14 years and counting...
Comments
-
Halifax2TheMax said:
That they know how to drive safely in the state they’re residing in? Or did you mean “government issued ID?” Makes a difference as last time I checked, driver’s licenses weren’t “given out.”tempo_n_groove said:Question?
What is the upside of giving illegal/undocumented immigrants a drivers license?PJ_Soul said:
Safety. It's a hell of a lot better than them driving around without a driver's license, right?tempo_n_groove said:Question?
What is the upside of giving illegal/undocumented immigrants a drivers license?Non-residents
Out-of-state and foreign driver licensesYou can drive in New York State with a valid driver license from another state or country. You don’t need to apply for a New York State driver license unless you become a New York State resident.
If you have a driver license from another country you do not need to have an International Driving Permit, but it is helpful. The permit verifies in several languages that you have a valid driver license. Police officers who can’t read the language on your foreign driver license will be able to read the permit. Contact the authorities in your home country to get an International Driving Permit.
0 -
Appeals court says Trump admin can't end DACA0 -
Well, words do assist with understanding and since you’re using the word “obtaining,” and “driver’s licenses,” my previous answer, at a minimum, stands. Pay a fee, take a written test and if not surrendering an existing license, take a road test, have your vision checked, pass all three, be issued a license. Safer driver, if driving. If used for an ID, proof of existence, Identification for opening bank accounts, getting utilities turned on, making a major purchase like a car, getting a loan, obtaining credit. What do you use ID for and wouldn’t those same things for an immigrant, legal or otherwise, be beneficial?tempo_n_groove said:
We love harping on words don't we...Halifax2TheMax said:
That they know how to drive safely in the state they’re residing in? Or did you mean “government issued ID?” Makes a difference as last time I checked, driver’s licenses weren’t “given out.”tempo_n_groove said:Question?
What is the upside of giving illegal/undocumented immigrants a drivers license?
"What is the upside of illegal/undocumented immigrants obtaining a drivers license?"09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
See my previous answer below. A foreigner technically does not need one to operate a vehicle in NY (I used NY as an example).Halifax2TheMax said:
Well, words do assist with understanding and since you’re using the word “obtaining,” and “driver’s licenses,” my previous answer, at a minimum, stands. Pay a fee, take a written test and if not surrendering an existing license, take a road test, have your vision checked, pass all three, be issued a license. Safer driver, if driving. If used for an ID, proof of existence, Identification for opening bank accounts, getting utilities turned on, making a major purchase like a car, getting a loan, obtaining credit. What do you use ID for and wouldn’t those same things for an immigrant, legal or otherwise, be beneficial?tempo_n_groove said:
We love harping on words don't we...Halifax2TheMax said:
That they know how to drive safely in the state they’re residing in? Or did you mean “government issued ID?” Makes a difference as last time I checked, driver’s licenses weren’t “given out.”tempo_n_groove said:Question?
What is the upside of giving illegal/undocumented immigrants a drivers license?
"What is the upside of illegal/undocumented immigrants obtaining a drivers license?"
That sounds all good but all of the things you listed you don't need an ID for sans maybe obtaining credit but you can get a bank account. So there are ways around all of that you listed.Non-residents
Out-of-state and foreign driver licensesYou can drive in New York State with a valid driver license from another state or country. You don’t need to apply for a New York State driver license unless you become a New York State resident.
If you have a driver license from another country you do not need to have an International Driving Permit, but it is helpful. The permit verifies in several languages that you have a valid driver license. Police officers who can’t read the language on your foreign driver license will be able to read the permit. Contact the authorities in your home country to get an International Driving Permit.
