Hillary won more votes for President

Halifax2TheMax · September 2016

Alt-right floats misinformation, knowing the average American won't read, never mind comprehend, the baseless facts provided. Just say it, repeat it and repeat it.

Try reading your drivel professor and comprehending it. But as a self professed neocon, you're a warrior for truth, aren't you?

PJ_Soul · September 2016

tonifig8 said:

PJ_Soul said:

tonifig8 said:
Hillary was asked twice by reporters, if Tim K. knew about her condition? First response was completely ignored. Second time she was asked she said, "I communicated with Tim; I talked to him again last night," Clinton said. "We communicated, but I’m not going to go into our personal conversations."

Wtf.
What are you hoping for here? Seems reasonable to me.
Nearly 70% untrustworthy. You would think that something as basic as this would get a regular answer. The internet almost crashed on Sunday. Her health has been the center of conversation 24/7 since Sunday.

David Axelrod's comment immediately comes to mind

I don't really know what you're talking about, but I do know that media certainly has done a great job in putting green what's important out of the minds of voters and has everyone focusing on a non-issue.

oftenreading · September 2016

PJ_Soul said:

tonifig8 said:

PJ_Soul said:

tonifig8 said:
Hillary was asked twice by reporters, if Tim K. knew about her condition? First response was completely ignored. Second time she was asked she said, "I communicated with Tim; I talked to him again last night," Clinton said. "We communicated, but I’m not going to go into our personal conversations."

Wtf.
What are you hoping for here? Seems reasonable to me.
Nearly 70% untrustworthy. You would think that something as basic as this would get a regular answer. The internet almost crashed on Sunday. Her health has been the center of conversation 24/7 since Sunday.

David Axelrod's comment immediately comes to mind
I don't really know what you're talking about, but I do know that media certainly has done a great job in putting green what's important out of the minds of voters and has everyone focusing on a non-issue.

Hmmm. Now I'm thinking about golf. That's a non-issue.

JC29856 · September 2016

Clinton hypocrisy.

https://youtu.be/vV0TUnGDxeQ

JC29856 · September 2016

Clinton hypocrisy.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/feb/25/barackobama.hillaryclinton

Halifax2TheMax · September 2016

JC29856 said:
Clinton hypocrisy.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/feb/25/barackobama.hillaryclinton

"The photo in question first appeared on the Drudge Report."

Halifax2TheMax · September 2016

On the one hand, you have a campaign that fired staffers or had staffers resign for the "dirty tricks" committed and on the other a campaign that embraced the "dirty tricks" and ran with it for six years until a day or two ago. Then the subject of said "dirty tricks" appointed Hillary SoS. Yup, hypocrisy.

BS44325 · September 2016

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

tonifig8 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:
People are missing a little tidbit here. If indeed HC started the birther movement, which I think is a stretch, Trump believed it without any proof whatsoever and made it his mission to smear a sitting president. Do you realky want a guy who is willing to do so much damage just to firce his own agenda without so much as a fucking google search? The guy, in my opinion, just made himself look like a stupid sheep who is easily playable by the other side.
Wait, but if she did start it what does that make her?

And who started this whole birther discussion again?

It's crazy how most of the time spent around here is about defending Clinton. It's one excuse after another... Non-stop. And the clintonite army doesn't see a single issue with Clinton.

It's the world against a good, honest, hard working woman (according to the clintonites) .... You guys are doing a great job making excuse after excuse after excuse... I'm sure she's completely innocent and the rest of us are just angry Bernie bros
Sidney Blumenthal
Such a stupid argument on so many levels. To compare what Blumenthal allegedly told an ex-Mclatchey person with what Trump has clearly done on TV and Twitter for 6 years is beyond the scope of bizarre and straight into realm of retarded. Only out and out morons would fall for such a blatant lie (flip over to Breitbart.com for them). Only the type of people that believe that Hillary had JFK Jr. killed would believe such a thing AND draw equivalency between the candidates because of it. Pathetic. Keep peddling it though, it's a real compliment to all that do.
It's pretty clear that you don't understand how a "whisper campaign" works. Blumenthal doesn't act on his own.
It's pretty clear you don't have any true evidence, ergo a 'whisper campaign'. And even if there is a shred of truth, isn't Trump the one that made it a spectacle for for six years? As I said, it's total false equivalency.
The Blumenthal report is evidence. There is no false equivalency. They were both participants in the nonsense. Trump was a jerk for it and so was Hillary. The difference is that Hillary and her supporters want to take some kind of moral high ground that they have not earned.
What Blumenthal report? There is a tweet from an ex McC newswire person that claims it.
A little more then a tweet

