It’s not about the finger in the air and Q. It’s about the rhetoric flowing from POOTWH’s mouth and the 35% of the repub party, his base, agreeing with it and just enough indies to go along with it. All of these deplorables don’t travel to his rallies but they agree with the rhetoric and more than likely would jump in if someone else starts the shit. Dismissing this or excusing it or not recognizing it for what it is, is dangerous, irresponsible and perhaps, complicitness. Ignore it at your peril.
I agree with this but not one reporter honed in on it hence my "lazy reporting" comment. if you want to call it a nazi salute then back it up. Just saying it doesn't do anything for me and I'll call that out.
I am not down for another 4 years of Trump but if I see lazy comments and reporting I'll call it out.
I’m relieved that you’re calling out the lazy reporting and not the rhetoric spewing forth nor the lack of condemnation from any of the members of one of the two major political parties. Carry on.
I like that Hannity and the rest of MAGAstream media has to hear this nonsense and then parrot it as viable. Then again, there's no way these people ever feel self consciousness.
1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine 2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
It’s not about the finger in the air and Q. It’s about the rhetoric flowing from POOTWH’s mouth and the 35% of the repub party, his base, agreeing with it and just enough indies to go along with it. All of these deplorables don’t travel to his rallies but they agree with the rhetoric and more than likely would jump in if someone else starts the shit. Dismissing this or excusing it or not recognizing it for what it is, is dangerous, irresponsible and perhaps, complicitness. Ignore it at your peril.
I agree with this but not one reporter honed in on it hence my "lazy reporting" comment. if you want to call it a nazi salute then back it up. Just saying it doesn't do anything for me and I'll call that out.
I am not down for another 4 years of Trump but if I see lazy comments and reporting I'll call it out.
The one finger is supposedly a reference to wwg1wwa, the main rally cry of Q cult, not directly a nazi salute. This subset of republicans believe Trump will bring violence to democrats and celebrate that anticipated violence.
And as Hal alludes, trump is embracing violence. This week trump posted “The Storm is Coming." The "storm" is a belief within the QAnon community that Trump will resume power and have his enemies arrested or killed.
Now maybe the moderates are right and this is just a tiny fraction of republicans. But if they still vote Republican, they are directly supporting violence against their political enemies, since it’s embraced by their party leader, and almost all candidates running in the midterms, by their desire to deny the right to vote, and have all votes counted fairly and results fairly certified.
Accusing democrats of committing fraud without proof is another form of violence.
I had thought the Jan six committee did a good job demonstrating the violence on Jan six is correlated with all the election rigging activities by trump. But looking at polls, and many other moderates on forums like this,it seems the committee failed.
The fringe extreme is now the center of the gop, and the moderates continuing to vote R is giving them power.
And those in the middle who want to pretend Jan six is isolated upon itself. Check out all the complaints on the Biden topic to keep the riot talk here.
It’s not about the finger in the air and Q. It’s about the rhetoric flowing from POOTWH’s mouth and the 35% of the repub party, his base, agreeing with it and just enough indies to go along with it. All of these deplorables don’t travel to his rallies but they agree with the rhetoric and more than likely would jump in if someone else starts the shit. Dismissing this or excusing it or not recognizing it for what it is, is dangerous, irresponsible and perhaps, complicitness. Ignore it at your peril.
I agree with this but not one reporter honed in on it hence my "lazy reporting" comment. if you want to call it a nazi salute then back it up. Just saying it doesn't do anything for me and I'll call that out.
I am not down for another 4 years of Trump but if I see lazy comments and reporting I'll call it out.
The one finger is supposedly a reference to wwg1wwa, the main rally cry of Q cult, not directly a nazi salute. This subset of republicans believe Trump will bring violence to democrats and celebrate that anticipated violence.
And as Hal alludes, trump is embracing violence. This week trump posted “The Storm is Coming." The "storm" is a belief within the QAnon community that Trump will resume power and have his enemies arrested or killed.
Now maybe the moderates are right and this is just a tiny fraction of republicans. But if they still vote Republican, they are directly supporting violence against their political enemies, since it’s embraced by their party leader, and almost all candidates running in the midterms, by their desire to deny the right to vote, and have all votes counted fairly and results fairly certified.
