Hillary won more votes for President

1110111113115116488

Comments

  • InHiding80
    InHiding80 Upland,CA Posts: 7,623
    Ding dong, the witch is dead! :joy:

    Good riddance to DWS.
  • InHiding80
    InHiding80 Upland,CA Posts: 7,623
    http://yournewswire.com/julian-assange-my-next-leak-will-ensure-hillarys-arrest/

    Someone get me Michael Jacksons popcorn. I'm loving the hell out of this. :lol: Assange is Chris Walken to Clinton's Martin Sheen. It's over.
  • Degeneratefk
    Degeneratefk Posts: 3,123
    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    That last statement is an excellent point that is lost by most trump supporters.

    The presidency is NOT an entry level position. But most trump supporters think that in order to go outside of the establishment, you need someone that has never been in politics. Not a good idea when most of his campaign revolves around foreign policy and foreign trade deals. I think trump vastly underestimates how experience in dealing with world leaders is more than just making a deal to host the miss universe pageant.

    Obama had zero experience in 2008 and nobody cared. They didn't care when he ran against Hillary and they didn't care when he ran against McCain. Trump's real world experience easily outweighs both Clinton and Obama unless you think only people who have made their life inside government could possibly understand how to be President. That's just silly.
    That's not true at all. If I remember correctly, he was a senator.
    Being a senator for two years might look good on a resumé but it hardly makes you experienced. I believed the same about Rubio, Cruz and Rand Paul. There is a reason why that prior to the election of Obama the US has primarily elected governors. Governors make decisions while senators yap then vote while almost never having to deal with the consequences.
    But it's still more experience than what Trump has.
    will myself to find a home, a home within myself
    we will find a way, we will find our place
  • InHiding80
    InHiding80 Upland,CA Posts: 7,623
    http://yournewswire.com/julian-assange-my-next-leak-will-ensure-hillarys-arrest/

    We all might get our wish so Bernie can own Trumps orange ass in the debates! :lol: Arrest with your conscience!
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    That last statement is an excellent point that is lost by most trump supporters.

    The presidency is NOT an entry level position. But most trump supporters think that in order to go outside of the establishment, you need someone that has never been in politics. Not a good idea when most of his campaign revolves around foreign policy and foreign trade deals. I think trump vastly underestimates how experience in dealing with world leaders is more than just making a deal to host the miss universe pageant.

    Obama had zero experience in 2008 and nobody cared. They didn't care when he ran against Hillary and they didn't care when he ran against McCain. Trump's real world experience easily outweighs both Clinton and Obama unless you think only people who have made their life inside government could possibly understand how to be President. That's just silly.
    That's not true at all. If I remember correctly, he was a senator.
    Being a senator for two years might look good on a resumé but it hardly makes you experienced. I believed the same about Rubio, Cruz and Rand Paul. There is a reason why that prior to the election of Obama the US has primarily elected governors. Governors make decisions while senators yap then vote while almost never having to deal with the consequences.
    But it's still more experience than what Trump has.
    It depends on how you weigh people's accomplishments. In my eyes Kaine and Pence both have more experience then Clinton when it comes to government service. Trump's management of a global enterprise is different but far more approaches that of governor then anything Clinton has done.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,882
    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    That last statement is an excellent point that is lost by most trump supporters.

    The presidency is NOT an entry level position. But most trump supporters think that in order to go outside of the establishment, you need someone that has never been in politics. Not a good idea when most of his campaign revolves around foreign policy and foreign trade deals. I think trump vastly underestimates how experience in dealing with world leaders is more than just making a deal to host the miss universe pageant.

    Obama had zero experience in 2008 and nobody cared. They didn't care when he ran against Hillary and they didn't care when he ran against McCain. Trump's real world experience easily outweighs both Clinton and Obama unless you think only people who have made their life inside government could possibly understand how to be President. That's just silly.
    That's not true at all. If I remember correctly, he was a senator.
    Being a senator for two years might look good on a resumé but it hardly makes you experienced. I believed the same about Rubio, Cruz and Rand Paul. There is a reason why that prior to the election of Obama the US has primarily elected governors. Governors make decisions while senators yap then vote while almost never having to deal with the consequences.
    But it's still more experience than what Trump has.
    It depends on how you weigh people's accomplishments. In my eyes Kaine and Pence both have more experience then Clinton when it comes to government service. Trump's management of a global enterprise is different but far more approaches that of governor then anything Clinton has done.
    8 years as a very active first lady, Senate term and Sec't of State. How can you say Trump's beauty pageants and golf courses supersedes the role of the chief diplomat?
  • mrussel1 said:

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    That last statement is an excellent point that is lost by most trump supporters.

