9/11 "Conspiracy" Theories

Gern Blansten · September 2018

mcgruff10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

136 people saw the fucking plane

You see a plane in the released video?

136 eyewitnesses saw the plane. Fact. Sorry that none of them had video cameras as most were driving to work at the time.

Gern Blansten · September 2018

mcgruff10 said:

my2hands said:

mcgruff10 said:

my2hands said:

mcgruff10 said:

my2hands said:

https://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/04/us/a-trainee-noted-for-incompetence.html

"He could not fly at all"

Yup, why ask questions? Lol

''I'm still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon,'' the former employee said. ''He could not fly at all.''
interesting. That pentagon video always bothered me because it looks more like a missile than a plane.

You dont see a 757, bro? Lol

I mean shit, they are only 150 feet long and 130 feet wide, I'm sure it's just the frame by frame video that explains why we dont see a plane fly straight into a building only feet off the ground

Ok so let’s say that it was a missile and not a plane. Then what happened to that flight? What happened to the people? Where is the wreckage? Why was a missile being fired toward the pentagon?

I do not pretend to have those answers. I have the same questions.

How would you keep it quiet? Trust me, I get it.

And if you use planes to hit the WTC, why not use a plane to hit the pentagon?

Fair questions, no doubt. Show a clear video of the most secure building in the world getting hit by a 757 and those questions would all disappear, but here we are.

I just don't see a 757 in the video that was released. What the heck is it?

Watch the video that I posted. 30 seconds in you have an eyewitness describe watching a 737 hit the pentagon.

mcgruff10 · September 2018

Gern Blansten said:

mcgruff10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

136 people saw the fucking plane

You see a plane in the released video?

136 eyewitnesses saw the plane. Fact. Sorry that none of them had video cameras as most were driving to work at the time.

You didn’t answer my question: do you see a plane in that video?

Gern Blansten · September 2018

my2hands said:

dignin said:

Debunking the Myths About the 9/11 Attack on the Pentagon
Conspiracy theorists who doubt the facts about the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks didn't stop with the World Trade Center. Here, we answer their claims about the attack on the Pentagon.

https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/

Yeah, that's just as weak as I remember reading it the first time years ago.

“I was close enough that I could see through the windows of the airplane, and watch as it hit…it was accelerating. It was wheels up, flaps up, engines full throttle.”

-Lincoln Liebner….EYEWITNESS

pjhawks · September 2018

mcgruff10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

mcgruff10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

136 people saw the fucking plane

You see a plane in the released video?

136 eyewitnesses saw the plane. Fact. Sorry that none of them had video cameras as most were driving to work at the time.

You didn’t answer my question: do you see a plane in that video?

i do, at the :24 second mark

Gern Blansten · September 2018

mcgruff10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

136 people saw the fucking plane

You see a plane in the released video?

yes at 24 second mark....this is a stop action video...notice how jumpy the vehicle is? So take the hit at the 24 second mark, add that to the 136 EYEWITNESSES THAT SAY THEY SAW A FUCKING AIRPLANE HIT THE PENTAGON and tell me how you would summarize that.

mcgruff10 · September 2018

Gern Blansten said:

mcgruff10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

136 people saw the fucking plane

You see a plane in the released video?

yes at 24 second mark....this is a stop action video...notice how jumpy the vehicle is? So take the hit at the 24 second mark, add that to the 136 EYEWITNESSES THAT SAY THEY SAW A FUCKING AIRPLANE HIT THE PENTAGON and tell me how you would summarize that.

I still don’t see a plane in the video.

Gern Blansten · September 2018

https://www.businessinsider.com/the-fbi-pentagon-on-911-2017-5#the-red-c-in-the-american-airlines-logo-is-clearly-visible-in-this-picture-3

Gern Blansten · September 2018

mcgruff10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

mcgruff10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

136 people saw the fucking plane

You see a plane in the released video?

yes at 24 second mark....this is a stop action video...notice how jumpy the vehicle is? So take the hit at the 24 second mark, add that to the 136 EYEWITNESSES THAT SAY THEY SAW A FUCKING AIRPLANE HIT THE PENTAGON and tell me how you would summarize that.

I still don’t see a plane in the video.

You also don't see 136 EYEWITNESSES THAT SAID THEY SAW THE AIRPLANE HIT THE PENTAGON....but they still exist

Gern Blansten · September 2018

Image: https://amp.businessinsider.com/images/591f4e3634911b102e8b4dc8-750-497.jpg

Gern Blansten · September 2018

Image: https://amp.businessinsider.com/images/591f4cd134911b19008b5237-750-497.jpg

mcgruff10 · September 2018

Gern Blansten said:

mcgruff10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

mcgruff10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

136 people saw the fucking plane

You see a plane in the released video?

yes at 24 second mark....this is a stop action video...notice how jumpy the vehicle is? So take the hit at the 24 second mark, add that to the 136 EYEWITNESSES THAT SAY THEY SAW A FUCKING AIRPLANE HIT THE PENTAGON and tell me how you would summarize that.

I still don’t see a plane in the video.

