Hillary won more votes for President
Comments
-
It's lunchtime somewhere, walnut sauce pizza sounds delious!JC29856 said:Gern Blansten said:California defense attorney E. Randal Schoenberg, who successfully sued to have a search warrant for Hillary Clinton’s emails released, said on Tuesday that the order did not meet the standard of probable cause.
The warrant which was unsealed on Tuesday suggests that federal magistrate Kevin Fox in Manhattan granted the Oct. 30 warrant to search Anthony Weiner’s laptop “based exclusively on the FBI’s contention” that it may have contained classified emails exchanged between Clinton and Weiner’s wife, Huma Abedin, according to Politico.
Schoenberg wrote on Facebook that he was “appalled” after seeing the warrant because the FBI had presented “nothing at all” that amounted to probable cause.
“You will have to ask Judge Fox, or the agent in charge (whose name has been redacted), or Director Comey, why they thought they might find evidence of a crime, why they felt it necessary to inform Congress, and why they even sought this search warrant,” Schoenberg said.
Yeah you fell for that bullshit.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
A lot of Democrats I know, and some are family members, are so out of touch with the common struggles of every day people because of their income status level, it is not funny. This elite mindframe of Democrats in general is not working. It doesn't work for the people of this country and now it doesn't work for Democrats. Because they lost the election. Time to learn the lesson and start over again.JC29856 said:
Crazy that they got away with it for that long. Considering the base, maybe not.Free said:Same old same old Democratic Party doesn't work anymore!
0 -
What's ironic, is this is being used to explain part of her downfall. Trump out offended/derided people of all types on a daily basis so to believe her one slip of the tongue was the end is ridiculous. Trump just got away with it for some reason. Maybe because he was consistent with being offensive and rude.JimmyV said:
After she got caught on tape saying it at a high priced fundraiser, yes she did apologize. The damage was already done. It reaffirmed the belief that she (like Romney) was an out of touch elitist and (also like Romney) gave her opponent a rallying cry. You can't really blame right-wing news when the candidate steps in it like that.Gern Blansten said:
yes and then she apologized and said she shouldn't have said "half"HughFreakingDillon said:
well, she did say "half of his supporters are deplorables" or something of the like. half is a lot.Gern Blansten said:
to be clear....she was referring to racists and the likeJimmyV said:The "basket of deplorables" line will live forever in our political lexicon. Right alongside Watergate, swiftboating, October Surprise and the 47 percent. Who talks that way about the electorate when they are trying to win votes? Clinton held white, male, Midwestern voters in contempt, just the same as Mitt Romney did the 47 percent. Both believed they were going to win the election. Neither one did.
The platform can certainly be tweaked, but the platform was not the problem. The candidate was the problem. I harp on this not because Hillary Clinton is some villain who deserves it. She isn't. I do it because the Democratic party decided on her long before a single primary vote was cast...and then she lost to Donald Trump! This didn't need to happen. We can't let it happen again.
The morons who labeled themselves "deplorables" for being Trump supporters were clearly following the right wing bullshit news.It's a hopeless situation...0 -
That doesn't make sense. Democrats as a party support an increased minimum wage, health insurance for all, policies that strengthen workers rights, etc.Free said:
A lot of Democrats I know, and some are family members, are so out of touch with the common struggles of every day people because of their income status level, it is not funny. This elite mindframe of Democrats in general is not working. It doesn't work for the people of this country and now it doesn't work for Democrats. Because they lost the election. Time to learn the lesson and start over again.JC29856 said:
Crazy that they got away with it for that long. Considering the base, maybe not.Free said:Same old same old Democratic Party doesn't work anymore!
