I wonder if our president is taking his own advice:
If American Presidents discussed American atrocities they'd have a lot of 'splainin to do
What part of Pearl Harbor was an America atrocity?
If the US President's want to bring up wrongdoing by other countries towards the US, then the line of other countries that have grievances against the US would be very extensive and the atrocities committed by the US towards other countries far outweigh any atrocities committed against the US. Why is that so hard for you to see. By the way, WW2 is over. Japan is a good friend of the west. Trump is a fucking idiot for bringing up that attack...
Dissagree but I am definitely not debating this. I didn’t realize world war 2 was over, thanks for letting me know Capt. however I am still wondering what part of Pearl Harbor is an American atrocity.
The original post that started this conversation was referring to atrocities committed by the US towards other countries. In the case of Japan specifically, some might say dropping 2 nuclear bombs on Japan, were atrocities as well. I am not going to debate it either. Because there is nothing to debate...
I don't think dropping two nuclear bombs was an atrocity, to me it was the way to end the war against an enemy that wouldn't give up. I definitely think Japan out atrocitied (word? lol) us during World War 2. Rape of Nanking, treatment of prisoners of war....etc
You might think differently if it was Japan who had dropped nuclear bombs on two American cities to end the war.
Not to mention the firebombing of Japanese civilians throughout the war. Maybe check out the doc The Fog Of War.
Are you trying to imply that Japan was innocent in this? They started world war 2, what did you want the us to do? I know all about the firebombings and how more people were killed in those bombings than in the nuclear bomb droppings. Even with all those people dying in the firebombings Japan still didn’t surrender.
In what way did the Japanese start WW2?
Hitler rushed to get his army ready after he surprisingly heard on the radio about the Pearl Harbour attack? "Hurry up with the jew-hating leaflets" people heard him yell while running into his study to design the swastika.
Hehe.
Um, they invaded China in the 1930's and then attacked the US at Pearl Harbor. A lot of scholars argue that the war started here although the official start of World War 2 was on September 1, 1939 with the German invasion of Poland. At that point Japan had already killed millions.
Scholars also say, the winning team after WW1 started WW2 by putting Germany in a position where Hitler-labeled nationalism had soil to grow. That was in the 10s.
Check-mate Japan. Now the US started WW2.
Doh...except England and France were the forces behind the Treaty of Versailles, not the Americans. Wilson wanted the Fourteen Points to be the basis of the treaty. He was against the War Guilt clause specifically. Try again.
Without the punchline "Now the US started WW2.", how would the point of my comment come across as lovingly?
"Check-mate Japan. Now France, and England and a bunch of other countries - including the US - lay a foundation through their peace terms for the possibility of the Germany people to accept authoritarianism which you can see as a thread leading up Germany attacking it's neighbors".
No need to kill all the fun.
I stand by my comment. Among a bunch of stiffs.
Haha, blaming the US for starting the worst war in history, one which many of our family members were affected by directly, is a real riot. I can never get enough of you trashing the US while you are on a US website dedicated to a US band. It's all so much fun.
I guess you see some point in some way of branding the band in this nationalistic thing of yours.
I see them as Pearl Jam. Not the olympic team of musicians from the USA.
I also do not really care what country the server is where this website is being stored. I also do not have problem with a great band being from the US. Or the five of my five favorite movies. Or a copywriter named Bob I worked with once. But I guess you see it in a different way.
Also, I have not blamed the US for starting WW2. You have a problem understanding text and the different uses of it. Subtext. Sarcasm. Witty-ness. Those kind of things.
Your family members being affected by WW2 concerns me not in the context of my comment. And should not.
all good. Fridens liljor.
Do you have a few iron crosses in the attic as a thanks for helping transport munitions to the Eastern Front for the Nazis? That was very helpful, it more efficiently cleared the way for the Einsatzgruppen to do its dirty work.
I wonder if our president is taking his own advice:
If American Presidents discussed American atrocities they'd have a lot of 'splainin to do
What part of Pearl Harbor was an America atrocity?
If the US President's want to bring up wrongdoing by other countries towards the US, then the line of other countries that have grievances against the US would be very extensive and the atrocities committed by the US towards other countries far outweigh any atrocities committed against the US. Why is that so hard for you to see. By the way, WW2 is over. Japan is a good friend of the west. Trump is a fucking idiot for bringing up that attack...
Dissagree but I am definitely not debating this. I didn’t realize world war 2 was over, thanks for letting me know Capt. however I am still wondering what part of Pearl Harbor is an American atrocity.
The original post that started this conversation was referring to atrocities committed by the US towards other countries. In the case of Japan specifically, some might say dropping 2 nuclear bombs on Japan, were atrocities as well. I am not going to debate it either. Because there is nothing to debate...
I don't think dropping two nuclear bombs was an atrocity, to me it was the way to end the war against an enemy that wouldn't give up. I definitely think Japan out atrocitied (word? lol) us during World War 2. Rape of Nanking, treatment of prisoners of war....etc
You might think differently if it was Japan who had dropped nuclear bombs on two American cities to end the war.
Not to mention the firebombing of Japanese civilians throughout the war. Maybe check out the doc The Fog Of War.
Are you trying to imply that Japan was innocent in this? They started world war 2, what did you want the us to do? I know all about the firebombings and how more people were killed in those bombings than in the nuclear bomb droppings. Even with all those people dying in the firebombings Japan still didn’t surrender.
In what way did the Japanese start WW2?
Hitler rushed to get his army ready after he surprisingly heard on the radio about the Pearl Harbour attack? "Hurry up with the jew-hating leaflets" people heard him yell while running into his study to design the swastika.
Hehe.
Um, they invaded China in the 1930's and then attacked the US at Pearl Harbor. A lot of scholars argue that the war started here although the official start of World War 2 was on September 1, 1939 with the German invasion of Poland. At that point Japan had already killed millions.
Scholars also say, the winning team after WW1 started WW2 by putting Germany in a position where Hitler-labeled nationalism had soil to grow. That was in the 10s.
Check-mate Japan. Now the US started WW2.
Doh...except England and France were the forces behind the Treaty of Versailles, not the Americans. Wilson wanted the Fourteen Points to be the basis of the treaty. He was against the War Guilt clause specifically. Try again.
Without the punchline "Now the US started WW2.", how would the point of my comment come across as lovingly?
"Check-mate Japan. Now France, and England and a bunch of other countries - including the US - lay a foundation through their peace terms for the possibility of the Germany people to accept authoritarianism which you can see as a thread leading up Germany attacking it's neighbors".
No need to kill all the fun.
I stand by my comment. Among a bunch of stiffs.
Haha, blaming the US for starting the worst war in history, one which many of our family members were affected by directly, is a real riot. I can never get enough of you trashing the US while you are on a US website dedicated to a US band. It's all so much fun.
I guess you see some point in some way of branding the band in this nationalistic thing of yours.
I see them as Pearl Jam. Not the olympic team of musicians from the USA.
I also do not really care what country the server is where this website is being stored. I also do not have problem with a great band being from the US. Or the five of my five favorite movies. Or a copywriter named Bob I worked with once. But I guess you see it in a different way.
