Donald Trump
Comments
-
Is he slicing garlic with a razor blade as well?
Paul Manafort thinks he's being treated like a 'VIP' in jail, special counsel says - CNN Politics https://apple.news/AJnSqSArgRcS-mZkPYwSCSw
“Had zero to do with Team Trump Treason’s campaign and Russia, Russia, Russia collusion.”
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
Gern Blansten said:It's a hopeless situation...0
-
The Juggler said:RoleModelsinBlood31 said:Thirty Bills Unpaid said:RoleModelsinBlood31 said:oftenreading said:But since you brought up the issue of GOP voters, it’s hard to ignore the statement in the article that 46% of republicans polled were in favour of Little, who is completely open about his anti-Semitic, Holocaust-denying, and yes, Nazi beliefs. 46%. So yes, maybe we can’t say that the majority of republican voters support Nazi policies, but 46% is a pretty sizeable minority.
That figure is a gauge to tell us roughly where things are at.
Someone still doesn't know the difference between polls and electoral college forecasts??? Really? Almost two year after the fact? Jesus H.........national polls had her up 2-3%. She won the popular vote by like 2.5%. They were, and are, largely accurate. State specific polling in the few states that flipped late to Trump (largely due to the Comey bombshell) was what was wrong.Trump supporters.....ugh.
0 -
tbergs said:Gern Blansten said:
He might of thought that was his cousin or something? I dunno. Just trying to see why it's like to be a Trump apologist."My brain's a good brain!"0 -
and BTW this is all I need to know about the SCOTUS nominee
Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 -
Tiki said:and BTW this is all I need to know about the SCOTUS nomineehippiemom = goodness0
-
Besides being a conservative, what's wrong with the nominee? He's not an extreme view on the court. My issue is with the process and how Garland was blocked. Changing the rules was wrong and has jaded the court moving forward.It's a hopeless situation...0
-
tbergs said:Besides being a conservative, what's wrong with the nominee? He's not an extreme view on the court. My issue is with the process and how Garland was blocked. Changing the rules was wrong and has jaded the court moving forward.1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley0 -
OnWis97 said:tbergs said:Besides being a conservative, what's wrong with the nominee? He's not an extreme view on the court. My issue is with the process and how Garland was blocked. Changing the rules was wrong and has jaded the court moving forward.It's a hopeless situation...0
-
tbergs said:Besides being a conservative, what's wrong with the nominee? He's not an extreme view on the court. My issue is with the process and how Garland was blocked. Changing the rules was wrong and has jaded the court moving forward.
This is is so true. Obama should have had his nominee for sure and trump should only be now appointing his first. And this guy is certainly qualified. Not sure I’m going to like how he rules all the time, but he’s no Scott Pruitthippiemom = goodness0 -
cincybearcat said:tbergs said:Besides being a conservative, what's wrong with the nominee? He's not an extreme view on the court. My issue is with the process and how Garland was blocked. Changing the rules was wrong and has jaded the court moving forward.
This is is so true. Obama should have had his nominee for sure and trump should only be now appointing his first. And this guy is certainly qualified. Not sure I’m going to like how he rules all the time, but he’s no Scott Pruitt
This sums up how I feel about it. No matter what happens, I just cannot wrap my head around how the republicans stole a supreme court seat. That didn't generate the outrage it should have.And, like I said yesterday, I also have a problem with a president being allowed to pick one while under an fbi investigation.
Post edited by The Juggler onwww.myspace.com0 -
He's not Merrick Garland AND if those 2 assholes and all the senate R's line up and are for him, then I'm against him.
Rage is a perfectly acceptable as motivation.Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 -
-
trump bashes on our ally which pissed off John Kelly, or at least that’s what we thought. Well the white house let us know the real story. Keep it classy, trump:
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said John Kelly "was displeased because he was expecting a full breakfast and there were only pastries and cheese."
0 -
Go Beavers said:BS44325 said:oftenreading said:But since you brought up the issue of GOP voters, it’s hard to ignore the statement in the article that 46% of republicans polled were in favour of Little, who is completely open about his anti-Semitic, Holocaust-denying, and yes, Nazi beliefs. 46%. So yes, maybe we can’t say that the majority of republican voters support Nazi policies, but 46% is a pretty sizeable minority.0
-
The Juggler said:cincybearcat said:tbergs said:Besides being a conservative, what's wrong with the nominee? He's not an extreme view on the court. My issue is with the process and how Garland was blocked. Changing the rules was wrong and has jaded the court moving forward.
This is is so true. Obama should have had his nominee for sure and trump should only be now appointing his first. And this guy is certainly qualified. Not sure I’m going to like how he rules all the time, but he’s no Scott Pruitt
This sums up how I feel about it. No matter what happens, I just cannot wrap my head around how the republicans stole a supreme court seat. That didn't generate the outrage it should have.And, like I said yesterday, I also have a problem with a president being allowed to pick one while under an fbi investigation.
0 -
BS44325 said:Go Beavers said:BS44325 said:oftenreading said:But since you brought up the issue of GOP voters, it’s hard to ignore the statement in the article that 46% of republicans polled were in favour of Little, who is completely open about his anti-Semitic, Holocaust-denying, and yes, Nazi beliefs. 46%. So yes, maybe we can’t say that the majority of republican voters support Nazi policies, but 46% is a pretty sizeable minority.
It says a lot that your only retort is my word choice. The meaning remains
0 -
BS44325 said:The Juggler said:cincybearcat said:tbergs said:Besides being a conservative, what's wrong with the nominee? He's not an extreme view on the court. My issue is with the process and how Garland was blocked. Changing the rules was wrong and has jaded the court moving forward.
This is is so true. Obama should have had his nominee for sure and trump should only be now appointing his first. And this guy is certainly qualified. Not sure I’m going to like how he rules all the time, but he’s no Scott Pruitt
This sums up how I feel about it. No matter what happens, I just cannot wrap my head around how the republicans stole a supreme court seat. That didn't generate the outrage it should have.And, like I said yesterday, I also have a problem with a president being allowed to pick one while under an fbi investigation.
www.myspace.com0 -
BS44325 said:The Juggler said:cincybearcat said:tbergs said:Besides being a conservative, what's wrong with the nominee? He's not an extreme view on the court. My issue is with the process and how Garland was blocked. Changing the rules was wrong and has jaded the court moving forward.
This is is so true. Obama should have had his nominee for sure and trump should only be now appointing his first. And this guy is certainly qualified. Not sure I’m going to like how he rules all the time, but he’s no Scott Pruitt
This sums up how I feel about it. No matter what happens, I just cannot wrap my head around how the republicans stole a supreme court seat. That didn't generate the outrage it should have.And, like I said yesterday, I also have a problem with a president being allowed to pick one while under an fbi investigation.
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help