Outrage Culture
Comments
-
Yeah I remember I was 'seeing' this girl at the time and we referred to her affectionately as "poundcake". I think that was the only decent song from that album.tempo_n_groove said:
Van Halen used it on their album too!mrussel1 said:
I agree that acronyms are relatively recent in history, but I'm not sure that closes the case. I always found this one interesting. I just read the "Snopes" on this, but I think the author makes a conclusion based on a bad assumption. He says the because the stocks would treat the word "for" as superfluous, it can't be the origin. That seems like rather silly evidence, using that as your only reason. Now it's hard to prove a negative, proving that something didn't exist, so I get that. I'm still going to use it though.oftenreading said:Also, as a general rule of thumb, very few words originally derive from acronyms, and those that do are relatively new ones.0 -
You are mistaken as there aren't any good songs on that album...mrussel1 said:
Yeah I remember I was 'seeing' this girl at the time and we referred to her affectionately as "poundcake". I think that was the only decent song from that album.tempo_n_groove said:
Van Halen used it on their album too!mrussel1 said:
I agree that acronyms are relatively recent in history, but I'm not sure that closes the case. I always found this one interesting. I just read the "Snopes" on this, but I think the author makes a conclusion based on a bad assumption. He says the because the stocks would treat the word "for" as superfluous, it can't be the origin. That seems like rather silly evidence, using that as your only reason. Now it's hard to prove a negative, proving that something didn't exist, so I get that. I'm still going to use it though.oftenreading said:Also, as a general rule of thumb, very few words originally derive from acronyms, and those that do are relatively new ones.0 -
Ha! Touche. It sucked.tempo_n_groove said:
You are mistaken as there aren't any good songs on that album...mrussel1 said:
Yeah I remember I was 'seeing' this girl at the time and we referred to her affectionately as "poundcake". I think that was the only decent song from that album.tempo_n_groove said:
Van Halen used it on their album too!mrussel1 said:
I agree that acronyms are relatively recent in history, but I'm not sure that closes the case. I always found this one interesting. I just read the "Snopes" on this, but I think the author makes a conclusion based on a bad assumption. He says the because the stocks would treat the word "for" as superfluous, it can't be the origin. That seems like rather silly evidence, using that as your only reason. Now it's hard to prove a negative, proving that something didn't exist, so I get that. I'm still going to use it though.oftenreading said:Also, as a general rule of thumb, very few words originally derive from acronyms, and those that do are relatively new ones.0 -
Be Excellent To Each OtherParty On, Dudes!0 -
Snopes isn’t the only source that disagrees with you. You seem so convinced of your origin story - is fuck really the hill you want to die on?mrussel1 said:
I agree that acronyms are relatively recent in history, but I'm not sure that closes the case. I always found this one interesting. I just read the "Snopes" on this, but I think the author makes a conclusion based on a bad assumption. He says the because the stocks would treat the word "for" as superfluous, it can't be the origin. That seems like rather silly evidence, using that as your only reason. Now it's hard to prove a negative, proving that something didn't exist, so I get that. I'm still going to use it though.oftenreading said:Also, as a general rule of thumb, very few words originally derive from acronyms, and those that do are relatively new ones.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
If you are going to die anyway...that sounds like the hill to do it onoftenreading said:
Snopes isn’t the only source that disagrees with you. You seem so convinced of your origin story - is fuck really the hill you want to die on?mrussel1 said:
I agree that acronyms are relatively recent in history, but I'm not sure that closes the case. I always found this one interesting. I just read the "Snopes" on this, but I think the author makes a conclusion based on a bad assumption. He says the because the stocks would treat the word "for" as superfluous, it can't be the origin. That seems like rather silly evidence, using that as your only reason. Now it's hard to prove a negative, proving that something didn't exist, so I get that. I'm still going to use it though.oftenreading said:Also, as a general rule of thumb, very few words originally derive from acronyms, and those that do are relatively new ones. hippiemom = goodness0 -
I thought Eddie explained it one of the two Boston shows last year?09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
I've believed this for the better part of 30 years. Internet hacks won't convince me of otherwise. Now if a true historian or etymologist comes out with something (if they bother), then probably. Until then, I'll continue to have fun with it.oftenreading said:
Snopes isn’t the only source that disagrees with you. You seem so convinced of your origin story - is fuck really the hill you want to die on?mrussel1 said:
I agree that acronyms are relatively recent in history, but I'm not sure that closes the case. I always found this one interesting. I just read the "Snopes" on this, but I think the author makes a conclusion based on a bad assumption. He says the because the stocks would treat the word "for" as superfluous, it can't be the origin. That seems like rather silly evidence, using that as your only reason. Now it's hard to prove a negative, proving that something didn't exist, so I get that. I'm still going to use it though.oftenreading said:Also, as a general rule of thumb, very few words originally derive from acronyms, and those that do are relatively new ones. 0 -
Yeah, and he marveled at the multiple uses of the word. And then told politicians to fuck off. So I guess his story had a point.Halifax2TheMax said:I thought Eddie explained it one of the two Boston shows last year?0 -
0 -
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/wild-bee-population_n_5d374e6fe4b004b6adb709d6PJ_Soul said:FWIW Brian, I don't think we've crossed any line and aren't at risk of getting banned from this conversation.
