The Democratic Presidential Debates
Comments
-
What connection are they making? I don't understand your point either. Seems like mostly a Pete and Amy thing...Spiritual_Chaos said:
I don't think they are making that specific connection...mrussel1 said:
Why would an adult dislike someone based on similarity to a character from a sitcom?Spiritual_Chaos said:
I dont think anyone in the race likes Pete. Honestly. Hes like that dude from The Big Bang Theory.mrussel1 said:
There's a weird vibe between Pete and Amy. She does not like him and takes what he says very personally, it appears.cincybearcat said:
Yeah and after finishing the debate last night...might need to move Warren up to the #1 and slide Pete down 1 spot. While I didn't always like what she said or what she was doing, Warren dominated the narrative of the night. Pete was solid, but got a little petty with Amy I thought...though Amy's responses to him did highlight potential risk with her....she may have finished below Bloomberg even. Joe/Bernie was basically a wash and could be flipped. I put Joe ahead because he benefited on stage the most by Bloomberg being attacked. Well, bernie benefited in that people didnt attack him as much as well.Spiritual_Chaos said:
You ranking @cincybearcatSpiritual_Chaos said:DEBATE RANKING
1. Warren (fighting to survive. Killed Bloomberg all by herself)
2. Sanders (Energized and refuted attacks ("if not capitalist it must be communism" "Your healthcare plan is expensive" effecticly.
3. Pete (Best at showing an alternative to Sanders)
4. Biden (Not bad per se but disappeared a lot)
5. Amy (think's her "punchlines" are smarter and more fun then they are)
6. Bloomberg (a Trump test dummie)
1) Pete
2) Warren
3) Joe
4) Bernie
5) Amy
6) Bloomberg
Not that different.
i think the rest have respect for eachother. But they don’t like Pete.www.myspace.com0 -
An interesting article touching on Iowa, the DNC, and the electoral college. Highly relevant to the electability conversation here.
https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2020/02/21/the-tyranny-of-the-minority-from-iowa-caucus-to-electoral-college/?fbclid=IwAR3sVfZGV5s3wjzTo0CT0l__Ko6hq_OeS9LAT-1cH4ksEjf7Za_ThnV-vgM
0 -
I'm not suggesting I'm going out on a limb, dude. I know I'm saying what anyone else that understands this process already knows. But your "we gotta come together, too much is at stake" stance is easier said than done. If by some chance Sanders gets the nomination, will Bloomberg and Biden be behind him? Warren likely will, but I'm not sure about them. And if he doesn't win the nomination, and it's perceived by his supporters that he was screwed, they're not going to come out and vote for Bloomberg or whoever.The Juggler said:
You're not exactly going out on a limb predicting treacherous waters if there is a brokered convention, dude. Of course that will dramatically weaken whoever is the nominee.Ledbetterman10 said:
That's true. I just think, in this scenario where Sanders has a plurality but not the majority, granting him the nomination likely will bode well for Trump's re-election, but to deny him the nomination will have ramifications that go well beyond the Trump presidency....The Juggler said:
I've said this many times, democrats love finding ways to lose elections they should win.Ledbetterman10 said:
That all sounds well and good, Juggler. But if Sanders goes into the convention with the most delegates, but not the 1,991 he needs to secure the nomination, and the superdelegates give the nomination to someone else, forget about beating Trump, I think it could be an electoral death-sentence for the Democrats. Let's say, hypothetically, that Sanders gets 33% of the total votes in the primary and that's the plurality, but he doesn't receive the nomination. Well that's 33% of registered democrats that might tell the party to fuck off forever.The Juggler said:Folks,
Here's the thing...after yesterday's unsurprising news that Russia is at it again and Trump is covering it up, we all have to be on the same page. That's number one.
Number two...no matter who the nominee is, a moderate billionaire with a sexist past from a sexist time, a former Obama VP, or a socialist senator from Vermont who is closer to the NRA than most would like.....one thing is clear---WE ALL HAVE TO UNITE BEHIND WHOMEVER IS THE NOMINEE.
Donald Trump is an existential risk to our democracy. Defeating him is more important than literally ANY OTHER ISSUE in this campaign. I really hope the candidates in the next debate focus on that instead of tearing each other down. That's number three (Biden voice).
You know I am an independent. My views are moderate mostly. But I can tell with 100% certainty that I will back Bernie or Elizabeth, or the reincarnation of Hillary as a result of a brokered convention. I also pledge to volunteer my time to help whomever it is. I hope you all will do the same.
Quit the bickering. Focus on the most important thing that unites all of us------defeating this fucking Russian stooge in November. Literally the future of the country is dependent upon this. Anything else you care about policy-wise should be a distant second.
