Why is that when it's mentioned that Clinton has skeletons in her closet, the response is that she doesn't, because Trump does? Was Hitler good because Pol Pot was bad? Can't we just agree that they both have some egregious actions under their belts, and focus on the severity of their offences?
Seems reasonable doesn't it? But some Hillary supporters refuse to accept or acknowledge that she's anything less than perfect. This is why she's referred to as a queen.
Hi.. I like to just make shit up and apply it to other people.... Who the fuck calls her a queen? Oh I know. You fucking do. No one else does here. Not one person that supports her calls her that. But if you like to make shit up and then convince yourself it's true, knock yourself out.
Why is that when it's mentioned that Clinton has skeletons in her closet, the response is that she doesn't, because Trump does? Was Hitler good because Pol Pot was bad? Can't we just agree that they both have some egregious actions under their belts, and focus on the severity of their offences?
Seems reasonable doesn't it? But some Hillary supporters refuse to accept or acknowledge that she's anything less than perfect. This is why she's referred to as a queen.
Hi.. I like to just make shit up and apply it to other people.... Who the fuck calls her a queen? Oh I know. You fucking do. No one else does here. Not one person that supports her calls her that. But if you like to make shit up and then convince yourself it's true, knock yourself out.
I wasn't even referring to you personally but whatev.
Several (not all) refuse to admit any of Hillary's faults.
Why is that when it's mentioned that Clinton has skeletons in her closet, the response is that she doesn't, because Trump does? Was Hitler good because Pol Pot was bad? Can't we just agree that they both have some egregious actions under their belts, and focus on the severity of their offences?
Seems reasonable doesn't it? But some Hillary supporters refuse to accept or acknowledge that she's anything less than perfect. This is why she's referred to as a queen.
Hi.. I like to just make shit up and apply it to other people.... Who the fuck calls her a queen? Oh I know. You fucking do. No one else does here. Not one person that supports her calls her that. But if you like to make shit up and then convince yourself it's true, knock yourself out.
I wasn't even referring to you personally but whatev.
Several (not all) refuse to admit any of Hillary's faults.
Everyone has faults...why is it so important to you for anyone here to admit to Clinton's faults?
Compare Clinton's faults to Trump's faults and the answer is clear in my opinion. If your opinion differs then so be it.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Why is that when it's mentioned that Clinton has skeletons in her closet, the response is that she doesn't, because Trump does? Was Hitler good because Pol Pot was bad? Can't we just agree that they both have some egregious actions under their belts, and focus on the severity of their offences?
Seems reasonable doesn't it? But some Hillary supporters refuse to accept or acknowledge that she's anything less than perfect. This is why she's referred to as a queen.
Hi.. I like to just make shit up and apply it to other people.... Who the fuck calls her a queen? Oh I know. You fucking do. No one else does here. Not one person that supports her calls her that. But if you like to make shit up and then convince yourself it's true, knock yourself out.
I wasn't even referring to you personally but whatev.
Several (not all) refuse to admit any of Hillary's faults.
Everyone has faults...why is it so important to you for anyone here to admit to Clinton's faults?
Compare Clinton's faults to Trump's faults and the answer is clear in my opinion. If your opinion differs then so be it.
Why is that when it's mentioned that Clinton has skeletons in her closet, the response is that she doesn't, because Trump does? Was Hitler good because Pol Pot was bad? Can't we just agree that they both have some egregious actions under their belts, and focus on the severity of their offences?
Seems reasonable doesn't it? But some Hillary supporters refuse to accept or acknowledge that she's anything less than perfect. This is why she's referred to as a queen.
Hi.. I like to just make shit up and apply it to other people.... Who the fuck calls her a queen? Oh I know. You fucking do. No one else does here. Not one person that supports her calls her that. But if you like to make shit up and then convince yourself it's true, knock yourself out.
I wasn't even referring to you personally but whatev.
Several (not all) refuse to admit any of Hillary's faults.
Who? I have seen everyone acknowledge her faults. Just because we don't lose our minds when we find out that she plays politics like any other politician, that doesn't mean we find her faultless.
Why is that when it's mentioned that Clinton has skeletons in her closet, the response is that she doesn't, because Trump does? Was Hitler good because Pol Pot was bad? Can't we just agree that they both have some egregious actions under their belts, and focus on the severity of their offences?
