The Podesta Emails

Boxes&Books

my2hands said:

JC29856 said:

“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”

Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1

In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.

Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)

that's because one is an actual story, and the other is a total non story so far...

you act like the JFK assassination and 9/11 conspiracy has been hacked and exposed LOL

Didn't you wish him

pjalive21 said:

Gern Blansten said:

pjalive21 said:

my2hands said:

Disturbed and about to win in a landslide lol

If she wins its because most people don't have the mental capacity to research the candidate they are voting for... we may disagree on this forum but ill tell you right now at least everyone can form a valid reason for why they back their candidate (which i dont have one anymore) so much respect in that matter to the people on this board which gives me a glimmer of hope

just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisle

Who are you voting for?

was Rand Paul....as of right now im not voting for the first time in my entire life and that is depressing

Dude, vote trump. A protest vote. That simple. Don't give the bigger crook any help.

I'm a progressive and will be voting Trump to protest this crooked Hillary.

Boxes&Books

my2hands said:

Disturbed and about to win in a landslide lol

You're LOL'ing because you're electing a crook? Astonishing. Two of thee very worst candidates ever! And you're LOL'ing.... Amazing

JC29856

Is the staff confirming Obama knew about Hillary's email server? What if Obama knew and lied about knowing?

Suggest Philippe talk to Josh (Earnest) or Eric (Holder). They know POTUS and HRC emailed. Josh has been asked about that. Standard practice is not to confirm anything about his email, so his answer to press was that he would not comment/confirm. I recollect that Josh was also asked if POTUS ever noticed her personal email account and he said something like POTUS likely had better things to do than focus on his Cabinet's email addresses.

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21779

HughFreakingDillon

pjalive21 said:

my2hands said:

Disturbed and about to win in a landslide lol

If she wins its because most people don't have the mental capacity to research the candidate they are voting for... we may disagree on this forum but ill tell you right now at least everyone can form a valid reason for why they back their candidate (which i dont have one anymore) so much respect in that matter to the people on this board which gives me a glimmer of hope

just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisle

it has little to do with mental capacity. it has everything to do with partisanship, and fear of the other candidate, on both sides. but moreso than in any other election in history, partisanship on the R side is shifting because they all know how dangerous Trump is. and it's no that they fear he will bring down the crooked establishment. they fear he will bring down the republic as a whole. which he very well might.

Gern Blansten

tonifig8 said:

my2hands said:

Disturbed and about to win in a landslide lol

You're LOL'ing because you're electing a crook? Astonishing. Two of thee very worst candidates ever! And you're LOL'ing.... Amazing

LOL

JC29856

The discussion should be were Hilliarys emails hacked? Was national security compromised by having an insecure server?

Podesta admits it'd be stupid to say there is a security argument for having a private email server

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23327

pjalive21

my2hands said:

pjalive21 said:

Gern Blansten said:

pjalive21 said:

my2hands said:

Disturbed and about to win in a landslide lol

If she wins its because most people don't have the mental capacity to research the candidate they are voting for... we may disagree on this forum but ill tell you right now at least everyone can form a valid reason for why they back their candidate (which i dont have one anymore) so much respect in that matter to the people on this board which gives me a glimmer of hope

just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisle

Who are you voting for?

was Rand Paul....as of right now im not voting for the first time in my entire life and that is depressing

no local races to have a voice in? no marijuana legalization ballot measure you can vote yes on? lol

surely you can find a reason to vote...

I also have more faith in the American public than most people do and happen to believe that people are more informed and knowledgeable now than ever before

Ill vote those other issues for sure...im specifically talking about presidential because local issues to me are just as important

tonifig8 said:

my2hands said:

JC29856 said:

“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”

Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1

In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.

Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)

that's because one is an actual story, and the other is a total non story so far...

you act like the JFK assassination and 9/11 conspiracy has been hacked and exposed LOL

Didn't you wish him

pjalive21 said:

Gern Blansten said:

pjalive21 said:

my2hands said:

Disturbed and about to win in a landslide lol

If she wins its because most people don't have the mental capacity to research the candidate they are voting for... we may disagree on this forum but ill tell you right now at least everyone can form a valid reason for why they back their candidate (which i dont have one anymore) so much respect in that matter to the people on this board which gives me a glimmer of hope

just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisle

Who are you voting for?

was Rand Paul....as of right now im not voting for the first time in my entire life and that is depressing

Dude, vote trump. A protest vote. That simple. Don't give the bigger crook any help.

