The Podesta Emails

Options
1404143454668

Comments

  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    my2hands said:

    JC29856 said:

    JC29856 said:

    “The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”

    Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1

    In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.

    Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)

    What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothing there for christsakes... Yet
    I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.
    honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?

    I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
    Stein

    Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Qatar gifts Bill Clinton $1,000,000 for his birthday. Arms flow increases 1,482%: https://t.co/bgVbNhhe1C and https://t.co/cfkP6yDBhr
  • benjs
    benjs Toronto, ON Posts: 9,359
    JC29856 said:

    my2hands said:

    JC29856 said:

    JC29856 said:

    “The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”

    Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1

    In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.

    Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)

    What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothing there for christsakes... Yet
    I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.
    honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?

    I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
    Stein

    Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.
    You seem too intelligent to honestly believe that today's political system will impeach Clinton. Am I wrong?
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    benjs said:

    JC29856 said:

    my2hands said:

    JC29856 said:

    JC29856 said:

    “The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”

    Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1

    In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.

    Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)

    What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothing there for christsakes... Yet
    I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.
    honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?

    I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
    Stein

    Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.
    You seem too intelligent to honestly believe that today's political system will impeach Clinton. Am I wrong?
    What do you think all this is for? They're warming up for impeachment to drag her name through some more mud. It's not that they actually have anything on her, they're building a narrative to try to contain Hillary to 4 years. That's why the down ticket voting is so important.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    benjs said:

    JC29856 said:

    my2hands said:

    JC29856 said:

    JC29856 said:

    “The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”

    Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1

    In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.

    Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)

    What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothing there for christsakes... Yet
    I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.
    honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?

    I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
    Stein

    Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.
    You seem too intelligent to honestly believe that today's political system will impeach Clinton. Am I wrong?
    I've never been accused of being intelligent. I think things are going to happen that will change the political climate it will be unprecedented.
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    Social Exclusion Breeds Conspiratorial Thinking
    "...they find their own group where they feel they belong — albeit one largely untethered to reality. "
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    JC29856 said:

    benjs said:

    JC29856 said:

    my2hands said:

    JC29856 said:

    JC29856 said:

    “The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”

    Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1

    In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.

    Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)

    What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothing there for christsakes... Yet
    I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.
    honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?

    I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
    Stein

    Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.
    You seem too intelligent to honestly believe that today's political system will impeach Clinton. Am I wrong?
    I've never been accused of being intelligent. I think things are going to happen that will change the political climate it will be unprecedented.
    Change the political climate? Hasn't this already happened?
  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,597
    benjs said:

    JC29856 said:

    my2hands said:

    JC29856 said:

    JC29856 said:

    “The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”

    Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1

    In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.

    Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)

    What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothing there for christsakes... Yet
    I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.
    honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?

    I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
    Stein

    Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.
    You seem too intelligent to honestly believe that today's political system will impeach Clinton. Am I wrong?
    We didn't think they would impeach her husband in 1998 either. Congress is even crazier today thanks to the Tea Party. It won't happen shortly after she is inaugurated but it could definitely happen.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/301715-rubio-says-gop-should-avoid-talking-about-wikileaks

    Wow...something intelligent from Rubio

    Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) said that he will not discuss any leaked documents published by WikiLeaks and is calling on the rest of his party to ignore them as well.

    "As our intelligence agencies have said, these leaks are an effort by a foreign government to interfere with our electoral process and I will not indulge it,” Rubio told ABC News.
    "Further, I want to warn my fellow Republicans who may want to capitalize politically on these leaks: Today it is the Democrats. Tomorrow it could be us."
    Marco can't help it. Hillary has released the mind worms.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Rubio- we're all in glass houses, don't be stupid and throw stones
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    benjs said:

    JC29856 said:

    my2hands said:

    JC29856 said:

    JC29856 said:

    “The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”

    Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1

    In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.

    Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)

    What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothalittlre for christsakes... Yet
    I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.
    honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?

    I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
    Stein

    Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.
    You seem too intelligent to honestly believe that today's political system will impeach Clinton. Am I wrong?
    Would you like to further discuss today's political system? I wasn't sure if you meant the mechanisms or the climate. I welcome an ongoing discussion.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Hmmmm. Hilliary a wee bit disturbed about wiki leaks.
  • Yea, she looks disturbed.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • my2hands
    my2hands Posts: 17,117
    Disturbed and about to win in a landslide lol
  • Gern Blansten
    Gern Blansten Mar-A-Lago Posts: 22,150
    JC29856 said:

    Hmmmm. Hilliary a wee bit disturbed about wiki leaks.

    Yeah so disturbed that she destroyed your boy
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
  • pjalive21
    pjalive21 St. Louis, MO Posts: 2,818
    edited October 2016
    my2hands said:

    Disturbed and about to win in a landslide lol

    If she wins its because most people don't have the mental capacity to research the candidate they are voting for... we may disagree on this forum but ill tell you right now at least everyone can form a valid reason for why they back their candidate (which i dont have one anymore) so much respect in that matter to the people on this board which gives me a glimmer of hope

    just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisle

  • Gern Blansten
    Gern Blansten Mar-A-Lago Posts: 22,150
    pjalive21 said:

    my2hands said:

    Disturbed and about to win in a landslide lol

    If she wins its because most people don't have the mental capacity to research the candidate they are voting for... we may disagree on this forum but ill tell you right now at least everyone can form a valid reason for why they back their candidate (which i dont have one anymore) so much respect in that matter to the people on this board which gives me a glimmer of hope

    just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisle

    Who are you voting for?
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
  • pjalive21
    pjalive21 St. Louis, MO Posts: 2,818

    pjalive21 said:

    my2hands said:

    Disturbed and about to win in a landslide lol

    If she wins its because most people don't have the mental capacity to research the candidate they are voting for... we may disagree on this forum but ill tell you right now at least everyone can form a valid reason for why they back their candidate (which i dont have one anymore) so much respect in that matter to the people on this board which gives me a glimmer of hope

    just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisle

    Who are you voting for?
    was Rand Paul....as of right now im not voting for the first time in my entire life and that is depressing
  • my2hands
    my2hands Posts: 17,117
    pjalive21 said:

    pjalive21 said:

    my2hands said:

    Disturbed and about to win in a landslide lol

    If she wins its because most people don't have the mental capacity to research the candidate they are voting for... we may disagree on this forum but ill tell you right now at least everyone can form a valid reason for why they back their candidate (which i dont have one anymore) so much respect in that matter to the people on this board which gives me a glimmer of hope

    just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisle

    Who are you voting for?
    was Rand Paul....as of right now im not voting for the first time in my entire life and that is depressing
    no local races to have a voice in? no marijuana legalization ballot measure you can vote yes on? lol

    surely you can find a reason to vote...

    I also have more faith in the American public than most people do and happen to believe that people are more informed and knowledgeable now than ever before


  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Here is a wonderful post for thorough discussion. Email discusses whats Hilliarys position on TPP and Glass/St plus is mentions the Gold Standard which I thought Hilliary claimed she never said. Thoughts??

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22392
    1. * She has to be for TPP*. She called it the "gold standard" of trade agreements. I think opposing that would be a huge flip flop. She can say that as President she would work to change it. She can say that it can be better. But I think she should support it.
This discussion has been closed.