Doesn't mean we can't do whatever we can to help whoever the nominee is
I personally think Trump will beat whoever the nominee is. So for the sake of their democratic party's future, the DNC better not fuck with their voters and say "Sure you like Bernie Sanders, but we're smarter than you and we know he can't beat Trump, so here's Bloomberg." That would blow up in their faces two-fold. First off, they'll piss off a large portion of their party, and secondly, in my opinion, Bloomberg will lose anyway.
My point is a simple one--no matter who it is/no matter how it plays out, support him/her and stop driving wedges before it's too late. The democrats have, once again, offered up a less than ideal field of candidates. Trump should be easy to beat but they are stepping all over themselves yet again. We gotta come together. Too much is at stake.
Also, half the country loves Trump, and they've already banded together. In fact, their bond (or whatever you wanna call it) has become stronger over the past four years. They're all in unison to see the democrats destroyed. You want (as I do, but I'm skeptical that it happens) the other half of the country to come together over the course of June through November. Not impossible, but as I said, easier said than done.
2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
I think they see, what people in here miss, that he is an opportunist just eyeing the job and would walk over their dead bodies and switching whatever policies he needs to, to get it. Holding the hand of lobbyists and doing whatever speaking at whatever tea-party gathering he needs to.The Juggler said:
What connection are they making? I don't understand your point either. Seems like mostly a Pete and Amy thing...Spiritual_Chaos said:
I don't think they are making that specific connection...mrussel1 said:
Why would an adult dislike someone based on similarity to a character from a sitcom?Spiritual_Chaos said:
I dont think anyone in the race likes Pete. Honestly. Hes like that dude from The Big Bang Theory.mrussel1 said:
There's a weird vibe between Pete and Amy. She does not like him and takes what he says very personally, it appears.cincybearcat said:
Yeah and after finishing the debate last night...might need to move Warren up to the #1 and slide Pete down 1 spot. While I didn't always like what she said or what she was doing, Warren dominated the narrative of the night. Pete was solid, but got a little petty with Amy I thought...though Amy's responses to him did highlight potential risk with her....she may have finished below Bloomberg even. Joe/Bernie was basically a wash and could be flipped. I put Joe ahead because he benefited on stage the most by Bloomberg being attacked. Well, bernie benefited in that people didnt attack him as much as well.Spiritual_Chaos said:
You ranking @cincybearcatSpiritual_Chaos said:DEBATE RANKING
1. Warren (fighting to survive. Killed Bloomberg all by herself)
2. Sanders (Energized and refuted attacks ("if not capitalist it must be communism" "Your healthcare plan is expensive" effecticly.
3. Pete (Best at showing an alternative to Sanders)
4. Biden (Not bad per se but disappeared a lot)
5. Amy (think's her "punchlines" are smarter and more fun then they are)
6. Bloomberg (a Trump test dummie)
1) Pete
2) Warren
3) Joe
4) Bernie
5) Amy
6) Bloomberg
Not that different.
i think the rest have respect for eachother. But they don’t like Pete.
A more extreme version of present day Warren in other words.
Yang would have never been like that.Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Pete is unlikeable. Other people are also unlikeable. .The Juggler said:
What connection are they making? I don't understand your point either. Seems like mostly a Pete and Amy thing...Spiritual_Chaos said:
I don't think they are making that specific connection...mrussel1 said:
Why would an adult dislike someone based on similarity to a character from a sitcom?Spiritual_Chaos said:
I dont think anyone in the race likes Pete. Honestly. Hes like that dude from The Big Bang Theory.mrussel1 said:
There's a weird vibe between Pete and Amy. She does not like him and takes what he says very personally, it appears.cincybearcat said:
Yeah and after finishing the debate last night...might need to move Warren up to the #1 and slide Pete down 1 spot. While I didn't always like what she said or what she was doing, Warren dominated the narrative of the night. Pete was solid, but got a little petty with Amy I thought...though Amy's responses to him did highlight potential risk with her....she may have finished below Bloomberg even. Joe/Bernie was basically a wash and could be flipped. I put Joe ahead because he benefited on stage the most by Bloomberg being attacked. Well, bernie benefited in that people didnt attack him as much as well.Spiritual_Chaos said:
You ranking @cincybearcatSpiritual_Chaos said:DEBATE RANKING
1. Warren (fighting to survive. Killed Bloomberg all by herself)
2. Sanders (Energized and refuted attacks ("if not capitalist it must be communism" "Your healthcare plan is expensive" effecticly.
3. Pete (Best at showing an alternative to Sanders)
4. Biden (Not bad per se but disappeared a lot)
5. Amy (think's her "punchlines" are smarter and more fun then they are)
6. Bloomberg (a Trump test dummie)
1) Pete
2) Warren
3) Joe
4) Bernie
5) Amy
6) Bloomberg
Not that different.
i think the rest have respect for eachother. But they don’t like Pete.
