Donald Trump

Options
16186196216236242954

Comments

  • HTOWN Posts: 37,489
    BS44325 said:
    I’ll stop trying to make a difference...

    No way
    Unreal. :rofl:
    I LOVE MUSIC.
    www.cluthelee.com
    www.cluthe.com
  • Posts: 6,124
    edited December 2017
    CM189191 said:
    Is that alt-right, alt-news, or alt-reality? 

    "I peered in his eyes as we stood in line just to have a look
    But the pages I found looked like an unbound coloring book
    The kids of today should defend themselves against the 70’s"

    I was close...
    Always found the idea of a guy born in ‘57 and a guy born in ‘64 telling kids in the ‘90s to defend themselves against the 70’s strange.
  • HTOWN Posts: 37,489
    ^^That’s funny.

    I think it’s strange that people support a sexist, misogynistic bigot.
    I LOVE MUSIC.
    www.cluthelee.com
    www.cluthe.com
  • Posts: 6,124
    mfc2006 said:
    ^^That’s funny.

    I think it’s strange that people support a sexist, misogynistic bigot.
    On the surface I would agree but I also recognize that people aren’t always given the choice between two clean candidates. More often then not we are choosing between poisons...and I’ll swallow poison until I grow immune.

  • Posts: 30,876
    BS44325 said:
    Now who’s being naive. NBC tried to shut him down. If Clinton was president there is no guarantee that the New Yorker would have published. I can’t believe how blind you are to big media’s complicity in covering for these people all these years.
    So because NBC wouldn't do it, the New Yorker is the only other option.  I didn't realize that in 2017 those were the only two sources.  No alternative news, no RT (where Greenwald went), no Breitbart, no twitter link,  no one else.  The story would have been dead with zero avenue of communication without Trump in office.  Jesus Christ, look at what you are writing.  It's absolute foolishness.  
  • Posts: 6,124
    mrussel1 said:
    So because NBC wouldn't do it, the New Yorker is the only other option.  I didn't realize that in 2017 those were the only two sources.  No alternative news, no RT (where Greenwald went), no Breitbart, no twitter link,  no one else.  The story would have been dead with zero avenue of communication without Trump in office.  Jesus Christ, look at what you are writing.  It's absolute foolishness.  
    Certainly there are plenty of other places to publish...but ask yourself a question: With this story being know by major players for years why did it take so long to finally go to the press? Ronan Farrow clear took the time and did the research but was obstructed by many every step of the way until eventually the protection racket collapsed. Weinstein as in tight with the Obama’s...Malia was interning for him. Weinstein was in tight with the Clinton’s. It is your obtuseness to this fact which is foolish. The powerful protected and enabled the powerful. The candidate you supported was at the top of the enabler list.
  • Maryland Posts: 16,491
    BS44325 said:
    It’s from a PJ Song. Save You. Sorry...I should have been more specific. Forgot you are one of those “I really liked the first three albums” guys.
    Could you be any more fucking full of yourself? Good god!
  • HTOWN Posts: 37,489
    BS44325 said:
    On the surface I would agree but I also recognize that people aren’t always given the choice between two clean candidates. More often then not we are choosing between poisons...and I’ll swallow poison until I grow immune.

    That’s such a bullshit position. The whole “lesser of two evils” theory has been disproven simply by the fact that there aren’t many people in this world as evil as Trump.

    There is no cure or immunity to that poison, so enjoy drinking it. 
    I LOVE MUSIC.
    www.cluthelee.com
    www.cluthe.com
  • Posts: 10,395
    BS44325 said:
    Certainly there are plenty of other places to publish...but ask yourself a question: With this story being know by major players for years why did it take so long to finally go to the press? Ronan Farrow clear took the time and did the research but was obstructed by many every step of the way until eventually the protection racket collapsed. Weinstein as in tight with the Obama’s...Malia was interning for him. Weinstein was in tight with the Clinton’s. It is your obtuseness to this fact which is foolish. The powerful protected and enabled the powerful. The candidate you supported was at the top of the enabler list.
    If that's the theory you're going to take, then who do you think Trump is enabling right now? If we're going to be subjected to the whims of powerful people, I am quite confident the Obamas and Clintons at least were more interested in improving this country as a whole and not just making money for themselves.

    From what I've seen, Trump is enabling white supremacists, sexual assaulters (after numerous allegations), racists, etc. Chide the Obamas all you want for that Weinstein relationship, but that's all speculation.
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • Posts: 30,876
    tbergs said:
    If that's the theory you're going to take, then who do you think Trump is enabling right now? If we're going to be subjected to the whims of powerful people, I am quite confident the Obamas and Clintons at least were more interested in improving this country as a whole and not just making money for themselves.

    From what I've seen, Trump is enabling white supremacists, sexual assaulters (after numerous allegations), racists, etc. Chide the Obamas all you want for that Weinstein relationship, but that's all speculation.
    His is a ridiculous position.  To say that a Clinton WH would have completely obstructed or otherwise stopped Ronan Farrow stretches credulity to the extreme.  You would have to believe that the Clintons killed Vince Foster to start making those leaps.  And to think that only a Trump victory made it all happen.  Retarded.  
  • Posts: 30,876
    Now if you say that... People were incensed that Trump got away with his sexual assault history and so Farrow was able to get people to go on the record that otherwise would not have historically.. yeah I'll give you that.  Candidate Trump's sexual assaults cleared the way for Farrow and the #metoo movement.  I'll buy that.  Congratulations on that being the head of your party.  And the most high profile #2 is a child rapist.  Good for you guys.  
  • Posts: 9,617
    BS44325 said:
    On the surface I would agree but I also recognize that people aren’t always given the choice between two clean candidates. More often then not we are choosing between poisons...and I’ll swallow poison until I grow immune.

