What was the last movie you watched?

1329330332334335836

Comments

  • i_lov_it
    i_lov_it Perth, Western Australia Posts: 4,007
    edited September 2017
    PJ_Soul said:
    I also saw It.

    As a huge SK fan I am happy to say that this movie is awesome. It totally lived up to the hype. :) This is clearly a movie made by real King fans. It is really true to the spirit of the novel, as well as the story for the most part. I think any changes that were made were made for very good reasons, and they actually enhanced the movie. They relegated some of the kids to more secondary roles too, but that actually worked well for the sake of the film format, so I had no problem with that. And the 27 year time shift from the book to the movie (kids in the 80s instead of the 50s) works very well. I was a little dubious about that, but it was done right. And the acting is just great and Pennywise is SOOOOOO good!

    I feel like this movie will actually be better for people who are really familiar with the book. There are a lot of things, some subtle, that related to the book in a way that would only really be understood or appreciated by fans of that book. Same goes with the entire feel and tone of the movie, actually. So I found that interesting and appreciated it. I would actually recommend that people who haven't already read the book before seeing the movie because it enhances the film experience. I am not sure I have ever said that about an adaptation before.

    I never go to see movies on opening weekend, so maybe this is normal for that time in a movie's life and I just didn't realise it, but the packed theatre crowd was hilarious! I have never seen an audience so enthusiastically engaged, lol. Everyone was applauding at parts, and cheering, and there was a big round of applause at the end. All the megafans were out in force. It was really fun!

    And holy, are they ever going to clean up with this one. The film was playing constantly all day long in at least 4 theatres at the Cineplex by my house, and every theatre was sold out for every showing, and everyone was stoked. The place was a gong show (in a good way). I've never seen it like that before! I think this is thanks to some of the greatest and most creative movie marketing in the history of movies. I am impressed. Especially since the movie lived up to it.

    One thing I didn't realize was that this is a two-parter. I started assuming once we were an hour and a half in with still no sign of the present day with the adults. I am excited to see the next one!!

    Oh, and this one is LIGHT YEARS better than previous attempts. But I say that as someone who thinks previous adaptations of It absolutely suck. I never understood why anyone liked either one if them. Someone called this version "slightly better" than the 90s one. I couldn't disagree more. This version is a zillion times better.
    So this is a Really Good review Alli...so better then the Original?...That's impressive...
    Post edited by i_lov_it on
  • PJ_Soul said:
    I also saw It.

    As a huge SK fan I am happy to say that this movie is awesome. It totally lived up to the hype. :) This is clearly a movie made by real King fans. It is really true to the spirit of the novel, as well as the story for the most part. I think any changes that were made were made for very good reasons, and they actually enhanced the movie. They relegated some of the kids to more secondary roles too, but that actually worked well for the sake of the film format, so I had no problem with that. And the 27 year time shift from the book to the movie (kids in the 80s instead of the 50s) works very well. I was a little dubious about that, but it was done right. And the acting is just great and Pennywise is SOOOOOO good!

    I feel like this movie will actually be better for people who are really familiar with the book. There are a lot of things, some subtle, that related to the book in a way that would only really be understood or appreciated by fans of that book. Same goes with the entire feel and tone of the movie, actually. So I found that interesting and appreciated it. I would actually recommend that people who haven't already read the book before seeing the movie because it enhances the film experience. I am not sure I have ever said that about an adaptation before.

    I never go to see movies on opening weekend, so maybe this is normal for that time in a movie's life and I just didn't realise it, but the packed theatre crowd was hilarious! I have never seen an audience so enthusiastically engaged, lol. Everyone was applauding at parts, and cheering, and there was a big round of applause at the end. All the megafans were out in force. It was really fun!

    And holy, are they ever going to clean up with this one. The film was playing constantly all day long in at least 4 theatres at the Cineplex by my house, and every theatre was sold out for every showing, and everyone was stoked. The place was a gong show (in a good way). I've never seen it like that before! I think this is thanks to some of the greatest and most creative movie marketing in the history of movies. I am impressed. Especially since the movie lived up to it.

