Hillary won more votes for President
Comments
-
You really should try to stop causing trouble. PJ Soul is a valued member and deserves respect and you are not providing it.Free said:
I was laughing hysterically about "everyone can pretty much be 100% assured that if she were POTUS every single bit of info would be handled with the greatest care imaginable - more than anyone preceding her."josevolution said:
Free it's either her or him no one else is getting the nod , I wish there were other viable candidates but it ain't happening ..Free said:PJ_Soul said:
The thing is, now everyone can pretty much be 100% assured that if she were POTUS every single bit of info would be handled with the greatest care imaginable - more than anyone preceding her. There is no way she's going to be making any of those mistakes again, since she'll be under the microscope in that context from here on out.PJPOWER said:
Her carelessness with her email usage pertaining to confidential information should disqualify her for any security clearances, a requirement for POTUS, disqualifying her for POTUS as welljosevolution said:
Really you are saying that she would be just as bad as Trump because there is no way I can be convinced that his qualified to be POTUS ...PJPOWER said:
So shit>shit? I'm yet to be convinced that she would do a better job.josevolution said:
No I'm not saying you said it but rather stating that this is it these two are what is left to choose from , if it's not her then it will be him and I'd say she is better for the job I wish we did have more viable choices !PJPOWER said:
Did I say that? Isn't this a Hillary thread? I think they both suck on almost the same level, I can say that with conviction. I'm just surprised at how many people love her in this thread.josevolution said:
And then you have Trump can you really say with total conviction that he would be less reckless or better fit to be President ...PJPOWER said:
Are we not about holding our representatives responsible for their carelessness and recklessness? If she is careless with her duties as Secretary of State, is it not safe to conclude that she would also be careless with her duties as the president? Reckless would be her throwing a book at a car driver's head...oh wait she did that too. She seems to display both reckless and careless behavior through many examples in the past. Have we not had enough of those presidents in the past?Kat said:
They want to make an example of him so any other Republican who wants to be reasonable will be afraid to do it if it's not in the PARTY's interests. I also wonder why the word McCarthyism just popped into my mind? I also notice that some are using the term reckless instead of careless, thereby trying to elevate the level of any mistake with email. That's just phony. It was recommended that no charges be filed because what happened didn't reach the necessary level of a crime.mrussel1 said:I heard this question earlier:
Mr Comey, how long have you been Director
3 years
How many cases have you personally been involved with?
10-20
Of those, how many did you have to testify before Congress after your decision?
None
These are clearly dangerous times and it's important for reasonable people to remember what America is about.
I read a joke the other day: "If Hillary and Donald were on sinking boat in the middle of the ocean and had to swim to shore, who would win??? America, America would win". Lol
0 -
This isn't about PJ Soul it's about the comment and "not saying it in any context other than the truth".mrussel1 said:
You really should try to stop causing trouble. PJ Soul is a valued member and deserves respect and you are not providing it.Free said:
I was laughing hysterically about "everyone can pretty much be 100% assured that if she were POTUS every single bit of info would be handled with the greatest care imaginable - more than anyone preceding her."josevolution said:
Free it's either her or him no one else is getting the nod , I wish there were other viable candidates but it ain't happening ..Free said:PJ_Soul said:
The thing is, now everyone can pretty much be 100% assured that if she were POTUS every single bit of info would be handled with the greatest care imaginable - more than anyone preceding her. There is no way she's going to be making any of those mistakes again, since she'll be under the microscope in that context from here on out.PJPOWER said:
Her carelessness with her email usage pertaining to confidential information should disqualify her for any security clearances, a requirement for POTUS, disqualifying her for POTUS as welljosevolution said:
Really you are saying that she would be just as bad as Trump because there is no way I can be convinced that his qualified to be POTUS ...PJPOWER said:
So shit>shit? I'm yet to be convinced that she would do a better job.josevolution said:
No I'm not saying you said it but rather stating that this is it these two are what is left to choose from , if it's not her then it will be him and I'd say she is better for the job I wish we did have more viable choices !PJPOWER said:
Did I say that? Isn't this a Hillary thread? I think they both suck on almost the same level, I can say that with conviction. I'm just surprised at how many people love her in this thread.josevolution said:
And then you have Trump can you really say with total conviction that he would be less reckless or better fit to be President ...PJPOWER said:
Are we not about holding our representatives responsible for their carelessness and recklessness? If she is careless with her duties as Secretary of State, is it not safe to conclude that she would also be careless with her duties as the president? Reckless would be her throwing a book at a car driver's head...oh wait she did that too. She seems to display both reckless and careless behavior through many examples in the past. Have we not had enough of those presidents in the past?Kat said:
They want to make an example of him so any other Republican who wants to be reasonable will be afraid to do it if it's not in the PARTY's interests. I also wonder why the word McCarthyism just popped into my mind? I also notice that some are using the term reckless instead of careless, thereby trying to elevate the level of any mistake with email. That's just phony. It was recommended that no charges be filed because what happened didn't reach the necessary level of a crime.mrussel1 said:I heard this question earlier:
Mr Comey, how long have you been Director
3 years
How many cases have you personally been involved with?
