Hillary won more votes for President
Comments
-
I highly doubt that is the reason. I'd say it's closer to 30 people didn't vote due to the "archaic" system.JC29856 said:
Half don't vote because they know the archaic system is broken.Degeneratefk said:He lost by almost 3 million votes. Imagine if all of the registered voters actually voted.
will myself to find a home, a home within myself
we will find a way, we will find our place0 -
http://archive.is/8mQ2ODegeneratefk said:
I highly doubt that is the reason. I'd say it's closer to 30 people didn't vote due to the "archaic" system.JC29856 said:
Half don't vote because they know the archaic system is broken.Degeneratefk said:He lost by almost 3 million votes. Imagine if all of the registered voters actually voted.
Mega triggered!!
A man interviewed on the ABC world news said the man who harassed Ivanka on that Jet Blue flight was so upset when he got off plane he was "shaking".
7:48 AM PT -- The husband of the unruly passenger tweeted an hour before the plane took off, "Ivanka and Jared at JFK T5, flying commercial. My husband chasing them down to harass them."Post edited by JC29856 on0 -
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/clinton-electoral-college-trump-232906
Any hypocrisy here? Accept the results.
Electoral college coup
Call logs, emails and text messages reveal a Clinton campaign walking a tightrope — never fully endorsing the effort, but intentionally declining to stamp it out. The approach was comparable, one former campaign official said, to the campaign’s passive-but-not-dismissive response to long-shot recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania.
Indeed, as news of Russia’s role in influencing the election emerged, an exhausted and shell-shocked Clinton team at times appeared torn between accepting the election results and continuing to publicly fight Trump’s ascension to the White House.0 -
Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.0
-
very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?mrussel1 said:Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.
0 -
I'm sure she's said something to her corporate, big bank and celeb donors...JC29856 said:
very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?mrussel1 said:Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.
And they want their $$$$ back.0 -
No, it means she is retiring. She's no longer a public figure that holds any public office. Again, there is such an element of hypocrisy here. On one hand people say "Why hasn't Hillary said anything" and the other it's "Time to move past the tired old Democrats". Well which is it?JC29856 said:
very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?mrussel1 said:Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.
And I love that people around here are quoting the 62 or whatever % of Democrats don't want her to run again. Well no shit, neither do I. I didn't want Gore or Kerry to run again after they lost. It's very unusual for someone to run twice. The only one I can think of, in modern times, is Nixon. The bigger news is 38% do want her to run again. That surprises me.0 -
the first part doesnt pertain to memrussel1 said:
No, it means she is retiring. She's no longer a public figure that holds any public office. Again, there is such an element of hypocrisy here. On one hand people say "Why hasn't Hillary said anything" and the other it's "Time to move past the tired old Democrats". Well which is it?JC29856 said:
very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?mrussel1 said:Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.
And I love that people around here are quoting the 62 or whatever % of Democrats don't want her to run again. Well no shit, neither do I. I didn't want Gore or Kerry to run again after they lost. It's very unusual for someone to run twice. The only one I can think of, in modern times, is Nixon. The bigger news is 38% do want her to run again. That surprises me.
the second part you make a good point, but to clarify, the reason why you dont want her to run again is because she lost?0 -
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/311591-biden-clinton-never-figured-out-why-she-was-running
Biden: Clinton never figured out why she was running0 -
Very sad lives, to be so stuck on hatred, bitterness, and vengeance. I'm just glad it's not me who is so miserable. Funny how the the people who went out of their way to successfully defeat her cannot move on. It’s as though they can't function without a Clinton to beat on. Their lives are meaningless if they're not tracking down every word of bad news about Clinton. It's just really, really weird.0
-
triggered!what dreams said:Very sad lives, to be so stuck on hatred, bitterness, and vengeance. I'm just glad it's not me who is so miserable. Funny how the the people who went out of their way to successfully defeat her cannot move on. It’s as though they can't function without a Clinton to beat on. Their lives are meaningless if they're not tracking down every word of bad news about Clinton. It's just really, really weird.
0 -
Yet you're not over it if you feel the need to post in this thread.what dreams said:Very sad lives, to be so stuck on hatred, bitterness, and vengeance. I'm just glad it's not me who is so miserable. Funny how the the people who went out of their way to successfully defeat her cannot move on. It’s as though they can't function without a Clinton to beat on. Their lives are meaningless if they're not tracking down every word of bad news about Clinton. It's just really, really weird.
0 -
Yes, exactly. The point of politics are to win, in order to enact the changes, policies, etc. that you believe in. If the candidate cannot win, then there is no reason to run. I, and I bet most others like Gern, What Dreams, etc. have no personal loyalty to Hillary. We don't know her. We weren't in line for an administration job. We believed in the policies that she believed in. It's that simple. I would have preferred Biden from the very start. But he chose not to run. Hillary won the primaries. She was the candidate.JC29856 said:
the first part doesnt pertain to memrussel1 said:
No, it means she is retiring. She's no longer a public figure that holds any public office. Again, there is such an element of hypocrisy here. On one hand people say "Why hasn't Hillary said anything" and the other it's "Time to move past the tired old Democrats". Well which is it?JC29856 said:
very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?mrussel1 said:Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.