    The presidency is NOT an entry level position. But most trump supporters think that in order to go outside of the establishment, you need someone that has never been in politics. Not a good idea when most of his campaign revolves around foreign policy and foreign trade deals. I think trump vastly underestimates how experience in dealing with world leaders is more than just making a deal to host the miss universe pageant.

    Obama had zero experience in 2008 and nobody cared. They didn't care when he ran against Hillary and they didn't care when he ran against McCain. Trump's real world experience easily outweighs both Clinton and Obama unless you think only people who have made their life inside government could possibly understand how to be President. That's just silly.
    That's not true at all. If I remember correctly, he was a senator.
    Being a senator for two years might look good on a resumé but it hardly makes you experienced. I believed the same about Rubio, Cruz and Rand Paul. There is a reason why that prior to the election of Obama the US has primarily elected governors. Governors make decisions while senators yap then vote while almost never having to deal with the consequences.
    But it's still more experience than what Trump has.
    It depends on how you weigh people's accomplishments. In my eyes Kaine and Pence both have more experience then Clinton when it comes to government service. Trump's management of a global enterprise is different but far more approaches that of governor then anything Clinton has done.
    8 years as a very active first lady, Senate term and Sec't of State. How can you say Trump's beauty pageants and golf courses supersedes the role of the chief diplomat?
    Are not the best golf courses where real business is done?
  • Degeneratefk
    Degeneratefk Posts: 3,123

    mrussel1 said:

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    That last statement is an excellent point that is lost by most trump supporters.

    The presidency is NOT an entry level position. But most trump supporters think that in order to go outside of the establishment, you need someone that has never been in politics. Not a good idea when most of his campaign revolves around foreign policy and foreign trade deals. I think trump vastly underestimates how experience in dealing with world leaders is more than just making a deal to host the miss universe pageant.

    Obama had zero experience in 2008 and nobody cared. They didn't care when he ran against Hillary and they didn't care when he ran against McCain. Trump's real world experience easily outweighs both Clinton and Obama unless you think only people who have made their life inside government could possibly understand how to be President. That's just silly.
    That's not true at all. If I remember correctly, he was a senator.
    Being a senator for two years might look good on a resumé but it hardly makes you experienced. I believed the same about Rubio, Cruz and Rand Paul. There is a reason why that prior to the election of Obama the US has primarily elected governors. Governors make decisions while senators yap then vote while almost never having to deal with the consequences.
    But it's still more experience than what Trump has.
    It depends on how you weigh people's accomplishments. In my eyes Kaine and Pence both have more experience then Clinton when it comes to government service. Trump's management of a global enterprise is different but far more approaches that of governor then anything Clinton has done.
    8 years as a very active first lady, Senate term and Sec't of State. How can you say Trump's beauty pageants and golf courses supersedes the role of the chief diplomat?
    Are not the best golf courses where real business is done?
    No
    will myself to find a home, a home within myself
    we will find a way, we will find our place
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562

    Saw Bernie on MTP or FTN this morning...can't remember which

    He should have a pretty powerful speech at the convention. He was asked about who his supporters will support and he was pretty adamant that there is no other choice but Clinton if his supporters truly believe what he does.

    So there...

    Saw Bernie on MTP or FTN this morning...can't remember which

    He should have a pretty powerful speech at the convention. He was asked about who his supporters will support and he was pretty adamant that there is no other choice but Clinton if his supporters truly believe what he does.

    So there...

    So there what?

    That Bernie supporters will dutifully follow his word and vote Hillary "because he says so"?

    :lol:
  • Degeneratefk
    Degeneratefk Posts: 3,123
    What's the conspiracy that forced Schultz to resign? That she was a Clinton supporter? Seems silly.
    will myself to find a home, a home within myself
    we will find a way, we will find our place
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,882

    What's the conspiracy that forced Schultz to resign? That she was a Clinton supporter? Seems silly.