0 -
Pie chart, please.Ledbetterman10 said:
I'm not suggesting I'm going out on a limb, dude. I know I'm saying what anyone else that understands this process already knows. But your "we gotta come together, too much is at stake" stance is easier said than done. If by some chance Sanders gets the nomination, will Bloomberg and Biden be behind him? Warren likely will, but I'm not sure about them. And if he doesn't win the nomination, and it's perceived by his supporters that he was screwed, they're not going to come out and vote for Bloomberg or whoever.The Juggler said:
You're not exactly going out on a limb predicting treacherous waters if there is a brokered convention, dude. Of course that will dramatically weaken whoever is the nominee.Ledbetterman10 said:
That's true. I just think, in this scenario where Sanders has a plurality but not the majority, granting him the nomination likely will bode well for Trump's re-election, but to deny him the nomination will have ramifications that go well beyond the Trump presidency....The Juggler said:
I've said this many times, democrats love finding ways to lose elections they should win.Ledbetterman10 said:
That all sounds well and good, Juggler. But if Sanders goes into the convention with the most delegates, but not the 1,991 he needs to secure the nomination, and the superdelegates give the nomination to someone else, forget about beating Trump, I think it could be an electoral death-sentence for the Democrats. Let's say, hypothetically, that Sanders gets 33% of the total votes in the primary and that's the plurality, but he doesn't receive the nomination. Well that's 33% of registered democrats that might tell the party to fuck off forever.The Juggler said:Folks,
Here's the thing...after yesterday's unsurprising news that Russia is at it again and Trump is covering it up, we all have to be on the same page. That's number one.
Number two...no matter who the nominee is, a moderate billionaire with a sexist past from a sexist time, a former Obama VP, or a socialist senator from Vermont who is closer to the NRA than most would like.....one thing is clear---WE ALL HAVE TO UNITE BEHIND WHOMEVER IS THE NOMINEE.
Donald Trump is an existential risk to our democracy. Defeating him is more important than literally ANY OTHER ISSUE in this campaign. I really hope the candidates in the next debate focus on that instead of tearing each other down. That's number three (Biden voice).
You know I am an independent. My views are moderate mostly. But I can tell with 100% certainty that I will back Bernie or Elizabeth, or the reincarnation of Hillary as a result of a brokered convention. I also pledge to volunteer my time to help whomever it is. I hope you all will do the same.
Quit the bickering. Focus on the most important thing that unites all of us------defeating this fucking Russian stooge in November. Literally the future of the country is dependent upon this. Anything else you care about policy-wise should be a distant second.
Doesn't mean we can't do whatever we can to help whoever the nominee is
I personally think Trump will beat whoever the nominee is. So for the sake of their democratic party's future, the DNC better not fuck with their voters and say "Sure you like Bernie Sanders, but we're smarter than you and we know he can't beat Trump, so here's Bloomberg." That would blow up in their faces two-fold. First off, they'll piss off a large portion of their party, and secondly, in my opinion, Bloomberg will lose anyway.
My point is a simple one--no matter who it is/no matter how it plays out, support him/her and stop driving wedges before it's too late. The democrats have, once again, offered up a less than ideal field of candidates. Trump should be easy to beat but they are stepping all over themselves yet again. We gotta come together. Too much is at stake.
Also, half the country loves Trump, and they've already banded together. In fact, their bond (or whatever you wanna call it) has become stronger over the past four years. They're all in unison to see the democrats destroyed. You want (as I do, but I'm skeptical that it happens) the other half of the country to come together over the course of June through November. Not impossible, but as I said, easier said than done.0 -
You're a homophobe. Per the standards you've set for yourself on this board, I can call you a homophobe for saying Pete is unlikeable because you called me sexist yesterday for saying Amy was unlikeable.ecdanc said:
Pete is unlikeable. Other people are also unlikeable. .The Juggler said:
What connection are they making? I don't understand your point either. Seems like mostly a Pete and Amy thing...Spiritual_Chaos said:
I don't think they are making that specific connection...mrussel1 said:
Why would an adult dislike someone based on similarity to a character from a sitcom?Spiritual_Chaos said:
I dont think anyone in the race likes Pete. Honestly. Hes like that dude from The Big Bang Theory.mrussel1 said:
There's a weird vibe between Pete and Amy. She does not like him and takes what he says very personally, it appears.cincybearcat said:
Yeah and after finishing the debate last night...might need to move Warren up to the #1 and slide Pete down 1 spot. While I didn't always like what she said or what she was doing, Warren dominated the narrative of the night. Pete was solid, but got a little petty with Amy I thought...though Amy's responses to him did highlight potential risk with her....she may have finished below Bloomberg even. Joe/Bernie was basically a wash and could be flipped. I put Joe ahead because he benefited on stage the most by Bloomberg being attacked. Well, bernie benefited in that people didnt attack him as much as well.Spiritual_Chaos said:
You ranking @cincybearcatSpiritual_Chaos said:DEBATE RANKING
1. Warren (fighting to survive. Killed Bloomberg all by herself)
2. Sanders (Energized and refuted attacks ("if not capitalist it must be communism" "Your healthcare plan is expensive" effecticly.