0 -
Wouldn’t a state issued ID establish residency, as in local, not permanent or legal US resident or citizen? I’d be surprised a utility or a landlord or bank would accept a foreign driver’s license to open accounts, savings or credit.tempo_n_groove said:
See my previous answer below. A foreigner technically does not need one to operate a vehicle in NY (I used NY as an example).Halifax2TheMax said:
Well, words do assist with understanding and since you’re using the word “obtaining,” and “driver’s licenses,” my previous answer, at a minimum, stands. Pay a fee, take a written test and if not surrendering an existing license, take a road test, have your vision checked, pass all three, be issued a license. Safer driver, if driving. If used for an ID, proof of existence, Identification for opening bank accounts, getting utilities turned on, making a major purchase like a car, getting a loan, obtaining credit. What do you use ID for and wouldn’t those same things for an immigrant, legal or otherwise, be beneficial?tempo_n_groove said:
We love harping on words don't we...Halifax2TheMax said:
That they know how to drive safely in the state they’re residing in? Or did you mean “government issued ID?” Makes a difference as last time I checked, driver’s licenses weren’t “given out.”tempo_n_groove said:Question?
What is the upside of giving illegal/undocumented immigrants a drivers license?
"What is the upside of illegal/undocumented immigrants obtaining a drivers license?"
That sounds all good but all of the things you listed you don't need an ID for sans maybe obtaining credit but you can get a bank account. So there are ways around all of that you listed.Non-residents
Out-of-state and foreign driver licensesYou can drive in New York State with a valid driver license from another state or country. You don’t need to apply for a New York State driver license unless you become a New York State resident.
If you have a driver license from another country you do not need to have an International Driving Permit, but it is helpful. The permit verifies in several languages that you have a valid driver license. Police officers who can’t read the language on your foreign driver license will be able to read the permit. Contact the authorities in your home country to get an International Driving Permit.
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
And international driving permits are only valid for 60 or 90 days, if I recall. Usually the length of time permitted by a tourist visa.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Halifax2TheMax said:
Wouldn’t a state issued ID establish residency, as in local, not permanent or legal US resident or citizen? I’d be surprised a utility or a landlord or bank would accept a foreign driver’s license to open accounts, savings or credit.tempo_n_groove said:
See my previous answer below. A foreigner technically does not need one to operate a vehicle in NY (I used NY as an example).Halifax2TheMax said:
Well, words do assist with understanding and since you’re using the word “obtaining,” and “driver’s licenses,” my previous answer, at a minimum, stands. Pay a fee, take a written test and if not surrendering an existing license, take a road test, have your vision checked, pass all three, be issued a license. Safer driver, if driving. If used for an ID, proof of existence, Identification for opening bank accounts, getting utilities turned on, making a major purchase like a car, getting a loan, obtaining credit. What do you use ID for and wouldn’t those same things for an immigrant, legal or otherwise, be beneficial?tempo_n_groove said:
We love harping on words don't we...Halifax2TheMax said:
That they know how to drive safely in the state they’re residing in? Or did you mean “government issued ID?” Makes a difference as last time I checked, driver’s licenses weren’t “given out.”tempo_n_groove said:Question?
What is the upside of giving illegal/undocumented immigrants a drivers license?
"What is the upside of illegal/undocumented immigrants obtaining a drivers license?"
That sounds all good but all of the things you listed you don't need an ID for sans maybe obtaining credit but you can get a bank account. So there are ways around all of that you listed.Non-residents
Out-of-state and foreign driver licensesYou can drive in New York State with a valid driver license from another state or country. You don’t need to apply for a New York State driver license unless you become a New York State resident.
If you have a driver license from another country you do not need to have an International Driving Permit, but it is helpful. The permit verifies in several languages that you have a valid driver license. Police officers who can’t read the language on your foreign driver license will be able to read the permit. Contact the authorities in your home country to get an International Driving Permit.
Halifax2TheMax said:And international driving permits are only valid for 60 or 90 days, if I recall. Usually the length of time permitted by a tourist visa.
Remember this revolves around illegal and undocumented immigrants.
How can an illegal/undocumented establish residency?
Bank of America was given a ration of shit for letting people open accounts without a US drivers' licenses. It is possible to open a bank account here. It is also easy enough to rent an apartment here. I know PJ soul commented that it was the same in Canada.
Yes after a certain period of time you might need to change your residency if you don't have a work visas or if it expires.
So what you have described is what a normal person would/should do. I'm asking about illegal/undocumented immigrants/people.
I ask because I am seeing a push here in NY to be able to give them a drivers license.