Accusing democrats of committing fraud without proof is another form of violence.
I had thought the Jan six committee did a good job demonstrating the violence on Jan six is correlated with all the election rigging activities by trump. But looking at polls, and many other moderates on forums like this,it seems the committee failed.
The fringe extreme is now the center of the gop, and the moderates continuing to vote R is giving them power.
And those in the middle who want to pretend Jan six is isolated upon itself. Check out all the complaints on the Biden topic to keep the riot talk here.
What hand or finger symbol did Obama ever get? Or Bush? This is a bizarre cultish act. No one is saying that there will be another holocaust... We're saying it's fucking weird
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
0
Options
mickeyrat
up my ass, like Chadwick was up his Posts: 35,832
Trump's legal woes mount without protection of presidency
By ERIC TUCKER
1 hour ago
WASHINGTON (AP) — Stark repudiation by federal judges he appointed. Far-reaching fraud allegations by New York’s attorney general. It's been a week of widening legal troubles for Donald Trump, laying bare the challenges piling up as the former president operates without the protections afforded by the White House.
The bravado that served him well in the political arena is less handy in a legal realm dominated by verifiable evidence, where judges this week have looked askance at his claims and where a fraud investigation that took root when Trump was still president burst into public view in an allegation-filled 222-page state lawsuit.
In politics, “you can say what you want and if people like it, it works. In a legal realm, it’s different,” said Chris Edelson, a presidential powers scholar and American University government professor. “It’s an arena where there are tangible consequences for missteps, misdeeds, false statements in a way that doesn't apply in politics.”
That distinction between politics and law was evident in a single 30-hour period this week.
Trump insisted on Fox News in an interview that aired Wednesday that the highly classified government records he had at Mar-a-Lago actually had been declassified, that a president has the power to declassify information “even by thinking about it.”
A day earlier, however, an independent arbiter his own lawyers had recommended appeared perplexed when the Trump team declined to present any information to support his claims that the documents had been declassified. The special master, Raymond Dearie, a veteran federal judge, said Trump's team was trying to “have its cake and eat it” too, and that, absent information to back up the claims, he was inclined to regard the records the way the government does: Classified.
On Wednesday morning, Letitia James, the New York State attorney general, accused Trump in a lawsuit of padding his net worth by billions of dollars and habitually misleading banks about the value of prized assets. The lawsuit, the culmination of a three-year investigation that began when he was president, also names as defendants three of his adult children and seeks to bar them from ever again running a company in the state. Trump has denied any wrongdoing.
Hours later, three judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit — two of them Trump appointees — handed him a startling loss in the Mar-a-Lago investigation.
The court overwhelmingly rejected arguments that he was entitled to have the special master do an independent review of the roughly 100 classified documents taken during last month's FBI search, and said it was not clear why Trump should have an “interest in or need for” those records.
That ruling opened the way for the Justice Department to resume its use of the classified records in its probe. It lifted a hold placed by a lower court judge, Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee whose rulings in the Mar-a-Lago matter had to date been the sole bright spot for the former president. On Thursday, she responded by striking the parts of her order that had required the Justice Department to give Dearie, and Trump's lawyers, access to the classified records.
Dearie followed up with his own order, giving the Justice Department until Sept. 26 to submit an affidavit asserting that the FBI's detailed inventory of items taken in the search is accurate. Trump's team will have until Sept. 30 to identity errors or mistakes in the inventory.
Between Dearie's position, and the appeals court ruling, “I think that basically there may be a developing consensus, if not an already developed consensus, that the government has the stronger position in a lot of these issues and a lot of these controversies,” said Richard Serafini, a Florida criminal defense lawyer and former Justice Department prosecutor.
To be sure, Trump is hardly a stranger to courtroom dramas, having been deposed in numerous lawsuits throughout his decades-long business career, and he has demonstrated a remarkable capacity to survive situations that seemed dire.
His lawyers did not immediately respond Thursday to a request seeking comment.
In the White House, Trump faced a perilous investigation into whether he had obstructed a Justice Department probe of possible collusion between Russia and his 2016 campaign. Ultimately, he was protected at least in part by the power of the presidency, with special counsel Robert Mueller citing longstanding department policy prohibiting the indictment of a sitting president.