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article102354777.html

They actually sent an investigator to Kenya based on Blumenthal pushing them the story
How fucking daft are you? Did you even read the article you linked? Oh professor you're slipping.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article102354777.html

"There is no evidence that the campaign or Hillary had direct knowledge of or supported the efforts of Blummie." To paraphrase a key fucking sentence buried in the article.

Shhhhhhhhhhh, hear the whisper.

Only a fool would believe that Blumethal just acted on his own. He is a Clinton operative through and through. Shortly after the election Clinton tried to get him a position at the State Department but was shut out by the Obama administration due to his burning of bridges in the campaign. No worries though...the Clinton Foundation then hired him at a salay of $10,000.00 a month to feed her intelligence on Libya. You can try to keep up the appearance of plausible deniability if you like but people just aren't buying it.

Halifax2TheMax · September 2016

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

tonifig8 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:
People are missing a little tidbit here. If indeed HC started the birther movement, which I think is a stretch, Trump believed it without any proof whatsoever and made it his mission to smear a sitting president. Do you realky want a guy who is willing to do so much damage just to firce his own agenda without so much as a fucking google search? The guy, in my opinion, just made himself look like a stupid sheep who is easily playable by the other side.
Wait, but if she did start it what does that make her?

And who started this whole birther discussion again?

It's crazy how most of the time spent around here is about defending Clinton. It's one excuse after another... Non-stop. And the clintonite army doesn't see a single issue with Clinton.

It's the world against a good, honest, hard working woman (according to the clintonites) .... You guys are doing a great job making excuse after excuse after excuse... I'm sure she's completely innocent and the rest of us are just angry Bernie bros
Sidney Blumenthal
Such a stupid argument on so many levels. To compare what Blumenthal allegedly told an ex-Mclatchey person with what Trump has clearly done on TV and Twitter for 6 years is beyond the scope of bizarre and straight into realm of retarded. Only out and out morons would fall for such a blatant lie (flip over to Breitbart.com for them). Only the type of people that believe that Hillary had JFK Jr. killed would believe such a thing AND draw equivalency between the candidates because of it. Pathetic. Keep peddling it though, it's a real compliment to all that do.
It's pretty clear that you don't understand how a "whisper campaign" works. Blumenthal doesn't act on his own.
It's pretty clear you don't have any true evidence, ergo a 'whisper campaign'. And even if there is a shred of truth, isn't Trump the one that made it a spectacle for for six years? As I said, it's total false equivalency.
The Blumenthal report is evidence. There is no false equivalency. They were both participants in the nonsense. Trump was a jerk for it and so was Hillary. The difference is that Hillary and her supporters want to take some kind of moral high ground that they have not earned.
What Blumenthal report? There is a tweet from an ex McC newswire person that claims it.
A little more then a tweet

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article102354777.html

They actually sent an investigator to Kenya based on Blumenthal pushing them the story
How fucking daft are you? Did you even read the article you linked? Oh professor you're slipping.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article102354777.html

"There is no evidence that the campaign or Hillary had direct knowledge of or supported the efforts of Blummie." To paraphrase a key fucking sentence buried in the article.

Shhhhhhhhhhh, hear the whisper.
Only a fool would believe that Blumethal just acted on his own. He is a Clinton operative through and through. Shortly after the election Clinton tried to get him a position at the State Department but was shut out by the Obama administration due to his burning of bridges in the campaign. No worries though...the Clinton Foundation then hired him at a salay of $10,000.00 a month to feed her intelligence on Libya. You can try to keep up the appearance of plausible deniability if you like but people just aren't buying it.

And you can continue to try and escape the matrix, professor.

Do you have a source for why Bloomy was hired for $10K a month? Or is it just one more thing you want it to be?