Like I already said, I do think there are real reasons to be very concerned about the honeybee die off, if what you are concerned about is the food supply/agriculture (but also about the ecosystem in general). And I really think we need to be concerned about that, especially as I also think we are RIGHT on the edge of some really serious problems because of climate change. We need all the successful crops we can get right now. But also, other pollinators are indeed dying off. Here are a couple articles:
I should add.... isn't a whole species, whatever it is, becoming threatened and going through a massive die-off a legit thing to feel outraged about in any case, especially considering the fact that pesticide use is a major factor in it happening?
Honeybees are destroying America, and they need to go back to the shithole countries from which they came. Post edited by dankind onI SAW PEARL JAM0 -
When did SNOPES (Super Neighborly Organization to Prove Everyone's Shit) start spelling itself out with lower-case letters?oftenreading said:
Snopes isn’t the only source that disagrees with you. You seem so convinced of your origin story - is fuck really the hill you want to die on?mrussel1 said:
I agree that acronyms are relatively recent in history, but I'm not sure that closes the case. I always found this one interesting. I just read the "Snopes" on this, but I think the author makes a conclusion based on a bad assumption. He says the because the stocks would treat the word "for" as superfluous, it can't be the origin. That seems like rather silly evidence, using that as your only reason. Now it's hard to prove a negative, proving that something didn't exist, so I get that. I'm still going to use it though.oftenreading said:Also, as a general rule of thumb, very few words originally derive from acronyms, and those that do are relatively new ones. 1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley0 -
dankind said:
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/wild-bee-population_n_5d374e6fe4b004b6adb709d6PJ_Soul said:FWIW Brian, I don't think we've crossed any line and aren't at risk of getting banned from this conversation.Like I already said, I do think there are real reasons to be very concerned about the honeybee die off, if what you are concerned about is the food supply/agriculture (but also about the ecosystem in general). And I really think we need to be concerned about that, especially as I also think we are RIGHT on the edge of some really serious problems because of climate change. We need all the successful crops we can get right now. But also, other pollinators are indeed dying off. Here are a couple articles:
I should add.... isn't a whole species, whatever it is, becoming threatened and going through a massive die-off a legit thing to feel outraged about in any case, especially considering the fact that pesticide use is a major factor in it happening?
Honeybees are destroying America, and they need to go back to the shithole countries from which they came.LOLGood article, actually. It points out why wild bees are more important (and at least as endangered) as imported exotics like the honeybee.
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
Be Best, don’t bee-ist.dankind said:
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/wild-bee-population_n_5d374e6fe4b004b6adb709d6PJ_Soul said:FWIW Brian, I don't think we've crossed any line and aren't at risk of getting banned from this conversation.Like I already said, I do think there are real reasons to be very concerned about the honeybee die off, if what you are concerned about is the food supply/agriculture (but also about the ecosystem in general). And I really think we need to be concerned about that, especially as I also think we are RIGHT on the edge of some really serious problems because of climate change. We need all the successful crops we can get right now. But also, other pollinators are indeed dying off. Here are a couple articles:
I should add.... isn't a whole species, whatever it is, becoming threatened and going through a massive die-off a legit thing to feel outraged about in any case, especially considering the fact that pesticide use is a major factor in it happening?