It doesn't make sense.0 -
Appeals court panel says Trump administration can’t end DACA, setting up Supreme Court fight
I guess this is where Trump hopes his SCOTUS picks will start to come in handy.With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
Yep he will def expect them to pay up on their nominations ...PJ_Soul said:Appeals court panel says Trump administration can’t end DACA, setting up Supreme Court fight
I guess this is where Trump hopes his SCOTUS picks will start to come in handy.jesus greets me looks just like me ....0 -
I was talking about the politics of it. When you said political ploy on both sides I thought you meant democrat and republican. It was a ploy by the president and the republicans and fox news carried their water with non stop coverage. The other channels were forced to cover it some because of what the president said but none gave it nearly the attention that fox did.tempo_n_groove said:
Can't they both?The Juggler said:
How was it a political ploy on both sides? One side blatantly lied and exaggerated the threat leading up Tuesday while the other side talked about health care, and the economy.tempo_n_groove said:
I should have been clearer that I was agreeing w you. Funny how that all media outlets were noticing "no coverage" on the caravan and reporting the same thing you said then boom, there's finally a story.The Juggler said:
An article on their website is akin to wall to wall coverage with reporters embedded with the "invaders?"tempo_n_groove said:
I googled this because I was curious...The Juggler said:
https://www.foxnews.com/world/migrant-caravan-gets-within-reach-of-border-what-happens-now
3 hours ago. So the media is listening.
As recently as Monday this was supposedly a crisis the required us sending 15,000 troops down there as soon as possible.
Trump hasn't tweeted about it since before the election. His supporters are suckers.
It is interesting that only Fox is still running a story and even more interesting that no other media outlets are too.
You were right. It was a huge political ploy on both sides... No one really gives a shit about the caravan.
Every news source was following it because Trump brought it up. News sources were discussing why it is important that we do something. They went and interviewed the migrants in central America then after the election, everyone stopped reporting on it.
You even said it was a political ploy and I agree with you. Both sides got what they wanted from it.
1-to put Trump as an unemphatic person towards the plights of the migrants.
2-to show that an "invasion" was coming and to be scared.
Trump stopped tweeting and the media stopped caring.
It's what I thought you were getting to? Am I wrong?
www.myspace.com0 -
When my feed has news stories from the BBC and the Times with titles that say "The Migrant Caravan and why it matters" it means that they did care and wanted to thumb it back at Trump.The Juggler said:
I was talking about the politics of it. When you said political ploy on both sides I thought you meant democrat and republican. It was a ploy by the president and the republicans and fox news carried their water with non stop coverage. The other channels were forced to cover it some because of what the president said but none gave it nearly the attention that fox did.tempo_n_groove said:
Can't they both?The Juggler said:
How was it a political ploy on both sides? One side blatantly lied and exaggerated the threat leading up Tuesday while the other side talked about health care, and the economy.tempo_n_groove said:
I should have been clearer that I was agreeing w you. Funny how that all media outlets were noticing "no coverage" on the caravan and reporting the same thing you said then boom, there's finally a story.The Juggler said:
An article on their website is akin to wall to wall coverage with reporters embedded with the "invaders?"tempo_n_groove said:
I googled this because I was curious...The Juggler said:
https://www.foxnews.com/world/migrant-caravan-gets-within-reach-of-border-what-happens-now
3 hours ago. So the media is listening.
As recently as Monday this was supposedly a crisis the required us sending 15,000 troops down there as soon as possible.
Trump hasn't tweeted about it since before the election. His supporters are suckers.
It is interesting that only Fox is still running a story and even more interesting that no other media outlets are too.
You were right. It was a huge political ploy on both sides... No one really gives a shit about the caravan.
Every news source was following it because Trump brought it up. News sources were discussing why it is important that we do something. They went and interviewed the migrants in central America then after the election, everyone stopped reporting on it.
You even said it was a political ploy and I agree with you. Both sides got what they wanted from it.
1-to put Trump as an unemphatic person towards the plights of the migrants.
2-to show that an "invasion" was coming and to be scared.
