Donald Trump

Thirty Bills Unpaid said:

cincybearcat said:

RunIntoTheRain said:

dignin said:

PJ_Soul said:

cincybearcat said:

PJ_Soul said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

PJ_Soul said:

cincybearcat said:

PJ_Soul said:

cincybearcat said:

josevolution said:

cincybearcat said:

josevolution said:

https://apple.news/ARso3fQ0dQL2wIJBqCbJ19w
The Baffoon is the last person to call anyone crazy and it’s a telling sign that the Baffoon attacks him on his hand movements that tells me he fears him as a candidate..

Is that his ISIS bride next to him?

”ok wifey...make sure you are looking at Beto while he is talking. Of and blink so it looks like you are real”.

Nothing to do with my comment just your observation that matches the Baffoon’s , why don’t you comment of the Baffoon’s idiotic comment.,

Ummm your post had the link to the video.....

Who was Beto jerking off 2 handed to start that thing?

I guess this is why he air drums.

I really don't understand what meaning you actually apply to him air drumming once. Can you please explain this to me? You and a couple others keep mentioning it as though it means something.

Cause it's funny that people relate to him because he air drummed this one time.  

Now, trump is an idiot...but watching that Beto video...how could you not laugh at his wife's creepy staring and the hilarious hand movements in the beginning at least! That was pure gold!

I see so much wrong with that attitude. People did NOT relate to him because he air drummed that last time. That is just a made up thing that the right came up with (seems to have worked!). People related to O'Rourke for many, many reasons, and there happened to be one clip of him going through a drive through acting like a normal person with a Who song on the radio, and he acted normal. And people just in general appreciate that he acts like a normal person rather than faking his way through everything he does in the front of a camera, which is completely fair. I think it is really cheap and, I dunno, intellectually shallow I guess, so take that and turn it into this stupid thing about the air drumming. It's the same with Trudeau's socks. FFS, the man wears fashionable socks, and somehow the right turned it into a "thing" just like people have with this. It's just fucking low brow crap.

Its all they got.

Right?? I mean, they're still talking about it a year later, lol. It's so dumb. And I'm not commenting on you directly Cincy, really. Sorry, but you've basically fallen for it, and repeating what you're being taught. I know how that sounds, and I apologize in advance for sounding condescending - I just don't know how else to put it.

 No I think it’s funny. And that’s ok. And I do think that video of him was funny to watch too!

... But you are saying that something that isn't real is funny.

Remember boys and girls, it's okay to make fun of Beto but not okay to make fun of Trump's toilet paper shoes.

Apparently it’s ok to infer Beto’s wife Amy is an ISIS bride.

Hahahahaha yup that’s what I did. I love that the group always gets the band back together. Mods won’t care or address it ever. Except to ban someone that was pointing it out.

1) I’m making fun of the stupid video. 
2) you all use toilet paper on trumps shoe as some sort of condemnation of his ability to be president. I don’t think this stupid video should decide if Beto should be president.

You spoke condescendingly to everyone that pointed out and/or laughed at fatso walking up the stairs with ass wipe stuck to the bottom of his shoe. Then you proceed to do the same thing for something that isn't even remotely as funny.

The ass wipe stuck to the bottom of Tubby's shoe is an iconic image. It is because it so perfectly depicts the orange unit's presidency: sloppy, mindless, careless and shitty. 

Waving to all his guppies, "Look at me. Goodbye American people. Yes. Yes. Goodbye."

We were looking at you ya twit. And you had toilet paper on your shoe after taking a presidential Big Mac poo on your golden toilet. F**king idiot. You can't even shit without f**king up.

In his rush to get off the golden throne and get in front of the cameras, I guarantee he wasn't thorough. At the end of his day, his size 48 tightie whities needed to be tossed out.

(a) In any place open to the general public, and in the communal areas of multi-unit housing, it is unlawful for a person to:

(1) Intentionally or recklessly act in such a manner as to cause another person to be in reasonable fear that a person or property in a person’s immediate possession is likely to be harmed or taken;

(2) Incite or provoke violence where there is a likelihood that such violence will ensue; or

(3) Direct abusive or offensive language or gestures at another person (other than a law enforcement officer while acting in his or her official capacity) in a manner likely to provoke immediate physical retaliation or violence by that person or another person.

(b) It is unlawful for a person to engage in loud, threatening, or abusive language, or disruptive conduct, with the intent and effect of impeding or disrupting the orderly conduct of a lawful public gathering, or of a congregation of people engaged in any religious service or in worship, a funeral, or similar proceeding.

(c) It is unlawful for a person to engage in loud, threatening, or abusive language, or disruptive conduct with the intent and effect of impeding or disrupting the lawful use of a public conveyance by one or more other persons.

(c-1) It is unlawful for a person to engage in loud, threatening, or abusive language, or disruptive conduct in a public building with the intent and effect of impeding or disrupting the orderly conduct of business in that public building.

(d) It is unlawful for a person to make an unreasonably loud noise between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. that is likely to annoy or disturb one or more other persons in their residences.

(e) It is unlawful for a person to urinate or defecate in public, other than in a urinal or toilet.

(f) It is unlawful for a person to stealthily look into a window or other opening of a dwelling, as defined in § 6-101.07, under circumstances in which an occupant would have a reasonable expectation of privacy. It is not necessary that the dwelling be occupied at the time the person looks into the window or other opening.

(g) It is unlawful, under circumstances whereby a breach of the peace may be occasioned, to interfere with any person in any public place by jostling against the person, unnecessarily crowding the person, or placing a hand in the proximity of the person’s handbag, pocketbook, or wallet.

(h) A person who violates any provision of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be fined not more than the amount set forth in § 22-3571.01, imprisoned not more than 90 days, or both.

PJ_Soul said:

Many pundits are actually saying that Trump will only lose if the campaign topic is Trump. Basically, the surest tactic for the Dems, according to many, is to attack and highlight how awful Trump is.

PJ_Soul said:

Many pundits are actually saying that Trump will only lose if the campaign topic is Trump. Basically, the surest tactic for the Dems, according to many, is to attack and highlight how awful Trump is.

PJ_Soul said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

PJ_Soul said:

Many pundits are actually saying that Trump will only lose if the campaign topic is Trump. Basically, the surest tactic for the Dems, according to many, is to attack and highlight how awful Trump is.

I disagree with those pundits. Certainly you have to attack Trump on how awful he is (as you would any incumbent), but I think the Dems primary tactic needs to be selling their own platform for America as what's best for the country. Because really, Trump's no more awful now than he was in 2016. It's just now he's powerful to go along with awful. 

Oh, I think he is far more awful than then, as a candidate. I don't think many people realized just how much of a fucking trainwreck he and his friends would actually be. It is so much worse than most people imagined back then IMO. I know I never thought it would be so bad, and I was as anti-Trump as one could be at the time.

PJ_Soul said:

 And I don't think I imagined that he'd decide to make American's totalitarian enemies his friends and America's friends his enemies either... I guess I didn't think he quite had the nerve. Boy was I wrong. 

Ledbetterman10 said:

PJ_Soul said:

 And I don't think I imagined that he'd decide to make American's totalitarian enemies his friends and America's friends his enemies either... I guess I didn't think he quite had the nerve. Boy was I wrong. 

And this is the thing about Trump fans that confuses me the most. Conservatives pride themselves on being patriotic (or at least put on a front that they do). What is less patriotic and less American than the U.S. President siding with the likes of the Russian President, North Korean Dictator, and Saudi Crown Prince over his own intelligence committees?