The Podesta Emails
Comments
-
Steinmy2hands said:
honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?JC29856 said:
I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.Gern Blansten said:
What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothing there for christsakes... YetJC29856 said:“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.0 -
Qatar gifts Bill Clinton $1,000,000 for his birthday. Arms flow increases 1,482%: https://t.co/bgVbNhhe1C and https://t.co/cfkP6yDBhr0
-
You seem too intelligent to honestly believe that today's political system will impeach Clinton. Am I wrong?JC29856 said:
Steinmy2hands said:
honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?JC29856 said:
I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.Gern Blansten said:
What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothing there for christsakes... YetJC29856 said:“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
What do you think all this is for? They're warming up for impeachment to drag her name through some more mud. It's not that they actually have anything on her, they're building a narrative to try to contain Hillary to 4 years. That's why the down ticket voting is so important.benjs said:
You seem too intelligent to honestly believe that today's political system will impeach Clinton. Am I wrong?JC29856 said:
Steinmy2hands said:
honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?JC29856 said:
I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.Gern Blansten said:
What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothing there for christsakes... YetJC29856 said:“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.0 -
I've never been accused of being intelligent. I think things are going to happen that will change the political climate it will be unprecedented.benjs said:
You seem too intelligent to honestly believe that today's political system will impeach Clinton. Am I wrong?JC29856 said:
Steinmy2hands said:
honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?JC29856 said:
I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.Gern Blansten said:
What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothing there for christsakes... YetJC29856 said:“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.0 -
Social Exclusion Breeds Conspiratorial Thinking
"...they find their own group where they feel they belong — albeit one largely untethered to reality. "0 -
Change the political climate? Hasn't this already happened?JC29856 said:
I've never been accused of being intelligent. I think things are going to happen that will change the political climate it will be unprecedented.benjs said:
You seem too intelligent to honestly believe that today's political system will impeach Clinton. Am I wrong?JC29856 said:
Steinmy2hands said:
honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?JC29856 said:
I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.Gern Blansten said:
What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothing there for christsakes... YetJC29856 said:“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.0 -
We didn't think they would impeach her husband in 1998 either. Congress is even crazier today thanks to the Tea Party. It won't happen shortly after she is inaugurated but it could definitely happen.benjs said:
You seem too intelligent to honestly believe that today's political system will impeach Clinton. Am I wrong?JC29856 said:
Steinmy2hands said:
honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?JC29856 said:
I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.Gern Blansten said:
What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothing there for christsakes... YetJC29856 said:“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.___________________________________________
"...I changed by not changing at all..."0 -
Marco can't help it. Hillary has released the mind worms.Gern Blansten said:http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/301715-rubio-says-gop-should-avoid-talking-about-wikileaks
Wow...something intelligent from RubioSen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) said that he will not discuss any leaked documents published by WikiLeaks and is calling on the rest of his party to ignore them as well.
"As our intelligence agencies have said, these leaks are an effort by a foreign government to interfere with our electoral process and I will not indulge it,” Rubio told ABC News.
"Further, I want to warn my fellow Republicans who may want to capitalize politically on these leaks: Today it is the Democrats. Tomorrow it could be us."09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Rubio- we're all in glass houses, don't be stupid and throw stones0
-
Would you like to further discuss today's political system? I wasn't sure if you meant the mechanisms or the climate. I welcome an ongoing discussion.benjs said:
You seem too intelligent to honestly believe that today's political system will impeach Clinton. Am I wrong?JC29856 said:
Steinmy2hands said:
honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?JC29856 said:
I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.Gern Blansten said:
What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothalittlre for christsakes... YetJC29856 said:“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.0 -
Hmmmm. Hilliary a wee bit disturbed about wiki leaks.0
-
Yea, she looks disturbed.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Disturbed and about to win in a landslide lol0
-
Yeah so disturbed that she destroyed your boyJC29856 said:Hmmmm. Hilliary a wee bit disturbed about wiki leaks.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
If she wins its because most people don't have the mental capacity to research the candidate they are voting for... we may disagree on this forum but ill tell you right now at least everyone can form a valid reason for why they back their candidate (which i dont have one anymore) so much respect in that matter to the people on this board which gives me a glimmer of hopemy2hands said:Disturbed and about to win in a landslide lol
just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisle
0 -
Who are you voting for?pjalive21 said:
If she wins its because most people don't have the mental capacity to research the candidate they are voting for... we may disagree on this forum but ill tell you right now at least everyone can form a valid reason for why they back their candidate (which i dont have one anymore) so much respect in that matter to the people on this board which gives me a glimmer of hopemy2hands said:Disturbed and about to win in a landslide lol
just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisleRemember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
was Rand Paul....as of right now im not voting for the first time in my entire life and that is depressingGern Blansten said:
Who are you voting for?pjalive21 said:
If she wins its because most people don't have the mental capacity to research the candidate they are voting for... we may disagree on this forum but ill tell you right now at least everyone can form a valid reason for why they back their candidate (which i dont have one anymore) so much respect in that matter to the people on this board which gives me a glimmer of hopemy2hands said:Disturbed and about to win in a landslide lol
just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisle0 -
no local races to have a voice in? no marijuana legalization ballot measure you can vote yes on? lolpjalive21 said:
was Rand Paul....as of right now im not voting for the first time in my entire life and that is depressingGern Blansten said:
Who are you voting for?pjalive21 said:
If she wins its because most people don't have the mental capacity to research the candidate they are voting for... we may disagree on this forum but ill tell you right now at least everyone can form a valid reason for why they back their candidate (which i dont have one anymore) so much respect in that matter to the people on this board which gives me a glimmer of hopemy2hands said:Disturbed and about to win in a landslide lol
just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisle
surely you can find a reason to vote...
I also have more faith in the American public than most people do and happen to believe that people are more informed and knowledgeable now than ever before
0 -
Here is a wonderful post for thorough discussion. Email discusses whats Hilliarys position on TPP and Glass/St plus is mentions the Gold Standard which I thought Hilliary claimed she never said. Thoughts??
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22392
1. * She has to be for TPP*. She called it the "gold standard" of trade agreements. I think opposing that would be a huge flip flop. She can say that as President she would work to change it. She can say that it can be better. But I think she should support it.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help