10-20
Of those, how many did you have to testify before Congress after your decision?
None
These are clearly dangerous times and it's important for reasonable people to remember what America is about.
I read a joke the other day: "If Hillary and Donald were on sinking boat in the middle of the ocean and had to swim to shore, who would win??? America, America would win". Lol
Why can't that be criticized without turning it personal by you?0 -
The laughing thing is obnoxious and disrespectful.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
This isn't about PJ Soul it's about the comment and "not saying it in any context other than the truth".mrussel1 said:
You really should try to stop causing trouble. PJ Soul is a valued member and deserves respect and you are not providing it.Free said:
I was laughing hysterically about "everyone can pretty much be 100% assured that if she were POTUS every single bit of info would be handled with the greatest care imaginable - more than anyone preceding her."josevolution said:
Free it's either her or him no one else is getting the nod , I wish there were other viable candidates but it ain't happening ..Free said:PJ_Soul said:
The thing is, now everyone can pretty much be 100% assured that if she were POTUS every single bit of info would be handled with the greatest care imaginable - more than anyone preceding her. There is no way she's going to be making any of those mistakes again, since she'll be under the microscope in that context from here on out.PJPOWER said:
Her carelessness with her email usage pertaining to confidential information should disqualify her for any security clearances, a requirement for POTUS, disqualifying her for POTUS as welljosevolution said:
Really you are saying that she would be just as bad as Trump because there is no way I can be convinced that his qualified to be POTUS ...PJPOWER said:
So shit>shit? I'm yet to be convinced that she would do a better job.josevolution said:
No I'm not saying you said it but rather stating that this is it these two are what is left to choose from , if it's not her then it will be him and I'd say she is better for the job I wish we did have more viable choices !PJPOWER said:
Did I say that? Isn't this a Hillary thread? I think they both suck on almost the same level, I can say that with conviction. I'm just surprised at how many people love her in this thread.josevolution said:
And then you have Trump can you really say with total conviction that he would be less reckless or better fit to be President ...PJPOWER said:
Are we not about holding our representatives responsible for their carelessness and recklessness? If she is careless with her duties as Secretary of State, is it not safe to conclude that she would also be careless with her duties as the president? Reckless would be her throwing a book at a car driver's head...oh wait she did that too. She seems to display both reckless and careless behavior through many examples in the past. Have we not had enough of those presidents in the past?Kat said:
They want to make an example of him so any other Republican who wants to be reasonable will be afraid to do it if it's not in the PARTY's interests. I also wonder why the word McCarthyism just popped into my mind? I also notice that some are using the term reckless instead of careless, thereby trying to elevate the level of any mistake with email. That's just phony. It was recommended that no charges be filed because what happened didn't reach the necessary level of a crime.mrussel1 said:I heard this question earlier:
Mr Comey, how long have you been Director
3 years
How many cases have you personally been involved with?
10-20
Of those, how many did you have to testify before Congress after your decision?
None
These are clearly dangerous times and it's important for reasonable people to remember what America is about.