Also, I have not blamed the US for starting WW2. You have a problem understanding text and the different uses of it. Subtext. Sarcasm. Witty-ness. Those kind of things.
Your family members being affected by WW2 concerns me not in the context of my comment. And should not.
Yep, they're mine. What's yours is a surrender. Great job. Pat your grandparents on the back. If everyone took Sweden's position, what would Europe look like today?
"Snus" would be legal in all countries, and not just Sweden as now:
(Nice of you to pull n Sweden... when did this conversation be about Sweden? Or even the US taking part in WW2? You seem a bit hostile.)
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
I wonder if our president is taking his own advice:
If American Presidents discussed American atrocities they'd have a lot of 'splainin to do
What part of Pearl Harbor was an America atrocity?
If the US President's want to bring up wrongdoing by other countries towards the US, then the line of other countries that have grievances against the US would be very extensive and the atrocities committed by the US towards other countries far outweigh any atrocities committed against the US. Why is that so hard for you to see. By the way, WW2 is over. Japan is a good friend of the west. Trump is a fucking idiot for bringing up that attack...
Dissagree but I am definitely not debating this. I didn’t realize world war 2 was over, thanks for letting me know Capt. however I am still wondering what part of Pearl Harbor is an American atrocity.
The original post that started this conversation was referring to atrocities committed by the US towards other countries. In the case of Japan specifically, some might say dropping 2 nuclear bombs on Japan, were atrocities as well. I am not going to debate it either. Because there is nothing to debate...
I don't think dropping two nuclear bombs was an atrocity, to me it was the way to end the war against an enemy that wouldn't give up. I definitely think Japan out atrocitied (word? lol) us during World War 2. Rape of Nanking, treatment of prisoners of war....etc
You might think differently if it was Japan who had dropped nuclear bombs on two American cities to end the war.
Not to mention the firebombing of Japanese civilians throughout the war. Maybe check out the doc The Fog Of War.
Are you trying to imply that Japan was innocent in this? They started world war 2, what did you want the us to do? I know all about the firebombings and how more people were killed in those bombings than in the nuclear bomb droppings. Even with all those people dying in the firebombings Japan still didn’t surrender.
In what way did the Japanese start WW2?
Hitler rushed to get his army ready after he surprisingly heard on the radio about the Pearl Harbour attack? "Hurry up with the jew-hating leaflets" people heard him yell while running into his study to design the swastika.
Hehe.
Um, they invaded China in the 1930's and then attacked the US at Pearl Harbor. A lot of scholars argue that the war started here although the official start of World War 2 was on September 1, 1939 with the German invasion of Poland. At that point Japan had already killed millions.
Scholars also say, the winning team after WW1 started WW2 by putting Germany in a position where Hitler-labeled nationalism had soil to grow. That was in the 10s.
Check-mate Japan. Now the US started WW2.
Doh...except England and France were the forces behind the Treaty of Versailles, not the Americans. Wilson wanted the Fourteen Points to be the basis of the treaty. He was against the War Guilt clause specifically. Try again.
Without the punchline "Now the US started WW2.", how would the point of my comment come across as lovingly?
"Check-mate Japan. Now France, and England and a bunch of other countries - including the US - lay a foundation through their peace terms for the possibility of the Germany people to accept authoritarianism which you can see as a thread leading up Germany attacking it's neighbors".
No need to kill all the fun.
I stand by my comment. Among a bunch of stiffs.
Haha, blaming the US for starting the worst war in history, one which many of our family members were affected by directly, is a real riot. I can never get enough of you trashing the US while you are on a US website dedicated to a US band. It's all so much fun.
I guess you see some point in some way of branding the band in this nationalistic thing of yours.
I see them as Pearl Jam. Not the olympic team of musicians from the USA.
I also do not really care what country the server is where this website is being stored. I also do not have problem with a great band being from the US. Or the five of my five favorite movies. Or a copywriter named Bob I worked with once. But I guess you see it in a different way.
Also, I have not blamed the US for starting WW2. You have a problem understanding text and the different uses of it. Subtext. Sarcasm. Witty-ness. Those kind of things.
Your family members being affected by WW2 concerns me not in the context of my comment. And should not.
Yep, they're mine. What's yours is a surrender. Great job. Pat your grandparents on the back. If everyone took Sweden's position, what would Europe look like today?
I wonder if our president is taking his own advice:
If American Presidents discussed American atrocities they'd have a lot of 'splainin to do
What part of Pearl Harbor was an America atrocity?
If the US President's want to bring up wrongdoing by other countries towards the US, then the line of other countries that have grievances against the US would be very extensive and the atrocities committed by the US towards other countries far outweigh any atrocities committed against the US. Why is that so hard for you to see. By the way, WW2 is over. Japan is a good friend of the west. Trump is a fucking idiot for bringing up that attack...
Dissagree but I am definitely not debating this. I didn’t realize world war 2 was over, thanks for letting me know Capt. however I am still wondering what part of Pearl Harbor is an American atrocity.
The original post that started this conversation was referring to atrocities committed by the US towards other countries. In the case of Japan specifically, some might say dropping 2 nuclear bombs on Japan, were atrocities as well. I am not going to debate it either. Because there is nothing to debate...
I don't think dropping two nuclear bombs was an atrocity, to me it was the way to end the war against an enemy that wouldn't give up. I definitely think Japan out atrocitied (word? lol) us during World War 2. Rape of Nanking, treatment of prisoners of war....etc
You might think differently if it was Japan who had dropped nuclear bombs on two American cities to end the war.
Not to mention the firebombing of Japanese civilians throughout the war. Maybe check out the doc The Fog Of War.
Are you trying to imply that Japan was innocent in this? They started world war 2, what did you want the us to do? I know all about the firebombings and how more people were killed in those bombings than in the nuclear bomb droppings. Even with all those people dying in the firebombings Japan still didn’t surrender.
In what way did the Japanese start WW2?
Hitler rushed to get his army ready after he surprisingly heard on the radio about the Pearl Harbour attack? "Hurry up with the jew-hating leaflets" people heard him yell while running into his study to design the swastika.
Hehe.
Um, they invaded China in the 1930's and then attacked the US at Pearl Harbor. A lot of scholars argue that the war started here although the official start of World War 2 was on September 1, 1939 with the German invasion of Poland. At that point Japan had already killed millions.
Scholars also say, the winning team after WW1 started WW2 by putting Germany in a position where Hitler-labeled nationalism had soil to grow. That was in the 10s.
Check-mate Japan. Now the US started WW2.
Doh...except England and France were the forces behind the Treaty of Versailles, not the Americans. Wilson wanted the Fourteen Points to be the basis of the treaty. He was against the War Guilt clause specifically. Try again.
Without the punchline "Now the US started WW2.", how would the point of my comment come across as lovingly?
"Check-mate Japan. Now France, and England and a bunch of other countries - including the US - lay a foundation through their peace terms for the possibility of the Germany people to accept authoritarianism which you can see as a thread leading up Germany attacking it's neighbors".
No need to kill all the fun.
I stand by my comment. Among a bunch of stiffs.
Haha, blaming the US for starting the worst war in history, one which many of our family members were affected by directly, is a real riot. I can never get enough of you trashing the US while you are on a US website dedicated to a US band. It's all so much fun.