    One thing I didn't realize was that this is a two-parter. I started assuming once we were an hour and a half in with still no sign of the present day with the adults. I am excited to see the next one!!

    Oh, and this one is LIGHT YEARS better than previous attempts. But I say that as someone who thinks previous adaptations of It absolutely suck. I never understood why anyone liked either one if them. Someone called this version "slightly better" than the 90s one. I couldn't disagree more. This version is a zillion times better.
    Just back from the film.  The book was damn right scary, this was not.  Good movie, I overhyped it.
  • dankind
    dankind Posts: 20,841
    PJ_Soul said:
    I also saw It.

    As a huge SK fan I am happy to say that this movie is awesome. It totally lived up to the hype. :) This is clearly a movie made by real King fans. It is really true to the spirit of the novel, as well as the story for the most part. I think any changes that were made were made for very good reasons, and they actually enhanced the movie. They relegated some of the kids to more secondary roles too, but that actually worked well for the sake of the film format, so I had no problem with that. And the 27 year time shift from the book to the movie (kids in the 80s instead of the 50s) works very well. I was a little dubious about that, but it was done right. And the acting is just great and Pennywise is SOOOOOO good!

    I feel like this movie will actually be better for people who are really familiar with the book. There are a lot of things, some subtle, that related to the book in a way that would only really be understood or appreciated by fans of that book. Same goes with the entire feel and tone of the movie, actually. So I found that interesting and appreciated it. I would actually recommend that people who haven't already read the book before seeing the movie because it enhances the film experience. I am not sure I have ever said that about an adaptation before.

    I never go to see movies on opening weekend, so maybe this is normal for that time in a movie's life and I just didn't realise it, but the packed theatre crowd was hilarious! I have never seen an audience so enthusiastically engaged, lol. Everyone was applauding at parts, and cheering, and there was a big round of applause at the end. All the megafans were out in force. It was really fun!

    And holy, are they ever going to clean up with this one. The film was playing constantly all day long in at least 4 theatres at the Cineplex by my house, and every theatre was sold out for every showing, and everyone was stoked. The place was a gong show (in a good way). I've never seen it like that before! I think this is thanks to some of the greatest and most creative movie marketing in the history of movies. I am impressed. Especially since the movie lived up to it.

    One thing I didn't realize was that this is a two-parter. I started assuming once we were an hour and a half in with still no sign of the present day with the adults. I am excited to see the next one!!

    Oh, and this one is LIGHT YEARS better than previous attempts. But I say that as someone who thinks previous adaptations of It absolutely suck. I never understood why anyone liked either one if them. Someone called this version "slightly better" than the 90s one. I couldn't disagree more. This version is a zillion times better.
    Just back from the film.  The book was damn right scary, this was not.  Good movie, I overhyped it.
    I haven't seen the film yet, but I remember one huge disappointment from the miniseries was how unscary the monster was compared with all of IT's other manifestations (Pennywise, etc.). I hope the filmmakers learned from that shortcoming and left the creature more to the imagination than the miniseries did. All of the other manifestations were grounded in some sort of reality, whereas the monster was just ridiculous when attempted in a mostly realistic miniseries.  
    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • dankind said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    I also saw It.

    As a huge SK fan I am happy to say that this movie is awesome. It totally lived up to the hype. :) This is clearly a movie made by real King fans. It is really true to the spirit of the novel, as well as the story for the most part. I think any changes that were made were made for very good reasons, and they actually enhanced the movie. They relegated some of the kids to more secondary roles too, but that actually worked well for the sake of the film format, so I had no problem with that. And the 27 year time shift from the book to the movie (kids in the 80s instead of the 50s) works very well. I was a little dubious about that, but it was done right. And the acting is just great and Pennywise is SOOOOOO good!

    I feel like this movie will actually be better for people who are really familiar with the book. There are a lot of things, some subtle, that related to the book in a way that would only really be understood or appreciated by fans of that book. Same goes with the entire feel and tone of the movie, actually. So I found that interesting and appreciated it. I would actually recommend that people who haven't already read the book before seeing the movie because it enhances the film experience. I am not sure I have ever said that about an adaptation before.