PJ_Soul · September 2016

oftenreading said:

PJ_Soul said:

tonifig8 said:

PJ_Soul said:

tonifig8 said:
Hillary was asked twice by reporters, if Tim K. knew about her condition? First response was completely ignored. Second time she was asked she said, "I communicated with Tim; I talked to him again last night," Clinton said. "We communicated, but I’m not going to go into our personal conversations."

Wtf.
What are you hoping for here? Seems reasonable to me.
Nearly 70% untrustworthy. You would think that something as basic as this would get a regular answer. The internet almost crashed on Sunday. Her health has been the center of conversation 24/7 since Sunday.

David Axelrod's comment immediately comes to mind
I don't really know what you're talking about, but I do know that media certainly has done a great job in putting green what's important out of the minds of voters and has everyone focusing on a non-issue.
Hmmm. Now I'm thinking about golf. That's a non-issue.

whoopies. *putting

BS44325 · September 2016

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

tonifig8 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:
People are missing a little tidbit here. If indeed HC started the birther movement, which I think is a stretch, Trump believed it without any proof whatsoever and made it his mission to smear a sitting president. Do you realky want a guy who is willing to do so much damage just to firce his own agenda without so much as a fucking google search? The guy, in my opinion, just made himself look like a stupid sheep who is easily playable by the other side.
Wait, but if she did start it what does that make her?

And who started this whole birther discussion again?

It's crazy how most of the time spent around here is about defending Clinton. It's one excuse after another... Non-stop. And the clintonite army doesn't see a single issue with Clinton.

It's the world against a good, honest, hard working woman (according to the clintonites) .... You guys are doing a great job making excuse after excuse after excuse... I'm sure she's completely innocent and the rest of us are just angry Bernie bros
Sidney Blumenthal
Such a stupid argument on so many levels. To compare what Blumenthal allegedly told an ex-Mclatchey person with what Trump has clearly done on TV and Twitter for 6 years is beyond the scope of bizarre and straight into realm of retarded. Only out and out morons would fall for such a blatant lie (flip over to Breitbart.com for them). Only the type of people that believe that Hillary had JFK Jr. killed would believe such a thing AND draw equivalency between the candidates because of it. Pathetic. Keep peddling it though, it's a real compliment to all that do.
It's pretty clear that you don't understand how a "whisper campaign" works. Blumenthal doesn't act on his own.
It's pretty clear you don't have any true evidence, ergo a 'whisper campaign'. And even if there is a shred of truth, isn't Trump the one that made it a spectacle for for six years? As I said, it's total false equivalency.
The Blumenthal report is evidence. There is no false equivalency. They were both participants in the nonsense. Trump was a jerk for it and so was Hillary. The difference is that Hillary and her supporters want to take some kind of moral high ground that they have not earned.
What Blumenthal report? There is a tweet from an ex McC newswire person that claims it.
A little more then a tweet

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article102354777.html

They actually sent an investigator to Kenya based on Blumenthal pushing them the story
How fucking daft are you? Did you even read the article you linked? Oh professor you're slipping.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article102354777.html

"There is no evidence that the campaign or Hillary had direct knowledge of or supported the efforts of Blummie." To paraphrase a key fucking sentence buried in the article.

Shhhhhhhhhhh, hear the whisper.
Only a fool would believe that Blumethal just acted on his own. He is a Clinton operative through and through. Shortly after the election Clinton tried to get him a position at the State Department but was shut out by the Obama administration due to his burning of bridges in the campaign. No worries though...the Clinton Foundation then hired him at a salay of $10,000.00 a month to feed her intelligence on Libya. You can try to keep up the appearance of plausible deniability if you like but people just aren't buying it.
And you can continue to try and escape the matrix, professor.

Do you have a source for why Bloomy was hired for $10K a month? Or is it just one more thing you want it to be?

Does anyone have a source for why he was hired for $10k a month? Is it because of his amazing contribution to Haitian relief efforts or for the delivery of HIV medications in Africa? Do people who donate to the Clinton Foundation know that a large percentage of their charitable dollars go towards keeping the Blumenthal Libyan Intelligence agency in business?

