FBI to reopen investigation of Clinton

1235712

Comments

  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,759
    edited October 2016
    BS44325 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    People are saying Comey and the FBI are being irresponsible, how about if Clinton turned over everything in the first place, or maybe she should not have used a private server. Nope it is the FBIs fault.

    Lol, pretty sure that's already been covered. This is new news we're talking about.
    What I meant is this would not be coming up 11 days out if all was handed over earlier.
    But apparently they were handed over.
    Right. The FBI were investigating Weiner for possibly texting minors or something to that extent. In that investigation they confiscated his device(s). While analyzing those device(s) did they find Clinton related classified material that shouldn't be there? That would give truth to the accusation of unlawful sharing of classified intel if that's the case.
    Nobody has said it was classified though. We don't know anything about them, who they were from, what they were about, why they were on Weiner's device... for all we know it's just email from some person who happens to be connected to Hillary's campaign. We've already seen that these aren't from Clinton though, so I don't see how them being classified material on the wrong device would impact Clinton directly if she didn't send them.
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124

    BS44325 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    People are saying Comey and the FBI are being irresponsible, how about if Clinton turned over everything in the first place, or maybe she should not have used a private server. Nope it is the FBIs fault.

    Lol, pretty sure that's already been covered. This is new news we're talking about.
    What I meant is this would not be coming up 11 days out if all was handed over earlier.
    But apparently they were handed over.
    Right. The FBI were investigating Weiner for possibly texting minors or something to that extent. In that investigation they confiscated his device(s). While analyzing those device(s) did they find Clinton related classified material that shouldn't be there? That would give truth to the accusation of unlawful sharing of classified intel if that's the case.
    No one has ever said there was classified information. They basically said they need to confirm it is not. In fact the FBI has said in the past that Huma did not receive classified information.
    That's why I wrote it in the form of a question. Comey said Clinton had classified info on her private server. What he didn't say is that she had intent or awareness that she shared that information or left it unsecured. Remember the law on classified info mentions "negligence". The anger on his failure to recommend charges hangs on that because to most people she was clearly negligent. The question again is whether new info came out that displays either intent or irrefutable evidence of negligence.
  • pjalive21
    pjalive21 St. Louis, MO Posts: 2,818
    edited October 2016
    Eichenwald did bring up a good side point.....what was the FBI doing investigating Weiner in a sexting case?
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,956
    pjalive21 said:

    Eichenwald did bring up a good side point.....what was the FBI doing investigating Weiner in a sexting case?

    maybe cause the girl was 15? how is he not charged with anything in this case yet?
  • pjalive21
    pjalive21 St. Louis, MO Posts: 2,818
    pjhawks said:

    pjalive21 said:

    Eichenwald did bring up a good side point.....what was the FBI doing investigating Weiner in a sexting case?

    maybe cause the girl was 15? how is he not charged with anything in this case yet?
    good point...this guy has some serious issues and needs to be castrated and the only thought i had is that it had to be a minor if they are involved

  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,618

    ^^^
    She can't say anything official about this because it is now an investigation "or further work".
    Typical headlines that won't stick to Teflon.
    But you can bet your ass that if there was even a whiff of an email that Trump neglected to provide in one of his many trials this place would be on fire.

    Who would give a poop about anything with Trump and emails? That would pale in comparison with what we already know about the guy and what he admits to doing.
  • ^^^
    cmon
    The libs are licking their chops waiting for any dirt on Trump.
    As for the latest against Hillary it seems pretty quiet around the press and AMT - almost as though this whole blip didn't happen.
    Next headline up "so and so resigns over this "
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,759

    ^^^
    cmon
    The libs are licking their chops waiting for any dirt on Trump.
    As for the latest against Hillary it seems pretty quiet around the press and AMT - almost as though this whole blip didn't happen.
    Next headline up "so and so resigns over this "