    No it's the emails between staffers. I'm not sure if she was on any of those or not, but it's a CEO thing, in my mind.
  • Degeneratefk
    Degeneratefk Posts: 3,123
    mrussel1 said:

    What's the conspiracy that forced Schultz to resign? That she was a Clinton supporter? Seems silly.

    No it's the emails between staffers. I'm not sure if she was on any of those or not, but it's a CEO thing, in my mind.
    Yea, i dont see a problem with it. Why are they not allowed to have a preference?
    will myself to find a home, a home within myself
    we will find a way, we will find our place
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    edited July 2016

    mrussel1 said:

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    That last statement is an excellent point that is lost by most trump supporters.

    The presidency is NOT an entry level position. But most trump supporters think that in order to go outside of the establishment, you need someone that has never been in politics. Not a good idea when most of his campaign revolves around foreign policy and foreign trade deals. I think trump vastly underestimates how experience in dealing with world leaders is more than just making a deal to host the miss universe pageant.

    Obama had zero experience in 2008 and nobody cared. They didn't care when he ran against Hillary and they didn't care when he ran against McCain. Trump's real world experience easily outweighs both Clinton and Obama unless you think only people who have made their life inside government could possibly understand how to be President. That's just silly.
    That's not true at all. If I remember correctly, he was a senator.
    Being a senator for two years might look good on a resumé but it hardly makes you experienced. I believed the same about Rubio, Cruz and Rand Paul. There is a reason why that prior to the election of Obama the US has primarily elected governors. Governors make decisions while senators yap then vote while almost never having to deal with the consequences.
    But it's still more experience than what Trump has.
    It depends on how you weigh people's accomplishments. In my eyes Kaine and Pence both have more experience then Clinton when it comes to government service. Trump's management of a global enterprise is different but far more approaches that of governor then anything Clinton has done.
    8 years as a very active first lady, Senate term and Sec't of State. How can you say Trump's beauty pageants and golf courses supersedes the role of the chief diplomat?
    Are not the best golf courses where real business is done?
    No
    Really?
    image
    image
    image
    image
    Post edited by PJfanwillneverleave1 on
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,882

    mrussel1 said:

    What's the conspiracy that forced Schultz to resign? That she was a Clinton supporter? Seems silly.

    No it's the emails between staffers. I'm not sure if she was on any of those or not, but it's a CEO thing, in my mind.
    Yea, i dont see a problem with it. Why are they not allowed to have a preference?
    I actually think the DNC as an organization should stay neutral. I don't think individuals need to be neutral because they have a vote too and have the right to advocate. But if you use official resources to or plot strategy against one of the candidates, that's a bridge too far. Now WhatDreams is busy going through the emails so she may disagree whether there is any fire there or not. But the perception, on the eve of the campaign, isn't great. DSW was going to leave after the convention, likely, anyway. So better to get this out of the way before the convention starts.
  • Degeneratefk
    Degeneratefk Posts: 3,123
    mrussel1 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    What's the conspiracy that forced Schultz to resign? That she was a Clinton supporter? Seems silly.

    No it's the emails between staffers. I'm not sure if she was on any of those or not, but it's a CEO thing, in my mind.
    Yea, i dont see a problem with it. Why are they not allowed to have a preference?
    I actually think the DNC as an organization should stay neutral. I don't think individuals need to be neutral because they have a vote too and have the right to advocate. But if you use official resources to or plot strategy against one of the candidates, that's a bridge too far. Now WhatDreams is busy going through the emails so she may disagree whether there is any fire there or not. But the perception, on the eve of the campaign, isn't great. DSW was going to leave after the convention, likely, anyway. So better to get this out of the way before the convention starts.
    Yea, i see your point. If it's the worst thing the Democrats have to worry about, they should be fine.
    will myself to find a home, a home within myself
    we will find a way, we will find our place
  • Degeneratefk
    Degeneratefk Posts: 3,123

    mrussel1 said:

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    That last statement is an excellent point that is lost by most trump supporters.

