should understand this. It wouldn't matter if it was Trump or anyone else.
"Three liberal judges just ruled in concurrence with the laws of the land." Fixed it for you.
If it was split on party lines then there would be a reasonable discussion to be had.
I haven't heard any mainstream dem/liberal say that. Likely you haven't either. Just because some numnut on facebook says it doesn't mean they speak for all liberals.
Let's take a look at the spokespeople for the left...the champions of the cause....
LMAO at the left. Everyday they prove how dumb they are.
Three liberal judges just ruled in favor of Trump. Grouping everyone "left" together never has and never will make any sense.
Why the meltdown on socials then? Lefts are trying to say they should all be kicked off the court....and they are traitors blah blah blah..
There was never any potential outcome then the one the court agreed upon unanimously. Anyone with half an education beyond a High School Diploma or GED should understand this. It wouldn't matter if it was Trump or anyone else.
"Three liberal judges just ruled in concurrence with the laws of the land." Fixed it for you.
If it was split on party lines then there would be a reasonable discussion to be had.
I haven't heard any mainstream dem/liberal say that. Likely you haven't either. Just because some numnut on facebook says it doesn't mean they speak for all liberals.
Let's take a look at the spokespeople for the left...the champions of the cause....
You can peruse the comments sections and likes they receive of your own free will. Lefts are in full meltdown.
Why not just beat him on the ballot instead of crying that they can't circumvent laws to keep him off the ballot?
Funny you say that we did beat him on the ballot see 2020! Did he take the loosing honorably I ask you? No he fucking ordered an insurrection! So what’s it going to take beating how many times before he crawls away and never to be heard again? So please tell us again who was crying like a petulant child?
I agree. He is a petulant child.
Was the election fair? Yes.
I disagree, he did not order an insurrection. The courts and laws agree with me. You need to accept this as fact and move past it.
he didn't explicitly order it. but he did the political equivalent of yelling fire in a crowded theatre. actually, he did worse. he yelled fire and then lied about who lit it and pointed the "victims" in their direction.
I don't know how anyone could come to the conclusion that there should be no consequences for that.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
0
Options
brianlux
Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 40,732
zzzzzzzzzz
“The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
Opinion | With Colorado ruling, the court displays an ‘originalism of convenience’ Opinion by Ruth Marcus Associate editor March 07, 2024 at 6:30 ET So much for originalism. We’ve seen this phenomenon from this conservative, supposedly originalist court before. But Monday’s ruling in Trump v. Anderson underscores the undeniable reality: the court practices an originalism of convenience. When push comes to shove, when a strict originalist approach would yield an undesirable outcome, professed fealty to originalism gives way to practical considerations. Some might call this results-oriented reasoning hypocritical. In this instance — I agree with the bottom line — I’ll go with a welcome display of intellectual flexibility and common sense. In my view, the court was correct to consider the practical fallout of letting Colorado remove former president Donald Trump from its primary ballot, as all nine justices agreed should not be allowed. Maybe we’re all living constitutionalists now. Listen to the conservative justices discussing the dangerous consequences of letting individual states decide for themselves whether candidates for president should be allowed on the ballot.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
0
Options
mickeyrat
up my ass, like Chadwick was up his Posts: 35,802
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
0
Options
mickeyrat
up my ass, like Chadwick was up his Posts: 35,802
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
0
Options
mickeyrat
up my ass, like Chadwick was up his Posts: 35,802
The Biggest Election Deniers Want SCOTUS to Ban Voting Machines
By Matt Cohen
March 15, 2024
“This is big everybody! This is what we’ve been waiting for,” Mike
Lindell, the pillow mogul, conspiracy theorist and advisor to former
President Donald Trump, teased
on Steve Bannon’s podcast on Sunday. “This isn’t just some tinfoil hat
case, this is huge… This new evidence is the most explosive evidence
ever! This coming Friday on the steps of the Supreme Court, 3:00 PM.
We’re gonna hand-deliver this to the world. It’s going to be the biggest
thing ever, and we are going to save this country!”
Lindell will not end up on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court, as he later told Lou Dobbs that it was not “safe” for him without explaining why. But lawyers that Lindell hired
are reviving a lawsuit challenging the use of electronic voting
machines in Arizona by asking the nation’s highest court to take the
case. The lawsuit — filed originally in 2022 on behalf of Republican
gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake and state Rep. Mark Finchem, who ran
for secretary of state — alleges
that the electronic voting systems used to tabulate votes are not
trustworthy, thus violating state law and the U.S. Constitution.