I read a joke the other day: "If Hillary and Donald were on sinking boat in the middle of the ocean and had to swim to shore, who would win??? America, America would win". Lol
Why can't that be criticized without turning it personal by you?0 -
good god,mrussel1 said:
The laughing thing is obnoxious and disrespectful.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
This isn't about PJ Soul it's about the comment and "not saying it in any context other than the truth".mrussel1 said:
You really should try to stop causing trouble. PJ Soul is a valued member and deserves respect and you are not providing it.Free said:
I was laughing hysterically about "everyone can pretty much be 100% assured that if she were POTUS every single bit of info would be handled with the greatest care imaginable - more than anyone preceding her."josevolution said:
Free it's either her or him no one else is getting the nod , I wish there were other viable candidates but it ain't happening ..Free said:PJ_Soul said:
The thing is, now everyone can pretty much be 100% assured that if she were POTUS every single bit of info would be handled with the greatest care imaginable - more than anyone preceding her. There is no way she's going to be making any of those mistakes again, since she'll be under the microscope in that context from here on out.PJPOWER said:
Her carelessness with her email usage pertaining to confidential information should disqualify her for any security clearances, a requirement for POTUS, disqualifying her for POTUS as welljosevolution said:
Really you are saying that she would be just as bad as Trump because there is no way I can be convinced that his qualified to be POTUS ...PJPOWER said:
So shit>shit? I'm yet to be convinced that she would do a better job.josevolution said:
No I'm not saying you said it but rather stating that this is it these two are what is left to choose from , if it's not her then it will be him and I'd say she is better for the job I wish we did have more viable choices !PJPOWER said:
Did I say that? Isn't this a Hillary thread? I think they both suck on almost the same level, I can say that with conviction. I'm just surprised at how many people love her in this thread.josevolution said:
And then you have Trump can you really say with total conviction that he would be less reckless or better fit to be President ...PJPOWER said:
Are we not about holding our representatives responsible for their carelessness and recklessness? If she is careless with her duties as Secretary of State, is it not safe to conclude that she would also be careless with her duties as the president? Reckless would be her throwing a book at a car driver's head...oh wait she did that too. She seems to display both reckless and careless behavior through many examples in the past. Have we not had enough of those presidents in the past?Kat said:
They want to make an example of him so any other Republican who wants to be reasonable will be afraid to do it if it's not in the PARTY's interests. I also wonder why the word McCarthyism just popped into my mind? I also notice that some are using the term reckless instead of careless, thereby trying to elevate the level of any mistake with email. That's just phony. It was recommended that no charges be filed because what happened didn't reach the necessary level of a crime.mrussel1 said:I heard this question earlier:
Mr Comey, how long have you been Director
3 years
How many cases have you personally been involved with?
10-20
Of those, how many did you have to testify before Congress after your decision?
None
These are clearly dangerous times and it's important for reasonable people to remember what America is about.
I read a joke the other day: "If Hillary and Donald were on sinking boat in the middle of the ocean and had to swim to shore, who would win??? America, America would win". Lol
Why can't that be criticized without turning it personal by you?
is this where it turns into the defense and lovefest support because someone didn't agree on a post?Post edited by PJfanwillneverleave1 on0 -
I wasn't laughing at her, it was at what was said. Don't make this more than it is.mrussel1 said:
You really should try to stop causing trouble. PJ Soul is a valued member and deserves respect and you are not providing it.Free said:
I was laughing hysterically about "everyone can pretty much be 100% assured that if she were POTUS every single bit of info would be handled with the greatest care imaginable - more than anyone preceding her."josevolution said:
Free it's either her or him no one else is getting the nod , I wish there were other viable candidates but it ain't happening ..Free said:PJ_Soul said:
The thing is, now everyone can pretty much be 100% assured that if she were POTUS every single bit of info would be handled with the greatest care imaginable - more than anyone preceding her. There is no way she's going to be making any of those mistakes again, since she'll be under the microscope in that context from here on out.PJPOWER said:
Her carelessness with her email usage pertaining to confidential information should disqualify her for any security clearances, a requirement for POTUS, disqualifying her for POTUS as welljosevolution said:
Really you are saying that she would be just as bad as Trump because there is no way I can be convinced that his qualified to be POTUS ...PJPOWER said:
So shit>shit? I'm yet to be convinced that she would do a better job.josevolution said:
No I'm not saying you said it but rather stating that this is it these two are what is left to choose from , if it's not her then it will be him and I'd say she is better for the job I wish we did have more viable choices !PJPOWER said:
Did I say that? Isn't this a Hillary thread? I think they both suck on almost the same level, I can say that with conviction. I'm just surprised at how many people love her in this thread.josevolution said:
And then you have Trump can you really say with total conviction that he would be less reckless or better fit to be President ...PJPOWER said:
Are we not about holding our representatives responsible for their carelessness and recklessness? If she is careless with her duties as Secretary of State, is it not safe to conclude that she would also be careless with her duties as the president? Reckless would be her throwing a book at a car driver's head...oh wait she did that too. She seems to display both reckless and careless behavior through many examples in the past. Have we not had enough of those presidents in the past?Kat said:
They want to make an example of him so any other Republican who wants to be reasonable will be afraid to do it if it's not in the PARTY's interests. I also wonder why the word McCarthyism just popped into my mind? I also notice that some are using the term reckless instead of careless, thereby trying to elevate the level of any mistake with email. That's just phony. It was recommended that no charges be filed because what happened didn't reach the necessary level of a crime.mrussel1 said:I heard this question earlier:
Mr Comey, how long have you been Director
3 years
How many cases have you personally been involved with?