The GOP opposes those things. Who lost touch?Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
This is a fair point. I think on some level many people viewed Trump's act as just that, an act. Like he was playing a character. Plus, most of his comments were made in public. He wasn't hiding them, although he did often deny them. Clinton on the other hand made her comments behind the closed doors of a fundraiser. It came across as an honest moment, a rare glimpse into what she really believed. That's why I think it was more damaging.tbergs said:
What's ironic, is this is being used to explain part of her downfall. Trump out offended/derided people of all types on a daily basis so to believe her one slip of the tongue was the end is ridiculous. Trump just got away with it for some reason. Maybe because he was consistent with being offensive and rude.JimmyV said:
After she got caught on tape saying it at a high priced fundraiser, yes she did apologize. The damage was already done. It reaffirmed the belief that she (like Romney) was an out of touch elitist and (also like Romney) gave her opponent a rallying cry. You can't really blame right-wing news when the candidate steps in it like that.Gern Blansten said:
yes and then she apologized and said she shouldn't have said "half"HughFreakingDillon said:
well, she did say "half of his supporters are deplorables" or something of the like. half is a lot.Gern Blansten said:
to be clear....she was referring to racists and the likeJimmyV said:The "basket of deplorables" line will live forever in our political lexicon. Right alongside Watergate, swiftboating, October Surprise and the 47 percent. Who talks that way about the electorate when they are trying to win votes? Clinton held white, male, Midwestern voters in contempt, just the same as Mitt Romney did the 47 percent. Both believed they were going to win the election. Neither one did.
The platform can certainly be tweaked, but the platform was not the problem. The candidate was the problem. I harp on this not because Hillary Clinton is some villain who deserves it. She isn't. I do it because the Democratic party decided on her long before a single primary vote was cast...and then she lost to Donald Trump! This didn't need to happen. We can't let it happen again.
The morons who labeled themselves "deplorables" for being Trump supporters were clearly following the right wing bullshit news.___________________________________________
"...I changed by not changing at all..."0 -
Jesus, like many Dems, you are very resistant to look at your party & just continue to look at Trump or Russia etc. The Dem party is out of touch. Trump appealed to more than Hillary did. (scary, but true) Trump was anti-establishment, Hillary represented more continued establishment. We saw how many millions of people following Sanders and Trump are anti-establishment.Gern Blansten said:
That doesn't make sense. Democrats as a party support an increased minimum wage, health insurance for all, policies that strengthen workers rights, etc.Free said:
A lot of Democrats I know, and some are family members, are so out of touch with the common struggles of every day people because of their income status level, it is not funny. This elite mindframe of Democrats in general is not working. It doesn't work for the people of this country and now it doesn't work for Democrats. Because they lost the election. Time to learn the lesson and start over again.JC29856 said:
Crazy that they got away with it for that long. Considering the base, maybe not.Free said:Same old same old Democratic Party doesn't work anymore!
The GOP opposes those things. Who lost touch?
There's no convincing someone who refuses to see things the way they are.0 -
Agreed. Prior to Trump running away with the election, they were more Hillary haters and there were Trump haters. It's just the way it is. She was supposed to win the black vote but didn't bring that either. (perhaps because she argued down a BLM supporter on camera). Also, he was more honest and upfront with the public where she made deals behind doors like you said. A ton of voters see that as very untrustworthy.JimmyV said:
This is a fair point. I think on some level many people viewed Trump's act as just that, an act. Like he was playing a character. Plus, most of his comments were made in public. He wasn't hiding them, although he did often deny them. Clinton on the other hand made her comments behind the closed doors of a fundraiser. It came across as an honest moment, a rare glimpse into what she really believed. That's why I think it was more damaging.tbergs said:
What's ironic, is this is being used to explain part of her downfall. Trump out offended/derided people of all types on a daily basis so to believe her one slip of the tongue was the end is ridiculous. Trump just got away with it for some reason. Maybe because he was consistent with being offensive and rude.JimmyV said:
After she got caught on tape saying it at a high priced fundraiser, yes she did apologize. The damage was already done. It reaffirmed the belief that she (like Romney) was an out of touch elitist and (also like Romney) gave her opponent a rallying cry. You can't really blame right-wing news when the candidate steps in it like that.Gern Blansten said:
yes and then she apologized and said she shouldn't have said "half"HughFreakingDillon said:
well, she did say "half of his supporters are deplorables" or something of the like. half is a lot.Gern Blansten said:
to be clear....she was referring to racists and the likeJimmyV said:The "basket of deplorables" line will live forever in our political lexicon. Right alongside Watergate, swiftboating, October Surprise and the 47 percent. Who talks that way about the electorate when they are trying to win votes? Clinton held white, male, Midwestern voters in contempt, just the same as Mitt Romney did the 47 percent. Both believed they were going to win the election. Neither one did.