I'm a progressive and will be voting Trump to protest this crooked Hillary.

ill be completely transparent if i do decide to vote it would be a protest vote against HRC

JC29856

Since one single vote doesn't matter the question shouldn't be who are you voting for, it should be, if your vote decided the election who would you vote for?
You would get different answers to those questions.

JC29856

Interesting how they want to eliminate competition (Biden bloomberg warren Sanders) and opposition? Gowdy
Does anyway think that illustrates a confident and strong candidate with leadership?


https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22078

I would not suggest HRC or the campaign raise this directly unless the strategy is total war, but I would suggest that some of her better surrogates might call on Trey Gowdy to resign from the Ethics C'tee

unsung

JC29856

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21795

Hilliary's support

I was under the impression she wasn't giving remarks in Marion since it's an event with 10-15 people?

Gern Blansten

JC29856 said:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21795

Hilliary's support

I was under the impression she wasn't giving remarks in Marion since it's an event with 10-15 people?

Shocking!!

my2hands

tonifig8 said:

Dude, vote trump. A protest vote. That simple. Don't give the bigger crook any help.

I'm a progressive and will be voting Trump to protest this crooked Hillary.

You are a "progressive" and you're voting for Trump? LOL

That's totally ridiculous

mace1229

pjalive21 said:

my2hands said:

Disturbed and about to win in a landslide lol

If she wins its because most people don't have the mental capacity to research the candidate they are voting for... we may disagree on this forum but ill tell you right now at least everyone can form a valid reason for why they back their candidate (which i dont have one anymore) so much respect in that matter to the people on this board which gives me a glimmer of hope

just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisle

I remember every election Jay Leno (I think) would go on the street and ask who someone was voting for. He then would switch the views of the two candidates and ask if they agree and the person would always say "yes, that's why I'm voting for him!" A good portion of the general population is clueless and relies too much on social media for news.

JC29856

https://youtu.be/8y6HJiD8yac

Free

JC29856 said:

https://youtu.be/8y6HJiD8yac

Deny, deny, deny. What is strategy. Brazil was also involved in the DNC convention baloney too.

JC29856

Free said:

JC29856 said:

https://youtu.be/8y6HJiD8yac

Deny, deny, deny. What is strategy. Brazil was also involved in the DNC convention baloney too.

Kelly should have brought up the email that the Sanders mole sent brazile from @berniesanders.com email.

"That's my story and I'm sticking to it" on steroids!

JC29856

Boring and a bunch of nothing
Hilliary is sociopathic
Answer from script, Russia Russia Russia


https://youtu.be/SWnEjPg83NA

JC29856

Wikileaks tweeted from their main accounts that bobama@ameritech dot net was secret email address used by Barack Obama.

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/789188917736071169

Obama is seen emailing Podesta several times from this secret address. The FBI previously stated that an Obama secret account was communicating with the unsecure, private email server set up by Hillary Clinton. The contents of the emails between Obama and Hillary were never released.

EMAILID 21779

More on Obama's email use. Staff is getting concerned about a NYT story, http://archive.is/noszL titled "Obama Says He Didn’t Know Hillary Clinton Was Using Private Email Address":

Phillipe Reines:

One of us should connect with the WH just so they know that the email will show his statement to not make sense.

Jennifer Palmieri :

Suggest Philippe talk to Josh or Eric (Holder or likely deputy press secretary Eric Shultz) They know POTUS and HRC emailed.

Both Palmieri and Reines are fully aware that not only Obama but lower level staff in the White House knew about the private server and the emails exchanged through it.

Phillipe Reines

Ok. Sounds like people are putting words into his mouth.

This is from March 2015, when Hillary has no official title or position. Yet her underlings are talking about how they will contact the White House to get them to change their story.

Mar 7, 2015 Interview with the owner of "bobama@ameritech" in which he claims he learned about the private email system only at "The same time everybody else learned it from news reports." Also "The policy of my administration is to encourage transparency" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxnFoFOyn48

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21779

Boxes&Books

my2hands said:

tonifig8 said:

Dude, vote trump. A protest vote. That simple. Don't give the bigger crook any help.

I'm a progressive and will be voting Trump to protest this crooked Hillary.

You are a "progressive" and you're voting for Trump? LOL

That's totally ridiculous

Yet you and so many other so-called progressives are voting for a crook who undermines our values and democracy. Gotcha.
Back to the Ed looks hot thread.