3. Pete (Best at showing an alternative to Sanders)
4. Biden (Not bad per se but disappeared a lot)
5. Amy (think's her "punchlines" are smarter and more fun then they are)
6. Bloomberg (a Trump test dummie)
1) Pete
2) Warren
3) Joe
4) Bernie
5) Amy
6) Bloomberg
Not that different.
i think the rest have respect for eachother. But they don’t like Pete.
2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
I like Pete a lot, why don't you like the man?ecdanc said:
Pete is unlikeable. Other people are also unlikeable. .The Juggler said:
What connection are they making? I don't understand your point either. Seems like mostly a Pete and Amy thing...Spiritual_Chaos said:
I don't think they are making that specific connection...mrussel1 said:
Why would an adult dislike someone based on similarity to a character from a sitcom?Spiritual_Chaos said:
I dont think anyone in the race likes Pete. Honestly. Hes like that dude from The Big Bang Theory.mrussel1 said:
There's a weird vibe between Pete and Amy. She does not like him and takes what he says very personally, it appears.cincybearcat said:
Yeah and after finishing the debate last night...might need to move Warren up to the #1 and slide Pete down 1 spot. While I didn't always like what she said or what she was doing, Warren dominated the narrative of the night. Pete was solid, but got a little petty with Amy I thought...though Amy's responses to him did highlight potential risk with her....she may have finished below Bloomberg even. Joe/Bernie was basically a wash and could be flipped. I put Joe ahead because he benefited on stage the most by Bloomberg being attacked. Well, bernie benefited in that people didnt attack him as much as well.Spiritual_Chaos said:
You ranking @cincybearcatSpiritual_Chaos said:DEBATE RANKING
1. Warren (fighting to survive. Killed Bloomberg all by herself)
2. Sanders (Energized and refuted attacks ("if not capitalist it must be communism" "Your healthcare plan is expensive" effecticly.
3. Pete (Best at showing an alternative to Sanders)
4. Biden (Not bad per se but disappeared a lot)
5. Amy (think's her "punchlines" are smarter and more fun then they are)
6. Bloomberg (a Trump test dummie)
1) Pete
2) Warren
3) Joe
4) Bernie
5) Amy
6) Bloomberg
Not that different.
i think the rest have respect for eachother. But they don’t like Pete.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
Look. Someone who can make connections and think in the abstract.ecdanc said:
Pete is unlikeable. Other people are also unlikeable. .The Juggler said:
What connection are they making? I don't understand your point either. Seems like mostly a Pete and Amy thing...Spiritual_Chaos said:
I don't think they are making that specific connection...mrussel1 said:
Why would an adult dislike someone based on similarity to a character from a sitcom?Spiritual_Chaos said:
I dont think anyone in the race likes Pete. Honestly. Hes like that dude from The Big Bang Theory.mrussel1 said:
There's a weird vibe between Pete and Amy. She does not like him and takes what he says very personally, it appears.cincybearcat said:
Yeah and after finishing the debate last night...might need to move Warren up to the #1 and slide Pete down 1 spot. While I didn't always like what she said or what she was doing, Warren dominated the narrative of the night. Pete was solid, but got a little petty with Amy I thought...though Amy's responses to him did highlight potential risk with her....she may have finished below Bloomberg even. Joe/Bernie was basically a wash and could be flipped. I put Joe ahead because he benefited on stage the most by Bloomberg being attacked. Well, bernie benefited in that people didnt attack him as much as well.Spiritual_Chaos said:
You ranking @cincybearcatSpiritual_Chaos said:DEBATE RANKING
1. Warren (fighting to survive. Killed Bloomberg all by herself)
2. Sanders (Energized and refuted attacks ("if not capitalist it must be communism" "Your healthcare plan is expensive" effecticly.
3. Pete (Best at showing an alternative to Sanders)
4. Biden (Not bad per se but disappeared a lot)
5. Amy (think's her "punchlines" are smarter and more fun then they are)
6. Bloomberg (a Trump test dummie)
1) Pete
2) Warren
3) Joe
4) Bernie
5) Amy
6) Bloomberg
Not that different.
i think the rest have respect for eachother. But they don’t like Pete.