The platform can certainly be tweaked, but the platform was not the problem. The candidate was the problem. I harp on this not because Hillary Clinton is some villain who deserves it. She isn't. I do it because the Democratic party decided on her long before a single primary vote was cast...and then she lost to Donald Trump! This didn't need to happen. We can't let it happen again.
The morons who labeled themselves "deplorables" for being Trump supporters were clearly following the right wing bullshit news.
But I digress. I just want to see the Dem party renew themselves and do something with their party rather then what they're currently doing – nothing.0 -
Trump: We don't feel the need to be politically correctGern Blansten said:
to be clear....she was referring to racists and the likeJimmyV said:The "basket of deplorables" line will live forever in our political lexicon. Right alongside Watergate, swiftboating, October Surprise and the 47 percent. Who talks that way about the electorate when they are trying to win votes? Clinton held white, male, Midwestern voters in contempt, just the same as Mitt Romney did the 47 percent. Both believed they were going to win the election. Neither one did.
The platform can certainly be tweaked, but the platform was not the problem. The candidate was the problem. I harp on this not because Hillary Clinton is some villain who deserves it. She isn't. I do it because the Democratic party decided on her long before a single primary vote was cast...and then she lost to Donald Trump! This didn't need to happen. We can't let it happen again.
The morons who labeled themselves "deplorables" for being Trump supporters were clearly following the right wing bullshit news.
Trump Supporters: We like him, he tells it like it is
Hillary: You and your supporters say and do some pretty deplorable stuff sometimes
Trump Supporters: We hate her, she tells it like it is0 -
No.. by vote totals, he didn't appeal to more people. He appealed to the right people in the right states.Free said:
Jesus, like many Dems, you are very resistant to look at your party & just continue to look at Trump or Russia etc. The Dem party is out of touch. Trump appealed to more than Hillary did. (scary, but true) Trump was anti-establishment, Hillary represented more continued establishment. We saw how many millions of people following Sanders and Trump are anti-establishment.Gern Blansten said:
That doesn't make sense. Democrats as a party support an increased minimum wage, health insurance for all, policies that strengthen workers rights, etc.Free said:
A lot of Democrats I know, and some are family members, are so out of touch with the common struggles of every day people because of their income status level, it is not funny. This elite mindframe of Democrats in general is not working. It doesn't work for the people of this country and now it doesn't work for Democrats. Because they lost the election. Time to learn the lesson and start over again.JC29856 said:
Crazy that they got away with it for that long. Considering the base, maybe not.Free said:Same old same old Democratic Party doesn't work anymore!
The GOP opposes those things. Who lost touch?
There's no convincing someone who refuses to see things the way they are.0 -
Correction: He didn't appeal to most Californiansmrussel1 said:
No.. by vote totals, he didn't appeal to more people. He appealed to the right people in the right states.Free said:
Jesus, like many Dems, you are very resistant to look at your party & just continue to look at Trump or Russia etc. The Dem party is out of touch. Trump appealed to more than Hillary did. (scary, but true) Trump was anti-establishment, Hillary represented more continued establishment. We saw how many millions of people following Sanders and Trump are anti-establishment.Gern Blansten said:
That doesn't make sense. Democrats as a party support an increased minimum wage, health insurance for all, policies that strengthen workers rights, etc.Free said:
A lot of Democrats I know, and some are family members, are so out of touch with the common struggles of every day people because of their income status level, it is not funny. This elite mindframe of Democrats in general is not working. It doesn't work for the people of this country and now it doesn't work for Democrats. Because they lost the election. Time to learn the lesson and start over again.JC29856 said:
Crazy that they got away with it for that long. Considering the base, maybe not.Free said:Same old same old Democratic Party doesn't work anymore!
The GOP opposes those things. Who lost touch?
