Calling someone a "fucking whore" doesn't result in a ban?
I have such a hard time navigating the rules of this forum. It's like the Jumanji world in here.
Get off your high horse...
Like my mom used to say, better to be on a high horse not calling women "fucking whores" than being down on the ground calling women "fucking whores".
Always wondered what she meant by it. Now finally I understand.
That absolutely makes no sense to the topic we're on...try to stay on topic
Makes no sense to you. Because you are down there on the ground.
What's with the put downs and belittling of other forum menbers because they disagree with your opinions?
Sea lion
WI 6/27/98 WI 10/8/00 MO 10/11/00 IL 4/23/03 MN 6/26/06 MN 6/27/06 WI 6/30/06 IL 8/5/07 IL 8/21/08 (EV) IL 8/22/08 (EV) IL 8/23/09 IL 8/24/09 IN 5/7/10 IL 6/28/11 (EV) IL 6/29/11 (EV) WI 9/3/11 WI 9/4/11 IL 7/19/13 NE 10/09/14 IL 10/17/14 MN 10/19/14 FL 4/11/16 IL 8/20/16 IL 8/22/16 IL 08/18/18 IL 08/20/18 IT 07/05/2020AT 07/07/2020
I think she believes that what happens within her country/constituency is more important than what happens within her political party apparatus.
She's doing the opposite of the very thing that democrats always criticize republicans for; she is putting country BEFORE party.
Fine, be an independent. I'm not arguing that she shouldn't do what she thinks is right, but refusing to pay party dues like everyone else, while still gaining the benefit of the party apparatus is bullshit. You're on the team or you're off the team. Make a decision. It's the same thing with Bernie. He puts the D on when it's convenient.
I think she believes that what happens within her country/constituency is more important than what happens within her political party apparatus.
She's doing the opposite of the very thing that democrats always criticize republicans for; she is putting country BEFORE party.
Fine, be an independent. I'm not arguing that she shouldn't do what she thinks is right, but refusing to pay party dues like everyone else, while still gaining the benefit of the party apparatus is bullshit. You're on the team or you're off the team. Make a decision. It's the same thing with Bernie. He puts the D on when it's convenient.
Did you read the article? She's supporting members of the team -- just not always the members of the team that the coaches want on the playing field. She's leveling it a bit. That could be a good thing.
Also, the article mentions that the DCCC is not hurting for money at this time.
I think she believes that what happens within her country/constituency is more important than what happens within her political party apparatus.
She's doing the opposite of the very thing that democrats always criticize republicans for; she is putting country BEFORE party.
Fine, be an independent. I'm not arguing that she shouldn't do what she thinks is right, but refusing to pay party dues like everyone else, while still gaining the benefit of the party apparatus is bullshit. You're on the team or you're off the team. Make a decision. It's the same thing with Bernie. He puts the D on when it's convenient.
Did you read the article? She's supporting members of the team -- just not always the members of the team that the coaches want on the playing field. She's leveling it a bit. That could be a good thing.
Also, the article mentions that the DCCC is not hurting for money at this time.
Yes I read the article, and the fact that: 1. She is funding primary challengers against existing Dem House members pisses me off and 2. her comments about the Democratic tent is too big pisses me off as well. Sorry we don't all pass her purity test. Would she rather I vote for a Republican here in VA? Or does she really not care at all. Her job is secure. I've always been of the opinion that people who can't compromise don't stand to lose anything. That's why they won't compromise.
I think she believes that what happens within her country/constituency is more important than what happens within her political party apparatus.
She's doing the opposite of the very thing that democrats always criticize republicans for; she is putting country BEFORE party.
Fine, be an independent. I'm not arguing that she shouldn't do what she thinks is right, but refusing to pay party dues like everyone else, while still gaining the benefit of the party apparatus is bullshit. You're on the team or you're off the team. Make a decision. It's the same thing with Bernie. He puts the D on when it's convenient.
Did you read the article? She's supporting members of the team -- just not always the members of the team that the coaches want on the playing field. She's leveling it a bit. That could be a good thing.
Also, the article mentions that the DCCC is not hurting for money at this time.
It's definitely going to ruffle some feathers and disrupt some status quo.
Interesting take but when she needs help she might not get it and the big D train might put their eggs in another D basket.
I think she believes that what happens within her country/constituency is more important than what happens within her political party apparatus.
She's doing the opposite of the very thing that democrats always criticize republicans for; she is putting country BEFORE party.
Fine, be an independent. I'm not arguing that she shouldn't do what she thinks is right, but refusing to pay party dues like everyone else, while still gaining the benefit of the party apparatus is bullshit. You're on the team or you're off the team. Make a decision. It's the same thing with Bernie. He puts the D on when it's convenient.
Did you read the article? She's supporting members of the team -- just not always the members of the team that the coaches want on the playing field. She's leveling it a bit. That could be a good thing.
Also, the article mentions that the DCCC is not hurting for money at this time.
It's definitely going to ruffle some feathers and disrupt some status quo.
Interesting take but when she needs help she might not get it and the big D train might put their eggs in another D basket.
She’s a huge fundraiser. I’m inclined to think that she’d raise just as much (or maybe even more!) without the democratic party’s support.
I think she believes that what happens within her country/constituency is more important than what happens within her political party apparatus.
She's doing the opposite of the very thing that democrats always criticize republicans for; she is putting country BEFORE party.
Fine, be an independent. I'm not arguing that she shouldn't do what she thinks is right, but refusing to pay party dues like everyone else, while still gaining the benefit of the party apparatus is bullshit. You're on the team or you're off the team. Make a decision. It's the same thing with Bernie. He puts the D on when it's convenient.
Did you read the article? She's supporting members of the team -- just not always the members of the team that the coaches want on the playing field. She's leveling it a bit. That could be a good thing.
Also, the article mentions that the DCCC is not hurting for money at this time.
It's definitely going to ruffle some feathers and disrupt some status quo.
Interesting take but when she needs help she might not get it and the big D train might put their eggs in another D basket.
She’s a huge fundraiser. I’m inclined to think that she’d raise just as much (or maybe even more!) without the democratic party’s support.
That's fine but if the DNC would rather have someone else in that seat that plays well w the rest of the team they might be inclined to have her ousted and put their weight behind someone else. You know, how politics really is.
Comments
Cheers,
HFD
I have such a hard time navigating the rules of this forum. It's like the Jumanji world in here.
Always wondered what she meant by it. Now finally I understand.
I guess yes then, I am disagreeing with your opinion.
This whole thing is a weird discussion.
FWIW, I think there's a distinction here about saying something about a club member.
Cheers,
HFD
She's doing the opposite of the very thing that democrats always criticize republicans for; she is putting country BEFORE party.
I agree.
Also, the article mentions that the DCCC is not hurting for money at this time.
I've always been of the opinion that people who can't compromise don't stand to lose anything. That's why they won't compromise.
Interesting take but when she needs help she might not get it and the big D train might put their eggs in another D basket.
Then she could run Indy?
Maybe?
That said I think she should play ball with the party.