The allegations, based on false claims and conspiracy theories about
Dominion Voting Systems stemming from the “Big Lie” of the 2020
election, were rejected by an Arizona district court judge — who sanctioned
Lake, Finchem, and their lawyers for their baseless claims — and the
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. But that hasn’t stopped Lake and
company.
In a cert petition filed in the Supreme Court — by one of Lindell’s lawyers, Lawrence J. Joseph, and first uploaded by Arizona Law
— Lake and Finchem again stir up conspiracy theories about Dominion
Voting Services, a voting machine manufacturer whose products are used
widely in elections across the country. Specifically, they allege that
Maricopa County election officials used “uncertified” software to
tabulate votes, and that they found a security breach in Dominion’s
voting machines that made them vulnerable to hacking.
With this latest effort, it’s time to review the wide-ranging cast of characters involved in this “frivolous” lawsuit that’s dragged on for two years.
Mike Lindell
For many years, Mike Lindell was best known as the MyPillow Guy — the
founder and CEO of a pillow manufacturing company who dominated infomercials in the mid-to-late 2000s. Lindell was an early supporter
of, and major donor to, Trump in the 2016 presidential race and soon
his relationship with the former president eclipsed his reputation as a
pillow magnate.
Lindell attended Trump’s inauguration and was a frequentguest
at the White House during his presidency. His seemingly close
relationship with the former president turned him into a popular figure
in Trump’s GOP, giving him a major platform as a frequent Fox News guest (also thanks to his MyPillow advertising on the network) and featured speaker at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC).
In 2020, Lindell campaigned for Trump and became a central figure in
the efforts to overturn the results of the election. After president Joe
Biden was declared the presumptive winner, Lindell sponsored and financed
a two-week bus tour across the country where prominent Trump supporters
held rallies promoting conspiracy theories about a stolen election.
Lindell was one of the most vocal proponents
of a debunked conspiracy theory alleging that Dominion Voting Systems —
a voting machine manufacturer whose products are used widely in
elections across the country — conspired with Biden and Democrats to
steal the election from Trump. “You have positioned yourself as a
prominent leader of the ongoing misinformation campaign,” Dominion wrote in a warning letter to Lindell. The company subsequently filed a defamation lawsuit against Lindell for $1.3 billion.
He continued his crusade against electronic voting machines in the
2022 midterms, bankrolling a legal effort to get them outlawed in
Arizona. He contributed at least $500,000 toward the lawsuit filed by
Lake and Finchem to ban the use of voting machines in the Arizona
midterms, according
to The Guardian, and said he wants to underwrite similar lawsuits
across the country. “I’d like to file the lawsuits in all 50 states,” he
said.
But she’s been the loudest in her promotion of the “Big Lie.” Her lawsuit
with Finchem to ban electronic voting machines was filed before she
even officially launched her gubernatorial campaign. She spent a
majority of her midterm campaign traveling around the state bragging
about her loyalty to Trump and the “Big Lie” movement. “As bad as they
want to make the stolen election, known as ‘The Big Lie’ go away — they
will never be successful,” she wrote on Twitter. “The World knows that 2020 was a terrible disaster that forced the worst President in History.”
After Lake’s resounding loss to Gov. Katie Hobbs (D) she refused to concede and describes herself as the “lawful governor of Arizona.” In December of 2022, she sued
Hobbs, who at the time was secretary of state, along with the Maricopa
County recorder, board of supervisors and director of elections
challenging the results of the election, which was dismissed by a
district court, the Arizona Court of Appeals and the Arizona Supreme
Court. (She appealed the Supreme Court decision and the litigation is ongoing before the Arizona Court of Appeals).
In October of 2023, Lake officially launched
her campaign for U.S. Senate, for the seat currently held by outgoing
Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I). In her Senate campaign, Lake is attempting (and
failing) to somewhat rehabilitate
her image as a hardline MAGA conspiracy theorist, saying in her
announcement speech that she wants to “restore honest elections,” which
she said was “not a Republican issue. It’s not a Democrat issue. It’s an
American issue,” according to the Wall Street Journal.
Kari Lake is still an election denier and her attachment to the writ
of certiorari filed today cements her connection to one of the biggest
lingering election litigation fueled by conspiracy theories.
Mark Finchem
Years before Finchem launched his campaign
to be Arizona’s secretary of state he cultivated a reputation as one of
the state’s most extremist Republican politicians. He’s a longtime
member of the far-right paramilitary group the Oath Keepers and, throughout his tenure in the Arizona House of Representatives, promoted a long list of racist, antisemitic and QAnon conspiracy theories, including that 9/11 was an attack by the federal government and that the deadly 2017 Unite the Right white supremacist rally was a Democratic deep state psyop.