    Waiting for dirt on Trump? You mean besides the 11 women who have come forward with the sexual assault accusations? And besides the fraud he committed through his charitable foundation? Besides the fact that he doesn't pay people, is accused of child rape and spousal rape, and was paying his own kids with campaign donations?
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • ^^^
    I said "any"
  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,618
    And quiet on AMT? This thread got 90 comments in about 3 hours.
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762

    ^^^
    cmon
    The libs are licking their chops waiting for any dirt on Trump.
    As for the latest against Hillary it seems pretty quiet around the press and AMT - almost as though this whole blip didn't happen.
    Next headline up "so and so resigns over this "

    You just say shit over and over and over with no actual grasp on reality. The press has been all over this all afternoon. In fact, as more details come out that distance Secretary Clinton from this, I think they're giving it too much attention for what it is. And all of the Clinton voters have been in both threads talking about this all afternoon. You just choose to ignore that so that you can say the media and Clinton supporters are not talking about it.
  • ^^^
    cmon
    The libs are licking their chops waiting for any dirt on Trump.
    As for the latest against Hillary it seems pretty quiet around the press and AMT - almost as though this whole blip didn't happen.
    Next headline up "so and so resigns over this "

    You just say shit over and over and over with no actual grasp on reality. The press has been all over this all afternoon. In fact, as more details come out that distance Secretary Clinton from this, I think they're giving it too much attention for what it is. And all of the Clinton voters have been in both threads talking about this all afternoon. You just choose to ignore that so that you can say the media and Clinton supporters are not talking about it.
    Clinton voters are talking about it in both threads?
    Who?
    And which one is not saying they believe this will affect her?
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,759

    ^^^
    I said "any"

    I know. What I'm saying is that you're wrong, we already have plenty.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762

    ^^^
    cmon
    The libs are licking their chops waiting for any dirt on Trump.
    As for the latest against Hillary it seems pretty quiet around the press and AMT - almost as though this whole blip didn't happen.
    Next headline up "so and so resigns over this "

    You just say shit over and over and over with no actual grasp on reality. The press has been all over this all afternoon. In fact, as more details come out that distance Secretary Clinton from this, I think they're giving it too much attention for what it is. And all of the Clinton voters have been in both threads talking about this all afternoon. You just choose to ignore that so that you can say the media and Clinton supporters are not talking about it.
    Clinton voters are talking about it in both threads?
    Who?
    And which one is not saying they believe this will affect her?
    It's going to affect her but it's not a deal breaker. I think she still wins the election. I think red states like Utah, Georgia and Arizona are out of the question after this though.
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,759
    Why would this non-story affect her?
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    Because the headline is worse than the story. With early voting going on across the country, this will affect how people vote. Not as much as PJfan would like, but it will change some votes.
  • And quiet on AMT? This thread got 90 comments in about 3 hours.

    Libs can make a lot of noise but not say anything.
    Not one Hillary supporter has agreed or will dare say this will affect her.
    Save for one at the time of posting this.
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,036

    And quiet on AMT? This thread got 90 comments in about 3 hours.

    Libs can make a lot of noise but not say anything.
    Not one Hillary supporter has agreed or will dare say this will affect her.
    Save for one at the time of posting this.
    You have a fucking reading comprehension problem. What is there so far that would hurt her? There is nothing that she did wrong so far
  • And quiet on AMT? This thread got 90 comments in about 3 hours.

    Libs can make a lot of noise but not say anything.
    Not one Hillary supporter has agreed or will dare say this will affect her.
    Save for one at the time of posting this.
    You have a fucking reading comprehension problem. What is there so far that would hurt her? There is nothing that she did wrong so far
    It will hurt her the same way Trumps accusers are hurt if proven correct.
    So far it is only allegations on both sides.
  • Because the headline is worse than the story. With early voting going on across the country, this will affect how people vote. Not as much as PJfan would like, but it will change some votes.

    In an odd way thank you.
This discussion has been closed.