I guess you see some point in some way of branding the band in this nationalistic thing of yours.
I see them as Pearl Jam. Not the olympic team of musicians from the USA.
I also do not really care what country the server is where this website is being stored. I also do not have problem with a great band being from the US. Or the five of my five favorite movies. Or a copywriter named Bob I worked with once. But I guess you see it in a different way.
Also, I have not blamed the US for starting WW2. You have a problem understanding text and the different uses of it. Subtext. Sarcasm. Witty-ness. Those kind of things.
Your family members being affected by WW2 concerns me not in the context of my comment. And should not.
Yep, they're mine. What's yours is a surrender. Great job. Pat your grandparents on the back. If everyone took Sweden's position, what would Europe look like today?
"Snus" would be legal in all countries, and not just Sweden as now:
(Nice of you to pull n Sweden... when did this conversation be about Sweden? Or even the US taking part in WW2? You seem a bit hostile.)
I wonder if our president is taking his own advice:
If American Presidents discussed American atrocities they'd have a lot of 'splainin to do
What part of Pearl Harbor was an America atrocity?
If the US President's want to bring up wrongdoing by other countries towards the US, then the line of other countries that have grievances against the US would be very extensive and the atrocities committed by the US towards other countries far outweigh any atrocities committed against the US. Why is that so hard for you to see. By the way, WW2 is over. Japan is a good friend of the west. Trump is a fucking idiot for bringing up that attack...
Dissagree but I am definitely not debating this. I didn’t realize world war 2 was over, thanks for letting me know Capt. however I am still wondering what part of Pearl Harbor is an American atrocity.
The original post that started this conversation was referring to atrocities committed by the US towards other countries. In the case of Japan specifically, some might say dropping 2 nuclear bombs on Japan, were atrocities as well. I am not going to debate it either. Because there is nothing to debate...
I don't think dropping two nuclear bombs was an atrocity, to me it was the way to end the war against an enemy that wouldn't give up. I definitely think Japan out atrocitied (word? lol) us during World War 2. Rape of Nanking, treatment of prisoners of war....etc
You might think differently if it was Japan who had dropped nuclear bombs on two American cities to end the war.
Not to mention the firebombing of Japanese civilians throughout the war. Maybe check out the doc The Fog Of War.
Are you trying to imply that Japan was innocent in this? They started world war 2, what did you want the us to do? I know all about the firebombings and how more people were killed in those bombings than in the nuclear bomb droppings. Even with all those people dying in the firebombings Japan still didn’t surrender.
In what way did the Japanese start WW2?
Hitler rushed to get his army ready after he surprisingly heard on the radio about the Pearl Harbour attack? "Hurry up with the jew-hating leaflets" people heard him yell while running into his study to design the swastika.
Hehe.
Um, they invaded China in the 1930's and then attacked the US at Pearl Harbor. A lot of scholars argue that the war started here although the official start of World War 2 was on September 1, 1939 with the German invasion of Poland. At that point Japan had already killed millions.
Scholars also say, the winning team after WW1 started WW2 by putting Germany in a position where Hitler-labeled nationalism had soil to grow. That was in the 10s.
Check-mate Japan. Now the US started WW2.
Doh...except England and France were the forces behind the Treaty of Versailles, not the Americans. Wilson wanted the Fourteen Points to be the basis of the treaty. He was against the War Guilt clause specifically. Try again.
Without the punchline "Now the US started WW2.", how would the point of my comment come across as lovingly?
"Check-mate Japan. Now France, and England and a bunch of other countries - including the US - lay a foundation through their peace terms for the possibility of the Germany people to accept authoritarianism which you can see as a thread leading up Germany attacking it's neighbors".
No need to kill all the fun.
I stand by my comment. Among a bunch of stiffs.
Haha, blaming the US for starting the worst war in history, one which many of our family members were affected by directly, is a real riot. I can never get enough of you trashing the US while you are on a US website dedicated to a US band. It's all so much fun.
I guess you see some point in some way of branding the band in this nationalistic thing of yours.
I see them as Pearl Jam. Not the olympic team of musicians from the USA.
I also do not really care what country the server is where this website is being stored. I also do not have problem with a great band being from the US. Or the five of my five favorite movies. Or a copywriter named Bob I worked with once. But I guess you see it in a different way.
Also, I have not blamed the US for starting WW2. You have a problem understanding text and the different uses of it. Subtext. Sarcasm. Witty-ness. Those kind of things.
Your family members being affected by WW2 concerns me not in the context of my comment. And should not.
all good. Fridens liljor.
Do you have a few iron crosses in the attic as a thanks for helping transport munitions to the Eastern Front for the Nazis? That was very helpful, it more efficiently cleared the way for the Einsatzgruppen to do its dirty work.
Do you have jars of bones from children being burned alive by napalm in Vietnam in yours?
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
Japan doing shitty stuff =/= The US getting a A-OK in slaughtering 250.000 civilians
You re making illogical comparisons and it is pretty evident that you don't have an open mind at all nor understand the gravity of Japanese atrocities in World War 2. All you care about is showing how the United States is wrong in every situation. However in this situation the US was definitely right and to be honest your opinion means nothing since your chicken shit country did nothing to help out the rest of Europe in their time of need except help arm the Nazis. Nice work.
I wonder if our president is taking his own advice:
If American Presidents discussed American atrocities they'd have a lot of 'splainin to do
What part of Pearl Harbor was an America atrocity?
If the US President's want to bring up wrongdoing by other countries towards the US, then the line of other countries that have grievances against the US would be very extensive and the atrocities committed by the US towards other countries far outweigh any atrocities committed against the US. Why is that so hard for you to see. By the way, WW2 is over. Japan is a good friend of the west. Trump is a fucking idiot for bringing up that attack...
Dissagree but I am definitely not debating this. I didn’t realize world war 2 was over, thanks for letting me know Capt. however I am still wondering what part of Pearl Harbor is an American atrocity.
The original post that started this conversation was referring to atrocities committed by the US towards other countries. In the case of Japan specifically, some might say dropping 2 nuclear bombs on Japan, were atrocities as well. I am not going to debate it either. Because there is nothing to debate...
I don't think dropping two nuclear bombs was an atrocity, to me it was the way to end the war against an enemy that wouldn't give up. I definitely think Japan out atrocitied (word? lol) us during World War 2. Rape of Nanking, treatment of prisoners of war....etc
The dropping of the bomb will always be up for a debate. When it comes to the dropping of the bomb, I always side with my mother's opinion.
My mother had 2 brothers who were in Europe at the time. She always said people were tired of war, herself included, and she wanted her brothers home safe...both served multiple years in Europe as most did.
I think we're on the same page here. My uncle was an island hopper, grunt marine. He would have definitely been part of the invasion force. He told me he would have never come home had he invaded the mainland. He had already been through Tarawa and Okinawa, among other stops.
I think we are. That is in a lot of ways we got to go on...I'm sure you or McGruff will correct me, but I believe the US figured casualties would be in and around a million...so your grandfather's assertion is likely correct. That is good that he got home and hopefully lived a really good life. All Uncles got home safely...and all of them lived into their 70' and 80's. I got an Uncle (Dad's brother) that served in the US Navy, never did get the story as to why...as you know, most war vets say very little...