Halifax2TheMax · September 2016

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

tonifig8 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:
People are missing a little tidbit here. If indeed HC started the birther movement, which I think is a stretch, Trump believed it without any proof whatsoever and made it his mission to smear a sitting president. Do you realky want a guy who is willing to do so much damage just to firce his own agenda without so much as a fucking google search? The guy, in my opinion, just made himself look like a stupid sheep who is easily playable by the other side.
Wait, but if she did start it what does that make her?

And who started this whole birther discussion again?

It's crazy how most of the time spent around here is about defending Clinton. It's one excuse after another... Non-stop. And the clintonite army doesn't see a single issue with Clinton.

It's the world against a good, honest, hard working woman (according to the clintonites) .... You guys are doing a great job making excuse after excuse after excuse... I'm sure she's completely innocent and the rest of us are just angry Bernie bros
Sidney Blumenthal
Such a stupid argument on so many levels. To compare what Blumenthal allegedly told an ex-Mclatchey person with what Trump has clearly done on TV and Twitter for 6 years is beyond the scope of bizarre and straight into realm of retarded. Only out and out morons would fall for such a blatant lie (flip over to Breitbart.com for them). Only the type of people that believe that Hillary had JFK Jr. killed would believe such a thing AND draw equivalency between the candidates because of it. Pathetic. Keep peddling it though, it's a real compliment to all that do.
It's pretty clear that you don't understand how a "whisper campaign" works. Blumenthal doesn't act on his own.
It's pretty clear you don't have any true evidence, ergo a 'whisper campaign'. And even if there is a shred of truth, isn't Trump the one that made it a spectacle for for six years? As I said, it's total false equivalency.
The Blumenthal report is evidence. There is no false equivalency. They were both participants in the nonsense. Trump was a jerk for it and so was Hillary. The difference is that Hillary and her supporters want to take some kind of moral high ground that they have not earned.
What Blumenthal report? There is a tweet from an ex McC newswire person that claims it.
A little more then a tweet

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article102354777.html

They actually sent an investigator to Kenya based on Blumenthal pushing them the story
How fucking daft are you? Did you even read the article you linked? Oh professor you're slipping.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article102354777.html

"There is no evidence that the campaign or Hillary had direct knowledge of or supported the efforts of Blummie." To paraphrase a key fucking sentence buried in the article.

Shhhhhhhhhhh, hear the whisper.
Only a fool would believe that Blumethal just acted on his own. He is a Clinton operative through and through. Shortly after the election Clinton tried to get him a position at the State Department but was shut out by the Obama administration due to his burning of bridges in the campaign. No worries though...the Clinton Foundation then hired him at a salay of $10,000.00 a month to feed her intelligence on Libya. You can try to keep up the appearance of plausible deniability if you like but people just aren't buying it.
And you can continue to try and escape the matrix, professor.

Do you have a source for why Bloomy was hired for $10K a month? Or is it just one more thing you want it to be?
Does anyone have a source for why he was hired for $10k a month? Is it because of his amazing contribution to Haitian relief efforts or for the delivery of HIV medications in Africa? Do people who donate to the Clinton Foundation know that a large percentage of their charitable dollars go towards keeping the Blumenthal Libyan Intelligence agency in business?

What % seeing that you seem to know?

BS44325 · September 2016

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

tonifig8 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:
People are missing a little tidbit here. If indeed HC started the birther movement, which I think is a stretch, Trump believed it without any proof whatsoever and made it his mission to smear a sitting president. Do you realky want a guy who is willing to do so much damage just to firce his own agenda without so much as a fucking google search? The guy, in my opinion, just made himself look like a stupid sheep who is easily playable by the other side.
Wait, but if she did start it what does that make her?

And who started this whole birther discussion again?

It's crazy how most of the time spent around here is about defending Clinton. It's one excuse after another... Non-stop. And the clintonite army doesn't see a single issue with Clinton.