Finchem attended
the rally near the White House on Jan. 6, 2021 that preceded the deadly
attack on the U.S. Capitol. He later tweeted photos of protesters
trespassing on the Capitol grounds and was subsequently interviewed by the U.S. Department of Justice and the House committee tasked with investigating the attack.
Like Lake, Finchem lost his 2022 election and sued to get the results overturned. A trial court dismissed the lawsuit and Finchem’s appeal to the Arizona Supreme Court was denied. Finchem appealed the Supreme Court’s denial but eventually withdrew it after a Maricopa County Superior Court Judge sanctioned him and his lawyer over the suit, writing that the lawsuit “was groundless and not brought in good faith.” His lawyer was forced to retire after the sanction. In July of 2023, Finchem filed a “statement of interest” to run for a seat in the Arizona state Senate.
Alan Dershowitz
Dershowitz — one of the most well-known Constitutional lawyers who’s represented everyone from O.J. Simpson, to Julian Assange, to Jeffrey Epstein and Trump in his first impeachment trial — said that he joined Lindell’s legal team in 2022 out of “respect for civil liberties and the Constitution.”
Specifically, Dershowitz said that he joined Lindell’s legal team to
represent him in a lawsuit against the Justice Department and the
Federal Bureau of Investigation over their search and seizure of his phone as part of an investigation into a Colorado county clerk allegedly tampering with voting equipment in 2022.
Yet Lindell kept Dershowitz on retainer and said
that he “hired” him to help with Lake and Finchem’s lawsuit to ban
electronic voting machines in Arizona. Dershowitz, along with Lake,
Finchem and the other members of Lindell’s legal team, were sanctioned by a district court judge. Dershowitz asked the court to reconsider, but his request was denied. In the order granting sanctions, the judge wrote
that the claims of the lawsuit were “frivolous in that they are ‘both
baseless and made without a reasonable and competent inquiry,’” and
specifically called out Lindell’s legal team for defending claims about
electronic voting machines that “baselessly kicked up a cloud of dust.”
In a statement
to Arizona Central in response to the sanctions, Dershowitz wrote that
he “never challenged the results of any Arizona elections,” but that he
“provided legal advice about the future use of vote counting machines by
companies that refuse to disclose the inner workings of their
machines.”
Lawrence J. Joseph
Lawrence Joseph, an attorney who is representing the applicants in
their petition filed in the Supreme Court today, is a familiar name to
those who paid close attention to Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020
election. That is because Joseph was instrumental in the legal efforts
that attempted to overturn the 2020 election results. Joseph notoriously
filed a petition on behalf of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to sue the state of Pennsylvania over their certification of 2020 election results.
The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a request to hear the case, and an amicus brief filed
by a group of former Republican officials opposing the effort said that
Paxton’s lawsuit “make a mockery of federalism and separation of
powers.”
Lawrence also filed a lawsuit
on behalf of Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert (R) against former Vice President
Mike Pence that sought to force Pence to reject the electoral votes in
certain states and instead have him choose electors to cast their ballot
for Trump.
We depend on your support to keep bringing you the latest
information and insight on the fight for democracy – always free and
available for all. After all, we can’t fight for the future of our
democracy unless we know what’s happening.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Comments
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
https://video.snapstream.net/Play/7EbeOwjfsAUmPgG78Kd9Bf?accessToken=dtue6kkdadhf3
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
SCOTUS also stayed away from the Colorado courts ruling that he engaged in Insurrection. which is kind of a big deal........
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
www.headstonesband.com
I don't know how anyone could come to the conclusion that there should be no consequences for that.
www.headstonesband.com
if mike pence has the courage...
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
or meme.
to own the libz
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Opinion by Ruth Marcus
Associate editor
March 07, 2024 at 6:30 ET
So much for originalism.
We’ve seen this phenomenon from this conservative, supposedly originalist court before. But Monday’s ruling in Trump v. Anderson underscores the undeniable reality: the court practices an originalism of convenience. When push comes to shove, when a strict originalist approach would yield an undesirable outcome, professed fealty to originalism gives way to practical considerations.
Some might call this results-oriented reasoning hypocritical. In this instance — I agree with the bottom line — I’ll go with a welcome display of intellectual flexibility and common sense. In my view, the court was correct to consider the practical fallout of letting Colorado remove former president Donald Trump from its primary ballot, as all nine justices agreed should not be allowed. Maybe we’re all living constitutionalists now.
