Donald Trump

14954964985005012954

Comments

  • Posts: 31,007
    dignin said:
    Recent polling shows that the vast majority of republicans support Trump but don't support the party. Things evolve, this is now the republican party.


    Republicans are signaling they prefer President Donald Trump's vision for the party, with 79% saying he is taking it in the right direction. A majority of GOP voters -- 53% -- believe Republican leaders in Congress are taking the party in the wrong direction.

    http://edition.cnn.com/2017/09/24/politics/cnn-poll-republican-party-approval/index.html

    I actually think it's the Lemming state.  But maybe not.  Maybe he is the voice of those "Republicans".  The whole thing is scary, to be honest.  It doesn't worry me that the country is so partisan so much as it being linked to race.  
  • Posts: 13,576
    mrussel1 said:
    I actually think it's the Lemming state.  But maybe not.  Maybe he is the voice of those "Republicans".  The whole thing is scary, to be honest.  It doesn't worry me that the country is so partisan so much as it being linked to race.  
    The jingoism is just as scary to me.
    For the first time in my life, I have an insight into how the world wars happened that came from my actual life and not a historical account.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • Posts: 31,007
    rgambs said:
    The jingoism is just as scary to me.
    For the first time in my life, I have an insight into how the world wars happened that came from my actual life and not a historical account.
    True, although jingoism was just a rampant after 9/11, leading up to the war.  Remember the Dixie Chicks and how their career was basically destroyed in country music?  The difference here is the capacity of NK to level a country or even two with their weapons.  Iraq didn't have that capacity.  
  • Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,804
    rgambs said:
    An island full of Americans without power and water and Trump is tweeting about the NFL.
    Idiot.
    My first thought as well.
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • Regarding what you said about 'welfare stability, and not growth', you know the rate of people on public assistance has been dropping for several years now. 
    Not untrue, but that is short sighted.  There are many forms of public assistance, but let's look at food stamps alone.  
    25M enrolled in 2005
    47M in 2013 (all time high)
    41M in 2016 

    Down in 3 years, but nearly doubled 2005-2013.
    $1 TRILLION is spent on PA each year.  

    Please don't confuse this with eliminating public programs, or leaving people hungry.  But it's a staggering number and I don't think our systems do enough to lift people out of PA.   
    Atlanta 2003
    Columbia 2008
    Charlotte 2013
    Seattle 2013
    Greenville 2016
  • Posts: 13,576
    mrussel1 said:
    True, although jingoism was just a rampant after 9/11, leading up to the war.  Remember the Dixie Chicks and how their career was basically destroyed in country music?  The difference here is the capacity of NK to level a country or even two with their weapons.  Iraq didn't have that capacity.  
    It was, it's been simmering ever since Hulk Hogan played the American flag guitar.

    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • Posts: 31,007
    rgambs said:
    It was, it's been simmering ever since Hulk Hogan played the American flag guitar.

    Most bad things can be traced to the Hulkster and Hulkamania broadly.
  • Posts: 31,007
    Not untrue, but that is short sighted.  There are many forms of public assistance, but let's look at food stamps alone.  
    25M enrolled in 2005
    47M in 2013 (all time high)
    41M in 2016 

    Down in 3 years, but nearly doubled 2005-2013.
    $1 TRILLION is spent on PA each year.  

    Please don't confuse this with eliminating public programs, or leaving people hungry.  But it's a staggering number and I don't think our systems do enough to lift people out of PA.   
    A good piece of that rise is linked to the recession I imagine.  The timing seems to substantiate that. 
  • mrussel1 said:
    A good piece of that rise is linked to the recession I imagine.  The timing seems to substantiate that. 
    Yes, very likely related.  Like many things, it takes longer rebound than it does for something to get bad.  I'd like to know how or if the existing programs were tweaked to help these situations.  
    Atlanta 2003
    Columbia 2008
    Charlotte 2013
    Seattle 2013
    Greenville 2016
  • Posts: 31,007
    Yes, very likely related.  Like many things, it takes longer rebound than it does for something to get bad.  I'd like to know how or if the existing programs were tweaked to help these situations.  
    Yes, according to this document (which is a good read).  It said that the ARRA (remember Obama's bill) allowed able bodied individuals to get up to 18 months of SNAP vs the previous limit of 90 days.  This was due to the high unemployment.  I imagine that provision has expired.  It also discusses other policy changes that affect participation.  But reading this, it further stands to reason that the growth was related to the recession.  
    https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/25626/412613-SNAP-s-Role-in-the-Great-Recession-and-Beyond.PDF
  • Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 11,673
    mrussel1 said:
    Most bad things can be traced to the Hulkster and Hulkamania broadly.
    SERIOUSLY??!!
    Now I have to add Hulk Hogan to this list.....

    President Obama
    Bill Clinton
    Hillary Clinton
    Kamala Harris
    Comet PIzza
    Emails
    Benghazi
    etc...