There's no convincing someone who refuses to see things the way they are.0 -
Although I've said before that it's always a mistake to call out voters (agreeing with you Free...see we agree..), let's be clear on what she said and where she said it. It was at the LBGT Gala and it was a public speech, not a private dinner secretly recorded (like Romney). It was meant to rally her people, specifically the LBGT. Here's the quote.. I think we can all agree that racists, xenophobic, homophobic people are deplorable..JimmyV said:
This is a fair point. I think on some level many people viewed Trump's act as just that, an act. Like he was playing a character. Plus, most of his comments were made in public. He wasn't hiding them, although he did often deny them. Clinton on the other hand made her comments behind the closed doors of a fundraiser. It came across as an honest moment, a rare glimpse into what she really believed. That's why I think it was more damaging.tbergs said:
What's ironic, is this is being used to explain part of her downfall. Trump out offended/derided people of all types on a daily basis so to believe her one slip of the tongue was the end is ridiculous. Trump just got away with it for some reason. Maybe because he was consistent with being offensive and rude.JimmyV said:
After she got caught on tape saying it at a high priced fundraiser, yes she did apologize. The damage was already done. It reaffirmed the belief that she (like Romney) was an out of touch elitist and (also like Romney) gave her opponent a rallying cry. You can't really blame right-wing news when the candidate steps in it like that.Gern Blansten said:
yes and then she apologized and said she shouldn't have said "half"HughFreakingDillon said:
well, she did say "half of his supporters are deplorables" or something of the like. half is a lot.Gern Blansten said:
to be clear....she was referring to racists and the likeJimmyV said:The "basket of deplorables" line will live forever in our political lexicon. Right alongside Watergate, swiftboating, October Surprise and the 47 percent. Who talks that way about the electorate when they are trying to win votes? Clinton held white, male, Midwestern voters in contempt, just the same as Mitt Romney did the 47 percent. Both believed they were going to win the election. Neither one did.
The platform can certainly be tweaked, but the platform was not the problem. The candidate was the problem. I harp on this not because Hillary Clinton is some villain who deserves it. She isn't. I do it because the Democratic party decided on her long before a single primary vote was cast...and then she lost to Donald Trump! This didn't need to happen. We can't let it happen again.
The morons who labeled themselves "deplorables" for being Trump supporters were clearly following the right wing bullshit news.
We are living in a volatile political environment. You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic -- you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up. He has given voice to their websites that used to only have 11,000 people -- now 11 million. He tweets and retweets their offensive hateful mean-spirited rhetoric. Now, some of those folks -- they are irredeemable, but thankfully they are not America."0 -
Curious...what website hill referring to?mrussel1 said:
Although I've said before that it's always a mistake to call out voters (agreeing with you Free...see we agree..), let's be clear on what she said and where she said it. It was at the LBGT Gala and it was a public speech, not a private dinner secretly recorded (like Romney). It was meant to rally her people, specifically the LBGT. Here's the quote.. I think we can all agree that racists, xenophobic, homophobic people are deplorable..JimmyV said:
This is a fair point. I think on some level many people viewed Trump's act as just that, an act. Like he was playing a character. Plus, most of his comments were made in public. He wasn't hiding them, although he did often deny them. Clinton on the other hand made her comments behind the closed doors of a fundraiser. It came across as an honest moment, a rare glimpse into what she really believed. That's why I think it was more damaging.tbergs said:
What's ironic, is this is being used to explain part of her downfall. Trump out offended/derided people of all types on a daily basis so to believe her one slip of the tongue was the end is ridiculous. Trump just got away with it for some reason. Maybe because he was consistent with being offensive and rude.JimmyV said:
After she got caught on tape saying it at a high priced fundraiser, yes she did apologize. The damage was already done. It reaffirmed the belief that she (like Romney) was an out of touch elitist and (also like Romney) gave her opponent a rallying cry. You can't really blame right-wing news when the candidate steps in it like that.Gern Blansten said:
yes and then she apologized and said she shouldn't have said "half"HughFreakingDillon said:
well, she did say "half of his supporters are deplorables" or something of the like. half is a lot.Gern Blansten said:
to be clear....she was referring to racists and the likeJimmyV said:The "basket of deplorables" line will live forever in our political lexicon. Right alongside Watergate, swiftboating, October Surprise and the 47 percent. Who talks that way about the electorate when they are trying to win votes? Clinton held white, male, Midwestern voters in contempt, just the same as Mitt Romney did the 47 percent. Both believed they were going to win the election. Neither one did.