Trump stopped tweeting and the media stopped caring.
It's what I thought you were getting to? Am I wrong?
Just what I gathered that Trump stopped tweeting and the rest of the world stopped caring.
If the other news media outlets thought this was a fight worth supporting(the caravan) then why did they stop on a dime reporting also?
I think you are giving each side too much credit.0 -
tempo_n_groove said:
When my feed has news stories from the BBC and the Times with titles that say "The Migrant Caravan and why it matters" it means that they did care and wanted to thumb it back at Trump.The Juggler said:
I was talking about the politics of it. When you said political ploy on both sides I thought you meant democrat and republican. It was a ploy by the president and the republicans and fox news carried their water with non stop coverage. The other channels were forced to cover it some because of what the president said but none gave it nearly the attention that fox did.tempo_n_groove said:
Can't they both?The Juggler said:
How was it a political ploy on both sides? One side blatantly lied and exaggerated the threat leading up Tuesday while the other side talked about health care, and the economy.tempo_n_groove said:
I should have been clearer that I was agreeing w you. Funny how that all media outlets were noticing "no coverage" on the caravan and reporting the same thing you said then boom, there's finally a story.The Juggler said:
An article on their website is akin to wall to wall coverage with reporters embedded with the "invaders?"tempo_n_groove said:
I googled this because I was curious...The Juggler said:
https://www.foxnews.com/world/migrant-caravan-gets-within-reach-of-border-what-happens-now
3 hours ago. So the media is listening.
As recently as Monday this was supposedly a crisis the required us sending 15,000 troops down there as soon as possible.
Trump hasn't tweeted about it since before the election. His supporters are suckers.
It is interesting that only Fox is still running a story and even more interesting that no other media outlets are too.
You were right. It was a huge political ploy on both sides... No one really gives a shit about the caravan.
Every news source was following it because Trump brought it up. News sources were discussing why it is important that we do something. They went and interviewed the migrants in central America then after the election, everyone stopped reporting on it.
You even said it was a political ploy and I agree with you. Both sides got what they wanted from it.
1-to put Trump as an unemphatic person towards the plights of the migrants.
2-to show that an "invasion" was coming and to be scared.
Trump stopped tweeting and the media stopped caring.
It's what I thought you were getting to? Am I wrong?
Just what I gathered that Trump stopped tweeting and the rest of the world stopped caring.
If the other news media outlets thought this was a fight worth supporting(the caravan) then why did they stop on a dime reporting also?
I think you are giving each side too much credit.
The other media outlets didn't stop covering it.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-46147137
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/caravan-migrants-trump-1.4897562
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/08/us/politics/trump-asylum-seekers-executive-order.html?action=click&module=Top Stories&pgtype=Homepage
These are all from the front pages today.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
But honestly, the migrant caravan doesn’t need to be reported on daily. It’s a group of people moving on foot, so not that much changes from day to day. It became news because Trump made it so, and more sane voices needed to counteract the narrative of fear. Now that that narrative has mysteriously dropped, there’s no need to write factual articles about the same thing again and again.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0
-
The sides I am talking about are the Republican Party (and their state run media, Fox) and the democrat party. Not totally sure what your point is.tempo_n_groove said:
When my feed has news stories from the BBC and the Times with titles that say "The Migrant Caravan and why it matters" it means that they did care and wanted to thumb it back at Trump.The Juggler said:
I was talking about the politics of it. When you said political ploy on both sides I thought you meant democrat and republican. It was a ploy by the president and the republicans and fox news carried their water with non stop coverage. The other channels were forced to cover it some because of what the president said but none gave it nearly the attention that fox did.tempo_n_groove said:
Can't they both?The Juggler said:
How was it a political ploy on both sides? One side blatantly lied and exaggerated the threat leading up Tuesday while the other side talked about health care, and the economy.tempo_n_groove said:
I should have been clearer that I was agreeing w you. Funny how that all media outlets were noticing "no coverage" on the caravan and reporting the same thing you said then boom, there's finally a story.The Juggler said:
An article on their website is akin to wall to wall coverage with reporters embedded with the "invaders?"tempo_n_groove said:
I googled this because I was curious...The Juggler said:
https://www.foxnews.com/world/migrant-caravan-gets-within-reach-of-border-what-happens-now
3 hours ago. So the media is listening.