It's the world against a good, honest, hard working woman (according to the clintonites) .... You guys are doing a great job making excuse after excuse after excuse... I'm sure she's completely innocent and the rest of us are just angry Bernie bros
Sidney Blumenthal
Such a stupid argument on so many levels. To compare what Blumenthal allegedly told an ex-Mclatchey person with what Trump has clearly done on TV and Twitter for 6 years is beyond the scope of bizarre and straight into realm of retarded. Only out and out morons would fall for such a blatant lie (flip over to Breitbart.com for them). Only the type of people that believe that Hillary had JFK Jr. killed would believe such a thing AND draw equivalency between the candidates because of it. Pathetic. Keep peddling it though, it's a real compliment to all that do.
It's pretty clear that you don't understand how a "whisper campaign" works. Blumenthal doesn't act on his own.
It's pretty clear you don't have any true evidence, ergo a 'whisper campaign'. And even if there is a shred of truth, isn't Trump the one that made it a spectacle for for six years? As I said, it's total false equivalency.
The Blumenthal report is evidence. There is no false equivalency. They were both participants in the nonsense. Trump was a jerk for it and so was Hillary. The difference is that Hillary and her supporters want to take some kind of moral high ground that they have not earned.
What Blumenthal report? There is a tweet from an ex McC newswire person that claims it.
A little more then a tweet

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article102354777.html

They actually sent an investigator to Kenya based on Blumenthal pushing them the story
How fucking daft are you? Did you even read the article you linked? Oh professor you're slipping.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article102354777.html

"There is no evidence that the campaign or Hillary had direct knowledge of or supported the efforts of Blummie." To paraphrase a key fucking sentence buried in the article.

Shhhhhhhhhhh, hear the whisper.
Only a fool would believe that Blumethal just acted on his own. He is a Clinton operative through and through. Shortly after the election Clinton tried to get him a position at the State Department but was shut out by the Obama administration due to his burning of bridges in the campaign. No worries though...the Clinton Foundation then hired him at a salay of $10,000.00 a month to feed her intelligence on Libya. You can try to keep up the appearance of plausible deniability if you like but people just aren't buying it.
And you can continue to try and escape the matrix, professor.

Do you have a source for why Bloomy was hired for $10K a month? Or is it just one more thing you want it to be?
Does anyone have a source for why he was hired for $10k a month? Is it because of his amazing contribution to Haitian relief efforts or for the delivery of HIV medications in Africa? Do people who donate to the Clinton Foundation know that a large percentage of their charitable dollars go towards keeping the Blumenthal Libyan Intelligence agency in business?
What % seeing that you seem to know?

Well let's see...

Only 5.7% went to actual charity so you can try to figure out the math

http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/16/just-5-7-percent-of-clinton-foundation-budget-actually-went-to-charity/

Also here's some corroboration on Blumenthal for the deniers out there

http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/79319/confessions-hillary-insider/

mrussel1 · September 2016

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

tonifig8 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:
People are missing a little tidbit here. If indeed HC started the birther movement, which I think is a stretch, Trump believed it without any proof whatsoever and made it his mission to smear a sitting president. Do you realky want a guy who is willing to do so much damage just to firce his own agenda without so much as a fucking google search? The guy, in my opinion, just made himself look like a stupid sheep who is easily playable by the other side.
Wait, but if she did start it what does that make her?

And who started this whole birther discussion again?

It's crazy how most of the time spent around here is about defending Clinton. It's one excuse after another... Non-stop. And the clintonite army doesn't see a single issue with Clinton.

It's the world against a good, honest, hard working woman (according to the clintonites) .... You guys are doing a great job making excuse after excuse after excuse... I'm sure she's completely innocent and the rest of us are just angry Bernie bros
Sidney Blumenthal
Such a stupid argument on so many levels. To compare what Blumenthal allegedly told an ex-Mclatchey person with what Trump has clearly done on TV and Twitter for 6 years is beyond the scope of bizarre and straight into realm of retarded. Only out and out morons would fall for such a blatant lie (flip over to Breitbart.com for them). Only the type of people that believe that Hillary had JFK Jr. killed would believe such a thing AND draw equivalency between the candidates because of it. Pathetic. Keep peddling it though, it's a real compliment to all that do.
It's pretty clear that you don't understand how a "whisper campaign" works. Blumenthal doesn't act on his own.
It's pretty clear you don't have any true evidence, ergo a 'whisper campaign'. And even if there is a shred of truth, isn't Trump the one that made it a spectacle for for six years? As I said, it's total false equivalency.
The Blumenthal report is evidence. There is no false equivalency. They were both participants in the nonsense. Trump was a jerk for it and so was Hillary. The difference is that Hillary and her supporters want to take some kind of moral high ground that they have not earned.
What Blumenthal report? There is a tweet from an ex McC newswire person that claims it.
A little more then a tweet

