Options

Should PJ Go Back To Having an Opening Band

1235»

Comments

  • Options
    rummyrummy British Columbia, Canada Posts: 4,351
    JimmyV said:
    rummy said:
    Who’s on PJs level that they would go-headline with?
    Foo Fighters?
    Please God no.
    I agree. I was just thinking of a band that is objectively at the same "level" in terms of popularity and has some sort of "connection" to the band.
  • Options
    rummyrummy British Columbia, Canada Posts: 4,351
    Pearl Jam with Alice in Chain playing a shorter set before (but longer than a opening act slot) would be cool also.
    I would dig AIC as an opener - if they must have one. I've yet to see Jerry and his band perform so this would be a good opportunity.
  • Options
    No 
  • Options
    100% yes....actually I miss that. Got RnR education with X, fell in love with BRMC etc. at previous PJ shows...

    Maybe that means a shorter PJ set, but honestly...that's OK with me and it could mean that less time = more energy (and no sit-down section)...
  • Options
    wobbler_kittywobbler_kitty Millbury, MA Posts: 161
    More openers and less PJ sounds terrible and co headliners sounds even worse. 
    +1000
  • Options
    JimmyVJimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 18,876
    An Evening With at a ballpark beats a co-headling show in an arena everytime.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • Options
    yall are missing out on new music: 

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1a6Hl39xWeE 
  • Options
    demetriosdemetrios Canada Posts: 87,697
    I don't mind the band bringing back an opening band. If they do though please let it be bands that have never opened for Pearl Jam.
  • Options
    demetrios said:
    I don't mind the band bringing back an opening band. If they do though please let it be bands that have never opened for Pearl Jam.
    tegan

    and

    sara
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • Options
    Testament 
  • Options
    NOPE.  
    Ithaca, NY-11/6/91 SPAC, NY-8/4/92 Rochester, NY-4/7/94 Toronto-9/21/96 Buffalo, NY-10/1/96 Barrie, ONT-8/20/98 Pittsburgh, PA- 8/25/98 Jones Beach, NY-8/23/00 Jones Beach, NY-8/24/00 Jones Beach, NY-8/25/00 SPAC, NY-8/27/00 Buffalo, NY-5/2/03 MSG-7/8/03 MSG -7/9/03 Hamilton, ONT-9/13/05 Albany, NY-5/12/06 Cleveland, OH-5/20/06 Camden, NJ-5/27/06 East Ruth, NJ-6/3/06 Chicago, IL-8/5/07 Bonnaroo-6/14/08 MSG-6/24/08 MSG-7/25/08 Mansfield, MA-7/30/08 Chicago, IL-8/23/09 Philly, PA-10/30/09 Philly, PA-10/31/09 Buffalo, NY 5/10/10 MSG 1&2 5/20-21/10
  • Options
    HesCalledDyerHesCalledDyer Maryland Posts: 16,418
    demetrios said:
    I don't mind the band bringing back an opening band. If they do though please let it be bands that have never opened for Pearl Jam.
    tegan

    and

    sara
    Ok, I would actually be down for this.
  • Options
    pdalowskypdalowsky Doncaster,UK Posts: 14,695
    No, absolutely not

    (although Rancid may make me reconsider)
  • Options
    TyTy Posts: 1,007
    Yes!!! I think they’d need it for an Aussie stadium tour, to sell the tickets. 
    The Strokes would be grand, or Black Keys or Kings Of Leon again. Wolfmother would probably open. 
    But I’d love King Gizz, Jason Isbell, You Am I, Strand Of Oaks, IDLES... or a Smashing Pumpkins double header would be a dream. 
    PJ - Sydney 1998; Sydney 2003; Sydney, Melbourne, Newcastle 2006; Melbourne, Sydney 2009; Gold Coast, Melbourne, Sydney 2014.
    EV - Canberra, Newcastle, Sydney 2011; Sydney 2014.
  • Options
    thenewno2
  • Options
    CantKeepmedownCantKeepmedown Portland, Maine Posts: 2,895
    yall are missing out on new music: 

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1a6Hl39xWeE 
    There's plenty of new, great music out there. I enjoy a lot of it.  They don't have to open for Pearl Jam to make it so.  
  • Options
    Dolly Parton to throw everyone off
Sign In or Register to comment.