Listen to the conservative justices discussing the dangerous consequences of letting individual states decide for themselves whether candidates for president should be allowed on the ballot.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
The Biggest Election Deniers Want SCOTUS to Ban Voting Machines By Matt Cohen March 15, 2024
“This is big everybody! This is what we’ve been waiting for,” Mike Lindell, the pillow mogul, conspiracy theorist and advisor to former President Donald Trump, teased on Steve Bannon’s podcast on Sunday. “This isn’t just some tinfoil hat case, this is huge… This new evidence is the most explosive evidence ever! This coming Friday on the steps of the Supreme Court, 3:00 PM. We’re gonna hand-deliver this to the world. It’s going to be the biggest thing ever, and we are going to save this country!”
Lindell will not end up on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court, as he later told Lou Dobbs that it was not “safe” for him without explaining why. But lawyers that Lindell hired are reviving a lawsuit challenging the use of electronic voting machines in Arizona by asking the nation’s highest court to take the case. The lawsuit — filed originally in 2022 on behalf of Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake and state Rep. Mark Finchem, who ran for secretary of state — alleges that the electronic voting systems used to tabulate votes are not trustworthy, thus violating state law and the U.S. Constitution.
The allegations, based on false claims and conspiracy theories about Dominion Voting Systems stemming from the “Big Lie” of the 2020 election, were rejected by an Arizona district court judge — who sanctioned Lake, Finchem, and their lawyers for their baseless claims — and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. But that hasn’t stopped Lake and company.
In a cert petition filed in the Supreme Court — by one of Lindell’s lawyers, Lawrence J. Joseph, and first uploaded by Arizona Law — Lake and Finchem again stir up conspiracy theories about Dominion Voting Services, a voting machine manufacturer whose products are used widely in elections across the country. Specifically, they allege that Maricopa County election officials used “uncertified” software to tabulate votes, and that they found a security breach in Dominion’s voting machines that made them vulnerable to hacking.
With this latest effort, it’s time to review the wide-ranging cast of characters involved in this “frivolous” lawsuit that’s dragged on for two years.
Mike Lindell
For many years, Mike Lindell was best known as the MyPillow Guy — the founder and CEO of a pillow manufacturing company who dominated infomercials in the mid-to-late 2000s. Lindell was an early supporter of, and major donor to, Trump in the 2016 presidential race and soon his relationship with the former president eclipsed his reputation as a pillow magnate.
Lindell attended Trump’s inauguration and was a frequent guest at the White House during his presidency. His seemingly close relationship with the former president turned him into a popular figure in Trump’s GOP, giving him a major platform as a frequent Fox News guest (also thanks to his MyPillow advertising on the network) and featured speaker at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC).
In 2020, Lindell campaigned for Trump and became a central figure in the efforts to overturn the results of the election. After president Joe Biden was declared the presumptive winner, Lindell sponsored and financed a two-week bus tour across the country where prominent Trump supporters held rallies promoting conspiracy theories about a stolen election. Lindell was one of the most vocal proponents of a debunked conspiracy theory alleging that Dominion Voting Systems — a voting machine manufacturer whose products are used widely in elections across the country — conspired with Biden and Democrats to steal the election from Trump. “You have positioned yourself as a prominent leader of the ongoing misinformation campaign,” Dominion wrote in a warning letter to Lindell. The company subsequently filed a defamation lawsuit against Lindell for $1.3 billion.
He continued his crusade against electronic voting machines in the 2022 midterms, bankrolling a legal effort to get them outlawed in Arizona. He contributed at least $500,000 toward the lawsuit filed by Lake and Finchem to ban the use of voting machines in the Arizona midterms, according to The Guardian, and said he wants to underwrite similar lawsuits across the country. “I’d like to file the lawsuits in all 50 states,” he said.
Kari Lake
Lake, a former local TV news anchor, positioned herself as Arizona’s leading MAGA sycophant — and avowed election denier — when she launched her gubernatorial campaign in 2021. Throughout her pivot from media to politics, Lake promoted right-wing conspiracy theories and misinformation relating to COVID-19, former President Barack Obama and immigration.
But she’s been the loudest in her promotion of the “Big Lie.” Her lawsuit with Finchem to ban electronic voting machines was filed before she even officially launched her gubernatorial campaign. She spent a majority of her midterm campaign traveling around the state bragging about her loyalty to Trump and the “Big Lie” movement. “As bad as they want to make the stolen election, known as ‘The Big Lie’ go away — they will never be successful,” she wrote on Twitter. “The World knows that 2020 was a terrible disaster that forced the worst President in History.”
After Lake’s resounding loss to Gov. Katie Hobbs (D) she refused to concede and describes herself as the “lawful governor of Arizona.” In December of 2022, she sued Hobbs, who at the time was secretary of state, along with the Maricopa County recorder, board of supervisors and director of elections challenging the results of the election, which was dismissed by a district court, the Arizona Court of Appeals and the Arizona Supreme Court. (She appealed the Supreme Court decision and the litigation is ongoing before the Arizona Court of Appeals).
