Hillary won more votes for President

1…467468470472473…488

Comments

  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    edited December 2016
    JimmyV said:

    2,864,974

    CM logic: IF you dont count California, Hilliary loses pop vote by 1.5M.....errrrr keeeee!
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    JC29856 said:

    JimmyV said:

    2,864,974

    CM logic: IF you dont count California, Hilliary loses pop vote by 1.5M.....errrrr keeeee!
    Everyone knows CA doesn't count. Full of nothing but illegals and felons.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    CM189191 said:

    JC29856 said:

    JimmyV said:

    2,864,974

    CM logic: IF you dont count California, Hilliary loses pop vote by 1.5M.....errrrr keeeee!
    Everyone knows CA doesn't count. Full of nothing but illegals and felons.
    Your IF logic not mine. And Texas doesnt count why??
  • Degeneratefk
    Degeneratefk Posts: 3,123
    JC29856 said:

    Degeneratefk said:

    He lost by almost 3 million votes. Imagine if all of the registered voters actually voted.

    Half don't vote because they know the archaic system is broken.
    I highly doubt that is the reason. I'd say it's closer to 30 people didn't vote due to the "archaic" system.
    will myself to find a home, a home within myself
    we will find a way, we will find our place
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    edited December 2016
    Degeneratefk said:

    JC29856 said:

    Degeneratefk said:

    He lost by almost 3 million votes. Imagine if all of the registered voters actually voted.

    Half don't vote because they know the archaic system is broken.
    I highly doubt that is the reason. I'd say it's closer to 30 people didn't vote due to the "archaic" system.
    http://archive.is/8mQ2O

    Mega triggered!!
    A man interviewed on the ABC world news said the man who harassed Ivanka on that Jet Blue flight was so upset when he got off plane he was "shaking".

    7:48 AM PT -- The husband of the unruly passenger tweeted an hour before the plane took off, "Ivanka and Jared at JFK T5, flying commercial. My husband chasing them down to harass them."
    Post edited by JC29856 on
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/clinton-electoral-college-trump-232906

    Any hypocrisy here? Accept the results.

    Electoral college coup
    Call logs, emails and text messages reveal a Clinton campaign walking a tightrope — never fully endorsing the effort, but intentionally declining to stamp it out. The approach was comparable, one former campaign official said, to the campaign’s passive-but-not-dismissive response to long-shot recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania.

    Indeed, as news of Russia’s role in influencing the election emerged, an exhausted and shell-shocked Clinton team at times appeared torn between accepting the election results and continuing to publicly fight Trump’s ascension to the White House.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,884
    Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    mrussel1 said:

    Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.

    very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    edited December 2016
    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.

    very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?
    I'm sure she's said something to her corporate, big bank and celeb donors...

    And they want their $$$$ back.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,884
    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.

    very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?
    No, it means she is retiring. She's no longer a public figure that holds any public office. Again, there is such an element of hypocrisy here. On one hand people say "Why hasn't Hillary said anything" and the other it's "Time to move past the tired old Democrats". Well which is it?
    And I love that people around here are quoting the 62 or whatever % of Democrats don't want her to run again. Well no shit, neither do I. I didn't want Gore or Kerry to run again after they lost. It's very unusual for someone to run twice. The only one I can think of, in modern times, is Nixon. The bigger news is 38% do want her to run again. That surprises me.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.

    very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?
    No, it means she is retiring. She's no longer a public figure that holds any public office. Again, there is such an element of hypocrisy here. On one hand people say "Why hasn't Hillary said anything" and the other it's "Time to move past the tired old Democrats". Well which is it?
    And I love that people around here are quoting the 62 or whatever % of Democrats don't want her to run again. Well no shit, neither do I. I didn't want Gore or Kerry to run again after they lost. It's very unusual for someone to run twice. The only one I can think of, in modern times, is Nixon. The bigger news is 38% do want her to run again. That surprises me.
    the first part doesnt pertain to me
    the second part you make a good point, but to clarify, the reason why you dont want her to run again is because she lost?
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/311591-biden-clinton-never-figured-out-why-she-was-running

    Biden: Clinton never figured out why she was running
  • what dreams
    what dreams Posts: 1,761
    Very sad lives, to be so stuck on hatred, bitterness, and vengeance. I'm just glad it's not me who is so miserable. Funny how the the people who went out of their way to successfully defeat her cannot move on. It’s as though they can't function without a Clinton to beat on. Their lives are meaningless if they're not tracking down every word of bad news about Clinton. It's just really, really weird.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    what dreams said:

    Very sad lives, to be so stuck on hatred, bitterness, and vengeance. I'm just glad it's not me who is so miserable. Funny how the the people who went out of their way to successfully defeat her cannot move on. It’s as though they can't function without a Clinton to beat on. Their lives are meaningless if they're not tracking down every word of bad news about Clinton. It's just really, really weird.

    triggered!
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    what dreams said:

    Very sad lives, to be so stuck on hatred, bitterness, and vengeance. I'm just glad it's not me who is so miserable. Funny how the the people who went out of their way to successfully defeat her cannot move on. It’s as though they can't function without a Clinton to beat on. Their lives are meaningless if they're not tracking down every word of bad news about Clinton. It's just really, really weird.