My Mom's 2 brothers were to be re-deployed the Pacific operations, which never did happen because of the bomb.
I wonder if our president is taking his own advice:
If American Presidents discussed American atrocities they'd have a lot of 'splainin to do
What part of Pearl Harbor was an America atrocity?
If the US President's want to bring up wrongdoing by other countries towards the US, then the line of other countries that have grievances against the US would be very extensive and the atrocities committed by the US towards other countries far outweigh any atrocities committed against the US. Why is that so hard for you to see. By the way, WW2 is over. Japan is a good friend of the west. Trump is a fucking idiot for bringing up that attack...
Dissagree but I am definitely not debating this. I didn’t realize world war 2 was over, thanks for letting me know Capt. however I am still wondering what part of Pearl Harbor is an American atrocity.
The original post that started this conversation was referring to atrocities committed by the US towards other countries. In the case of Japan specifically, some might say dropping 2 nuclear bombs on Japan, were atrocities as well. I am not going to debate it either. Because there is nothing to debate...
I don't think dropping two nuclear bombs was an atrocity, to me it was the way to end the war against an enemy that wouldn't give up. I definitely think Japan out atrocitied (word? lol) us during World War 2. Rape of Nanking, treatment of prisoners of war....etc
You might think differently if it was Japan who had dropped nuclear bombs on two American cities to end the war.
Not to mention the firebombing of Japanese civilians throughout the war. Maybe check out the doc The Fog Of War.
Are you trying to imply that Japan was innocent in this? They started world war 2, what did you want the us to do? I know all about the firebombings and how more people were killed in those bombings than in the nuclear bomb droppings. Even with all those people dying in the firebombings Japan still didn’t surrender.
In what way did the Japanese start WW2?
Hitler rushed to get his army ready after he surprisingly heard on the radio about the Pearl Harbour attack? "Hurry up with the jew-hating leaflets" people heard him yell while running into his study to design the swastika.
Hehe.
Um, they invaded China in the 1930's and then attacked the US at Pearl Harbor. A lot of scholars argue that the war started here although the official start of World War 2 was on September 1, 1939 with the German invasion of Poland. At that point Japan had already killed millions.
Scholars also say, the winning team after WW1 started WW2 by putting Germany in a position where Hitler-labeled nationalism had soil to grow. That was in the 10s.
Check-mate Japan. Now the US started WW2.
Doh...except England and France were the forces behind the Treaty of Versailles, not the Americans. Wilson wanted the Fourteen Points to be the basis of the treaty. He was against the War Guilt clause specifically. Try again.
Without the punchline "Now the US started WW2.", how would the point of my comment come across as lovingly?
"Check-mate Japan. Now France, and England and a bunch of other countries - including the US - lay a foundation through their peace terms for the possibility of the Germany people to accept authoritarianism which you can see as a thread leading up Germany attacking it's neighbors".
No need to kill all the fun.
I stand by my comment. Among a bunch of stiffs.
Haha, blaming the US for starting the worst war in history, one which many of our family members were affected by directly, is a real riot. I can never get enough of you trashing the US while you are on a US website dedicated to a US band. It's all so much fun.
I guess you see some point in some way of branding the band in this nationalistic thing of yours.
I see them as Pearl Jam. Not the olympic team of musicians from the USA.
I also do not really care what country the server is where this website is being stored. I also do not have problem with a great band being from the US. Or the five of my five favorite movies. Or a copywriter named Bob I worked with once. But I guess you see it in a different way.
Also, I have not blamed the US for starting WW2. You have a problem understanding text and the different uses of it. Subtext. Sarcasm. Witty-ness. Those kind of things.
Your family members being affected by WW2 concerns me not in the context of my comment. And should not.
Yep, they're mine. What's yours is a surrender. Great job. Pat your grandparents on the back. If everyone took Sweden's position, what would Europe look like today?
"Snus" would be legal in all countries, and not just Sweden as now:
(Nice of you to pull n Sweden... when did this conversation be about Sweden? Or even the US taking part in WW2? You seem a bit hostile.)
Nice deflection.
Have I in this discussion put forth an opinion about Sweden or the US joining/not joining WW2?
mr whatsaboutism
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
I wonder if our president is taking his own advice:
If American Presidents discussed American atrocities they'd have a lot of 'splainin to do
What part of Pearl Harbor was an America atrocity?
If the US President's want to bring up wrongdoing by other countries towards the US, then the line of other countries that have grievances against the US would be very extensive and the atrocities committed by the US towards other countries far outweigh any atrocities committed against the US. Why is that so hard for you to see. By the way, WW2 is over. Japan is a good friend of the west. Trump is a fucking idiot for bringing up that attack...
Dissagree but I am definitely not debating this. I didn’t realize world war 2 was over, thanks for letting me know Capt. however I am still wondering what part of Pearl Harbor is an American atrocity.
The original post that started this conversation was referring to atrocities committed by the US towards other countries. In the case of Japan specifically, some might say dropping 2 nuclear bombs on Japan, were atrocities as well. I am not going to debate it either. Because there is nothing to debate...
I don't think dropping two nuclear bombs was an atrocity, to me it was the way to end the war against an enemy that wouldn't give up. I definitely think Japan out atrocitied (word? lol) us during World War 2. Rape of Nanking, treatment of prisoners of war....etc
The dropping of the bomb will always be up for a debate. When it comes to the dropping of the bomb, I always side with my mother's opinion.
My mother had 2 brothers who were in Europe at the time. She always said people were tired of war, herself included, and she wanted her brothers home safe...both served multiple years in Europe as most did.
I think we're on the same page here. My uncle was an island hopper, grunt marine. He would have definitely been part of the invasion force. He told me he would have never come home had he invaded the mainland. He had already been through Tarawa and Okinawa, among other stops.
I think we are. That is in a lot of ways we got to go on...I'm sure you or McGruff will correct me, but I believe the US figured casualties would be in and around a million...so your grandfather's assertion is likely correct. That is good that he got home and hopefully lived a really good life. All Uncles got home safely...and all of them lived into their 70' and 80's. I got an Uncle (Dad's brother) that served in the US Navy, never did get the story as to why...as you know, most war vets say very little...
My Mom's 2 brothers were to be re-deployed the Pacific operations, which never did happen because of the bomb.
Estimates were definitely in the millions and the war would have went on for a few more years. Yes the US killed hundreds of thousands in the atomic bomb droppings but millions more would have died on both sides. Crazy thing is that the Japanese still didn't want to surrender after the second bomb,. I have read countless accounts of soldiers on both sides that didn't believe that the Japanese surrendered.
You see fit to criticize the US at every turn. You seem to ignore your acquiescence to evil during the most consequential point in world history. I'm just doing you a favor and reminding you that the alternative to war is not always peace.
Japan doing shitty stuff =/= The US getting a A-OK in slaughtering 250.000 civilians
You re making illogical comparisons and it is pretty evident that you don't have an open mind at all nor understand the gravity of Japanese atrocities in World War 2. All you care about is showing how the United States is wrong in every situation. However in this situation the US was definitely right and to be honest your opinion means nothing since your chicken shit country did nothing to help out the rest of Europe in their time of need except help arm the Nazis. Nice work.