Seems reasonable doesn't it? But some Hillary supporters refuse to accept or acknowledge that she's anything less than perfect. This is why she's referred to as a queen.
Hi.. I like to just make shit up and apply it to other people.... Who the fuck calls her a queen? Oh I know. You fucking do. No one else does here. Not one person that supports her calls her that. But if you like to make shit up and then convince yourself it's true, knock yourself out.
I wasn't even referring to you personally but whatev.
Several (not all) refuse to admit any of Hillary's faults.
Who? I have seen everyone acknowledge her faults. Just because we don't lose our minds when we find out that she plays politics like any other politician, that doesn't mean we find her faultless.
Why is that when it's mentioned that Clinton has skeletons in her closet, the response is that she doesn't, because Trump does? Was Hitler good because Pol Pot was bad? Can't we just agree that they both have some egregious actions under their belts, and focus on the severity of their offences?
Seems reasonable doesn't it? But some Hillary supporters refuse to accept or acknowledge that she's anything less than perfect. This is why she's referred to as a queen.
Hi.. I like to just make shit up and apply it to other people.... Who the fuck calls her a queen? Oh I know. You fucking do. No one else does here. Not one person that supports her calls her that. But if you like to make shit up and then convince yourself it's true, knock yourself out.
I wasn't even referring to you personally but whatev.
Several (not all) refuse to admit any of Hillary's faults.
Who? I have seen everyone acknowledge her faults. Just because we don't lose our minds when we find out that she plays politics like any other politician, that doesn't mean we find her faultless.
Why is that when it's mentioned that Clinton has skeletons in her closet, the response is that she doesn't, because Trump does? Was Hitler good because Pol Pot was bad? Can't we just agree that they both have some egregious actions under their belts, and focus on the severity of their offences?
Seems reasonable doesn't it? But some Hillary supporters refuse to accept or acknowledge that she's anything less than perfect. This is why she's referred to as a queen.
Hi.. I like to just make shit up and apply it to other people.... Who the fuck calls her a queen? Oh I know. You fucking do. No one else does here. Not one person that supports her calls her that. But if you like to make shit up and then convince yourself it's true, knock yourself out.
I wasn't even referring to you personally but whatev.
Several (not all) refuse to admit any of Hillary's faults.
Who? I have seen everyone acknowledge her faults. Just because we don't lose our minds when we find out that she plays politics like any other politician, that doesn't mean we find her faultless.
And who the fuck calls her the Queen?
i think it was pete rose.
Are you being serious?
Pete Rose doesn't strike me as a Hillary supporter.
Is there honor in winning when you've cheated? Hillary and Donna Brazile
There is a new email on the chain where Donna Brazile was caught helping Hillary cheat in the debate. She totally lied when she said she didn't send a question to Hillary in advance of the debate.
I rarely hear it. I'll send a few more. Though some questions Roland submitted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AMZkDM2SpY This is what Donna said about this issue. Donna claimed she was "being persecuted" for being asked about leaking the question to Hillary so she could cheat.
Previously Donna was busted because this older part of the email: "Here's one that worries me about HRC. DEATH PENALTY 19 states and.. " The subject of Donna Brazile's email was:
subject: From time to time I get the questions in advance
Subject: One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash
Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint.
Here is the Flint question Cooper asks:
... Tonight the Democratic candidates are here to answer questions about what they would do for Flint, as well as about other issues facing their country right now.
Each candidate has one minute for an opening statement, Senator Sanders is first. We begin with him. Senator Sanders?
Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon" I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
call this the conspiracy theorist in me but do you believe Abedin or Weiner himself saved those emails on purpose to use as leverage? I blame talk radio this morning for that theory
call this the conspiracy theorist in me but do you believe Abedin or Weiner himself saved those emails on purpose to use as leverage? I blame talk radio this morning for that theory
You can learn a lot about what might happen in an alternate universe, when listening to talk radio in the morning.
I don't think I've ever heard of 200,000 emails on a laptop let alone 650,000. Anyone else lend any perspective on 650k emails on a computer?
i have almost 20,000 for this year on my office computer (received and sent) and i'm about a million times less important than the Secretary of State so I don't see that is it that far fetched especially if that is over a period of years.
I don't think I've ever heard of 200,000 emails on a laptop let alone 650,000. Anyone else lend any perspective on 650k emails on a computer?
i have almost 20,000 for this year on my office computer (received and sent) and i'm about a million times less important than the Secretary of State so I don't see that is it that far fetched especially if that is over a period of years.