There must be some degrees of good old socialist in you."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
You would also vote for Trump over human-being Bernie Sanders. So maybe not liking Pete is the correct preference. Haha.mcgruff10 said:
I like Pete a lot, why don't you like the man?ecdanc said:
Pete is unlikeable. Other people are also unlikeable. .The Juggler said:
What connection are they making? I don't understand your point either. Seems like mostly a Pete and Amy thing...Spiritual_Chaos said:
I don't think they are making that specific connection...mrussel1 said:
Why would an adult dislike someone based on similarity to a character from a sitcom?Spiritual_Chaos said:
I dont think anyone in the race likes Pete. Honestly. Hes like that dude from The Big Bang Theory.mrussel1 said:
There's a weird vibe between Pete and Amy. She does not like him and takes what he says very personally, it appears.cincybearcat said:
Yeah and after finishing the debate last night...might need to move Warren up to the #1 and slide Pete down 1 spot. While I didn't always like what she said or what she was doing, Warren dominated the narrative of the night. Pete was solid, but got a little petty with Amy I thought...though Amy's responses to him did highlight potential risk with her....she may have finished below Bloomberg even. Joe/Bernie was basically a wash and could be flipped. I put Joe ahead because he benefited on stage the most by Bloomberg being attacked. Well, bernie benefited in that people didnt attack him as much as well.Spiritual_Chaos said:
You ranking @cincybearcatSpiritual_Chaos said:DEBATE RANKING
1. Warren (fighting to survive. Killed Bloomberg all by herself)
2. Sanders (Energized and refuted attacks ("if not capitalist it must be communism" "Your healthcare plan is expensive" effecticly.
3. Pete (Best at showing an alternative to Sanders)
4. Biden (Not bad per se but disappeared a lot)
5. Amy (think's her "punchlines" are smarter and more fun then they are)
6. Bloomberg (a Trump test dummie)
1) Pete
2) Warren
3) Joe
4) Bernie
5) Amy
6) Bloomberg
Not that different.
i think the rest have respect for eachother. But they don’t like Pete.Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Word choice matters, bruh.Ledbetterman10 said:
You're a homophobe. Per the standards you've set for yourself on this board, I can call you a homophobe for saying Pete is unlikeable because you called me sexist yesterday for saying Amy was unlikeable.ecdanc said:
Pete is unlikeable. Other people are also unlikeable. .The Juggler said:
What connection are they making? I don't understand your point either. Seems like mostly a Pete and Amy thing...Spiritual_Chaos said:
I don't think they are making that specific connection...mrussel1 said:
Why would an adult dislike someone based on similarity to a character from a sitcom?Spiritual_Chaos said:
I dont think anyone in the race likes Pete. Honestly. Hes like that dude from The Big Bang Theory.mrussel1 said:
There's a weird vibe between Pete and Amy. She does not like him and takes what he says very personally, it appears.cincybearcat said:
Yeah and after finishing the debate last night...might need to move Warren up to the #1 and slide Pete down 1 spot. While I didn't always like what she said or what she was doing, Warren dominated the narrative of the night. Pete was solid, but got a little petty with Amy I thought...though Amy's responses to him did highlight potential risk with her....she may have finished below Bloomberg even. Joe/Bernie was basically a wash and could be flipped. I put Joe ahead because he benefited on stage the most by Bloomberg being attacked. Well, bernie benefited in that people didnt attack him as much as well.Spiritual_Chaos said:
You ranking @cincybearcatSpiritual_Chaos said:DEBATE RANKING
1. Warren (fighting to survive. Killed Bloomberg all by herself)
2. Sanders (Energized and refuted attacks ("if not capitalist it must be communism" "Your healthcare plan is expensive" effecticly.
3. Pete (Best at showing an alternative to Sanders)
4. Biden (Not bad per se but disappeared a lot)
5. Amy (think's her "punchlines" are smarter and more fun then they are)
6. Bloomberg (a Trump test dummie)
1) Pete
2) Warren
3) Joe
4) Bernie
5) Amy
6) Bloomberg
Not that different.
i think the rest have respect for eachother. But they don’t like Pete.0 -
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
-
Agreed. How dare you use a word as nasty as “unlikeable.” Bigotry!ecdanc said:
Word choice matters, bruh.Ledbetterman10 said:
You're a homophobe. Per the standards you've set for yourself on this board, I can call you a homophobe for saying Pete is unlikeable because you called me sexist yesterday for saying Amy was unlikeable.ecdanc said:
Pete is unlikeable. Other people are also unlikeable. .The Juggler said:
What connection are they making? I don't understand your point either. Seems like mostly a Pete and Amy thing...Spiritual_Chaos said:
I don't think they are making that specific connection...mrussel1 said:
Why would an adult dislike someone based on similarity to a character from a sitcom?Spiritual_Chaos said:
I dont think anyone in the race likes Pete. Honestly. Hes like that dude from The Big Bang Theory.mrussel1 said:
There's a weird vibe between Pete and Amy. She does not like him and takes what he says very personally, it appears.cincybearcat said:
Yeah and after finishing the debate last night...might need to move Warren up to the #1 and slide Pete down 1 spot. While I didn't always like what she said or what she was doing, Warren dominated the narrative of the night. Pete was solid, but got a little petty with Amy I thought...though Amy's responses to him did highlight potential risk with her....she may have finished below Bloomberg even. Joe/Bernie was basically a wash and could be flipped. I put Joe ahead because he benefited on stage the most by Bloomberg being attacked. Well, bernie benefited in that people didnt attack him as much as well.Spiritual_Chaos said:
You ranking @cincybearcatSpiritual_Chaos said:DEBATE RANKING
1. Warren (fighting to survive. Killed Bloomberg all by herself)
2. Sanders (Energized and refuted attacks ("if not capitalist it must be communism" "Your healthcare plan is expensive" effecticly.