My god, how sanctimonious you are all of a sudden?
In what way does my opinion on the matter have less weight than yours because I am not from the US? You do see how that kind of argumentation make you look right?
If they were "definitely right", there would not have been discussions and debates about it like it has the last 70 years. You saying they were "definitely right" don't need to be discussed though, it's all very transparent.
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
I wonder if our president is taking his own advice:
If American Presidents discussed American atrocities they'd have a lot of 'splainin to do
What part of Pearl Harbor was an America atrocity?
If the US President's want to bring up wrongdoing by other countries towards the US, then the line of other countries that have grievances against the US would be very extensive and the atrocities committed by the US towards other countries far outweigh any atrocities committed against the US. Why is that so hard for you to see. By the way, WW2 is over. Japan is a good friend of the west. Trump is a fucking idiot for bringing up that attack...
Dissagree but I am definitely not debating this. I didn’t realize world war 2 was over, thanks for letting me know Capt. however I am still wondering what part of Pearl Harbor is an American atrocity.
The original post that started this conversation was referring to atrocities committed by the US towards other countries. In the case of Japan specifically, some might say dropping 2 nuclear bombs on Japan, were atrocities as well. I am not going to debate it either. Because there is nothing to debate...
I don't think dropping two nuclear bombs was an atrocity, to me it was the way to end the war against an enemy that wouldn't give up. I definitely think Japan out atrocitied (word? lol) us during World War 2. Rape of Nanking, treatment of prisoners of war....etc
You might think differently if it was Japan who had dropped nuclear bombs on two American cities to end the war.
Not to mention the firebombing of Japanese civilians throughout the war. Maybe check out the doc The Fog Of War.
Are you trying to imply that Japan was innocent in this? They started world war 2, what did you want the us to do? I know all about the firebombings and how more people were killed in those bombings than in the nuclear bomb droppings. Even with all those people dying in the firebombings Japan still didn’t surrender.
In what way did the Japanese start WW2?
Hitler rushed to get his army ready after he surprisingly heard on the radio about the Pearl Harbour attack? "Hurry up with the jew-hating leaflets" people heard him yell while running into his study to design the swastika.
Hehe.
Um, they invaded China in the 1930's and then attacked the US at Pearl Harbor. A lot of scholars argue that the war started here although the official start of World War 2 was on September 1, 1939 with the German invasion of Poland. At that point Japan had already killed millions.
Scholars also say, the winning team after WW1 started WW2 by putting Germany in a position where Hitler-labeled nationalism had soil to grow. That was in the 10s.
Check-mate Japan. Now the US started WW2.
Doh...except England and France were the forces behind the Treaty of Versailles, not the Americans. Wilson wanted the Fourteen Points to be the basis of the treaty. He was against the War Guilt clause specifically. Try again.
Without the punchline "Now the US started WW2.", how would the point of my comment come across as lovingly?
"Check-mate Japan. Now France, and England and a bunch of other countries - including the US - lay a foundation through their peace terms for the possibility of the Germany people to accept authoritarianism which you can see as a thread leading up Germany attacking it's neighbors".
No need to kill all the fun.
I stand by my comment. Among a bunch of stiffs.
Haha, blaming the US for starting the worst war in history, one which many of our family members were affected by directly, is a real riot. I can never get enough of you trashing the US while you are on a US website dedicated to a US band. It's all so much fun.
I guess you see some point in some way of branding the band in this nationalistic thing of yours.
I see them as Pearl Jam. Not the olympic team of musicians from the USA.
I also do not really care what country the server is where this website is being stored. I also do not have problem with a great band being from the US. Or the five of my five favorite movies. Or a copywriter named Bob I worked with once. But I guess you see it in a different way.
Also, I have not blamed the US for starting WW2. You have a problem understanding text and the different uses of it. Subtext. Sarcasm. Witty-ness. Those kind of things.
Your family members being affected by WW2 concerns me not in the context of my comment. And should not.
all good. Fridens liljor.
Do you have a few iron crosses in the attic as a thanks for helping transport munitions to the Eastern Front for the Nazis? That was very helpful, it more efficiently cleared the way for the Einsatzgruppen to do its dirty work.
Do you have jars of bones from children being burned alive by napalm in Vietnam in yours?
Nope, I had no family involved in Vietnam. If you had family in Sweden during the war and they did not take up arms against the Nazis, then they were complicit.
You see fit to criticize the US at every turn. You seem to ignore your acquiescence to evil during the most consequential point in world history. I'm just doing you a favor and reminding you that the alternative to war is not always peace.
Swedens part in WW2 has been discussed on this forum as recent as 2019. When did I ignore it? Mr whatsaboutism.
What exactly have I criticized about the US and WW2 here? In Bulletpoints if possible.
Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
Japan doing shitty stuff =/= The US getting a A-OK in slaughtering 250.000 civilians
You re making illogical comparisons and it is pretty evident that you don't have an open mind at all nor understand the gravity of Japanese atrocities in World War 2. All you care about is showing how the United States is wrong in every situation. However in this situation the US was definitely right and to be honest your opinion means nothing since your chicken shit country did nothing to help out the rest of Europe in their time of need except help arm the Nazis. Nice work.
My god, how sanctimonious you are all of a sudden?
In what way does my opinion on the matter have less weight than yours because I am not from the US? You do see how that kind of argumentation make you look right?
If they were "definitely right", there would not have been discussions and debates about it like it has the last 70 years. You saying they were "definitely right" don't need to be discussed though, it's all very transparent.
Definitely not an example of being sanctimonious. But yeah sometimes someones opinion does not hold much water when their own country didn't walk the walk.
You see fit to criticize the US at every turn. You seem to ignore your acquiescence to evil during the most consequential point in world history. I'm just doing you a favor and reminding you that the alternative to war is not always peace.
Swedens part in WW2 has been discussed on this forum as recent as 2019. When did I ignore it? Mr whatsaboutism.
What exactly have I criticized about the US and WW2 here? In Bulletpoints if possible.
You stated the US started the war, Mr. Can'tFindaMirror. Second, I'm pretty sure US actions has been discussed all the fucking time. Mostly brought up by you. So if there is a one time statute of limitation on the discussion, you've well exceeded that.
I wonder if our president is taking his own advice:
If American Presidents discussed American atrocities they'd have a lot of 'splainin to do
What part of Pearl Harbor was an America atrocity?
If the US President's want to bring up wrongdoing by other countries towards the US, then the line of other countries that have grievances against the US would be very extensive and the atrocities committed by the US towards other countries far outweigh any atrocities committed against the US. Why is that so hard for you to see. By the way, WW2 is over. Japan is a good friend of the west. Trump is a fucking idiot for bringing up that attack...
Dissagree but I am definitely not debating this. I didn’t realize world war 2 was over, thanks for letting me know Capt. however I am still wondering what part of Pearl Harbor is an American atrocity.
The original post that started this conversation was referring to atrocities committed by the US towards other countries. In the case of Japan specifically, some might say dropping 2 nuclear bombs on Japan, were atrocities as well. I am not going to debate it either. Because there is nothing to debate...
