The Democratic Presidential Debates
Comments
-
Ah, food! I'm down with that.
Fuck this presidential talk, dammit.0 -
I m a Tito s guy.ecdanc said:
Smirnoff, but good call!!!mcgruff10 said:
Drinking stoli?ecdanc said:
You’re probably right. And I’m drunk. What’s the topic?mrussel1 said:
I think your intellectual tank is empty on this topic.ecdanc said:
Donald Trump is your uncle?!? So much makes sense now.mrussel1 said:
There's easier ways to say "uncle".ecdanc said:
Given that we're having this conversation on a thread largely predicated on unseating the president we all think is doing some really fucked up shit, I'm not sure you can talk. Glass houses and all.mrussel1 said:
Are you guys working on your legal theories? You should hurry because communist implementation is going swimmingly thus far.ecdanc said:
Not yet. But we do look at your “western” legal tradition as a buncha bullshit.mrussel1 said:
Um no, common law, passed on through the centuries of western legal precedent. Do you commies have your own legal system too?ecdanc said:
Oh, your capitalist laws say something! Zing?mrussel1 said:
Oh wait, so even though intellectual property is considered a tangible asset legally (you know, like capital), you call it "labor"? Ha! That's rich.ecdanc said:
I literally don’t know what the fuck y’all are talking about. Please point me to the post where I said anything about intellectual labor.mrussel1 said:
His reading ability is fine and his question exposes the gap in a 19th century book applied to a 21st century economy. The lines between proletariat and bourgeoisie have blurred. You continue to be cagey on the topic but that's simply because good answers don't exist.ecdanc said:
I’m not challenging any assumptions; just your reading ability, I this case.cincybearcat said:
Don’t be all name calley, I ain’t in your class you can’t tell me that your assumptions are truth and I’ll fail if I go against those assumptions.ecdanc said:
Don’t be dopey. I said capital =/= work. Never said anything about intellectual labor.cincybearcat said:
I just did.ecdanc said:
That would be weird. Let me know if you see a professor doing that.cincybearcat said:
It seems weird for a professor to minimize intellectual property/effort. Isn’t that what teaching is? I for one think that has value.mrussel1 said:
You put zero value in the idea and the work that went into starting the factory. If one received zero for such things, what's the point of having an idea, and how do humans advance? Again, you can look at Soviet era technological advancements compared to the US. We don't need theories when we have results.ecdanc said:
I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
I like that, but favorite is Chopin, Polish potato vodka.mcgruff10 said:
I m a Tito s guy.ecdanc said:
Smirnoff, but good call!!!mcgruff10 said:
Drinking stoli?ecdanc said:
You’re probably right. And I’m drunk. What’s the topic?mrussel1 said:
I think your intellectual tank is empty on this topic.ecdanc said:
Donald Trump is your uncle?!? So much makes sense now.mrussel1 said:
There's easier ways to say "uncle".ecdanc said:
Given that we're having this conversation on a thread largely predicated on unseating the president we all think is doing some really fucked up shit, I'm not sure you can talk. Glass houses and all.mrussel1 said:
Are you guys working on your legal theories? You should hurry because communist implementation is going swimmingly thus far.ecdanc said:
Not yet. But we do look at your “western” legal tradition as a buncha bullshit.mrussel1 said:
Um no, common law, passed on through the centuries of western legal precedent. Do you commies have your own legal system too?ecdanc said:
Oh, your capitalist laws say something! Zing?mrussel1 said:
Oh wait, so even though intellectual property is considered a tangible asset legally (you know, like capital), you call it "labor"? Ha! That's rich.ecdanc said:
I literally don’t know what the fuck y’all are talking about. Please point me to the post where I said anything about intellectual labor.mrussel1 said:
His reading ability is fine and his question exposes the gap in a 19th century book applied to a 21st century economy. The lines between proletariat and bourgeoisie have blurred. You continue to be cagey on the topic but that's simply because good answers don't exist.ecdanc said:
I’m not challenging any assumptions; just your reading ability, I this case.cincybearcat said:
Don’t be all name calley, I ain’t in your class you can’t tell me that your assumptions are truth and I’ll fail if I go against those assumptions.ecdanc said:
Don’t be dopey. I said capital =/= work. Never said anything about intellectual labor.cincybearcat said:
I just did.ecdanc said:
That would be weird. Let me know if you see a professor doing that.cincybearcat said:
It seems weird for a professor to minimize intellectual property/effort. Isn’t that what teaching is? I for one think that has value.mrussel1 said:
You put zero value in the idea and the work that went into starting the factory. If one received zero for such things, what's the point of having an idea, and how do humans advance? Again, you can look at Soviet era technological advancements compared to the US. We don't need theories when we have results.ecdanc said:
0 -
I’d prefer it, but I drink too much to afford it. 😬mcgruff10 said:
I m a Tito s guy.ecdanc said:
Smirnoff, but good call!!!mcgruff10 said:
Drinking stoli?ecdanc said:
You’re probably right. And I’m drunk. What’s the topic?mrussel1 said:
I think your intellectual tank is empty on this topic.ecdanc said:
Donald Trump is your uncle?!? So much makes sense now.mrussel1 said:
There's easier ways to say "uncle".ecdanc said:
Given that we're having this conversation on a thread largely predicated on unseating the president we all think is doing some really fucked up shit, I'm not sure you can talk. Glass houses and all.mrussel1 said:
Are you guys working on your legal theories? You should hurry because communist implementation is going swimmingly thus far.ecdanc said:
Not yet. But we do look at your “western” legal tradition as a buncha bullshit.mrussel1 said:
Um no, common law, passed on through the centuries of western legal precedent. Do you commies have your own legal system too?ecdanc said:
Oh, your capitalist laws say something! Zing?mrussel1 said:
Oh wait, so even though intellectual property is considered a tangible asset legally (you know, like capital), you call it "labor"? Ha! That's rich.ecdanc said:
I literally don’t know what the fuck y’all are talking about. Please point me to the post where I said anything about intellectual labor.mrussel1 said:
His reading ability is fine and his question exposes the gap in a 19th century book applied to a 21st century economy. The lines between proletariat and bourgeoisie have blurred. You continue to be cagey on the topic but that's simply because good answers don't exist.ecdanc said:
I’m not challenging any assumptions; just your reading ability, I this case.cincybearcat said:
Don’t be all name calley, I ain’t in your class you can’t tell me that your assumptions are truth and I’ll fail if I go against those assumptions.ecdanc said:
Don’t be dopey. I said capital =/= work. Never said anything about intellectual labor.cincybearcat said:
I just did.ecdanc said:
That would be weird. Let me know if you see a professor doing that.cincybearcat said:
It seems weird for a professor to minimize intellectual property/effort. Isn’t that what teaching is? I for one think that has value.mrussel1 said:
You put zero value in the idea and the work that went into starting the factory. If one received zero for such things, what's the point of having an idea, and how do humans advance? Again, you can look at Soviet era technological advancements compared to the US. We don't need theories when we have results.ecdanc said:
0 -
'How do you fall for the Bernie Sanders scam?' Martin O'Malley on the Democrats and Iowa
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/feb/01/bernie-sanders-iowa-democrats-martin-omalley?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Look what I saw in the "Swedish News" app: https://huntnewsnu.com/61378/editorial/look-at-swedens-reality-not-bernie-sanders-version/
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Never had it. Have to try it.mrussel1 said:
I like that, but favorite is Chopin, Polish potato vodka.mcgruff10 said:
I m a Tito s guy.ecdanc said:
Smirnoff, but good call!!!mcgruff10 said:
Drinking stoli?ecdanc said:
You’re probably right. And I’m drunk. What’s the topic?mrussel1 said:
I think your intellectual tank is empty on this topic.ecdanc said:
Donald Trump is your uncle?!? So much makes sense now.mrussel1 said:
There's easier ways to say "uncle".ecdanc said:
Given that we're having this conversation on a thread largely predicated on unseating the president we all think is doing some really fucked up shit, I'm not sure you can talk. Glass houses and all.mrussel1 said:
Are you guys working on your legal theories? You should hurry because communist implementation is going swimmingly thus far.ecdanc said:
Not yet. But we do look at your “western” legal tradition as a buncha bullshit.mrussel1 said:
Um no, common law, passed on through the centuries of western legal precedent. Do you commies have your own legal system too?ecdanc said:
Oh, your capitalist laws say something! Zing?mrussel1 said:
Oh wait, so even though intellectual property is considered a tangible asset legally (you know, like capital), you call it "labor"? Ha! That's rich.ecdanc said:
I literally don’t know what the fuck y’all are talking about. Please point me to the post where I said anything about intellectual labor.mrussel1 said:
His reading ability is fine and his question exposes the gap in a 19th century book applied to a 21st century economy. The lines between proletariat and bourgeoisie have blurred. You continue to be cagey on the topic but that's simply because good answers don't exist.ecdanc said:
I’m not challenging any assumptions; just your reading ability, I this case.cincybearcat said:
Don’t be all name calley, I ain’t in your class you can’t tell me that your assumptions are truth and I’ll fail if I go against those assumptions.ecdanc said:
Don’t be dopey. I said capital =/= work. Never said anything about intellectual labor.cincybearcat said:
I just did.ecdanc said:
That would be weird. Let me know if you see a professor doing that.cincybearcat said:
It seems weird for a professor to minimize intellectual property/effort. Isn’t that what teaching is? I for one think that has value.mrussel1 said:
You put zero value in the idea and the work that went into starting the factory. If one received zero for such things, what's the point of having an idea, and how do humans advance? Again, you can look at Soviet era technological advancements compared to the US. We don't need theories when we have results.ecdanc said:
I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
It's about the same level as Belvedere, except Belv is grain vodka. They are both too good to mix with very much. If you're going to have a martini or just straight vodka, they are both super smooth.mcgruff10 said:
Never had it. Have to try it.mrussel1 said:
I like that, but favorite is Chopin, Polish potato vodka.mcgruff10 said:
I m a Tito s guy.ecdanc said:
Smirnoff, but good call!!!mcgruff10 said:
Drinking stoli?ecdanc said:
You’re probably right. And I’m drunk. What’s the topic?mrussel1 said:
I think your intellectual tank is empty on this topic.ecdanc said:
Donald Trump is your uncle?!? So much makes sense now.mrussel1 said:
There's easier ways to say "uncle".ecdanc said:
Given that we're having this conversation on a thread largely predicated on unseating the president we all think is doing some really fucked up shit, I'm not sure you can talk. Glass houses and all.mrussel1 said:
Are you guys working on your legal theories? You should hurry because communist implementation is going swimmingly thus far.ecdanc said:
Not yet. But we do look at your “western” legal tradition as a buncha bullshit.mrussel1 said:
Um no, common law, passed on through the centuries of western legal precedent. Do you commies have your own legal system too?ecdanc said:
Oh, your capitalist laws say something! Zing?mrussel1 said:
Oh wait, so even though intellectual property is considered a tangible asset legally (you know, like capital), you call it "labor"? Ha! That's rich.ecdanc said:
I literally don’t know what the fuck y’all are talking about. Please point me to the post where I said anything about intellectual labor.mrussel1 said:
His reading ability is fine and his question exposes the gap in a 19th century book applied to a 21st century economy. The lines between proletariat and bourgeoisie have blurred. You continue to be cagey on the topic but that's simply because good answers don't exist.ecdanc said:
I’m not challenging any assumptions; just your reading ability, I this case.cincybearcat said:
Don’t be all name calley, I ain’t in your class you can’t tell me that your assumptions are truth and I’ll fail if I go against those assumptions.ecdanc said:
Don’t be dopey. I said capital =/= work. Never said anything about intellectual labor.cincybearcat said:
I just did.ecdanc said:
That would be weird. Let me know if you see a professor doing that.cincybearcat said:
It seems weird for a professor to minimize intellectual property/effort. Isn’t that what teaching is? I for one think that has value.mrussel1 said:
You put zero value in the idea and the work that went into starting the factory. If one received zero for such things, what's the point of having an idea, and how do humans advance? Again, you can look at Soviet era technological advancements compared to the US. We don't need theories when we have results.ecdanc said:
0 -
You a big fan of student newspapers?mickeyrat said:Look what I saw in the "Swedish News" app: https://huntnewsnu.com/61378/editorial/look-at-swedens-reality-not-bernie-sanders-version/0 -
Lol. Totally understand.ecdanc said:
I’d prefer it, but I drink too much to afford it. 😬mcgruff10 said:
I m a Tito s guy.ecdanc said:
Smirnoff, but good call!!!mcgruff10 said:
Drinking stoli?ecdanc said:
You’re probably right. And I’m drunk. What’s the topic?mrussel1 said:
I think your intellectual tank is empty on this topic.ecdanc said:
Donald Trump is your uncle?!? So much makes sense now.mrussel1 said:
There's easier ways to say "uncle".ecdanc said:
Given that we're having this conversation on a thread largely predicated on unseating the president we all think is doing some really fucked up shit, I'm not sure you can talk. Glass houses and all.mrussel1 said:
Are you guys working on your legal theories? You should hurry because communist implementation is going swimmingly thus far.ecdanc said:
Not yet. But we do look at your “western” legal tradition as a buncha bullshit.mrussel1 said:
Um no, common law, passed on through the centuries of western legal precedent. Do you commies have your own legal system too?ecdanc said:
Oh, your capitalist laws say something! Zing?mrussel1 said:
Oh wait, so even though intellectual property is considered a tangible asset legally (you know, like capital), you call it "labor"? Ha! That's rich.ecdanc said:
I literally don’t know what the fuck y’all are talking about. Please point me to the post where I said anything about intellectual labor.mrussel1 said:
His reading ability is fine and his question exposes the gap in a 19th century book applied to a 21st century economy. The lines between proletariat and bourgeoisie have blurred. You continue to be cagey on the topic but that's simply because good answers don't exist.ecdanc said:
I’m not challenging any assumptions; just your reading ability, I this case.cincybearcat said:
Don’t be all name calley, I ain’t in your class you can’t tell me that your assumptions are truth and I’ll fail if I go against those assumptions.ecdanc said:
Don’t be dopey. I said capital =/= work. Never said anything about intellectual labor.cincybearcat said:
I just did.ecdanc said:
That would be weird. Let me know if you see a professor doing that.cincybearcat said:
It seems weird for a professor to minimize intellectual property/effort. Isn’t that what teaching is? I for one think that has value.mrussel1 said:
You put zero value in the idea and the work that went into starting the factory. If one received zero for such things, what's the point of having an idea, and how do humans advance? Again, you can look at Soviet era technological advancements compared to the US. We don't need theories when we have results.ecdanc said:
I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
That's pretty much what many of us have been saying. Very appropriate.mickeyrat said:Look what I saw in the "Swedish News" app: https://huntnewsnu.com/61378/editorial/look-at-swedens-reality-not-bernie-sanders-version/0 -
Wait, I thought Sweden was a utopia?mrussel1 said:
That's pretty much what many of us have been saying. Very appropriate.mickeyrat said:Look what I saw in the "Swedish News" app: https://huntnewsnu.com/61378/editorial/look-at-swedens-reality-not-bernie-sanders-version/I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
Vodka drinkers?
0 -
So you are saying MATH =/= mathbrianlux said:=/= ?Is that equal divided by equal?Would that be the same as infinity or zero?MATH I'm good with but math is not my strong suit.
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Spiritual_Chaos said:
So you are saying MATH =/= mathbrianlux said:=/= ?Is that equal divided by equal?Would that be the same as infinity or zero?MATH I'm good with but math is not my strong suit.
Well, no, more like Ecdanc's Equation leads me to thinking, as in "Make America Think Harder", about a subject I am not so strong in- which is math. The best I could come up with is either "equal divided by equal = infinity" or "equal divided by equal = zero." But now that I think HARDER about it (which is difficult to do at 1:10 AM in the AM), I have a feeling the answer to "equal divided by equal" may be one. Man oh man, I am going to need some good strong coffee in about 7 hours.
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
It means ”not equal to”brianlux said:Spiritual_Chaos said:
So you are saying MATH =/= mathbrianlux said:=/= ?Is that equal divided by equal?Would that be the same as infinity or zero?MATH I'm good with but math is not my strong suit.
Well, no, more like Ecdanc's Equation leads me to thinking, as in "Make America Think Harder", about a subject I am not so strong in- which is math. The best I could come up with is either "equal divided by equal = infinity" or "equal divided by equal = zero." But now that I think HARDER about it (which is difficult to do at 1:10 AM in the AM), I have a feeling the answer to "equal divided by equal" may be one. Man oh man, I am going to need some good strong coffee in about 7 hours.
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help