3. Pete (Best at showing an alternative to Sanders)
4. Biden (Not bad per se but disappeared a lot)
5. Amy (think's her "punchlines" are smarter and more fun then they are)
6. Bloomberg (a Trump test dummie)
1) Pete
2) Warren
3) Joe
4) Bernie
5) Amy
6) Bloomberg
Not that different.
i think the rest have respect for eachother. But they don’t like Pete.2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
To be clear, I was just helping you all get SC’s point, not calling anyone unlikeable. But, yeah, I don’t like ButtigiegSpiritual_Chaos said:
Look. Someone who can make connections and think in the abstract.ecdanc said:
Pete is unlikeable. Other people are also unlikeable. .The Juggler said:
What connection are they making? I don't understand your point either. Seems like mostly a Pete and Amy thing...Spiritual_Chaos said:
I don't think they are making that specific connection...mrussel1 said:
Why would an adult dislike someone based on similarity to a character from a sitcom?Spiritual_Chaos said:
I dont think anyone in the race likes Pete. Honestly. Hes like that dude from The Big Bang Theory.mrussel1 said:
There's a weird vibe between Pete and Amy. She does not like him and takes what he says very personally, it appears.cincybearcat said:
Yeah and after finishing the debate last night...might need to move Warren up to the #1 and slide Pete down 1 spot. While I didn't always like what she said or what she was doing, Warren dominated the narrative of the night. Pete was solid, but got a little petty with Amy I thought...though Amy's responses to him did highlight potential risk with her....she may have finished below Bloomberg even. Joe/Bernie was basically a wash and could be flipped. I put Joe ahead because he benefited on stage the most by Bloomberg being attacked. Well, bernie benefited in that people didnt attack him as much as well.Spiritual_Chaos said:
You ranking @cincybearcatSpiritual_Chaos said:DEBATE RANKING
1. Warren (fighting to survive. Killed Bloomberg all by herself)
2. Sanders (Energized and refuted attacks ("if not capitalist it must be communism" "Your healthcare plan is expensive" effecticly.
3. Pete (Best at showing an alternative to Sanders)
4. Biden (Not bad per se but disappeared a lot)
5. Amy (think's her "punchlines" are smarter and more fun then they are)
6. Bloomberg (a Trump test dummie)
1) Pete
2) Warren
3) Joe
4) Bernie
5) Amy
6) Bloomberg
Not that different.
i think the rest have respect for eachother. But they don’t like Pete.
There must be some degrees of good old socialist in you.0 -
Reading is hard.Ledbetterman10 said:
Agreed. How dare you use a word as nasty as “unlikeable.” Bigotry!ecdanc said:
Word choice matters, bruh.Ledbetterman10 said:
You're a homophobe. Per the standards you've set for yourself on this board, I can call you a homophobe for saying Pete is unlikeable because you called me sexist yesterday for saying Amy was unlikeable.ecdanc said:
Pete is unlikeable. Other people are also unlikeable. .The Juggler said:
What connection are they making? I don't understand your point either. Seems like mostly a Pete and Amy thing...Spiritual_Chaos said:
I don't think they are making that specific connection...mrussel1 said:
Why would an adult dislike someone based on similarity to a character from a sitcom?Spiritual_Chaos said:
I dont think anyone in the race likes Pete. Honestly. Hes like that dude from The Big Bang Theory.mrussel1 said:
There's a weird vibe between Pete and Amy. She does not like him and takes what he says very personally, it appears.cincybearcat said:
Yeah and after finishing the debate last night...might need to move Warren up to the #1 and slide Pete down 1 spot. While I didn't always like what she said or what she was doing, Warren dominated the narrative of the night. Pete was solid, but got a little petty with Amy I thought...though Amy's responses to him did highlight potential risk with her....she may have finished below Bloomberg even. Joe/Bernie was basically a wash and could be flipped. I put Joe ahead because he benefited on stage the most by Bloomberg being attacked. Well, bernie benefited in that people didnt attack him as much as well.Spiritual_Chaos said:
You ranking @cincybearcatSpiritual_Chaos said:DEBATE RANKING
1. Warren (fighting to survive. Killed Bloomberg all by herself)
2. Sanders (Energized and refuted attacks ("if not capitalist it must be communism" "Your healthcare plan is expensive" effecticly.