  • St. Paul, MN Posts: 5,714
    I should have been more clear when putting myself out here.  I stated I am a republican voter.  I'm not the guy that defends Trump's every move.  Those are the people I think you're looking for.  I'm not that person.  So I'm not going to defend a lot of what is taking place.  I can't, I won't.  What has transpired is far from my hopes of a Trump presidency. Outside of my 401(k) growth, not a whole lot has been accomplished that I can be proud of.  I did NOT vote for Trump in the primaries.  I did not think he was a serious candidate.  

    I won't go line by line how I feel about all the issues, but I still support much of the republican agenda.  Specifically replacement of the ACA, immigration reform, social program and welfare stability (not growth), among others.  Given my feelings on the issues, I would not have voted democrat in the 2016 election.  





    He wasn't.  That's no longer a requirement.  Or even preferred.
    1995 Milwaukee   1998 Alpine, Alpine     2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston     2004 Boston, Boston     2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty)     2011 Alpine, Alpine    2013 Wrigley     2014 St. Paul     2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley     2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley     2021 Asbury Park     2022 St Louis     2023 Austin, Austin   2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley   2025 Nashville (II)
  • St. Paul, MN Posts: 5,714
    dignin said:
    Recent polling shows that the vast majority of republicans support Trump but don't support the party. Things evolve, this is now the republican party.


    Republicans are signaling they prefer President Donald Trump's vision for the party, with 79% saying he is taking it in the right direction. A majority of GOP voters -- 53% -- believe Republican leaders in Congress are taking the party in the wrong direction.

    http://edition.cnn.com/2017/09/24/politics/cnn-poll-republican-party-approval/index.html

    And yet most of the left doesn't think he has a chance to be re-elected. 
    1995 Milwaukee   1998 Alpine, Alpine     2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston     2004 Boston, Boston     2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty)     2011 Alpine, Alpine    2013 Wrigley     2014 St. Paul     2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley     2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley     2021 Asbury Park     2022 St Louis     2023 Austin, Austin   2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley   2025 Nashville (II)
  • Posts: 9,689
    mrussel1 said:
    Yes, according to this document (which is a good read).  It said that the ARRA (remember Obama's bill) allowed able bodied individuals to get up to 18 months of SNAP vs the previous limit of 90 days.  This was due to the high unemployment.  I imagine that provision has expired.  It also discusses other policy changes that affect participation.  But reading this, it further stands to reason that the growth was related to the recession.  
    https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/25626/412613-SNAP-s-Role-in-the-Great-Recession-and-Beyond.PDF
    It was definately due to the recession and wage lag. Most food stamp recipients are on it short term and also work. If the economy goes okay, it'll get to pre-recession levels in five years or so. Another problem is disproportionate high use in nearly every rural red county. It seems like they want to cling to dead economies.                                       

  • Posts: 10,513
    All of this and the opposing party is still here:

    http://time.com/magazine/
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • Posts: 6,927
    Not untrue, but that is short sighted.  There are many forms of public assistance, but let's look at food stamps alone.  
    25M enrolled in 2005
    47M in 2013 (all time high)
    41M in 2016 

    Down in 3 years, but nearly doubled 2005-2013.
    $1 TRILLION is spent on PA each year.  

    Please don't confuse this with eliminating public programs, or leaving people hungry.  But it's a staggering number and I don't think our systems do enough to lift people out of PA.   
    I agree, there’s no reason the federal government should maintain 79 different means-tested programs.  States should combine different forms of federal anti-poverty funding—food stamps, housing assistance, and more—into a single funding stream.  A guaranteed basic income would reduce government and offer citizens more control.  
  • Posts: 9,689
    It's odd that the author is pushing the notion of some hidden welfare spending. All of the info he presents has been in the discussion for a long time. Something he breezed past was the fact that medical care is almost half of means tested welfare spending. Certainly a focus that would help the budget would be reducing medical costs. 
  • Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,972
    You have to include the photo of the guy with his dogs because it's awesome.

    That's one of the best photos of all time, lol.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,972
    edited September 2017
    Latest tweet from President Trump folks....


    Great solidarity for our National Anthem and for our Country. Standing with locked arms is good, kneeling is not acceptable. Bad ratings! Please to inform that the Champion Pittsburgh Penguins of the NHL will be joining me at the White House for Ceremony. Great team!

    I wonder why he thinks anyone should give a flying fuck about what this totally unacceptable man thinks is acceptable? Laughable.
    As for the Penguins.... shame on them.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Winnipeg Posts: 40,118
    PJ_Soul said:
    I wonder why he thinks anyone should give a flying fuck about what this totally unacceptable man thinks is acceptable? Laughable.
    As for the Penguins.... shame on them.
    seems to be extreme narcissism. I really think he believes all americans are his subjects. 

    just once, I want him to fuck up and utter the "n" word in public or within ear shot. that would be glorious. 
    Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer



This discussion has been closed.