10-20
Of those, how many did you have to testify before Congress after your decision?
None
These are clearly dangerous times and it's important for reasonable people to remember what America is about.
I read a joke the other day: "If Hillary and Donald were on sinking boat in the middle of the ocean and had to swim to shore, who would win??? America, America would win". Lol
Taking things personally is where any sort of trouble starts.Post edited by Free on0 -
Exactly.josevolution said:
Free it's either her or him no one else is getting the nod , I wish there were other viable candidates but it ain't happening ..Free said:PJ_Soul said:
The thing is, now everyone can pretty much be 100% assured that if she were POTUS every single bit of info would be handled with the greatest care imaginable - more than anyone preceding her. There is no way she's going to be making any of those mistakes again, since she'll be under the microscope in that context from here on out.PJPOWER said:
Her carelessness with her email usage pertaining to confidential information should disqualify her for any security clearances, a requirement for POTUS, disqualifying her for POTUS as welljosevolution said:
Really you are saying that she would be just as bad as Trump because there is no way I can be convinced that his qualified to be POTUS ...PJPOWER said:
So shit>shit? I'm yet to be convinced that she would do a better job.josevolution said:
No I'm not saying you said it but rather stating that this is it these two are what is left to choose from , if it's not her then it will be him and I'd say she is better for the job I wish we did have more viable choices !PJPOWER said:
Did I say that? Isn't this a Hillary thread? I think they both suck on almost the same level, I can say that with conviction. I'm just surprised at how many people love her in this thread.josevolution said:
And then you have Trump can you really say with total conviction that he would be less reckless or better fit to be President ...PJPOWER said:
Are we not about holding our representatives responsible for their carelessness and recklessness? If she is careless with her duties as Secretary of State, is it not safe to conclude that she would also be careless with her duties as the president? Reckless would be her throwing a book at a car driver's head...oh wait she did that too. She seems to display both reckless and careless behavior through many examples in the past. Have we not had enough of those presidents in the past?Kat said:
They want to make an example of him so any other Republican who wants to be reasonable will be afraid to do it if it's not in the PARTY's interests. I also wonder why the word McCarthyism just popped into my mind? I also notice that some are using the term reckless instead of careless, thereby trying to elevate the level of any mistake with email. That's just phony. It was recommended that no charges be filed because what happened didn't reach the necessary level of a crime.mrussel1 said:I heard this question earlier:
Mr Comey, how long have you been Director
3 years
How many cases have you personally been involved with?
10-20
Of those, how many did you have to testify before Congress after your decision?
None
These are clearly dangerous times and it's important for reasonable people to remember what America is about.