3. Pete (Best at showing an alternative to Sanders)
4. Biden (Not bad per se but disappeared a lot)
5. Amy (think's her "punchlines" are smarter and more fun then they are)
6. Bloomberg (a Trump test dummie)
1) Pete
2) Warren
3) Joe
4) Bernie
5) Amy
6) Bloomberg
Not that different.
i think the rest have respect for eachother. But they don’t like Pete.0 -
I wonder if Hillary and W Bush-fan Ellen will have Bernie on this primary or if he's off her list. He was on in 2015. And just saw that Pete "Sheldon" Buttigieg was on today."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
-
Nah reading is easy. For example, a few posts up you said you didn't like Pete because of, "His politics mainly, but also his insufferable whiteness."ecdanc said:
Reading is hard.Ledbetterman10 said:
Agreed. How dare you use a word as nasty as “unlikeable.” Bigotry!ecdanc said:
Word choice matters, bruh.Ledbetterman10 said:
You're a homophobe. Per the standards you've set for yourself on this board, I can call you a homophobe for saying Pete is unlikeable because you called me sexist yesterday for saying Amy was unlikeable.ecdanc said:
Pete is unlikeable. Other people are also unlikeable. .The Juggler said:
What connection are they making? I don't understand your point either. Seems like mostly a Pete and Amy thing...Spiritual_Chaos said:
I don't think they are making that specific connection...mrussel1 said:
Why would an adult dislike someone based on similarity to a character from a sitcom?Spiritual_Chaos said:
I dont think anyone in the race likes Pete. Honestly. Hes like that dude from The Big Bang Theory.mrussel1 said:
There's a weird vibe between Pete and Amy. She does not like him and takes what he says very personally, it appears.cincybearcat said:
Yeah and after finishing the debate last night...might need to move Warren up to the #1 and slide Pete down 1 spot. While I didn't always like what she said or what she was doing, Warren dominated the narrative of the night. Pete was solid, but got a little petty with Amy I thought...though Amy's responses to him did highlight potential risk with her....she may have finished below Bloomberg even. Joe/Bernie was basically a wash and could be flipped. I put Joe ahead because he benefited on stage the most by Bloomberg being attacked. Well, bernie benefited in that people didnt attack him as much as well.Spiritual_Chaos said:
You ranking @cincybearcatSpiritual_Chaos said:DEBATE RANKING
1. Warren (fighting to survive. Killed Bloomberg all by herself)
2. Sanders (Energized and refuted attacks ("if not capitalist it must be communism" "Your healthcare plan is expensive" effecticly.
3. Pete (Best at showing an alternative to Sanders)
4. Biden (Not bad per se but disappeared a lot)
5. Amy (think's her "punchlines" are smarter and more fun then they are)
6. Bloomberg (a Trump test dummie)
1) Pete
2) Warren
3) Joe
4) Bernie
5) Amy
6) Bloomberg
Not that different.
i think the rest have respect for eachother. But they don’t like Pete.
So you're racist too?
Or are you sexist because he's a man? Because lord knows Amy and Warren have "insufferable whiteness" too.
See? Isn't this bullshit annoying?
2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
It’s an annoyance I’m used to. Lots of people don’t understand what racism and sexism are. You sound like some of my freshmen, so I’m not particularly annoyed.Ledbetterman10 said:
Nah reading is easy. For example, a few posts up you said you didn't like Pete because of, "His politics mainly, but also his insufferable whiteness."ecdanc said:
Reading is hard.Ledbetterman10 said:
Agreed. How dare you use a word as nasty as “unlikeable.” Bigotry!ecdanc said:
Word choice matters, bruh.Ledbetterman10 said:
You're a homophobe. Per the standards you've set for yourself on this board, I can call you a homophobe for saying Pete is unlikeable because you called me sexist yesterday for saying Amy was unlikeable.ecdanc said:
Pete is unlikeable. Other people are also unlikeable. .The Juggler said:
What connection are they making? I don't understand your point either. Seems like mostly a Pete and Amy thing...Spiritual_Chaos said:
I don't think they are making that specific connection...mrussel1 said:
Why would an adult dislike someone based on similarity to a character from a sitcom?Spiritual_Chaos said:
I dont think anyone in the race likes Pete. Honestly. Hes like that dude from The Big Bang Theory.mrussel1 said:
There's a weird vibe between Pete and Amy. She does not like him and takes what he says very personally, it appears.cincybearcat said:
Yeah and after finishing the debate last night...might need to move Warren up to the #1 and slide Pete down 1 spot. While I didn't always like what she said or what she was doing, Warren dominated the narrative of the night. Pete was solid, but got a little petty with Amy I thought...though Amy's responses to him did highlight potential risk with her....she may have finished below Bloomberg even. Joe/Bernie was basically a wash and could be flipped. I put Joe ahead because he benefited on stage the most by Bloomberg being attacked. Well, bernie benefited in that people didnt attack him as much as well.Spiritual_Chaos said:
You ranking @cincybearcatSpiritual_Chaos said:DEBATE RANKING
1. Warren (fighting to survive. Killed Bloomberg all by herself)
2. Sanders (Energized and refuted attacks ("if not capitalist it must be communism" "Your healthcare plan is expensive" effecticly.