As recently as Monday this was supposedly a crisis the required us sending 15,000 troops down there as soon as possible.
Trump hasn't tweeted about it since before the election. His supporters are suckers.
It is interesting that only Fox is still running a story and even more interesting that no other media outlets are too.
You were right. It was a huge political ploy on both sides... No one really gives a shit about the caravan.
Every news source was following it because Trump brought it up. News sources were discussing why it is important that we do something. They went and interviewed the migrants in central America then after the election, everyone stopped reporting on it.
You even said it was a political ploy and I agree with you. Both sides got what they wanted from it.
1-to put Trump as an unemphatic person towards the plights of the migrants.
2-to show that an "invasion" was coming and to be scared.
Trump stopped tweeting and the media stopped caring.
It's what I thought you were getting to? Am I wrong?
Just what I gathered that Trump stopped tweeting and the rest of the world stopped caring.
If the other news media outlets thought this was a fight worth supporting(the caravan) then why did they stop on a dime reporting also?
I think you are giving each side too much credit.
As of Monday, Fox had reporters embedded within the caravan and they were broadcasting live at the border while the president would not shut up about how this invasion was getting closer and closer to our country. Now? It’s hardly getting any attention on the news and the president hasn’t even really talked about it since the election. It was a political con job perpetrated by the president and his allies on Fox.www.myspace.com0 -
Waiting....watching the clock...it’s four o’clock and there’s absolutely no invasion coming
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/10/us/deployed-inside-the-united-states-the-military-waits-for-the-migrant-caravan.html#click=https://t.co/44ezyKcYCuDeployed Inside the United States: The Military Waits for the Migrant Caravan
With little electricity, no combat pay and holidays away from home, the 5,600 American troops on the southwest border are on a mission ordered by a politically determined commander in chief and a Pentagon unable to convince him of its perils.
www.myspace.com0 -
I’m just reading this now on the paper version of the NYT during a leisurely Sunday breakfast. I didn’t realize that it’s illegal for US troops to enforce US immigration law. There is basically nothing these troops are allowed to do other than logistical support, which the National Guard is already doing.The Juggler said:Waiting....watching the clock...it’s four o’clock and there’s absolutely no invasion coming
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/10/us/deployed-inside-the-united-states-the-military-waits-for-the-migrant-caravan.html#click=https://t.co/44ezyKcYCuDeployed Inside the United States: The Military Waits for the Migrant Caravan
With little electricity, no combat pay and holidays away from home, the 5,600 American troops on the southwest border are on a mission ordered by a politically determined commander in chief and a Pentagon unable to convince him of its perils.
And this is projected to cost about $200 million.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
America! Fuck Yeah!oftenreading said:
I’m just reading this now on the paper version of the NYT during a leisurely Sunday breakfast. I didn’t realize that it’s illegal for US troops to enforce US immigration law. There is basically nothing these troops are allowed to do other than logistical support, which the National Guard is already doing.The Juggler said:Waiting....watching the clock...it’s four o’clock and there’s absolutely no invasion coming
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/10/us/deployed-inside-the-united-states-the-military-waits-for-the-migrant-caravan.html#click=https://t.co/44ezyKcYCuDeployed Inside the United States: The Military Waits for the Migrant Caravan
With little electricity, no combat pay and holidays away from home, the 5,600 American troops on the southwest border are on a mission ordered by a politically determined commander in chief and a Pentagon unable to convince him of its perils.
And this is projected to cost about $200 million.www.myspace.com0 -
So when does this invasion begin? Are you prepared?Give Peas A Chance…0
-
Folks are cowering in middle America.Meltdown99 said:So when does this invasion begin? Are you prepared?09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
My wife and I have practiced our evacuation route at least a dozen times already.Meltdown99 said:So when does this invasion begin? Are you prepared?www.myspace.com0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.2K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.3K Flea Market
- 39.3K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help