    The presidency is NOT an entry level position. But most trump supporters think that in order to go outside of the establishment, you need someone that has never been in politics. Not a good idea when most of his campaign revolves around foreign policy and foreign trade deals. I think trump vastly underestimates how experience in dealing with world leaders is more than just making a deal to host the miss universe pageant.

    Obama had zero experience in 2008 and nobody cared. They didn't care when he ran against Hillary and they didn't care when he ran against McCain. Trump's real world experience easily outweighs both Clinton and Obama unless you think only people who have made their life inside government could possibly understand how to be President. That's just silly.
    That's not true at all. If I remember correctly, he was a senator.
    Being a senator for two years might look good on a resumé but it hardly makes you experienced. I believed the same about Rubio, Cruz and Rand Paul. There is a reason why that prior to the election of Obama the US has primarily elected governors. Governors make decisions while senators yap then vote while almost never having to deal with the consequences.
    But it's still more experience than what Trump has.
    It depends on how you weigh people's accomplishments. In my eyes Kaine and Pence both have more experience then Clinton when it comes to government service. Trump's management of a global enterprise is different but far more approaches that of governor then anything Clinton has done.
    8 years as a very active first lady, Senate term and Sec't of State. How can you say Trump's beauty pageants and golf courses supersedes the role of the chief diplomat?
    Are not the best golf courses where real business is done?
    No
    Really?
    image
    image
    image
    image
    All you have proven is that people golf.
    will myself to find a home, a home within myself
    we will find a way, we will find our place
  • what dreams
    what dreams Posts: 1,761
    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    Oh, politicians aren't they swell? They can tell you one thing and do another. They will make promises and never act on them once elected. You've got a politician here with a history of being pro-life, yet people will eat it up that he's actually pro choice because he says he now is.

    Really, guys? Think about this...

    Or maybe because he has voted that way?

    You claim to want representative democracy but you ridicule politicians who change their views to represent their constituents as flip-flippers? How does that square?

    Do you want politicians who listen to the changing will of the people or politicians who "stick to their guns" even as the issues shift under them?
    I'm beginning to think Free won't be happy until every public building in DC is burned to the ground with our elected leaders in them. He is against everyone and everything, except Sanders, but now Stein. Unfortunately he has nothing positive to bring to the table regarding either one of those people or their positions. The Stein thread is dead -- probably because there's nothing serious to talk about -- and the Sanders thread is full of whiny complaints about our democracy being rigged -- even though all those people protesting democratically and lawfully will be able to vote in November. Last I checked, we are all still free to be ourselves in this great nation. Free speech, free assemby, free press (free to lie), religion, bearing arms -- ALL intact. If we're smart enough to know the law and our rights, we'll get a fair trial. We all have an opportunity to get an education and be whatever we want to be in this country, if we're willing to work for it. I'm not quite sure what the hell else people want when it comes to their democratic freedom.

    It seems to me if people really want Stein or Johnson to win, they would spend their time making their case and building them up. But they can't because they're too busy parroting the main stream media chanting "Lock her up" about Hillary and desperately trying to make up shit about Tim Kaine and excusing away Donald Trump's complete incompetence to be the leader of our free world.

    But in politics, we know that's how people win. Call the opponents names, make up lies, exaggerate half truths. The Sanders faction are absolute experts at playing the very game they are trying to dismantle.
  • Boxes&Books
    Boxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672
    Free said:

    Saw Bernie on MTP or FTN this morning...can't remember which

    He should have a pretty powerful speech at the convention. He was asked about who his supporters will support and he was pretty adamant that there is no other choice but Clinton if his supporters truly believe what he does.

    So there...

    Saw Bernie on MTP or FTN this morning...can't remember which

    He should have a pretty powerful speech at the convention. He was asked about who his supporters will support and he was pretty adamant that there is no other choice but Clinton if his supporters truly believe what he does.

    So there...

    So there what?

    That Bernie supporters will dutifully follow his word and vote Hillary "because he says so"?

    :lol:
    Sanders needs to cut all this bullshit talk about us supporting anyone! I donated my time, money, and energy to fight against these shady politicians and now he's suggesting we support this garbage. F you for saying that, Sanders. This is bigger than Sanders and Clonton.
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    Schultz was National Co -Chair of Hillary's 2008 Presidential campaign.

This discussion has been closed.