Hillary won more votes for President
Comments
-
I didn't say it was, that is the introduction of the article. See all the graphs when you check out the article too.mrussel1 said:
77-22 is not polling numbers. It's the chance of winning the POTUS using the Electoral College.Free said:This is from a non bias site, Pew Research Center. It's not exactly Clinton 77%, Trump 22%...
2016 Campaign: Strong Interest, Widespread Dissatisfaction
http://www.people-press.org/2016/07/07/2016-campaign-strong-interest-widespread-dissatisfaction/0 -
Gern and I both read your post that way. Pew is very good. They were very accurate in 12. I don't doubt these numbers, nor do I doubt her 9 point lead that it gives her.Free said:
I didn't say it was, that is the introduction of the article. See all the graphs when you check out the article too.mrussel1 said:
77-22 is not polling numbers. It's the chance of winning the POTUS using the Electoral College.Free said:This is from a non bias site, Pew Research Center. It's not exactly Clinton 77%, Trump 22%...
2016 Campaign: Strong Interest, Widespread Dissatisfaction
http://www.people-press.org/2016/07/07/2016-campaign-strong-interest-widespread-dissatisfaction/0 -
Well I definitely agree that Trump continues to shoot himself in the foot. And I'm not sure he'll improve his improve his performance either. And considering how bad the email thing could have been, yeah, I guess she's weathered the storm. But she's nearly deadlocked in PA, OH, and FL and that's cause for concern.mrussel1 said:
I disagree. Bernie still has yet to endorse, and that's coming next week. I think she is doing fine. I don't recall Obama having 8-11 point leads at all in '12 but HRC has those in some polls. Most importantly, the electoral map looks really good for her right now. She has the Obama states and is tight in AZ, NC, NH, etc. I think she is in solid shape considering the email deal. And there's no evidence Trump will improve his performance. His two speeches this week were rambling 65 minute lists of petty grievances and stream of consciousness. That aint' changing.Ledbetterman10 said:
He ran against a well-spoken former governor. She's running against a corrupt, psychotic, quasi-racist. She's like a #1 seed that easily won her conference (the democratic primary) and on paper, should totally kill the fluky wildcard team that somehow defied all logic by winning their conference (Trump). Yet he's still very much in the game.mrussel1 said:
Based on what? Obama was up by 5 or 6 in June.2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
Did you even read the article?mrussel1 said:
Gern and I both read your post that way. Pew is very good. They were very accurate in 12. I don't doubt these numbers, nor do I doubt her 9 point lead that it gives her.Free said:
I didn't say it was, that is the introduction of the article. See all the graphs when you check out the article too.mrussel1 said:
77-22 is not polling numbers. It's the chance of winning the POTUS using the Electoral College.Free said:This is from a non bias site, Pew Research Center. It's not exactly Clinton 77%, Trump 22%...
2016 Campaign: Strong Interest, Widespread Dissatisfaction
http://www.people-press.org/2016/07/07/2016-campaign-strong-interest-widespread-dissatisfaction/0 -
Yes. I read it yesterday when it came out. Why? What are you trying to point out?Free said:
Did you even read the article?mrussel1 said:
Gern and I both read your post that way. Pew is very good. They were very accurate in 12. I don't doubt these numbers, nor do I doubt her 9 point lead that it gives her.Free said:
I didn't say it was, that is the introduction of the article. See all the graphs when you check out the article too.mrussel1 said:
77-22 is not polling numbers. It's the chance of winning the POTUS using the Electoral College.Free said:This is from a non bias site, Pew Research Center. It's not exactly Clinton 77%, Trump 22%...
2016 Campaign: Strong Interest, Widespread Dissatisfaction
http://www.people-press.org/2016/07/07/2016-campaign-strong-interest-widespread-dissatisfaction/0 -
Why should I vote for Hillary? Honest question.0
-
Because she has to beat Trump.mattsl1983 said:Why should I vote for Hillary? Honest question.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
Enough said. I'm convinced. Seriously.PJ_Soul said:
Because she has to beat Trump.mattsl1983 said:Why should I vote for Hillary? Honest question.
0 -
What is so terrible about trump that I should vote for his opponent blindly then? I find that to be a bit of an absurd answer.0
-
If that's where you are, you've either not paid attention or his antics don't bother you.0
-
I second matts|1983 question, other than stating she is not Trump why should someone vote for HRC?96 Randall's Island II
98 CAA
00 Virginia Beach;Camden I; Jones Beach III
05 Borgata Night I; Wachovia Center
06 Letterman Show; Webcast (guy in blue shirt), Camden I; DC
08 Camden I; Camden II; DC
09 Phillie III
10 MSG II
13 Wrigley Field
16 Phillie II0 -
Exactlymattsl1983 said:What is so terrible about trump that I should vote for his opponent blindly then? I find that to be a bit of an absurd answer.
0 -
Seriously?mattsl1983 said:What is so terrible about trump that I should vote for his opponent blindly then? I find that to be a bit of an absurd answer.
Go over to the Trump thread and read up on why it's not absurd at all.I think he is a million times more terrible than Hillary. He can't be allowed to win. Simple as that.
Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
Would Donald Trump Quit if He Wins the Election? He Doesn’t Rule It Out
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/07/08/us/politics/donald-trump-president.html
... And that was just verifies what I've been saying the whole time. I am not worried about Trump winning.Post edited by Free on0 -
I don't think he would do that, but I still wouldn't be surprised if he did. I don't think he decided to run with the idea that he might actually be President. It was just a big fucking reality TV shows that he decided to take on without really considering the ultimate consequences if he actually managed to pull it off.With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0
-
So which is it? Are you an uninformed voter or do you agree with his positions?mattsl1983 said:What is so terrible about trump that I should vote for his opponent blindly then? I find that to be a bit of an absurd answer.
0 -
I find it absurd that anyone would vote for Trump.mattsl1983 said:What is so terrible about trump that I should vote for his opponent blindly then? I find that to be a bit of an absurd answer.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
Are you not gonna answer his question? Mocking him is not answering the question.mrussel1 said:
So which is it? Are you an uninformed voter or do you agree with his positions?mattsl1983 said:What is so terrible about trump that I should vote for his opponent blindly then? I find that to be a bit of an absurd answer.
0 -
His question has a false premise. No one has asked anyone to vote for Hillary uninformed. No one is falling for that trick.Free said:
Are you not gonna answer his question? Mocking him is not answering the question.mrussel1 said:
So which is it? Are you an uninformed voter or do you agree with his positions?mattsl1983 said:What is so terrible about trump that I should vote for his opponent blindly then? I find that to be a bit of an absurd answer.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help