    I never go to see movies on opening weekend, so maybe this is normal for that time in a movie's life and I just didn't realise it, but the packed theatre crowd was hilarious! I have never seen an audience so enthusiastically engaged, lol. Everyone was applauding at parts, and cheering, and there was a big round of applause at the end. All the megafans were out in force. It was really fun!

    And holy, are they ever going to clean up with this one. The film was playing constantly all day long in at least 4 theatres at the Cineplex by my house, and every theatre was sold out for every showing, and everyone was stoked. The place was a gong show (in a good way). I've never seen it like that before! I think this is thanks to some of the greatest and most creative movie marketing in the history of movies. I am impressed. Especially since the movie lived up to it.

    One thing I didn't realize was that this is a two-parter. I started assuming once we were an hour and a half in with still no sign of the present day with the adults. I am excited to see the next one!!

    Oh, and this one is LIGHT YEARS better than previous attempts. But I say that as someone who thinks previous adaptations of It absolutely suck. I never understood why anyone liked either one if them. Someone called this version "slightly better" than the 90s one. I couldn't disagree more. This version is a zillion times better.
    Just back from the film.  The book was damn right scary, this was not.  Good movie, I overhyped it.
    I haven't seen the film yet, but I remember one huge disappointment from the miniseries was how unscary the monster was compared with all of IT's other manifestations (Pennywise, etc.). I hope the filmmakers learned from that shortcoming and left the creature more to the imagination than the miniseries did. All of the other manifestations were grounded in some sort of reality, whereas the monster was just ridiculous when attempted in a mostly realistic miniseries.  
    Was telling my wife on our walk home that this was one of those films where I thought less would have actually been more.  Take that for what it's worth.
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,707
    edited September 2017
    PJ_Soul said:
    I also saw It.

    As a huge SK fan I am happy to say that this movie is awesome. It totally lived up to the hype. :) This is clearly a movie made by real King fans. It is really true to the spirit of the novel, as well as the story for the most part. I think any changes that were made were made for very good reasons, and they actually enhanced the movie. They relegated some of the kids to more secondary roles too, but that actually worked well for the sake of the film format, so I had no problem with that. And the 27 year time shift from the book to the movie (kids in the 80s instead of the 50s) works very well. I was a little dubious about that, but it was done right. And the acting is just great and Pennywise is SOOOOOO good!

    I feel like this movie will actually be better for people who are really familiar with the book. There are a lot of things, some subtle, that related to the book in a way that would only really be understood or appreciated by fans of that book. Same goes with the entire feel and tone of the movie, actually. So I found that interesting and appreciated it. I would actually recommend that people who haven't already read the book before seeing the movie because it enhances the film experience. I am not sure I have ever said that about an adaptation before.

    I never go to see movies on opening weekend, so maybe this is normal for that time in a movie's life and I just didn't realise it, but the packed theatre crowd was hilarious! I have never seen an audience so enthusiastically engaged, lol. Everyone was applauding at parts, and cheering, and there was a big round of applause at the end. All the megafans were out in force. It was really fun!

    And holy, are they ever going to clean up with this one. The film was playing constantly all day long in at least 4 theatres at the Cineplex by my house, and every theatre was sold out for every showing, and everyone was stoked. The place was a gong show (in a good way). I've never seen it like that before! I think this is thanks to some of the greatest and most creative movie marketing in the history of movies. I am impressed. Especially since the movie lived up to it.

    One thing I didn't realize was that this is a two-parter. I started assuming once we were an hour and a half in with still no sign of the present day with the adults. I am excited to see the next one!!

    Oh, and this one is LIGHT YEARS better than previous attempts. But I say that as someone who thinks previous adaptations of It absolutely suck. I never understood why anyone liked either one if them. Someone called this version "slightly better" than the 90s one. I couldn't disagree more. This version is a zillion times better.
    Just back from the film.  The book was damn right scary, this was not.  Good movie, I overhyped it.
    It definitely isn't a terrifying horror movie. It's got more of a Goonies feel to it in a way, with a little Stand By Me mixed in. Kind of more of an adventure story with a really awesomely gruesome clown involved.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,707
    edited September 2017
    Speaking of not scary, I watched Psycho II last night. I'd seen some of it before, but not the whole thing. It's not terrible, but not close to good either.
    Anyone seen the Psycho remake with Vince Vaughan btw? I actually thought it was pretty effective. Vince Vaughan is a fairly unlikeable actor, but he really suited this role IMO.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    I also saw It.