I read a joke the other day: "If Hillary and Donald were on sinking boat in the middle of the ocean and had to swim to shore, who would win??? America, America would win". LolWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
Why don't you provide some kind of argument as to why you don't think she will be super careful not to mishandle confidential government emails after all of this instead of just being passive aggressive? Only an insane person would try doing that again after going through what she's gone through because of her past behaviour, and knowing that everyone will be watching her when it comes to that kind of thing. Do you think she is insane?Free said:
I was laughing hysterically about "everyone can pretty much be 100% assured that if she were POTUS every single bit of info would be handled with the greatest care imaginable - more than anyone preceding her."josevolution said:
Free it's either her or him no one else is getting the nod , I wish there were other viable candidates but it ain't happening ..Free said:PJ_Soul said:
The thing is, now everyone can pretty much be 100% assured that if she were POTUS every single bit of info would be handled with the greatest care imaginable - more than anyone preceding her. There is no way she's going to be making any of those mistakes again, since she'll be under the microscope in that context from here on out.PJPOWER said:
Her carelessness with her email usage pertaining to confidential information should disqualify her for any security clearances, a requirement for POTUS, disqualifying her for POTUS as welljosevolution said:
Really you are saying that she would be just as bad as Trump because there is no way I can be convinced that his qualified to be POTUS ...PJPOWER said:
So shit>shit? I'm yet to be convinced that she would do a better job.josevolution said:
No I'm not saying you said it but rather stating that this is it these two are what is left to choose from , if it's not her then it will be him and I'd say she is better for the job I wish we did have more viable choices !PJPOWER said:
Did I say that? Isn't this a Hillary thread? I think they both suck on almost the same level, I can say that with conviction. I'm just surprised at how many people love her in this thread.josevolution said:
And then you have Trump can you really say with total conviction that he would be less reckless or better fit to be President ...PJPOWER said:
Are we not about holding our representatives responsible for their carelessness and recklessness? If she is careless with her duties as Secretary of State, is it not safe to conclude that she would also be careless with her duties as the president? Reckless would be her throwing a book at a car driver's head...oh wait she did that too. She seems to display both reckless and careless behavior through many examples in the past. Have we not had enough of those presidents in the past?Kat said:
They want to make an example of him so any other Republican who wants to be reasonable will be afraid to do it if it's not in the PARTY's interests. I also wonder why the word McCarthyism just popped into my mind? I also notice that some are using the term reckless instead of careless, thereby trying to elevate the level of any mistake with email. That's just phony. It was recommended that no charges be filed because what happened didn't reach the necessary level of a crime.mrussel1 said:I heard this question earlier:
Mr Comey, how long have you been Director
3 years
How many cases have you personally been involved with?
10-20
Of those, how many did you have to testify before Congress after your decision?
None
These are clearly dangerous times and it's important for reasonable people to remember what America is about.
I read a joke the other day: "If Hillary and Donald were on sinking boat in the middle of the ocean and had to swim to shore, who would win??? America, America would win". LolWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
^^^
She is not insane but Trump would never have done this in the first place.
And if he becomes POTUS he would direct his underlings how to not let a Hillary happen.0 -
I know you're just trying to push buttons (you're not even a Trump supporter in reality IMO), but still just wondering how you want us to beleive you or anyone knows what Trump would or wouodn't do, since he has no political experience or track record at all.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
She is not insane but Trump would never have done this in the first place.
And if he becomes POTUS he would direct his underlings how to not let a Hillary happen.With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
^^^
No matter. America wants change in the establishment bad but because they don't have a choice this year they will pick Hillary.
No one says what the big bad Donald will do if voted in. That is strange.
0 -
Why wouod anyone need to say that? Donald is constantly pontificating about all the things he'll do within 10 minutes of gaining office.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
No matter. America wants change in the establishment bad but because they don't have a choice this year they will pick Hillary.
No one says what the big bad Donald will do if voted in. That is strange.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
^^^
Yes but seriously? All of them?
come on0 -
Meh, that doesn't mean I cannot keep the conversation about her atrocities alive and well.mrussel1 said:
Just vote for Trump and be done with it. Here's the thing... no one on this page is changing their mind on who they're voting for in November.PJPOWER said:
Her carelessness with her email usage pertaining to confidential information should disqualify her for any security clearances, a requirement for POTUS, disqualifying her for POTUS as welljosevolution said:
Really you are saying that she would be just as bad as Trump because there is no way I can be convinced that his qualified to be POTUS ...PJPOWER said:
So shit>shit? I'm yet to be convinced that she would do a better job.josevolution said:
No I'm not saying you said it but rather stating that this is it these two are what is left to choose from , if it's not her then it will be him and I'd say she is better for the job I wish we did have more viable choices !PJPOWER said:
Did I say that? Isn't this a Hillary thread? I think they both suck on almost the same level, I can say that with conviction. I'm just surprised at how many people love her in this thread.josevolution said:
And then you have Trump can you really say with total conviction that he would be less reckless or better fit to be President ...PJPOWER said:
Are we not about holding our representatives responsible for their carelessness and recklessness? If she is careless with her duties as Secretary of State, is it not safe to conclude that she would also be careless with her duties as the president? Reckless would be her throwing a book at a car driver's head...oh wait she did that too. She seems to display both reckless and careless behavior through many examples in the past. Have we not had enough of those presidents in the past?Kat said:
They want to make an example of him so any other Republican who wants to be reasonable will be afraid to do it if it's not in the PARTY's interests. I also wonder why the word McCarthyism just popped into my mind? I also notice that some are using the term reckless instead of careless, thereby trying to elevate the level of any mistake with email. That's just phony. It was recommended that no charges be filed because what happened didn't reach the necessary level of a crime.mrussel1 said:I heard this question earlier:
Mr Comey, how long have you been Director
3 years
How many cases have you personally been involved with?