Honeybees are destroying America, and they need to go back to the shithole countries from which they came.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
Rage Against the Machine’s ‘The Battle of Los Angeles’ Is 20, and It Hasn’t Aged a DayRage was loud, angry, and activist. They saw the future and screamed about it. Until they didn’t anymore.
https://www.theringer.com/music/2019/7/29/8934549/rage-against-the-machine-battle-los-angeles-best-album-1999
good read0 -
as a guy who was about 15 when that album came out, I wholeheartedly disagree that it sucked. it was on constant rotation in my buddy's mustang to and from the beach every weekend.mrussel1 said:
Ha! Touche. It sucked.tempo_n_groove said:
You are mistaken as there aren't any good songs on that album...mrussel1 said:
Yeah I remember I was 'seeing' this girl at the time and we referred to her affectionately as "poundcake". I think that was the only decent song from that album.tempo_n_groove said:
Van Halen used it on their album too!mrussel1 said:
I agree that acronyms are relatively recent in history, but I'm not sure that closes the case. I always found this one interesting. I just read the "Snopes" on this, but I think the author makes a conclusion based on a bad assumption. He says the because the stocks would treat the word "for" as superfluous, it can't be the origin. That seems like rather silly evidence, using that as your only reason. Now it's hard to prove a negative, proving that something didn't exist, so I get that. I'm still going to use it though.oftenreading said:Also, as a general rule of thumb, very few words originally derive from acronyms, and those that do are relatively new ones.
and to answer your next question, yes, i was still a flaming virgin at the end of that summer. But FUCK ROCKED!Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
Is that nostalgia or can you still say it's good?HughFreakingDillon said:
as a guy who was about 15 when that album came out, I wholeheartedly disagree that it sucked. it was on constant rotation in my buddy's mustang to and from the beach every weekend.mrussel1 said:
Ha! Touche. It sucked.tempo_n_groove said:
You are mistaken as there aren't any good songs on that album...mrussel1 said:
Yeah I remember I was 'seeing' this girl at the time and we referred to her affectionately as "poundcake". I think that was the only decent song from that album.tempo_n_groove said:
Van Halen used it on their album too!mrussel1 said:
I agree that acronyms are relatively recent in history, but I'm not sure that closes the case. I always found this one interesting. I just read the "Snopes" on this, but I think the author makes a conclusion based on a bad assumption. He says the because the stocks would treat the word "for" as superfluous, it can't be the origin. That seems like rather silly evidence, using that as your only reason. Now it's hard to prove a negative, proving that something didn't exist, so I get that. I'm still going to use it though.oftenreading said:Also, as a general rule of thumb, very few words originally derive from acronyms, and those that do are relatively new ones.
and to answer your next question, yes, i was still a flaming virgin at the end of that summer. But FUCK ROCKED!0 -
I haven't listened to VH in years, and don't really care to, it's not my thing anymore, but I honestly think it's still a really good record.mrussel1 said:
Is that nostalgia or can you still say it's good?HughFreakingDillon said:
as a guy who was about 15 when that album came out, I wholeheartedly disagree that it sucked. it was on constant rotation in my buddy's mustang to and from the beach every weekend.mrussel1 said:
Ha! Touche. It sucked.tempo_n_groove said:
You are mistaken as there aren't any good songs on that album...mrussel1 said:
Yeah I remember I was 'seeing' this girl at the time and we referred to her affectionately as "poundcake". I think that was the only decent song from that album.tempo_n_groove said:
Van Halen used it on their album too!mrussel1 said:
I agree that acronyms are relatively recent in history, but I'm not sure that closes the case. I always found this one interesting. I just read the "Snopes" on this, but I think the author makes a conclusion based on a bad assumption. He says the because the stocks would treat the word "for" as superfluous, it can't be the origin. That seems like rather silly evidence, using that as your only reason. Now it's hard to prove a negative, proving that something didn't exist, so I get that. I'm still going to use it though.oftenreading said:Also, as a general rule of thumb, very few words originally derive from acronyms, and those that do are relatively new ones.
and to answer your next question, yes, i was still a flaming virgin at the end of that summer. But FUCK ROCKED!
I'm going to put on that record just for giggles later. I'll report back tomorrow.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
See the pj Halloween T-shirt thread for some fake outrage.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0
-
^ That's for sure!
There are a few delicate flowers who seem to be shocked by Halloween-related horror imagery."I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/080
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help