    As a huge SK fan I am happy to say that this movie is awesome. It totally lived up to the hype. :) This is clearly a movie made by real King fans. It is really true to the spirit of the novel, as well as the story for the most part. I think any changes that were made were made for very good reasons, and they actually enhanced the movie. They relegated some of the kids to more secondary roles too, but that actually worked well for the sake of the film format, so I had no problem with that. And the 27 year time shift from the book to the movie (kids in the 80s instead of the 50s) works very well. I was a little dubious about that, but it was done right. And the acting is just great and Pennywise is SOOOOOO good!

    I feel like this movie will actually be better for people who are really familiar with the book. There are a lot of things, some subtle, that related to the book in a way that would only really be understood or appreciated by fans of that book. Same goes with the entire feel and tone of the movie, actually. So I found that interesting and appreciated it. I would actually recommend that people who haven't already read the book before seeing the movie because it enhances the film experience. I am not sure I have ever said that about an adaptation before.

    I never go to see movies on opening weekend, so maybe this is normal for that time in a movie's life and I just didn't realise it, but the packed theatre crowd was hilarious! I have never seen an audience so enthusiastically engaged, lol. Everyone was applauding at parts, and cheering, and there was a big round of applause at the end. All the megafans were out in force. It was really fun!

    And holy, are they ever going to clean up with this one. The film was playing constantly all day long in at least 4 theatres at the Cineplex by my house, and every theatre was sold out for every showing, and everyone was stoked. The place was a gong show (in a good way). I've never seen it like that before! I think this is thanks to some of the greatest and most creative movie marketing in the history of movies. I am impressed. Especially since the movie lived up to it.

    One thing I didn't realize was that this is a two-parter. I started assuming once we were an hour and a half in with still no sign of the present day with the adults. I am excited to see the next one!!

    Oh, and this one is LIGHT YEARS better than previous attempts. But I say that as someone who thinks previous adaptations of It absolutely suck. I never understood why anyone liked either one if them. Someone called this version "slightly better" than the 90s one. I couldn't disagree more. This version is a zillion times better.
    Just back from the film.  The book was damn right scary, this was not.  Good movie, I overhyped it.
    It definitely isn't a terrifying horror movie. It's got more of a Goonies feel to it in a way, with a little Stand By Me mixed in. Kind of more of an adventure story with a really awesomely gruesome clown involved.
    Definitely. The comradery between the kids was excellent.  I laughed out loud numerous times.
  • eeriepadave
    eeriepadave West Chester, PA Posts: 43,274
    PJ_Soul said:
    Speaking of not scary, I watched Psycho II last night. I'd seen some of it before, but not the whole thing. It's not terrible, but not close to good either.
    Anyone seen the Psycho remake with Vince Vaughan btw? I actually thought it was pretty effective. Vince Vaughan is a fairly unlikeable actor, but he really suited this role IMO.

    PJ_Soul said:
    Speaking of not scary, I watched Psycho II last night. I'd seen some of it before, but not the whole thing. It's not terrible, but not close to good either.
    Anyone seen the Psycho remake with Vince Vaughan btw? I actually thought it was pretty effective. Vince Vaughan is a fairly unlikeable actor, but he really suited this role IMO.
    i saw Psycho II a few years ago.  it was ok.  Never seen the remake though.
    8/28/98- Camden, NJ
    10/31/09- Philly
    5/21/10- NYC
    9/2/12- Philly, PA
    7/19/13- Wrigley
    10/19/13- Brooklyn, NY
    10/21/13- Philly, PA
    10/22/13- Philly, PA
    10/27/13- Baltimore, MD
    4/28/16- Philly, PA
    4/29/16- Philly, PA
    5/1/16- NYC
    5/2/16- NYC
    9/2/18- Boston, MA
    9/4/18- Boston, MA
    9/14/22- Camden, NJ
    9/7/24- Philly, PA
    9/9/24- Philly, PA
    Tres Mts.- 3/23/11- Philly. PA
    Eddie Vedder- 6/25/11- Philly, PA
    RNDM- 3/9/16- Philly, PA
  • dankind
    dankind Posts: 20,841
    The Bad News Bears (1976)
    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • dankind
    dankind Posts: 20,841
    Jaws 2
    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • War Dogs
    ********************************
    "Forgive every being,
    the bad feelings 
    it's just me"