In October of 2023, Lake officially launched her campaign for U.S. Senate, for the seat currently held by outgoing Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I). In her Senate campaign, Lake is attempting (and failing) to somewhat rehabilitate her image as a hardline MAGA conspiracy theorist, saying in her announcement speech that she wants to “restore honest elections,” which she said was “not a Republican issue. It’s not a Democrat issue. It’s an American issue,” according to the Wall Street Journal.
Kari Lake is still an election denier and her attachment to the writ of certiorari filed today cements her connection to one of the biggest lingering election litigation fueled by conspiracy theories.
Mark Finchem
Years before Finchem launched his campaign to be Arizona’s secretary of state he cultivated a reputation as one of the state’s most extremist Republican politicians. He’s a longtime member of the far-right paramilitary group the Oath Keepers and, throughout his tenure in the Arizona House of Representatives, promoted a long list of racist, antisemitic and QAnon conspiracy theories, including that 9/11 was an attack by the federal government and that the deadly 2017 Unite the Right white supremacist rally was a Democratic deep state psyop.
Finchem attended the rally near the White House on Jan. 6, 2021 that preceded the deadly attack on the U.S. Capitol. He later tweeted photos of protesters trespassing on the Capitol grounds and was subsequently interviewed by the U.S. Department of Justice and the House committee tasked with investigating the attack.
Like Lake, Finchem lost his 2022 election and sued to get the results overturned. A trial court dismissed the lawsuit and Finchem’s appeal to the Arizona Supreme Court was denied. Finchem appealed the Supreme Court’s denial but eventually withdrew it after a Maricopa County Superior Court Judge sanctioned him and his lawyer over the suit, writing that the lawsuit “was groundless and not brought in good faith.” His lawyer was forced to retire after the sanction. In July of 2023, Finchem filed a “statement of interest” to run for a seat in the Arizona state Senate.
Alan Dershowitz
Dershowitz — one of the most well-known Constitutional lawyers who’s represented everyone from O.J. Simpson, to Julian Assange, to Jeffrey Epstein and Trump in his first impeachment trial — said that he joined Lindell’s legal team in 2022 out of “respect for civil liberties and the Constitution.”
Specifically, Dershowitz said that he joined Lindell’s legal team to represent him in a lawsuit against the Justice Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation over their search and seizure of his phone as part of an investigation into a Colorado county clerk allegedly tampering with voting equipment in 2022.
Yet Lindell kept Dershowitz on retainer and said that he “hired” him to help with Lake and Finchem’s lawsuit to ban electronic voting machines in Arizona. Dershowitz, along with Lake, Finchem and the other members of Lindell’s legal team, were sanctioned by a district court judge. Dershowitz asked the court to reconsider, but his request was denied. In the order granting sanctions, the judge wrote that the claims of the lawsuit were “frivolous in that they are ‘both baseless and made without a reasonable and competent inquiry,’” and specifically called out Lindell’s legal team for defending claims about electronic voting machines that “baselessly kicked up a cloud of dust.”
In a statement to Arizona Central in response to the sanctions, Dershowitz wrote that he “never challenged the results of any Arizona elections,” but that he “provided legal advice about the future use of vote counting machines by companies that refuse to disclose the inner workings of their machines.”
Lawrence J. Joseph
Lawrence Joseph, an attorney who is representing the applicants in their petition filed in the Supreme Court today, is a familiar name to those who paid close attention to Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. That is because Joseph was instrumental in the legal efforts that attempted to overturn the 2020 election results. Joseph notoriously filed a petition on behalf of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to sue the state of Pennsylvania over their certification of 2020 election results.
The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a request to hear the case, and an amicus brief filed by a group of former Republican officials opposing the effort said that Paxton’s lawsuit “make a mockery of federalism and separation of powers.”
Lawrence also filed a lawsuit on behalf of Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert (R) against former Vice President Mike Pence that sought to force Pence to reject the electoral votes in certain states and instead have him choose electors to cast their ballot for Trump.
Related Links
We depend on your support to keep bringing you the latest information and insight on the fight for democracy – always free and available for all. After all, we can’t fight for the future of our democracy unless we know what’s happening.
Democracy Docket is the leading progressive news platform for information, analysis and opinion about voting rights and elections in the courts.
Content
Social
Connect With Us
© Democracy Docket 2024
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
continues.....
© 2024 The Lawfare Institute Published by The Lawfare Institute in Cooperation With
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14