    Yet you're not over it if you feel the need to post in this thread.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,884
    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.

    very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?
    No, it means she is retiring. She's no longer a public figure that holds any public office. Again, there is such an element of hypocrisy here. On one hand people say "Why hasn't Hillary said anything" and the other it's "Time to move past the tired old Democrats". Well which is it?
    And I love that people around here are quoting the 62 or whatever % of Democrats don't want her to run again. Well no shit, neither do I. I didn't want Gore or Kerry to run again after they lost. It's very unusual for someone to run twice. The only one I can think of, in modern times, is Nixon. The bigger news is 38% do want her to run again. That surprises me.
    the first part doesnt pertain to me
    the second part you make a good point, but to clarify, the reason why you dont want her to run again is because she lost?
    Yes, exactly. The point of politics are to win, in order to enact the changes, policies, etc. that you believe in. If the candidate cannot win, then there is no reason to run. I, and I bet most others like Gern, What Dreams, etc. have no personal loyalty to Hillary. We don't know her. We weren't in line for an administration job. We believed in the policies that she believed in. It's that simple. I would have preferred Biden from the very start. But he chose not to run. Hillary won the primaries. She was the candidate.
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.

    very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?
    No, it means she is retiring. She's no longer a public figure that holds any public office. Again, there is such an element of hypocrisy here. On one hand people say "Why hasn't Hillary said anything" and the other it's "Time to move past the tired old Democrats". Well which is it?
    And I love that people around here are quoting the 62 or whatever % of Democrats don't want her to run again. Well no shit, neither do I. I didn't want Gore or Kerry to run again after they lost. It's very unusual for someone to run twice. The only one I can think of, in modern times, is Nixon. The bigger news is 38% do want her to run again. That surprises me.
    the first part doesnt pertain to me
    the second part you make a good point, but to clarify, the reason why you dont want her to run again is because she lost?
    Yes, exactly. The point of politics are to win, in order to enact the changes, policies, etc. that you believe in. If the candidate cannot win, then there is no reason to run. I, and I bet most others like Gern, What Dreams, etc. have no personal loyalty to Hillary. We don't know her. We weren't in line for an administration job. We believed in the policies that she believed in. It's that simple. I would have preferred Biden from the very start. But he chose not to run. Hillary won the primaries. She was the candidate.
    What garbage. You're so pro Hillary that some of us here swore that you were paid to be her bot. So you can change your mind now but we all know what you were before the election. Unwilling to look at her faults unwilling to criticize or unwilling to be realistic. 20/20 is a bitch.
  • MeanMr.Mustard
    MeanMr.Mustard TBA Posts: 127
    yup...................
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,884
    Free said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    JC29856 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.

    very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?
    No, it means she is retiring. She's no longer a public figure that holds any public office. Again, there is such an element of hypocrisy here. On one hand people say "Why hasn't Hillary said anything" and the other it's "Time to move past the tired old Democrats". Well which is it?
    And I love that people around here are quoting the 62 or whatever % of Democrats don't want her to run again. Well no shit, neither do I. I didn't want Gore or Kerry to run again after they lost. It's very unusual for someone to run twice. The only one I can think of, in modern times, is Nixon. The bigger news is 38% do want her to run again. That surprises me.
    the first part doesnt pertain to me
    the second part you make a good point, but to clarify, the reason why you dont want her to run again is because she lost?
    Yes, exactly. The point of politics are to win, in order to enact the changes, policies, etc. that you believe in. If the candidate cannot win, then there is no reason to run. I, and I bet most others like Gern, What Dreams, etc. have no personal loyalty to Hillary. We don't know her. We weren't in line for an administration job. We believed in the policies that she believed in. It's that simple. I would have preferred Biden from the very start. But he chose not to run. Hillary won the primaries. She was the candidate.
    What garbage. You're so pro Hillary that some of us here swore that you were paid to be her bot. So you can change your mind now but we all know what you were before the election. Unwilling to look at her faults unwilling to criticize or unwilling to be realistic. 20/20 is a bitch.
    You have no fucking idea what you're talking about. But I don't hold your youth and inexperience against you. You'll get there someday. If you thought I was a paid shill then you're extremely ignorant. I'm a Democrat that believes in democratic principles. She was the standard bearer. That's how it works. And when the party divides, you have a Trump presidency.
    You project your mindset to others. You are about Bernie the individual because there is a sliver of difference in the policies between the two. Had Bernie won the primary, I would have gladly supported him against Trump. That's the difference been us. I've learned great is the enemy of good. One day you will.
  • Bentleyspop
    Bentleyspop Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 11,462
    what dreams said:

    Very sad lives, to be so stuck on hatred, bitterness, and vengeance. I'm just glad it's not me who is so miserable. Funny how the the people who went out of their way to successfully defeat her cannot move on. It’s as though they can't function without a Clinton to beat on. Their lives are meaningless if they're not tracking down every word of bad news about Clinton. It's just really, really weird.

    You're post is dead on

    There is a lot of fear, hate, and ignorance in the world.
    And a surprisingly large amount of it on here.

    Holding on to so much fear, hate, and ignorance is not good for anyone or the people around them. It is a very sad way to lives ones life
    Time to move on..

    Namaste'
This discussion has been closed.

Categories