  • dankind
    dankind Posts: 20,841
    Zoolander

    First time. That was awful. I thought that about 3 minutes of the film were mildly amusing -- namely, the riff on 2001: A Space Odyssey when they're trying to get into the computer. The rest was trash. 

    I've skipped this one for many years because Ben Stiller's scripts and direction just don't resonate with me at all.

    He's a killer actor, though.
    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • markymark550
    markymark550 Columbia, SC Posts: 5,219
    Role Models

    Seen it a couple of times and it still makes me laugh.
  • Dr. Delight
    Dr. Delight Posts: 11,210
    It Comes at Night
    Bleh, not the type of movie I was expecting. 

    And so you see, I have come to doubt
    All that I once held as true
    I stand alone without beliefs
    The only truth I know is you.
  • dankind
    dankind Posts: 20,841
    The Boondock Saints
    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • goldrush
    goldrush everybody knows this is nowhere Posts: 7,806
    The Usual Suspects was on TV last night. Still a really great movie
    “Do not postpone happiness”
    (Jeff Tweedy, Sydney 2007)

    “Put yer good money on the sunrise”
    (Tim Rogers)
  • CROJAM95
    CROJAM95 Posts: 10,877
    dankind said:
    Zoolander

    First time. That was awful. I thought that about 3 minutes of the film were mildly amusing -- namely, the riff on 2001: A Space Odyssey when they're trying to get into the computer. The rest was trash. 

    I've skipped this one for many years because Ben Stiller's scripts and direction just don't resonate with me at all.

    He's a killer actor, though.
    Tropic Thunder is awesome!! Robert Downey alone haha

    zoolander 2 was a steaming pile o shit
  • dankind
    dankind Posts: 20,841
    CROJAM95 said:
    dankind said:
    Zoolander

    First time. That was awful. I thought that about 3 minutes of the film were mildly amusing -- namely, the riff on 2001: A Space Odyssey when they're trying to get into the computer. The rest was trash. 

    I've skipped this one for many years because Ben Stiller's scripts and direction just don't resonate with me at all.

    He's a killer actor, though.
    Tropic Thunder is awesome!! Robert Downey alone haha

    zoolander 2 was a steaming pile o shit
    Tropic Thunder was probably his best effort, but I don't like that one much either. 
    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,598
    dankind said:
    CROJAM95 said:
    dankind said:
    Zoolander

    First time. That was awful. I thought that about 3 minutes of the film were mildly amusing -- namely, the riff on 2001: A Space Odyssey when they're trying to get into the computer. The rest was trash. 

    I've skipped this one for many years because Ben Stiller's scripts and direction just don't resonate with me at all.

    He's a killer actor, though.
    Tropic Thunder is awesome!! Robert Downey alone haha

    zoolander 2 was a steaming pile o shit
    Tropic Thunder was probably his best effort, but I don't like that one much either. 
    I don't like YOU much either
    www.myspace.com
  • dankind
    dankind Posts: 20,841
    dankind said:
    CROJAM95 said:
    dankind said:
    Zoolander

    First time. That was awful. I thought that about 3 minutes of the film were mildly amusing -- namely, the riff on 2001: A Space Odyssey when they're trying to get into the computer. The rest was trash. 

    I've skipped this one for many years because Ben Stiller's scripts and direction just don't resonate with me at all.

    He's a killer actor, though.
    Tropic Thunder is awesome!! Robert Downey alone haha

    zoolander 2 was a steaming pile o shit
    Tropic Thunder was probably his best effort, but I don't like that one much either. 
    I don't like YOU much either

    I SAW PEARL JAM