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article102354777.html

They actually sent an investigator to Kenya based on Blumenthal pushing them the story
How fucking daft are you? Did you even read the article you linked? Oh professor you're slipping.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article102354777.html

"There is no evidence that the campaign or Hillary had direct knowledge of or supported the efforts of Blummie." To paraphrase a key fucking sentence buried in the article.

Shhhhhhhhhhh, hear the whisper.
Only a fool would believe that Blumethal just acted on his own. He is a Clinton operative through and through. Shortly after the election Clinton tried to get him a position at the State Department but was shut out by the Obama administration due to his burning of bridges in the campaign. No worries though...the Clinton Foundation then hired him at a salay of $10,000.00 a month to feed her intelligence on Libya. You can try to keep up the appearance of plausible deniability if you like but people just aren't buying it.
And you can continue to try and escape the matrix, professor.

Do you have a source for why Bloomy was hired for $10K a month? Or is it just one more thing you want it to be?
Does anyone have a source for why he was hired for $10k a month? Is it because of his amazing contribution to Haitian relief efforts or for the delivery of HIV medications in Africa? Do people who donate to the Clinton Foundation know that a large percentage of their charitable dollars go towards keeping the Blumenthal Libyan Intelligence agency in business?
What % seeing that you seem to know?
Well let's see...

Only 5.7% went to actual charity so you can try to figure out the math

http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/16/just-5-7-percent-of-clinton-foundation-budget-actually-went-to-charity/

Also here's some corroboration on Blumenthal for the deniers out there

http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/79319/confessions-hillary-insider/

Check the politifact on the Clinton foundation bullshit. That 5.7 percent is a complete lie. How can we believe your other information when you are peddling something so easily disproved?

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/aug/25/reince-priebus/reince-priebus-false-claim-80-clinton-foundation-c/

BS44325 · September 2016

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

tonifig8 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:
People are missing a little tidbit here. If indeed HC started the birther movement, which I think is a stretch, Trump believed it without any proof whatsoever and made it his mission to smear a sitting president. Do you realky want a guy who is willing to do so much damage just to firce his own agenda without so much as a fucking google search? The guy, in my opinion, just made himself look like a stupid sheep who is easily playable by the other side.
Wait, but if she did start it what does that make her?

And who started this whole birther discussion again?

It's crazy how most of the time spent around here is about defending Clinton. It's one excuse after another... Non-stop. And the clintonite army doesn't see a single issue with Clinton.

It's the world against a good, honest, hard working woman (according to the clintonites) .... You guys are doing a great job making excuse after excuse after excuse... I'm sure she's completely innocent and the rest of us are just angry Bernie bros
Sidney Blumenthal
Such a stupid argument on so many levels. To compare what Blumenthal allegedly told an ex-Mclatchey person with what Trump has clearly done on TV and Twitter for 6 years is beyond the scope of bizarre and straight into realm of retarded. Only out and out morons would fall for such a blatant lie (flip over to Breitbart.com for them). Only the type of people that believe that Hillary had JFK Jr. killed would believe such a thing AND draw equivalency between the candidates because of it. Pathetic. Keep peddling it though, it's a real compliment to all that do.
It's pretty clear that you don't understand how a "whisper campaign" works. Blumenthal doesn't act on his own.
It's pretty clear you don't have any true evidence, ergo a 'whisper campaign'. And even if there is a shred of truth, isn't Trump the one that made it a spectacle for for six years? As I said, it's total false equivalency.
The Blumenthal report is evidence. There is no false equivalency. They were both participants in the nonsense. Trump was a jerk for it and so was Hillary. The difference is that Hillary and her supporters want to take some kind of moral high ground that they have not earned.
What Blumenthal report? There is a tweet from an ex McC newswire person that claims it.
A little more then a tweet

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article102354777.html

They actually sent an investigator to Kenya based on Blumenthal pushing them the story
How fucking daft are you? Did you even read the article you linked? Oh professor you're slipping.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article102354777.html

"There is no evidence that the campaign or Hillary had direct knowledge of or supported the efforts of Blummie." To paraphrase a key fucking sentence buried in the article.