I don't think dropping two nuclear bombs was an atrocity, to me it was the way to end the war against an enemy that wouldn't give up. I definitely think Japan out atrocitied (word? lol) us during World War 2. Rape of Nanking, treatment of prisoners of war....etc
You might think differently if it was Japan who had dropped nuclear bombs on two American cities to end the war.
Not to mention the firebombing of Japanese civilians throughout the war. Maybe check out the doc The Fog Of War.
Are you trying to imply that Japan was innocent in this? They started world war 2, what did you want the us to do? I know all about the firebombings and how more people were killed in those bombings than in the nuclear bomb droppings. Even with all those people dying in the firebombings Japan still didn’t surrender.
In what way did the Japanese start WW2?
Hitler rushed to get his army ready after he surprisingly heard on the radio about the Pearl Harbour attack? "Hurry up with the jew-hating leaflets" people heard him yell while running into his study to design the swastika.
Hehe.
Um, they invaded China in the 1930's and then attacked the US at Pearl Harbor. A lot of scholars argue that the war started here although the official start of World War 2 was on September 1, 1939 with the German invasion of Poland. At that point Japan had already killed millions.
Scholars also say, the winning team after WW1 started WW2 by putting Germany in a position where Hitler-labeled nationalism had soil to grow. That was in the 10s.
Check-mate Japan. Now the US started WW2.
Doh...except England and France were the forces behind the Treaty of Versailles, not the Americans. Wilson wanted the Fourteen Points to be the basis of the treaty. He was against the War Guilt clause specifically. Try again.
Without the punchline "Now the US started WW2.", how would the point of my comment come across as lovingly?
"Check-mate Japan. Now France, and England and a bunch of other countries - including the US - lay a foundation through their peace terms for the possibility of the Germany people to accept authoritarianism which you can see as a thread leading up Germany attacking it's neighbors".
No need to kill all the fun.
I stand by my comment. Among a bunch of stiffs.
Haha, blaming the US for starting the worst war in history, one which many of our family members were affected by directly, is a real riot. I can never get enough of you trashing the US while you are on a US website dedicated to a US band. It's all so much fun.
I guess you see some point in some way of branding the band in this nationalistic thing of yours.
I see them as Pearl Jam. Not the olympic team of musicians from the USA.
I also do not really care what country the server is where this website is being stored. I also do not have problem with a great band being from the US. Or the five of my five favorite movies. Or a copywriter named Bob I worked with once. But I guess you see it in a different way.
Also, I have not blamed the US for starting WW2. You have a problem understanding text and the different uses of it. Subtext. Sarcasm. Witty-ness. Those kind of things.
Your family members being affected by WW2 concerns me not in the context of my comment. And should not.
all good. Fridens liljor.
Do you have a few iron crosses in the attic as a thanks for helping transport munitions to the Eastern Front for the Nazis? That was very helpful, it more efficiently cleared the way for the Einsatzgruppen to do its dirty work.
Do you have jars of bones from children being burned alive by napalm in Vietnam in yours?
Nope, I had no family involved in Vietnam. If you had family in Sweden during the war and they did not take up arms against the Nazis, then they were complicit.
Okey. Why didn't your family take up arms before the US were attacked then? Your wonderful family was complicit until that point I take it?
And I don't see you take up arms in the Saudis war on Jemen - so you are in fact right now complicit behind your screen?
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
I wonder if our president is taking his own advice:
If American Presidents discussed American atrocities they'd have a lot of 'splainin to do
What part of Pearl Harbor was an America atrocity?
If the US President's want to bring up wrongdoing by other countries towards the US, then the line of other countries that have grievances against the US would be very extensive and the atrocities committed by the US towards other countries far outweigh any atrocities committed against the US. Why is that so hard for you to see. By the way, WW2 is over. Japan is a good friend of the west. Trump is a fucking idiot for bringing up that attack...
Dissagree but I am definitely not debating this. I didn’t realize world war 2 was over, thanks for letting me know Capt. however I am still wondering what part of Pearl Harbor is an American atrocity.
The original post that started this conversation was referring to atrocities committed by the US towards other countries. In the case of Japan specifically, some might say dropping 2 nuclear bombs on Japan, were atrocities as well. I am not going to debate it either. Because there is nothing to debate...
I don't think dropping two nuclear bombs was an atrocity, to me it was the way to end the war against an enemy that wouldn't give up. I definitely think Japan out atrocitied (word? lol) us during World War 2. Rape of Nanking, treatment of prisoners of war....etc
The dropping of the bomb will always be up for a debate. When it comes to the dropping of the bomb, I always side with my mother's opinion.
My mother had 2 brothers who were in Europe at the time. She always said people were tired of war, herself included, and she wanted her brothers home safe...both served multiple years in Europe as most did.
I think we're on the same page here. My uncle was an island hopper, grunt marine. He would have definitely been part of the invasion force. He told me he would have never come home had he invaded the mainland. He had already been through Tarawa and Okinawa, among other stops.
I think we are. That is in a lot of ways we got to go on...I'm sure you or McGruff will correct me, but I believe the US figured casualties would be in and around a million...so your grandfather's assertion is likely correct. That is good that he got home and hopefully lived a really good life. All Uncles got home safely...and all of them lived into their 70' and 80's. I got an Uncle (Dad's brother) that served in the US Navy, never did get the story as to why...as you know, most war vets say very little...
My Mom's 2 brothers were to be re-deployed the Pacific operations, which never did happen because of the bomb.
Estimates were definitely in the millions and the war would have went on for a few more years. Yes the US killed hundreds of thousands in the atomic bomb droppings but millions more would have died on both sides. Crazy thing is that the Japanese still didn't want to surrender after the second bomb,. I have read countless accounts of soldiers on both sides that didn't believe that the Japanese surrendered.
You are equating soldiers deaths on the allies side with civilians deaths on the Japanese side.
You know that's fucked up right?
Also, you still going to stand by your dropping atomic bombs on civilians is not an atrocity comment? I noticed you are sidestepping that now.
I wonder if our president is taking his own advice:
If American Presidents discussed American atrocities they'd have a lot of 'splainin to do
What part of Pearl Harbor was an America atrocity?
If the US President's want to bring up wrongdoing by other countries towards the US, then the line of other countries that have grievances against the US would be very extensive and the atrocities committed by the US towards other countries far outweigh any atrocities committed against the US. Why is that so hard for you to see. By the way, WW2 is over. Japan is a good friend of the west. Trump is a fucking idiot for bringing up that attack...
Dissagree but I am definitely not debating this. I didn’t realize world war 2 was over, thanks for letting me know Capt. however I am still wondering what part of Pearl Harbor is an American atrocity.
The original post that started this conversation was referring to atrocities committed by the US towards other countries. In the case of Japan specifically, some might say dropping 2 nuclear bombs on Japan, were atrocities as well. I am not going to debate it either. Because there is nothing to debate...
I don't think dropping two nuclear bombs was an atrocity, to me it was the way to end the war against an enemy that wouldn't give up. I definitely think Japan out atrocitied (word? lol) us during World War 2. Rape of Nanking, treatment of prisoners of war....etc
You might think differently if it was Japan who had dropped nuclear bombs on two American cities to end the war.