And I love that people around here are quoting the 62 or whatever % of Democrats don't want her to run again. Well no shit, neither do I. I didn't want Gore or Kerry to run again after they lost. It's very unusual for someone to run twice. The only one I can think of, in modern times, is Nixon. The bigger news is 38% do want her to run again. That surprises me.
the second part you make a good point, but to clarify, the reason why you dont want her to run again is because she lost?0 -
What garbage. You're so pro Hillary that some of us here swore that you were paid to be her bot. So you can change your mind now but we all know what you were before the election. Unwilling to look at her faults unwilling to criticize or unwilling to be realistic. 20/20 is a bitch.mrussel1 said:
Yes, exactly. The point of politics are to win, in order to enact the changes, policies, etc. that you believe in. If the candidate cannot win, then there is no reason to run. I, and I bet most others like Gern, What Dreams, etc. have no personal loyalty to Hillary. We don't know her. We weren't in line for an administration job. We believed in the policies that she believed in. It's that simple. I would have preferred Biden from the very start. But he chose not to run. Hillary won the primaries. She was the candidate.JC29856 said:
the first part doesnt pertain to memrussel1 said:
No, it means she is retiring. She's no longer a public figure that holds any public office. Again, there is such an element of hypocrisy here. On one hand people say "Why hasn't Hillary said anything" and the other it's "Time to move past the tired old Democrats". Well which is it?JC29856 said:
very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?mrussel1 said:Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.
And I love that people around here are quoting the 62 or whatever % of Democrats don't want her to run again. Well no shit, neither do I. I didn't want Gore or Kerry to run again after they lost. It's very unusual for someone to run twice. The only one I can think of, in modern times, is Nixon. The bigger news is 38% do want her to run again. That surprises me.
the second part you make a good point, but to clarify, the reason why you dont want her to run again is because she lost?0 -
yup...................0
-
You have no fucking idea what you're talking about. But I don't hold your youth and inexperience against you. You'll get there someday. If you thought I was a paid shill then you're extremely ignorant. I'm a Democrat that believes in democratic principles. She was the standard bearer. That's how it works. And when the party divides, you have a Trump presidency.Free said:
What garbage. You're so pro Hillary that some of us here swore that you were paid to be her bot. So you can change your mind now but we all know what you were before the election. Unwilling to look at her faults unwilling to criticize or unwilling to be realistic. 20/20 is a bitch.mrussel1 said:
Yes, exactly. The point of politics are to win, in order to enact the changes, policies, etc. that you believe in. If the candidate cannot win, then there is no reason to run. I, and I bet most others like Gern, What Dreams, etc. have no personal loyalty to Hillary. We don't know her. We weren't in line for an administration job. We believed in the policies that she believed in. It's that simple. I would have preferred Biden from the very start. But he chose not to run. Hillary won the primaries. She was the candidate.JC29856 said:
the first part doesnt pertain to memrussel1 said:
No, it means she is retiring. She's no longer a public figure that holds any public office. Again, there is such an element of hypocrisy here. On one hand people say "Why hasn't Hillary said anything" and the other it's "Time to move past the tired old Democrats". Well which is it?JC29856 said:
very strong rebuttal to the DNC and democrats, your use of profanity makes it even stronger. anyway, to address your point, actually i havent heard anything from hilliary, have you? has she said anything publicly since the purple concession speech? isnt that the point of the article "saying nothing really says something"?mrussel1 said:Have you heard the former candidate come out and challenge the results? Has she sent any tweets calling it rigged? Negative. So this article that is sans comments from Hillary means nothing. Let it fucking go.
And I love that people around here are quoting the 62 or whatever % of Democrats don't want her to run again. Well no shit, neither do I. I didn't want Gore or Kerry to run again after they lost. It's very unusual for someone to run twice. The only one I can think of, in modern times, is Nixon. The bigger news is 38% do want her to run again. That surprises me.
the second part you make a good point, but to clarify, the reason why you dont want her to run again is because she lost?
You project your mindset to others. You are about Bernie the individual because there is a sliver of difference in the policies between the two. Had Bernie won the primary, I would have gladly supported him against Trump. That's the difference been us. I've learned great is the enemy of good. One day you will.0 -
You're post is dead onwhat dreams said:Very sad lives, to be so stuck on hatred, bitterness, and vengeance. I'm just glad it's not me who is so miserable. Funny how the the people who went out of their way to successfully defeat her cannot move on. It’s as though they can't function without a Clinton to beat on. Their lives are meaningless if they're not tracking down every word of bad news about Clinton. It's just really, really weird.
There is a lot of fear, hate, and ignorance in the world.
And a surprisingly large amount of it on here.
Holding on to so much fear, hate, and ignorance is not good for anyone or the people around them. It is a very sad way to lives ones life
Time to move on..
Namaste'0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help