    I'm enjoying that infusion of lyrics.

  • Posts: 6,124
    mrussel1 said:
    Now if you say that... People were incensed that Trump got away with his sexual assault history and so Farrow was able to get people to go on the record that otherwise would not have historically.. yeah I'll give you that.  Candidate Trump's sexual assaults cleared the way for Farrow and the #metoo movement.  I'll buy that.  Congratulations on that being the head of your party.  And the most high profile #2 is a child rapist.  Good for you guys.  
    This is what I am saying and it bears out by looking at the case of Ashley Judd. Ashley Judd was a massive Hillary Clinton supporter. When Clinton lost Judd was at the forefront of the women’s march lashing out at President Trump. This past October however we find out that she was sexually harassed by Harvey Weinstein who we all know was a massive fundraiser of both Clinton and Obama. Now it is not for me to judge why or when Ashley Judd decided to come forward with her story but it goes to show that until the protection racket collapsed...until the power of the Clintons evaporated on a November night...the enablers had very little to fear. It took that collapse for the brave to feel they finally had the freedom to step forward. Trump will have to deal with his history. His supporters do not blow it off. What you don’t understand is that his supporters are telling you to stop with YOUR phoniness. They know what Trump is. They don’t condone it but they will choose his ugliness over this mythical nobility your party claims to stand for. If this leads to a bipartisan bloodletting then so be it. It is long overdue and the election of your candidate would have continued the charade.
  • Posts: 6,124
    CM189191 said:

    https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/trumps-inclusive-jobs-boom/

    Pretty sure Morgan Freeman is digging the jobs report...especially the part about wages being up.
  • Posts: 6,124
    mrussel1 said:
    His is a ridiculous position.  To say that a Clinton WH would have completely obstructed or otherwise stopped Ronan Farrow stretches credulity to the extreme.  You would have to believe that the Clintons killed Vince Foster to start making those leaps.  And to think that only a Trump victory made it all happen.  Retarded.  
    We’re you asleep during the 90’s? Articles are now being written saying that maybe Juanita Broaddrick should have been believed. The Clintons had a whole team tasked with making sure that she wasn’t. Hardly a stretch of credulity to believe that they wouldn’t cover for their friends. Bill was still taking rides on Jeff Epstein’s Lolita Express for F-sakes! Wake up man!
  • BS44325 said:
    We’re you asleep during the 90’s? Articles are now being written saying that maybe Juanita Broaddrick should have been believed. The Clintons had a whole team tasked with making sure that she wasn’t. Hardly a stretch of credulity to believe that they wouldn’t cover for their friends. Bill was still taking rides on Jeff Epstein’s Lolita Express for F-sakes! Wake up man!
    It’s 2017. Three US senators are calling for Trump to resign. According to your moral superiority he should. Do you support the call for Trump’s 
     resignation?
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Posts: 30,876
    BS44325 said:
    This is what I am saying and it bears out by looking at the case of Ashley Judd. Ashley Judd was a massive Hillary Clinton supporter. When Clinton lost Judd was at the forefront of the women’s march lashing out at President Trump. This past October however we find out that she was sexually harassed by Harvey Weinstein who we all know was a massive fundraiser of both Clinton and Obama. Now it is not for me to judge why or when Ashley Judd decided to come forward with her story but it goes to show that until the protection racket collapsed...until the power of the Clintons evaporated on a November night...the enablers had very little to fear. It took that collapse for the brave to feel they finally had the freedom to step forward. Trump will have to deal with his history. His supporters do not blow it off. What you don’t understand is that his supporters are telling you to stop with YOUR phoniness. They know what Trump is. They don’t condone it but they will choose his ugliness over this mythical nobility your party claims to stand for. If this leads to a bipartisan bloodletting then so be it. It is long overdue and the election of your candidate would have continued the charade.
    MY phoniness?  What is my phoniness?  And your bullshit spin is just another example of a right winger seeking to twist every event into a validation of their fucked up, racist, xenophobic, uber-"masculine" worldview.  But I'm not buying that shit.  Trump's base elected him AFTER the allegations.  Alabama will elect Moore (likely) AFTER the allegations.  What do we see on the D side?  Oh right.. Franken and Conyers resigning.  That's the reality. One side is holding their officials accountable.  The other is doubling down. 
  • USA Posts: 11,059
    Eh...
    Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 06132018
  • USA Posts: 11,059
    Roy Moore likes little girls and Trumpito likes Roy Moore.

    Here’s a reminder of what behavior the president has been accused of.  He should fucking resign.

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/11/what-happened-to-trumps-16-sexual-misconduct-accusers.html
    Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 06132018
  • USA Posts: 11,059
    he also did this on a trip to Pearl Harbor.  So classy.


    Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 06132018
This discussion has been closed.