Not to mention the firebombing of Japanese civilians throughout the war. Maybe check out the doc The Fog Of War.
Are you trying to imply that Japan was innocent in this? They started world war 2, what did you want the us to do? I know all about the firebombings and how more people were killed in those bombings than in the nuclear bomb droppings. Even with all those people dying in the firebombings Japan still didn’t surrender.
In what way did the Japanese start WW2?
Hitler rushed to get his army ready after he surprisingly heard on the radio about the Pearl Harbour attack? "Hurry up with the jew-hating leaflets" people heard him yell while running into his study to design the swastika.
Hehe.
Um, they invaded China in the 1930's and then attacked the US at Pearl Harbor. A lot of scholars argue that the war started here although the official start of World War 2 was on September 1, 1939 with the German invasion of Poland. At that point Japan had already killed millions.
Japan was not innocent, but go back to the end of the 19th century and early 20th and where do you think Japan learned to become aggressive and why they eventually targeted Hawaii? Good ol' Teddy sowed the seed when he sent his envoy there and then the subsequent US actions. For every action there is a reaction and the US can be traced to having some impact on our own future. Sure, Japan made the decision to bomb Pearl Harbor, but it's not like the US didn't initiate the bad blood decades earlier.
I wonder if our president is taking his own advice:
If American Presidents discussed American atrocities they'd have a lot of 'splainin to do
What part of Pearl Harbor was an America atrocity?
If the US President's want to bring up wrongdoing by other countries towards the US, then the line of other countries that have grievances against the US would be very extensive and the atrocities committed by the US towards other countries far outweigh any atrocities committed against the US. Why is that so hard for you to see. By the way, WW2 is over. Japan is a good friend of the west. Trump is a fucking idiot for bringing up that attack...
Dissagree but I am definitely not debating this. I didn’t realize world war 2 was over, thanks for letting me know Capt. however I am still wondering what part of Pearl Harbor is an American atrocity.
The original post that started this conversation was referring to atrocities committed by the US towards other countries. In the case of Japan specifically, some might say dropping 2 nuclear bombs on Japan, were atrocities as well. I am not going to debate it either. Because there is nothing to debate...
I don't think dropping two nuclear bombs was an atrocity, to me it was the way to end the war against an enemy that wouldn't give up. I definitely think Japan out atrocitied (word? lol) us during World War 2. Rape of Nanking, treatment of prisoners of war....etc
The dropping of the bomb will always be up for a debate. When it comes to the dropping of the bomb, I always side with my mother's opinion.
My mother had 2 brothers who were in Europe at the time. She always said people were tired of war, herself included, and she wanted her brothers home safe...both served multiple years in Europe as most did.
I think we're on the same page here. My uncle was an island hopper, grunt marine. He would have definitely been part of the invasion force. He told me he would have never come home had he invaded the mainland. He had already been through Tarawa and Okinawa, among other stops.
I think we are. That is in a lot of ways we got to go on...I'm sure you or McGruff will correct me, but I believe the US figured casualties would be in and around a million...so your grandfather's assertion is likely correct. That is good that he got home and hopefully lived a really good life. All Uncles got home safely...and all of them lived into their 70' and 80's. I got an Uncle (Dad's brother) that served in the US Navy, never did get the story as to why...as you know, most war vets say very little...
My Mom's 2 brothers were to be re-deployed the Pacific operations, which never did happen because of the bomb.
Estimates were definitely in the millions and the war would have went on for a few more years. Yes the US killed hundreds of thousands in the atomic bomb droppings but millions more would have died on both sides. Crazy thing is that the Japanese still didn't want to surrender after the second bomb,. I have read countless accounts of soldiers on both sides that didn't believe that the Japanese surrendered.
You think the brains in Japan would have quickly surrendered after bomb 1, so we can lay the blame for bomb 2 on Japan...they forced the US hand there.
You see fit to criticize the US at every turn. You seem to ignore your acquiescence to evil during the most consequential point in world history. I'm just doing you a favor and reminding you that the alternative to war is not always peace.
Swedens part in WW2 has been discussed on this forum as recent as 2019. When did I ignore it? Mr whatsaboutism.
What exactly have I criticized about the US and WW2 here? In Bulletpoints if possible.
You stated the US started the war, Mr. Can'tFindaMirror. Second, I'm pretty sure US actions has been discussed all the fucking time. Mostly brought up by you. So if there is a one time statute of limitation on the discussion, you've well exceeded that.
I stated that as a witty comment when someone - who often defends and puffs up the US - said that WW2 wasn't started by Germany but you could say it was started much earlier by Japan.
And it could be that you understand that, but is now skewing things for this angry narrative of yours. Which would be dishonest. Or you are only able to read text strictly literal. Which you should put as your tag, if that is the case. Would help.
Fridens liljor.
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
I wonder if our president is taking his own advice:
If American Presidents discussed American atrocities they'd have a lot of 'splainin to do
What part of Pearl Harbor was an America atrocity?
If the US President's want to bring up wrongdoing by other countries towards the US, then the line of other countries that have grievances against the US would be very extensive and the atrocities committed by the US towards other countries far outweigh any atrocities committed against the US. Why is that so hard for you to see. By the way, WW2 is over. Japan is a good friend of the west. Trump is a fucking idiot for bringing up that attack...
Dissagree but I am definitely not debating this. I didn’t realize world war 2 was over, thanks for letting me know Capt. however I am still wondering what part of Pearl Harbor is an American atrocity.
The original post that started this conversation was referring to atrocities committed by the US towards other countries. In the case of Japan specifically, some might say dropping 2 nuclear bombs on Japan, were atrocities as well. I am not going to debate it either. Because there is nothing to debate...
I don't think dropping two nuclear bombs was an atrocity, to me it was the way to end the war against an enemy that wouldn't give up. I definitely think Japan out atrocitied (word? lol) us during World War 2. Rape of Nanking, treatment of prisoners of war....etc
The dropping of the bomb will always be up for a debate. When it comes to the dropping of the bomb, I always side with my mother's opinion.
My mother had 2 brothers who were in Europe at the time. She always said people were tired of war, herself included, and she wanted her brothers home safe...both served multiple years in Europe as most did.
I think we're on the same page here. My uncle was an island hopper, grunt marine. He would have definitely been part of the invasion force. He told me he would have never come home had he invaded the mainland. He had already been through Tarawa and Okinawa, among other stops.
I think we are. That is in a lot of ways we got to go on...I'm sure you or McGruff will correct me, but I believe the US figured casualties would be in and around a million...so your grandfather's assertion is likely correct. That is good that he got home and hopefully lived a really good life. All Uncles got home safely...and all of them lived into their 70' and 80's. I got an Uncle (Dad's brother) that served in the US Navy, never did get the story as to why...as you know, most war vets say very little...
My Mom's 2 brothers were to be re-deployed the Pacific operations, which never did happen because of the bomb.
Estimates were definitely in the millions and the war would have went on for a few more years. Yes the US killed hundreds of thousands in the atomic bomb droppings but millions more would have died on both sides. Crazy thing is that the Japanese still didn't want to surrender after the second bomb,. I have read countless accounts of soldiers on both sides that didn't believe that the Japanese surrendered.