3. Pete (Best at showing an alternative to Sanders)
4. Biden (Not bad per se but disappeared a lot)
5. Amy (think's her "punchlines" are smarter and more fun then they are)
6. Bloomberg (a Trump test dummie)
1) Pete
2) Warren
3) Joe
4) Bernie
5) Amy
6) Bloomberg
Not that different.
i think the rest have respect for eachother. But they don’t like Pete.
So you're racist too?
Or are you sexist because he's a man? Because lord knows Amy and Warren have "insufferable whiteness" too.
See? Isn't this bullshit annoying?0 -
He's too white for you? What does that mean? Dude can't dance or play basketball?ecdanc said:
His politics mainly, but also his insufferable whiteness.mcgruff10 said:
I like Pete a lot, why don't you like the man?ecdanc said:
Pete is unlikeable. Other people are also unlikeable. .The Juggler said:
What connection are they making? I don't understand your point either. Seems like mostly a Pete and Amy thing...Spiritual_Chaos said:
I don't think they are making that specific connection...mrussel1 said:
Why would an adult dislike someone based on similarity to a character from a sitcom?Spiritual_Chaos said:
I dont think anyone in the race likes Pete. Honestly. Hes like that dude from The Big Bang Theory.mrussel1 said:
There's a weird vibe between Pete and Amy. She does not like him and takes what he says very personally, it appears.cincybearcat said:
Yeah and after finishing the debate last night...might need to move Warren up to the #1 and slide Pete down 1 spot. While I didn't always like what she said or what she was doing, Warren dominated the narrative of the night. Pete was solid, but got a little petty with Amy I thought...though Amy's responses to him did highlight potential risk with her....she may have finished below Bloomberg even. Joe/Bernie was basically a wash and could be flipped. I put Joe ahead because he benefited on stage the most by Bloomberg being attacked. Well, bernie benefited in that people didnt attack him as much as well.Spiritual_Chaos said:
You ranking @cincybearcatSpiritual_Chaos said:DEBATE RANKING
1. Warren (fighting to survive. Killed Bloomberg all by herself)
2. Sanders (Energized and refuted attacks ("if not capitalist it must be communism" "Your healthcare plan is expensive" effecticly.
3. Pete (Best at showing an alternative to Sanders)
4. Biden (Not bad per se but disappeared a lot)
5. Amy (think's her "punchlines" are smarter and more fun then they are)
6. Bloomberg (a Trump test dummie)
1) Pete
2) Warren
3) Joe
4) Bernie
5) Amy
6) Bloomberg
Not that different.
i think the rest have respect for eachother. But they don’t like Pete.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
You should read that AmCon article I posted yesterday. It will give you insight.. he's bourgeois and cis. https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/gays-who-hate-pete-buttigieg/mcgruff10 said:
I like Pete a lot, why don't you like the man?ecdanc said:
Pete is unlikeable. Other people are also unlikeable. .The Juggler said:
What connection are they making? I don't understand your point either. Seems like mostly a Pete and Amy thing...Spiritual_Chaos said:
I don't think they are making that specific connection...mrussel1 said:
Why would an adult dislike someone based on similarity to a character from a sitcom?Spiritual_Chaos said:
I dont think anyone in the race likes Pete. Honestly. Hes like that dude from The Big Bang Theory.mrussel1 said:
There's a weird vibe between Pete and Amy. She does not like him and takes what he says very personally, it appears.cincybearcat said:
Yeah and after finishing the debate last night...might need to move Warren up to the #1 and slide Pete down 1 spot. While I didn't always like what she said or what she was doing, Warren dominated the narrative of the night. Pete was solid, but got a little petty with Amy I thought...though Amy's responses to him did highlight potential risk with her....she may have finished below Bloomberg even. Joe/Bernie was basically a wash and could be flipped. I put Joe ahead because he benefited on stage the most by Bloomberg being attacked. Well, bernie benefited in that people didnt attack him as much as well.Spiritual_Chaos said:
You ranking @cincybearcatSpiritual_Chaos said:DEBATE RANKING
1. Warren (fighting to survive. Killed Bloomberg all by herself)
2. Sanders (Energized and refuted attacks ("if not capitalist it must be communism" "Your healthcare plan is expensive" effecticly.
3. Pete (Best at showing an alternative to Sanders)
4. Biden (Not bad per se but disappeared a lot)
5. Amy (think's her "punchlines" are smarter and more fun then they are)
6. Bloomberg (a Trump test dummie)
1) Pete
2) Warren
3) Joe
4) Bernie
5) Amy
6) Bloomberg
Not that different.
i think the rest have respect for eachother. But they don’t like Pete.0
https://youtu.be/GbYeCYHOELA
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help