Shhhhhhhhhhh, hear the whisper.
Only a fool would believe that Blumethal just acted on his own. He is a Clinton operative through and through. Shortly after the election Clinton tried to get him a position at the State Department but was shut out by the Obama administration due to his burning of bridges in the campaign. No worries though...the Clinton Foundation then hired him at a salay of $10,000.00 a month to feed her intelligence on Libya. You can try to keep up the appearance of plausible deniability if you like but people just aren't buying it.
And you can continue to try and escape the matrix, professor.

Do you have a source for why Bloomy was hired for $10K a month? Or is it just one more thing you want it to be?
Does anyone have a source for why he was hired for $10k a month? Is it because of his amazing contribution to Haitian relief efforts or for the delivery of HIV medications in Africa? Do people who donate to the Clinton Foundation know that a large percentage of their charitable dollars go towards keeping the Blumenthal Libyan Intelligence agency in business?
What % seeing that you seem to know?
Well let's see...

Only 5.7% went to actual charity so you can try to figure out the math

http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/16/just-5-7-percent-of-clinton-foundation-budget-actually-went-to-charity/

Also here's some corroboration on Blumenthal for the deniers out there

http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/79319/confessions-hillary-insider/

Check the politifact on the Clinton foundation bullshit. That 5.7 percent is a complete lie. How can we believe your other information when you are peddling something so easily disproved?

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/aug/25/reince-priebus/reince-priebus-false-claim-80-clinton-foundation-c/

Hmmm...so if politifact is right and the Clinton Foundation shouldn't be judged the same as other charities because it generally doesn't give grants and does most of it's charitable work "in-house" then where does the $10k per month to Blumenthal factor in? What in house charitable related work is he providing?

mrussel1 · September 2016

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

tonifig8 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:
People are missing a little tidbit here. If indeed HC started the birther movement, which I think is a stretch, Trump believed it without any proof whatsoever and made it his mission to smear a sitting president. Do you realky want a guy who is willing to do so much damage just to firce his own agenda without so much as a fucking google search? The guy, in my opinion, just made himself look like a stupid sheep who is easily playable by the other side.
Wait, but if she did start it what does that make her?

And who started this whole birther discussion again?

It's crazy how most of the time spent around here is about defending Clinton. It's one excuse after another... Non-stop. And the clintonite army doesn't see a single issue with Clinton.

It's the world against a good, honest, hard working woman (according to the clintonites) .... You guys are doing a great job making excuse after excuse after excuse... I'm sure she's completely innocent and the rest of us are just angry Bernie bros
Sidney Blumenthal
Such a stupid argument on so many levels. To compare what Blumenthal allegedly told an ex-Mclatchey person with what Trump has clearly done on TV and Twitter for 6 years is beyond the scope of bizarre and straight into realm of retarded. Only out and out morons would fall for such a blatant lie (flip over to Breitbart.com for them). Only the type of people that believe that Hillary had JFK Jr. killed would believe such a thing AND draw equivalency between the candidates because of it. Pathetic. Keep peddling it though, it's a real compliment to all that do.
It's pretty clear that you don't understand how a "whisper campaign" works. Blumenthal doesn't act on his own.
It's pretty clear you don't have any true evidence, ergo a 'whisper campaign'. And even if there is a shred of truth, isn't Trump the one that made it a spectacle for for six years? As I said, it's total false equivalency.
The Blumenthal report is evidence. There is no false equivalency. They were both participants in the nonsense. Trump was a jerk for it and so was Hillary. The difference is that Hillary and her supporters want to take some kind of moral high ground that they have not earned.
What Blumenthal report? There is a tweet from an ex McC newswire person that claims it.
A little more then a tweet

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article102354777.html

They actually sent an investigator to Kenya based on Blumenthal pushing them the story
How fucking daft are you? Did you even read the article you linked? Oh professor you're slipping.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article102354777.html

"There is no evidence that the campaign or Hillary had direct knowledge of or supported the efforts of Blummie." To paraphrase a key fucking sentence buried in the article.