You are equating soldiers deaths on the allies side with civilians deaths on the Japanese side.
You know that's fucked up right?
Also, you still going to stand by your dropping atomic bombs on civilians is not an atrocity comment? I noticed you are sidestepping that now.
Well we didn't have civilians in Japan so I"m not sure how that is messed up. Millions of Allied soldiers and Japanese soldiers and civilians would have died. What is wrong with statement. And yes I stand by my comment that it wasn't an atrocity.
You see fit to criticize the US at every turn. You seem to ignore your acquiescence to evil during the most consequential point in world history. I'm just doing you a favor and reminding you that the alternative to war is not always peace.
Swedens part in WW2 has been discussed on this forum as recent as 2019. When did I ignore it? Mr whatsaboutism.
What exactly have I criticized about the US and WW2 here? In Bulletpoints if possible.
You stated the US started the war, Mr. Can'tFindaMirror. Second, I'm pretty sure US actions has been discussed all the fucking time. Mostly brought up by you. So if there is a one time statute of limitation on the discussion, you've well exceeded that.
I stated that as a witty comment when someone - who often defends and puffs up the US - said that WW2 wasn't started by Germany but you could say it was started much earlier by Japan.
And it could be that you understand that, but is now skewing things for this angry narrative of yours. Which would be dishonest. Or you are only able to read text strictly literal. Which you should put as your tag, if that is the case. Would help.
Fridens liljor.
It's not witty though. Not even in the least. Second, no my family couldn't take up arms against Japan. Do you think some immigrant kids in Cleveland can go rent a boat and attack the Japanese in China? Stop with the wit, it ain't you.
You see fit to criticize the US at every turn. You seem to ignore your acquiescence to evil during the most consequential point in world history. I'm just doing you a favor and reminding you that the alternative to war is not always peace.
Swedens part in WW2 has been discussed on this forum as recent as 2019. When did I ignore it? Mr whatsaboutism.
What exactly have I criticized about the US and WW2 here? In Bulletpoints if possible.
You stated the US started the war, Mr. Can'tFindaMirror. Second, I'm pretty sure US actions has been discussed all the fucking time. Mostly brought up by you. So if there is a one time statute of limitation on the discussion, you've well exceeded that.
I stated that as a witty comment when someone - who often defends and puffs up the US - said that WW2 wasn't started by Germany but you could say it was started much earlier by Japan.
And it could be that you understand that, but is now skewing things for this angry narrative of yours. Which would be dishonest. Or you are only able to read text strictly literal. Which you should put as your tag, if that is the case. Would help.
Fridens liljor.
It's not witty though. Not even in the least. Second, no my family couldn't take up arms against Japan. Do you think some immigrant kids in Cleveland can go rent a boat and attack the Japanese in China? Stop with the wit, it ain't you.
It was witty. Or clever perhaps. But I understand that is hard to see when you can only read text strictly literal. So it's okey.
I'm still waiting for that bulletpoint list.
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
I wonder if our president is taking his own advice:
If American Presidents discussed American atrocities they'd have a lot of 'splainin to do
What part of Pearl Harbor was an America atrocity?
If the US President's want to bring up wrongdoing by other countries towards the US, then the line of other countries that have grievances against the US would be very extensive and the atrocities committed by the US towards other countries far outweigh any atrocities committed against the US. Why is that so hard for you to see. By the way, WW2 is over. Japan is a good friend of the west. Trump is a fucking idiot for bringing up that attack...
Dissagree but I am definitely not debating this. I didn’t realize world war 2 was over, thanks for letting me know Capt. however I am still wondering what part of Pearl Harbor is an American atrocity.
The original post that started this conversation was referring to atrocities committed by the US towards other countries. In the case of Japan specifically, some might say dropping 2 nuclear bombs on Japan, were atrocities as well. I am not going to debate it either. Because there is nothing to debate...
I don't think dropping two nuclear bombs was an atrocity, to me it was the way to end the war against an enemy that wouldn't give up. I definitely think Japan out atrocitied (word? lol) us during World War 2. Rape of Nanking, treatment of prisoners of war....etc
You might think differently if it was Japan who had dropped nuclear bombs on two American cities to end the war.
Not to mention the firebombing of Japanese civilians throughout the war. Maybe check out the doc The Fog Of War.
Are you trying to imply that Japan was innocent in this? They started world war 2, what did you want the us to do? I know all about the firebombings and how more people were killed in those bombings than in the nuclear bomb droppings. Even with all those people dying in the firebombings Japan still didn’t surrender.
In what way did the Japanese start WW2?
Hitler rushed to get his army ready after he surprisingly heard on the radio about the Pearl Harbour attack? "Hurry up with the jew-hating leaflets" people heard him yell while running into his study to design the swastika.
Hehe.
Um, they invaded China in the 1930's and then attacked the US at Pearl Harbor. A lot of scholars argue that the war started here although the official start of World War 2 was on September 1, 1939 with the German invasion of Poland. At that point Japan had already killed millions.
Japan was not innocent, but go back to the end of the 19th century and early 20th and where do you think Japan learned to become aggressive and why they eventually targeted Hawaii? Good ol' Teddy sowed the seed when he sent his envoy there and then the subsequent US actions. For every action there is a reaction and the US can be traced to having some impact on our own future. Sure, Japan made the decision to bomb Pearl Harbor, but it's not like the US didn't initiate the bad blood decades earlier.
Meh.. not sure I'm with you here. Teddy did not create imperialistic fervor in Japan. They saw themselves as racially superior. You could almost say they had a manifest destiny outlook, with all of SE Asia and Oceania as their rightful resources. They attacked Pearl Harbor because they knew war was imminent and they wanted to land a haymaker. They really just wanted us out of their sphere of influence.
I will say this, none of us know if the US would have got involved in WW2 with the Japenese attack. The US entering the war sure sped up the end of the war...maybe the war could have ended sooner without those so-called neutral countries playing both sides of the fence...
Comments
(Nice of you to pull n Sweden... when did this conversation be about Sweden? Or even the US taking part in WW2? You seem a bit hostile.)
My Mom's 2 brothers were to be re-deployed the Pacific operations, which never did happen because of the bomb.
mr whatsaboutism
In what way does my opinion on the matter have less weight than yours because I am not from the US? You do see how that kind of argumentation make you look right?
If they were "definitely right", there would not have been discussions and debates about it like it has the last 70 years. You saying they were "definitely right" don't need to be discussed though, it's all very transparent.
What exactly have I criticized about the US and WW2 here? In Bulletpoints if possible.
And I don't see you take up arms in the Saudis war on Jemen - so you are in fact right now complicit behind your screen?
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
You know that's fucked up right?
Also, you still going to stand by your dropping atomic bombs on civilians is not an atrocity comment? I noticed you are sidestepping that now.
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
And it could be that you understand that, but is now skewing things for this angry narrative of yours. Which would be dishonest. Or you are only able to read text strictly literal. Which you should put as your tag, if that is the case. Would help.
Fridens liljor.
And yes I stand by my comment that it wasn't an atrocity.
I'm still waiting for that bulletpoint list.
Okay I'm done. I still hate Trump.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©