DONALD J TRUMP HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN IMPEACHED

josevolution · July 2019

2018

Halifax2TheMax said:

There’s a whole lot of truth and facts in there.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/unfit-be-president-full-text-house-impeachment-resolution-trump-n1030611

I’d say all of it fits the Baffoon to a T , he represents thee worst this country has to offer if he where to migrate to another sane country he would be denied entrance based on these facts !

josevolution · July 2019

2018

Unless off course he was to go to Russia, NK , SA or any other corrupt crime filled nation!

Go Beavers · July 2019

Surprise surprise. Turns out Hope Hick perjured herself in the House testimony. Let’s see if they give a sh*t.

Halifax2TheMax · July 2019

Go Beavers said:

Surprise surprise. Turns out Hope Hick perjured herself in the House testimony. Let’s see if they give a sh*t.

I think you’re going to find that more than just Hope’s Hickey perjured themselves.

Halifax2TheMax · July 2019

Momentum is beginning to build.

https://apple.news/ADixTuuhXTu272GFtOhbONA

Halifax2TheMax · July 2019

Because the chairperson of the house judiciary committee would say this if Team Trump Treason were “fully exonerated.” Tick tock, tick tock, tick tock goes the impeachment clock.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/21/politics/mueller-investigation-nadler-says-evidence-trump-guilty-high-crimes-misdemeanors/index.html

Meltdown99 · July 2019

So impeachment hearings begin Friday? Or does congress need another report and more hearings or is the US congress spineless cowards...i'll go with spineless.

OnWis97 · July 2019

"THE FIELD"

Meltdown99 said:

So impeachment hearings begin Friday? Or does congress need another report and more hearings or is the US congress spineless cowards...i'll go with spineless.

At this point, we're more likely to have a retroactive impeach of Obama for not Making America Great Again, though Pelosi's pretty tight-lipped about her intentions there.

Meltdown99 · July 2019

If your hope is Pelosi a career politician and leech...good luck.

The Juggler · July 2019

2019

Well I think reasonable people will agree it makes sense to go in with their strongest hand. Why would you want to start an impeachment hearing without testimony from McGahn who is crucial to the obstruction issue or full testimony from others and without looking at his tax returns?

I realize it doesn't please the masses who thought this would've been done a year or two ago. But dealing with an admin who gives you nothing and then having to go through the courts takes time.

Patience, young jedis....

josevolution · July 2019

2018

So can someone shed some light on this , what can congress do to the criminals from this administration that have refused to comply with subpoena ?

The Juggler · July 2019

2019

josevolution said:

So can someone shed some light on this , what can congress do to the criminals from this administration that have refused to comply with subpoena ?

Fight them in court to force them to testify. That is literally what is happening right now.

Halifax2TheMax · July 2019

The Juggler said:

josevolution said:

So can someone shed some light on this , what can congress do to the criminals from this administration that have refused to comply with subpoena ?

Fight them in court to force them to testify. That is literally what is happening right now.

Judges don’t typically take kindly to contempt of congress and can threaten and impose jail time. Unless it’s a Team Trump Treason wholly unqualified appointed judge.

josevolution · July 2019

2018

The Juggler said:

josevolution said:

So can someone shed some light on this , what can congress do to the criminals from this administration that have refused to comply with subpoena ?

Fight them in court to force them to testify. That is literally what is happening right now.

Ok , I just don’t have any confidence in the system of checks & balances anymore..

HughFreakingDillon · July 2019

2018

as i said a while ago in some thread i can't recall, trump is proving that the checks and balances are nothing more than hugh hefner without viagra: the intention is there, but it's simply too limp to be effective.

The Juggler · July 2019

2019

josevolution said:

The Juggler said:

josevolution said:

So can someone shed some light on this , what can congress do to the criminals from this administration that have refused to comply with subpoena ?

Fight them in court to force them to testify. That is literally what is happening right now.

Ok , I just don’t have any confidence in the system of checks & balances anymore..

Just takes time unfortunately

jeffbr · July 2019

2017

An interesting article from NBC News where Pelosi is still dancing around impeachment, but Nadler says they're already in-effect working the impeachment investigation.

Pelosi: I'm not slow-walking impeachment inquiry. Nadler: It's 'in effect' anyway
But soon after Pelosi spoke, Nadler said Friday that his committee has “in effect” already been conducting an impeachment inquiry of Trump.

Flanked by Judiciary Committee members who’ve voiced support for an impeachment inquiry, Nadler was asked by NBC News to clarify whether the Judiciary Committee has already initiated such an inquiry.

“Whether you call that an inquiry, or whatever you want to call that, that’s what we’ve been doing,” Nadler said, later adding that they have already been conducting one “in effect.”

“I think too much has been made of the phrase 'impeachment inquiry,'” he said.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a constitutional law expert who has voiced support for such an inquiry, also said an effort of some kind was essentially underway. “A lot of people believe that we have been in an impeachment inquiry ..." he said. "I would say we are in an impeachment investigation.”

Nadler announced during the press conference that he would be going to court later in the day to ask for the grand jury information within the 448-page Mueller report, which he said will help determine whether they decide to impeach Trump. In the filing, the committee planned to say that “articles of impeachment are under consideration as part of the Committee’s investigation, although no final determination has been made.”

“Because Department of Justice policies will not allow prosecution of a sitting president, the United States House of Representatives is the only institution of the federal government that can now hold President Trump accountable for these actions,” Nadler said, reading directly from the petition he was filing in court. “To do so, the House must have access to all of the relevant facts and consider whether to exercise its full Article I powers including a constitutional power of the utmost gravity — recommendation of the articles of impeachment.”