The platform can certainly be tweaked, but the platform was not the problem. The candidate was the problem. I harp on this not because Hillary Clinton is some villain who deserves it. She isn't. I do it because the Democratic party decided on her long before a single primary vote was cast...and then she lost to Donald Trump! This didn't need to happen. We can't let it happen again.
The morons who labeled themselves "deplorables" for being Trump supporters were clearly following the right wing bullshit news.
We are living in a volatile political environment. You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic -- you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up. He has given voice to their websites that used to only have 11,000 people -- now 11 million. He tweets and retweets their offensive hateful mean-spirited rhetoric. Now, some of those folks -- they are irredeemable, but thankfully they are not America."0 -
I'm sure you could start with Stormfront. Just use your normal password for user stats.JC29856 said:
Curious...what website hill referring to?mrussel1 said:
Although I've said before that it's always a mistake to call out voters (agreeing with you Free...see we agree..), let's be clear on what she said and where she said it. It was at the LBGT Gala and it was a public speech, not a private dinner secretly recorded (like Romney). It was meant to rally her people, specifically the LBGT. Here's the quote.. I think we can all agree that racists, xenophobic, homophobic people are deplorable..JimmyV said:
This is a fair point. I think on some level many people viewed Trump's act as just that, an act. Like he was playing a character. Plus, most of his comments were made in public. He wasn't hiding them, although he did often deny them. Clinton on the other hand made her comments behind the closed doors of a fundraiser. It came across as an honest moment, a rare glimpse into what she really believed. That's why I think it was more damaging.tbergs said:
What's ironic, is this is being used to explain part of her downfall. Trump out offended/derided people of all types on a daily basis so to believe her one slip of the tongue was the end is ridiculous. Trump just got away with it for some reason. Maybe because he was consistent with being offensive and rude.JimmyV said:
After she got caught on tape saying it at a high priced fundraiser, yes she did apologize. The damage was already done. It reaffirmed the belief that she (like Romney) was an out of touch elitist and (also like Romney) gave her opponent a rallying cry. You can't really blame right-wing news when the candidate steps in it like that.Gern Blansten said:
yes and then she apologized and said she shouldn't have said "half"HughFreakingDillon said:
well, she did say "half of his supporters are deplorables" or something of the like. half is a lot.Gern Blansten said:
to be clear....she was referring to racists and the likeJimmyV said:The "basket of deplorables" line will live forever in our political lexicon. Right alongside Watergate, swiftboating, October Surprise and the 47 percent. Who talks that way about the electorate when they are trying to win votes? Clinton held white, male, Midwestern voters in contempt, just the same as Mitt Romney did the 47 percent. Both believed they were going to win the election. Neither one did.
The platform can certainly be tweaked, but the platform was not the problem. The candidate was the problem. I harp on this not because Hillary Clinton is some villain who deserves it. She isn't. I do it because the Democratic party decided on her long before a single primary vote was cast...and then she lost to Donald Trump! This didn't need to happen. We can't let it happen again.
The morons who labeled themselves "deplorables" for being Trump supporters were clearly following the right wing bullshit news.
We are living in a volatile political environment. You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic -- you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up. He has given voice to their websites that used to only have 11,000 people -- now 11 million. He tweets and retweets their offensive hateful mean-spirited rhetoric. Now, some of those folks -- they are irredeemable, but thankfully they are not America."0 -
So if Bernie was on the ticket the Dem party suddenly wouldn't be out of touch?Free said:
Jesus, like many Dems, you are very resistant to look at your party & just continue to look at Trump or Russia etc. The Dem party is out of touch. Trump appealed to more than Hillary did. (scary, but true) Trump was anti-establishment, Hillary represented more continued establishment. We saw how many millions of people following Sanders and Trump are anti-establishment.Gern Blansten said:
That doesn't make sense. Democrats as a party support an increased minimum wage, health insurance for all, policies that strengthen workers rights, etc.Free said:
A lot of Democrats I know, and some are family members, are so out of touch with the common struggles of every day people because of their income status level, it is not funny. This elite mindframe of Democrats in general is not working. It doesn't work for the people of this country and now it doesn't work for Democrats. Because they lost the election. Time to learn the lesson and start over again.JC29856 said:
Crazy that they got away with it for that long. Considering the base, maybe not.Free said:Same old same old Democratic Party doesn't work anymore!