Just to clarify, its wiener notebook not Hilliary.
call this the conspiracy theorist in me but do you believe Abedin or Weiner himself saved those emails on purpose to use as leverage? I blame talk radio this morning for that theory
I'm not certain these emails were on the computer hardrive, they could have been in a cloud or they could have come from NSA. The fbi investigators were none too happy when their boss decided not to indict.
Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon" I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
Yes legit, yesterday. Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.
So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?
Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon" I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
Yes legit, yesterday. Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.
So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?
I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
I wonder if real charities like breast cancer research or animal welfare institute have long chain email discussions about what to call their receipts? Is it a donation, a contribution, a sponsorship, an endowment? Do they go back and fourth on using attendance fees or membership fees or fellowships?
Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon" I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
Yes legit, yesterday. Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.
So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?
I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.
I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".
Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon" I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
Yes legit, yesterday. Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.
So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?
I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.
I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".
No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon" I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
Yes legit, yesterday. Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.
So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?
I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.
I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".
No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.
Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.
When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".
Key is the development of a single record for a voter that aggregates all that is known about them. In 2016 smart phones will be used to identify, meet, and update profiles on the voter.
Last week, WikiLeaks dropped a 2011 memo by top Bill Clinton aide Doug Band that lays bare Team Clinton’s sordid financial dealings when Hillary Clinton was secretary of State.
Band describes how the Clinton Foundation served as a conduit for what he called “Bill Clinton Inc.” — the former president’s for-profit arm. Other documents show State Department involvement. The result is an unsavory mix of charity work, profiteering, and pay-to-play politics that potentially reaches the highest levels of US foreign policy and screams for IRS and Department of Justice reviews.
Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon" I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
Yes legit, yesterday. Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.
So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?
I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.
I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".
No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.
Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.
When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".
These clintonites keep making excuses. The fact that Clinton used this info is completely irrelevant to them- it's the fault of others, not Clinton. Never is it Clinton's. It's astonishing the amount of excuses we read on here. The denial factor is off the charts.
Comments
Several (not all) refuse to admit any of Hillary's faults.
Compare Clinton's faults to Trump's faults and the answer is clear in my opinion. If your opinion differs then so be it.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
I have seen everyone acknowledge her faults.
Just because we don't lose our minds when we find out that she plays politics like any other politician, that doesn't mean we find her faultless.
Pete Rose doesn't strike me as a Hillary supporter.
Podesta said he divested Russian investments, emails reveal he shifted them to his daughter.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/36678
There is a new email on the chain where Donna Brazile was caught helping Hillary cheat in the debate. She totally lied when she said she didn't send a question to Hillary in advance of the debate.
I rarely hear it. I'll send a few more. Though some questions Roland submitted
Previously Donna was busted because this older part of the email: "Here's one that worries me about HRC. DEATH PENALTY 19 states and.. " The subject of Donna Brazile's email was:
subject: From time to time I get the questions in advance
Roland is Roland Martin, the guy who actually asked the questions about the death penalty, moderating. See this video
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/39807
Donna Brazile sending MORE questions to Hillary.
Subject: One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash
Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint.
Here is the Flint question Cooper asks:
... Tonight the Democratic candidates are here to answer questions about what they would do for Flint, as well as about other issues facing their country right now.
Each candidate has one minute for an opening statement, Senator Sanders is first. We begin with him. Senator Sanders?
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/38478
CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
call this the conspiracy theorist in me but do you believe Abedin or Weiner himself saved those emails on purpose to use as leverage? I blame talk radio this morning for that theory
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/38128
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.
So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?
When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".
got to give Obama credit, he didn't flip flop
Key is the development of a single record for a voter that aggregates all
that is known about them. In 2016 smart phones will be used to identify,
meet, and update profiles on the voter.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/37262
"...for every tool they lend us, a loss of independence..."
Band describes how the Clinton Foundation served as a conduit for what he called “Bill Clinton Inc.” — the former president’s for-profit arm. Other documents show State Department involvement.
The result is an unsavory mix of charity work, profiteering, and pay-to-play politics that potentially reaches the highest levels of US foreign policy and screams for IRS and Department of Justice reviews.
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/303663-bill-and-hillary-partners-in-crime-literally