You also don't see 136 EYEWITNESSES THAT SAID THEY SAW THE AIRPLANE HIT THE PENTAGON....but they still exist

I m not debating the eyewitness accounts, I am questioning the video.

Gern Blansten · September 2018

mcgruff10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

mcgruff10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

mcgruff10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

136 people saw the fucking plane

You see a plane in the released video?

yes at 24 second mark....this is a stop action video...notice how jumpy the vehicle is? So take the hit at the 24 second mark, add that to the 136 EYEWITNESSES THAT SAY THEY SAW A FUCKING AIRPLANE HIT THE PENTAGON and tell me how you would summarize that.

I still don’t see a plane in the video.

You also don't see 136 EYEWITNESSES THAT SAID THEY SAW THE AIRPLANE HIT THE PENTAGON....but they still exist

I m not debating the eyewitness accounts, I am questioning the video.

what is more likely? That the video isn't very clear and due to it not being high quality you are missing out on a half second of more detail? Or that it is a raging conspiracy theory and 136 EYEWITNESSES are in on your little discovery?

Drop it man.

PJPOWER · September 2018

mcgruff10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

mcgruff10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

mcgruff10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

136 people saw the fucking plane

You see a plane in the released video?

yes at 24 second mark....this is a stop action video...notice how jumpy the vehicle is? So take the hit at the 24 second mark, add that to the 136 EYEWITNESSES THAT SAY THEY SAW A FUCKING AIRPLANE HIT THE PENTAGON and tell me how you would summarize that.

I still don’t see a plane in the video.

You also don't see 136 EYEWITNESSES THAT SAID THEY SAW THE AIRPLANE HIT THE PENTAGON....but they still exist

I m not debating the eyewitness accounts, I am questioning the video.

The frame rate on that video is crazy slow. It is entirely feasible that a plane moving at “full throttle” would not be picked up on a video like that. In the video you can see “something” enter the frame and the the next frame the explosion. Due to the poor quality of the video (it was 2001), it is not good enough evidence to disprove the eyewitness reports and broken poles, etc.
Now if there were multiple eyewitnesses saying they saw a van pull up and fire a giant missle, that may be a thing.

Gern Blansten · September 2018

PJPOWER said:

mcgruff10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

mcgruff10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

mcgruff10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

136 people saw the fucking plane

You see a plane in the released video?

yes at 24 second mark....this is a stop action video...notice how jumpy the vehicle is? So take the hit at the 24 second mark, add that to the 136 EYEWITNESSES THAT SAY THEY SAW A FUCKING AIRPLANE HIT THE PENTAGON and tell me how you would summarize that.

I still don’t see a plane in the video.

You also don't see 136 EYEWITNESSES THAT SAID THEY SAW THE AIRPLANE HIT THE PENTAGON....but they still exist

I m not debating the eyewitness accounts, I am questioning the video.

The frame rate on that video is crazy slow. It is entirely feasible that a plane moving at “full throttle” would not be picked up on a video like that. I’m the video you can see “something” enter the frame and the the next frame the explosion. Due to the poor quality of the video (it was 2001), it is not good enough evidence to disprove the eyewitness reports and broken poles, etc.
Now if there were multiple eyewitnesses saying they saw a van pull up and fire a giant missle, that may be a thing.

Exactly...and ZERO eyewitnesses described anything other than a plane.

mickeyrat · September 2018

my2hands said:

dignin said:

Debunking the Myths About the 9/11 Attack on the Pentagon
Conspiracy theorists who doubt the facts about the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks didn't stop with the World Trade Center. Here, we answer their claims about the attack on the Pentagon.

https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/

Yeah, that's just as weak as I remember reading it the first time years ago.

what are your counter arguments to the points noted in that link?

mickeyrat · September 2018

my2hands said:

Show me a 757 in this video... supposedly flying a few feet off the ground... at a few hundred MPH... piloted by a poorly trained amateur pilot... who hits his target dead on square.... he didn't come even a few hundred yards short, he threaded the needle, in a 757, a few feet off the ground, travelling at a high rate of speed, with minimal training (yeah, no questions there)

https://youtu.be/AzFqXbfv_yg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvHXarRGF1M

PJPOWER · September 2018

mickeyrat said:

my2hands said:

Show me a 757 in this video... supposedly flying a few feet off the ground... at a few hundred MPH... piloted by a poorly trained amateur pilot... who hits his target dead on square.... he didn't come even a few hundred yards short, he threaded the needle, in a 757, a few feet off the ground, travelling at a high rate of speed, with minimal training (yeah, no questions there)

https://youtu.be/AzFqXbfv_yg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvHXarRGF1M

Anyone have a similar video explaining the physics of any other object (other than an airliner) causing this damage?

mickeyrat · September 2018

scroll down the list to SAGE....

http://www.dogingtonpost.com/remembering-the-hero-dogs-of-911/

PJPOWER · September 2018

Way to go Sage! Not to be morbid, but i’m guessing the canine sniffed out “pieces” of the piece of shit.
The dog must have been trained on sniffing out dog shit.

9/11 "Conspiracy" Theories

Comments

Debunking the Myths About the 9/11 Attack on the Pentagon

Debunking the Myths About the 9/11 Attack on the Pentagon

Categories