The GOP opposes those things. Who lost touch?
There's no convincing someone who refuses to see things the way they are.
Their policies would still be pretty much the same.
0 -
It isn't that simple. So, basically because a group of like minded people all choose to live in the same state, they count less? I guess we just need to spread those 3 million people out. If 300,000 - 500,000 move to each of the swing states that should be enough of a buffer and they'll forever be blue.JC29856 said:
Correction: He didn't appeal to most Californiansmrussel1 said:
No.. by vote totals, he didn't appeal to more people. He appealed to the right people in the right states.Free said:
Jesus, like many Dems, you are very resistant to look at your party & just continue to look at Trump or Russia etc. The Dem party is out of touch. Trump appealed to more than Hillary did. (scary, but true) Trump was anti-establishment, Hillary represented more continued establishment. We saw how many millions of people following Sanders and Trump are anti-establishment.Gern Blansten said:
That doesn't make sense. Democrats as a party support an increased minimum wage, health insurance for all, policies that strengthen workers rights, etc.Free said:
A lot of Democrats I know, and some are family members, are so out of touch with the common struggles of every day people because of their income status level, it is not funny. This elite mindframe of Democrats in general is not working. It doesn't work for the people of this country and now it doesn't work for Democrats. Because they lost the election. Time to learn the lesson and start over again.JC29856 said:
Crazy that they got away with it for that long. Considering the base, maybe not.Free said:Same old same old Democratic Party doesn't work anymore!
The GOP opposes those things. Who lost touch?
There's no convincing someone who refuses to see things the way they are.It's a hopeless situation...0 -
maybe she should have made herself more clear when she used the phrase "basket of deplorables" it's really not any different than other words used by Trump or anybody else that get misconstrued and used against them, it just an opportunity for one side to attack another.Gern Blansten said:
to be clear....she was referring to racists and the likeJimmyV said:The "basket of deplorables" line will live forever in our political lexicon. Right alongside Watergate, swiftboating, October Surprise and the 47 percent. Who talks that way about the electorate when they are trying to win votes? Clinton held white, male, Midwestern voters in contempt, just the same as Mitt Romney did the 47 percent. Both believed they were going to win the election. Neither one did.
The platform can certainly be tweaked, but the platform was not the problem. The candidate was the problem. I harp on this not because Hillary Clinton is some villain who deserves it. She isn't. I do it because the Democratic party decided on her long before a single primary vote was cast...and then she lost to Donald Trump! This didn't need to happen. We can't let it happen again.
The morons who labeled themselves "deplorables" for being Trump supporters were clearly following the right wing bullshit news.
I'm surprised there aren't T shirts that have "angry white men" printed on them already LOL !!
0 -
That doesn't make sense. She made it very clear that the deplorables she was referring to were racists and the like. Unless you were racist or the like you had no business being offended.MeanMr.Mustard said:
maybe she should have made herself more clear when she used the phrase "basket of deplorables" it's really not any different than other words used by Trump or anybody else that get misconstrued and used against them, it just an opportunity for one side to attack another.Gern Blansten said:
to be clear....she was referring to racists and the likeJimmyV said:The "basket of deplorables" line will live forever in our political lexicon. Right alongside Watergate, swiftboating, October Surprise and the 47 percent. Who talks that way about the electorate when they are trying to win votes? Clinton held white, male, Midwestern voters in contempt, just the same as Mitt Romney did the 47 percent. Both believed they were going to win the election. Neither one did.
The platform can certainly be tweaked, but the platform was not the problem. The candidate was the problem. I harp on this not because Hillary Clinton is some villain who deserves it. She isn't. I do it because the Democratic party decided on her long before a single primary vote was cast...and then she lost to Donald Trump! This didn't need to happen. We can't let it happen again.