It remains unclear if any of the current investigations — the Mar-a-Lago one or probes related to Jan. 6 or Georgia election interference — will produce criminal charges. And the New York lawsuit is a civil matter.
But there's no question Trump no longer enjoys the legal shield of the presidency, even though he has repeatedly leaned on an expansive view of executive power to defend his retention of records the government says are not his, no matter their classification.
Notably, the Justice Department and the federal appeals court have paid little heed to his assertions that the records had been declassified. For all his claims on TV and social media, both have noted that Trump has presented no information to support the idea that he took any steps to declassify the records.
The appeals court called the declassification question a “red herring” because even declassifying a record would not change its content or transform it from a government document into a personal one. And the statutes the Justice Department cites as the basis of its investigation do not explicitly mention classified information.
Trump's lawyers also have stopped short of saying in court, or in legal briefs, that the records were declassified. They told Dearie they shouldn't be forced to disclose their stance on that issue now because it could be part of their defense in the event of an indictment.
Even some legal experts who have otherwise sided with Trump in his legal fights are dubious of his assertions.
Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University law professor who testified as a Republican witness in the first impeachment proceedings in 2019, said he was struck by the “lack of a coherent and consistent position from the former president on the classified documents.”
“It’s not clear," he added, “what Jedi-like lawyers said that you could declassify things with a thought, but the courts are unlikely to embrace that claim."
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Digital World Acquisition Corporation (NASDAQ: DWAC) announced a SPAC merger to take Trump Media & Technology Group public in late 2021. The deal would bring the media company backed by former President Donald Trump public. Trump Media & Technology is the parent company of Truth Social, a free speech social media platform taking on the likes of Twitter and Facebook, two platforms that Trump has been banned from.
At the time of its merger announcement, Digital World Acquisition had an address of 78 SW 7th Street in Miami, Florida listed. The address was quickly found to be a WeWork office in Miami.
A filing from the SPAC on Friday, Sept. 23, 2022 shows the new mailing address as 3109 Grand Avenue in Miami, Florida. Financial Times discloses the address is a UPS Store that is located in a strip mall between a restaurant and nail salon.
A phone call to the UPS store by Financial Times confirmed that unit 450, which was listed on the address for the SPAC, is one of its mailboxes in the store.
Digital World Acquisition Corporation (NASDAQ: DWAC) announced a SPAC merger to take Trump Media & Technology Group public in late 2021. The deal would bring the media company backed by former President Donald Trump public. Trump Media & Technology is the parent company of Truth Social, a free speech social media platform taking on the likes of Twitter and Facebook, two platforms that Trump has been banned from.
At the time of its merger announcement, Digital World Acquisition had an address of 78 SW 7th Street in Miami, Florida listed. The address was quickly found to be a WeWork office in Miami.
A filing from the SPAC on Friday, Sept. 23, 2022 shows the new mailing address as 3109 Grand Avenue in Miami, Florida. Financial Times discloses the address is a UPS Store that is located in a strip mall between a restaurant and nail salon.
A phone call to the UPS store by Financial Times confirmed that unit 450, which was listed on the address for the SPAC, is one of its mailboxes in the store.
Totally legit. Hell, empty your 401K and put everything into it. It’s bound to return 30% within a year. Just like his real estate did. Speaking of which, for those accounting types on here, if you haven’t read Letitia James’ filing, you should. Your clients are missing out on potentially millions and it could do wonders for their cash flow. You’ll be heroes!
“The question I get asked more than any other question: ‘If you had it to do again, would you have done it?’” Trump told Haberman. “The answer is, yeah, I think so. Because here’s the way I look at it. I have so many rich friends and nobody knows who they are.”
“The question I get asked more than any other question: ‘If you had it to do again, would you have done it?’” Trump told Haberman. “The answer is, yeah, I think so. Because here’s the way I look at it. I have so many rich friends and nobody knows who they are.”
i don't even know what this quote means.
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self.- Hemingway
“The question I get asked more than any other question: ‘If you had it to do again, would you have done it?’” Trump told Haberman. “The answer is, yeah, I think so. Because here’s the way I look at it. I have so many rich friends and nobody knows who they are.”
i don't even know what this quote means.
being rich doesn't equal being famous. he wanted to be both.