Shhhhhhhhhhh, hear the whisper.
Only a fool would believe that Blumethal just acted on his own. He is a Clinton operative through and through. Shortly after the election Clinton tried to get him a position at the State Department but was shut out by the Obama administration due to his burning of bridges in the campaign. No worries though...the Clinton Foundation then hired him at a salay of $10,000.00 a month to feed her intelligence on Libya. You can try to keep up the appearance of plausible deniability if you like but people just aren't buying it.
And you can continue to try and escape the matrix, professor.

Do you have a source for why Bloomy was hired for $10K a month? Or is it just one more thing you want it to be?
Does anyone have a source for why he was hired for $10k a month? Is it because of his amazing contribution to Haitian relief efforts or for the delivery of HIV medications in Africa? Do people who donate to the Clinton Foundation know that a large percentage of their charitable dollars go towards keeping the Blumenthal Libyan Intelligence agency in business?
What % seeing that you seem to know?
Well let's see...

Only 5.7% went to actual charity so you can try to figure out the math

http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/16/just-5-7-percent-of-clinton-foundation-budget-actually-went-to-charity/

Also here's some corroboration on Blumenthal for the deniers out there

http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/79319/confessions-hillary-insider/

Check the politifact on the Clinton foundation bullshit. That 5.7 percent is a complete lie. How can we believe your other information when you are peddling something so easily disproved?

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/aug/25/reince-priebus/reince-priebus-false-claim-80-clinton-foundation-c/
Hmmm...so if politifact is right and the Clinton Foundation shouldn't be judged the same as other charities because it generally doesn't give grants and does most of it's charitable work "in-house" then where does the $10k per month to Blumenthal factor in? What in house charitable related work is he providing?

Are you familiar with the term non-sequitur? One unsubstantiated statement does not validate the unrelated other. You are basically saying that Blumenthal must have been the one typing Donald Trump's twitter and media campaign re: birtherism since he is somehow paid 10k per month by the Clinton Foundation. Got it. You really nailed it there. All those things explain why Donald Trump was the head birther. Got it.

Halifax2TheMax · September 2016

It's the neocon way. Throw shit without facts to back it up, see what sticks and make the opposition prove a negative, sources and facts be damned.

Shhhhhhhh, it's a whisper campaign.

Boxes&Books · September 2016

Halifax2TheMax said:
It's the neocon way. Throw shit without facts to back it up, see what sticks and make the opposition prove a negative, sources and facts be damned.

Shhhhhhhh, it's a whisper campaign.

Is this what the DNC did to sanders? Is he a Jew? What's his religion? Hmmmmmmm...
Shhhhhhhh.... It's a whisper campaign.

You make it sound as if they're somehow incapable of such acts.

Halifax2TheMax · September 2016

tonifig8 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:
It's the neocon way. Throw shit without facts to back it up, see what sticks and make the opposition prove a negative, sources and facts be damned.

Shhhhhhhh, it's a whisper campaign.
Is this what the DNC did to sanders? Is he a Jew? What's his religion? Hmmmmmmm...
Shhhhhhhh.... It's a whisper campaign.

You make it sound as if they're somehow incapable of such acts.

Funny you should float that. I'm sure it's why they did "it"' whatever "it" is.

Shhhhhhhhhhhhh, hear the whisper.

I won't hold my breath waiting for BS to tell us what % of GCF goes to bloomy but you rest assured it's "the majority of its funding." And all for that Libya Intel.

mrussel1 · September 2016

tonifig8 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:
It's the neocon way. Throw shit without facts to back it up, see what sticks and make the opposition prove a negative, sources and facts be damned.

Shhhhhhhh, it's a whisper campaign.
Is this what the DNC did to sanders? Is he a Jew? What's his religion? Hmmmmmmm...
Shhhhhhhh.... It's a whisper campaign.

You make it sound as if they're somehow incapable of such acts.

I do remember the ads and tweets about Sanders's religion during the primaries. I also remember posting a bunch of stuff about it here. I was happy to do it since it is considered "hazard pay" and we get paid more to talk about controversial subject. Quite the fucking pay day.

Hillary won more votes for President

Comments

Categories