Halifax2TheMax · July 2019

jeffbr said:

An interesting article from NBC News where Pelosi is still dancing around impeachment, but Nadler says they're already in-effect working the impeachment investigation.
Pelosi: I'm not slow-walking impeachment inquiry. Nadler: It's 'in effect' anyway
But soon after Pelosi spoke, Nadler said Friday that his committee has “in effect” already been conducting an impeachment inquiry of Trump.
Flanked by Judiciary Committee members who’ve voiced support for an impeachment inquiry, Nadler was asked by NBC News to clarify whether the Judiciary Committee has already initiated such an inquiry.
“Whether you call that an inquiry, or whatever you want to call that, that’s what we’ve been doing,” Nadler said, later adding that they have already been conducting one “in effect.”
“I think too much has been made of the phrase 'impeachment inquiry,'” he said.
Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a constitutional law expert who has voiced support for such an inquiry, also said an effort of some kind was essentially underway. “A lot of people believe that we have been in an impeachment inquiry ..." he said. "I would say we are in an impeachment investigation.”
Nadler announced during the press conference that he would be going to court later in the day to ask for the grand jury information within the 448-page Mueller report, which he said will help determine whether they decide to impeach Trump. In the filing, the committee planned to say that “articles of impeachment are under consideration as part of the Committee’s investigation, although no final determination has been made.”
“Because Department of Justice policies will not allow prosecution of a sitting president, the United States House of Representatives is the only institution of the federal government that can now hold President Trump accountable for these actions,” Nadler said, reading directly from the petition he was filing in court. “To do so, the House must have access to all of the relevant facts and consider whether to exercise its full Article I powers including a constitutional power of the utmost gravity — recommendation of the articles of impeachment.”

Nadler was interviewed on Anderson Cooper last night and he came off as logical, seeking additional information to provide the American people and wants witness testimony before the committee, particularly from McGahn, as well as access to Team Trump Treason’s tax returns. He strikes me as serious, fair, methodical, grave and not someone who would bring articles of impeachment if there’s no there, there. He knows more than he’s letting on but believes in the process, and the importance of the process. Nancy needs that diligence to bring it to the floor for a vote. Facts and evidence matter. The rush to judgement is the gravest of mistakes. Let the chips fall where they may as the truth will set you free. Particularly, if:

“There was no collusion.”

“I have nothing to hide.”

“I don’t know any Russians.”

“I’ll sit down and talk with anyone.”

“We do everything by the book.”

“Only the guilty plea the fifth.”

“Very legal, very cool.”

“Fully exonerated.”

“Essentially no obstruction.”

Follow the money from Russia with love and a PTape all the way to impeachment.

stuckinline · July 2019

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/supreme-court-trump-border-wall-funds_n_5d3b80c7e4b0c31569eae681

The Juggler · July 2019

2019

jeffbr said:

An interesting article from NBC News where Pelosi is still dancing around impeachment, but Nadler says they're already in-effect working the impeachment investigation.
Pelosi: I'm not slow-walking impeachment inquiry. Nadler: It's 'in effect' anyway
But soon after Pelosi spoke, Nadler said Friday that his committee has “in effect” already been conducting an impeachment inquiry of Trump.
Flanked by Judiciary Committee members who’ve voiced support for an impeachment inquiry, Nadler was asked by NBC News to clarify whether the Judiciary Committee has already initiated such an inquiry.
“Whether you call that an inquiry, or whatever you want to call that, that’s what we’ve been doing,” Nadler said, later adding that they have already been conducting one “in effect.”
“I think too much has been made of the phrase 'impeachment inquiry,'” he said.
Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a constitutional law expert who has voiced support for such an inquiry, also said an effort of some kind was essentially underway. “A lot of people believe that we have been in an impeachment inquiry ..." he said. "I would say we are in an impeachment investigation.”
Nadler announced during the press conference that he would be going to court later in the day to ask for the grand jury information within the 448-page Mueller report, which he said will help determine whether they decide to impeach Trump. In the filing, the committee planned to say that “articles of impeachment are under consideration as part of the Committee’s investigation, although no final determination has been made.”
“Because Department of Justice policies will not allow prosecution of a sitting president, the United States House of Representatives is the only institution of the federal government that can now hold President Trump accountable for these actions,” Nadler said, reading directly from the petition he was filing in court. “To do so, the House must have access to all of the relevant facts and consider whether to exercise its full Article I powers including a constitutional power of the utmost gravity — recommendation of the articles of impeachment.”

Saw this. Great news.

Anyone know how the 6 week recess plays into things though?

DONALD J TRUMP HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN IMPEACHED

Comments

“Whether you call that an inquiry, or whatever you want to call that, that’s what we’ve been doing,” Nadler said, later adding that they have already been conducting one “in effect.”

“Whether you call that an inquiry, or whatever you want to call that, that’s what we’ve been doing,” Nadler said, later adding that they have already been conducting one “in effect.”

“Whether you call that an inquiry, or whatever you want to call that, that’s what we’ve been doing,” Nadler said, later adding that they have already been conducting one “in effect.”

Categories

***DONALD J TRUMP HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN IMPEACHED***

Comments

“Whether you call that an inquiry, or whatever you want to call that, that’s what we’ve been doing,” Nadler said, later adding that they have already been conducting one “in effect.”

“Whether you call that an inquiry, or whatever you want to call that, that’s what we’ve been doing,” Nadler said, later adding that they have already been conducting one “in effect.”

“Whether you call that an inquiry, or whatever you want to call that, that’s what we’ve been doing,” Nadler said, later adding that they have already been conducting one “in effect.”

Categories

DONALD J TRUMP HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN IMPEACHED