“The question I get asked more than any other question: ‘If you had it to do again, would you have done it?’” Trump told Haberman. “The answer is, yeah, I think so. Because here’s the way I look at it. I have so many rich friends and nobody knows who they are.”
i don't even know what this quote means.
being rich doesn't equal being famous. he wanted to be both.
Yup. And he got it....which is crazy. He clearly loves the famous part the most....and sees faking his wealth as a way to get there....and it worked.
Comments
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
"You can declassify because you're sending it to Mar-I-Lieo or 'wherever' you're sending it." Oops.
"I declassified e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g."
Just a dispute over records storage.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
And as Hal alludes, trump is embracing violence. This week trump posted “The Storm is Coming." The "storm" is a belief within the QAnon community that Trump will resume power and have his enemies arrested or killed.
Now maybe the moderates are right and this is just a tiny fraction of republicans. But if they still vote Republican, they are directly supporting violence against their political enemies, since it’s embraced by their party leader, and almost all candidates running in the midterms, by their desire to deny the right to vote, and have all votes counted fairly and results fairly certified.
I had thought the Jan six committee did a good job demonstrating the violence on Jan six is correlated with all the election rigging activities by trump. But looking at polls, and many other moderates on forums like this,it seems the committee failed.
The fringe extreme is now the center of the gop, and the moderates continuing to vote R is giving them power.
And those in the middle who want to pretend Jan six is isolated upon itself. Check out all the complaints on the Biden topic to keep the riot talk here.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
WASHINGTON (AP) — Stark repudiation by federal judges he appointed. Far-reaching fraud allegations by New York’s attorney general. It's been a week of widening legal troubles for Donald Trump, laying bare the challenges piling up as the former president operates without the protections afforded by the White House.
The bravado that served him well in the political arena is less handy in a legal realm dominated by verifiable evidence, where judges this week have looked askance at his claims and where a fraud investigation that took root when Trump was still president burst into public view in an allegation-filled 222-page state lawsuit.
In politics, “you can say what you want and if people like it, it works. In a legal realm, it’s different,” said Chris Edelson, a presidential powers scholar and American University government professor. “It’s an arena where there are tangible consequences for missteps, misdeeds, false statements in a way that doesn't apply in politics.”
That distinction between politics and law was evident in a single 30-hour period this week.
Trump insisted on Fox News in an interview that aired Wednesday that the highly classified government records he had at Mar-a-Lago actually had been declassified, that a president has the power to declassify information “even by thinking about it.”
DONALD TRUMP
NY probe found potential crimes. Why isn't Trump in cuffs?
Trump docs probe: Court lifts hold on Mar-a-Lago records
'Art of the steal': Trump accused of vast fraud in NY suit
New York AG seeks sanctions that could hurt Trump's business
A day earlier, however, an independent arbiter his own lawyers had recommended appeared perplexed when the Trump team declined to present any information to support his claims that the documents had been declassified. The special master, Raymond Dearie, a veteran federal judge, said Trump's team was trying to “have its cake and eat it” too, and that, absent information to back up the claims, he was inclined to regard the records the way the government does: Classified.
On Wednesday morning, Letitia James, the New York State attorney general, accused Trump in a lawsuit of padding his net worth by billions of dollars and habitually misleading banks about the value of prized assets. The lawsuit, the culmination of a three-year investigation that began when he was president, also names as defendants three of his adult children and seeks to bar them from ever again running a company in the state. Trump has denied any wrongdoing.
Hours later, three judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit — two of them Trump appointees — handed him a startling loss in the Mar-a-Lago investigation.
The court overwhelmingly rejected arguments that he was entitled to have the special master do an independent review of the roughly 100 classified documents taken during last month's FBI search, and said it was not clear why Trump should have an “interest in or need for” those records.
That ruling opened the way for the Justice Department to resume its use of the classified records in its probe. It lifted a hold placed by a lower court judge, Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee whose rulings in the Mar-a-Lago matter had to date been the sole bright spot for the former president. On Thursday, she responded by striking the parts of her order that had required the Justice Department to give Dearie, and Trump's lawyers, access to the classified records.
Dearie followed up with his own order, giving the Justice Department until Sept. 26 to submit an affidavit asserting that the FBI's detailed inventory of items taken in the search is accurate. Trump's team will have until Sept. 30 to identity errors or mistakes in the inventory.