The morons who labeled themselves "deplorables" for being Trump supporters were clearly following the right wing bullshit news.
I'm surprised there aren't T shirts that have "angry white men" printed on them already LOL !!Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
You mean exactly the same.... And that's a tremendous point.eddiec said:
So if Bernie was on the ticket the Dem party suddenly wouldn't be out of touch?Free said:
Jesus, like many Dems, you are very resistant to look at your party & just continue to look at Trump or Russia etc. The Dem party is out of touch. Trump appealed to more than Hillary did. (scary, but true) Trump was anti-establishment, Hillary represented more continued establishment. We saw how many millions of people following Sanders and Trump are anti-establishment.Gern Blansten said:
That doesn't make sense. Democrats as a party support an increased minimum wage, health insurance for all, policies that strengthen workers rights, etc.Free said:
A lot of Democrats I know, and some are family members, are so out of touch with the common struggles of every day people because of their income status level, it is not funny. This elite mindframe of Democrats in general is not working. It doesn't work for the people of this country and now it doesn't work for Democrats. Because they lost the election. Time to learn the lesson and start over again.JC29856 said:
Crazy that they got away with it for that long. Considering the base, maybe not.Free said:Same old same old Democratic Party doesn't work anymore!
The GOP opposes those things. Who lost touch?
There's no convincing someone who refuses to see things the way they are.
Their policies would still be pretty much the same.0 -
MeanMr.Mustard said:
maybe she should have made herself more clear when she used the phrase "basket of deplorables" it's really not any different than other words used by Trump or anybody else that get misconstrued and used against them, it just an opportunity for one side to attack another.Gern Blansten said:
to be clear....she was referring to racists and the likeJimmyV said:The "basket of deplorables" line will live forever in our political lexicon. Right alongside Watergate, swiftboating, October Surprise and the 47 percent. Who talks that way about the electorate when they are trying to win votes? Clinton held white, male, Midwestern voters in contempt, just the same as Mitt Romney did the 47 percent. Both believed they were going to win the election. Neither one did.
The platform can certainly be tweaked, but the platform was not the problem. The candidate was the problem. I harp on this not because Hillary Clinton is some villain who deserves it. She isn't. I do it because the Democratic party decided on her long before a single primary vote was cast...and then she lost to Donald Trump! This didn't need to happen. We can't let it happen again.
The morons who labeled themselves "deplorables" for being Trump supporters were clearly following the right wing bullshit news.
I'm surprised there aren't T shirts that have "angry white men" printed on them already LOL !!https://youtu.be/UPw-3e_pzqU
I SAW PEARL JAM0 -
Basically nobody said they count less... And what would happen if those Californians were spead out?tbergs said:
It isn't that simple. So, basically because a group of like minded people all choose to live in the same state, they count less? I guess we just need to spread those 3 million people out. If 300,000 - 500,000 move to each of the swing states that should be enough of a buffer and they'll forever be blue.JC29856 said:
Correction: He didn't appeal to most Californiansmrussel1 said:
No.. by vote totals, he didn't appeal to more people. He appealed to the right people in the right states.Free said:
Jesus, like many Dems, you are very resistant to look at your party & just continue to look at Trump or Russia etc. The Dem party is out of touch. Trump appealed to more than Hillary did. (scary, but true) Trump was anti-establishment, Hillary represented more continued establishment. We saw how many millions of people following Sanders and Trump are anti-establishment.Gern Blansten said:
That doesn't make sense. Democrats as a party support an increased minimum wage, health insurance for all, policies that strengthen workers rights, etc.Free said:
A lot of Democrats I know, and some are family members, are so out of touch with the common struggles of every day people because of their income status level, it is not funny. This elite mindframe of Democrats in general is not working. It doesn't work for the people of this country and now it doesn't work for Democrats. Because they lost the election. Time to learn the lesson and start over again.JC29856 said:
Crazy that they got away with it for that long. Considering the base, maybe not.Free said:Same old same old Democratic Party doesn't work anymore!
The GOP opposes those things. Who lost touch?
There's no convincing someone who refuses to see things the way they are.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help