Between Dearie's position, and the appeals court ruling, “I think that basically there may be a developing consensus, if not an already developed consensus, that the government has the stronger position in a lot of these issues and a lot of these controversies,” said Richard Serafini, a Florida criminal defense lawyer and former Justice Department prosecutor.
To be sure, Trump is hardly a stranger to courtroom dramas, having been deposed in numerous lawsuits throughout his decades-long business career, and he has demonstrated a remarkable capacity to survive situations that seemed dire.
His lawyers did not immediately respond Thursday to a request seeking comment.
In the White House, Trump faced a perilous investigation into whether he had obstructed a Justice Department probe of possible collusion between Russia and his 2016 campaign. Ultimately, he was protected at least in part by the power of the presidency, with special counsel Robert Mueller citing longstanding department policy prohibiting the indictment of a sitting president.
He was twice impeached by a Democratic-led House of Representatives — once over a phone call with Ukraine's leader, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the second time over the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the Capitol — but was acquitted by the Senate on both occasions thanks to political support from fellow Republicans.
It remains unclear if any of the current investigations — the Mar-a-Lago one or probes related to Jan. 6 or Georgia election interference — will produce criminal charges. And the New York lawsuit is a civil matter.
But there's no question Trump no longer enjoys the legal shield of the presidency, even though he has repeatedly leaned on an expansive view of executive power to defend his retention of records the government says are not his, no matter their classification.
Notably, the Justice Department and the federal appeals court have paid little heed to his assertions that the records had been declassified. For all his claims on TV and social media, both have noted that Trump has presented no information to support the idea that he took any steps to declassify the records.
The appeals court called the declassification question a “red herring” because even declassifying a record would not change its content or transform it from a government document into a personal one. And the statutes the Justice Department cites as the basis of its investigation do not explicitly mention classified information.
Trump's lawyers also have stopped short of saying in court, or in legal briefs, that the records were declassified. They told Dearie they shouldn't be forced to disclose their stance on that issue now because it could be part of their defense in the event of an indictment.
Even some legal experts who have otherwise sided with Trump in his legal fights are dubious of his assertions.
Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University law professor who testified as a Republican witness in the first impeachment proceedings in 2019, said he was struck by the “lack of a coherent and consistent position from the former president on the classified documents.”
“It’s not clear," he added, “what Jedi-like lawyers said that you could declassify things with a thought, but the courts are unlikely to embrace that claim."
___
More on Donald Trump-related investigations: https://apnews.com/hub/donald-trump
_____
Follow Eric Tucker on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/etuckerAP
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
https://www.instagram.com/tv/Ci0y2UyjTBi/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Trump Tower, Bedminister, Doral, he fed-ex'ed that shit everywhere.
Luxury Residential Properties (trump.com)
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Trump's Deadbeat SPAC Switches Address To A P.O. Box - From A WeWork Office Space In Miami (msn.com)
Digital World Acquisition Corporation (NASDAQ: DWAC) announced a SPAC merger to take Trump Media & Technology Group public in late 2021. The deal would bring the media company backed by former President Donald Trump public. Trump Media & Technology is the parent company of Truth Social, a free speech social media platform taking on the likes of Twitter and Facebook, two platforms that Trump has been banned from.
At the time of its merger announcement, Digital World Acquisition had an address of 78 SW 7th Street in Miami, Florida listed. The address was quickly found to be a WeWork office in Miami.
A filing from the SPAC on Friday, Sept. 23, 2022 shows the new mailing address as 3109 Grand Avenue in Miami, Florida. Financial Times discloses the address is a UPS Store that is located in a strip mall between a restaurant and nail salon.
A phone call to the UPS store by Financial Times confirmed that unit 450, which was listed on the address for the SPAC, is one of its mailboxes in the store.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/26/politics/donald-trump-president-quote-maggie-haberman-book/?dicbo=v2-b2342a084e821c232c33f9b9f2e82364&iid=ob_lockedrail_longstory_pool
“The question I get asked more than any other question: ‘If you had it to do again, would you have done it?’” Trump told Haberman. “The answer is, yeah, I think so. Because here’s the way I look at it. I have so many rich friends and nobody knows who they are.”
www.headstonesband.com
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
www.headstonesband.com