10-20
Of those, how many did you have to testify before Congress after your decision?
None
These are clearly dangerous times and it's important for reasonable people to remember what America is about.
I read a joke the other day: "If Hillary and Donald were on sinking boat in the middle of the ocean and had to swim to shore, who would win??? America, America would win". Lol
"What difference does it make"-Hillary Clinton0 -
You should look up the meaning of the word 'atrocities'. You are grossly misusing it...PJPOWER said:
Meh, that doesn't mean I cannot keep the conversation about her atrocities alive and well.mrussel1 said:
Just vote for Trump and be done with it. Here's the thing... no one on this page is changing their mind on who they're voting for in November.PJPOWER said:
Her carelessness with her email usage pertaining to confidential information should disqualify her for any security clearances, a requirement for POTUS, disqualifying her for POTUS as welljosevolution said:
Really you are saying that she would be just as bad as Trump because there is no way I can be convinced that his qualified to be POTUS ...PJPOWER said:
So shit>shit? I'm yet to be convinced that she would do a better job.josevolution said:
No I'm not saying you said it but rather stating that this is it these two are what is left to choose from , if it's not her then it will be him and I'd say she is better for the job I wish we did have more viable choices !PJPOWER said:
Did I say that? Isn't this a Hillary thread? I think they both suck on almost the same level, I can say that with conviction. I'm just surprised at how many people love her in this thread.josevolution said:
And then you have Trump can you really say with total conviction that he would be less reckless or better fit to be President ...PJPOWER said:
Are we not about holding our representatives responsible for their carelessness and recklessness? If she is careless with her duties as Secretary of State, is it not safe to conclude that she would also be careless with her duties as the president? Reckless would be her throwing a book at a car driver's head...oh wait she did that too. She seems to display both reckless and careless behavior through many examples in the past. Have we not had enough of those presidents in the past?Kat said:
They want to make an example of him so any other Republican who wants to be reasonable will be afraid to do it if it's not in the PARTY's interests. I also wonder why the word McCarthyism just popped into my mind? I also notice that some are using the term reckless instead of careless, thereby trying to elevate the level of any mistake with email. That's just phony. It was recommended that no charges be filed because what happened didn't reach the necessary level of a crime.mrussel1 said:I heard this question earlier:
Mr Comey, how long have you been Director
3 years
How many cases have you personally been involved with?
10-20
Of those, how many did you have to testify before Congress after your decision?
None
These are clearly dangerous times and it's important for reasonable people to remember what America is about.
I read a joke the other day: "If Hillary and Donald were on sinking boat in the middle of the ocean and had to swim to shore, who would win??? America, America would win". Lol
"What difference does it make"-Hillary Clinton0 -
Agree.mrussel1 said:
You should look up the meaning of the word 'atrocities'. You are grossly misusing it...PJPOWER said:
Meh, that doesn't mean I cannot keep the conversation about her atrocities alive and well.mrussel1 said:
Just vote for Trump and be done with it. Here's the thing... no one on this page is changing their mind on who they're voting for in November.PJPOWER said:
Her carelessness with her email usage pertaining to confidential information should disqualify her for any security clearances, a requirement for POTUS, disqualifying her for POTUS as welljosevolution said:
Really you are saying that she would be just as bad as Trump because there is no way I can be convinced that his qualified to be POTUS ...PJPOWER said:
So shit>shit? I'm yet to be convinced that she would do a better job.josevolution said:
No I'm not saying you said it but rather stating that this is it these two are what is left to choose from , if it's not her then it will be him and I'd say she is better for the job I wish we did have more viable choices !PJPOWER said:
Did I say that? Isn't this a Hillary thread? I think they both suck on almost the same level, I can say that with conviction. I'm just surprised at how many people love her in this thread.josevolution said:
And then you have Trump can you really say with total conviction that he would be less reckless or better fit to be President ...PJPOWER said:
Are we not about holding our representatives responsible for their carelessness and recklessness? If she is careless with her duties as Secretary of State, is it not safe to conclude that she would also be careless with her duties as the president? Reckless would be her throwing a book at a car driver's head...oh wait she did that too. She seems to display both reckless and careless behavior through many examples in the past. Have we not had enough of those presidents in the past?Kat said:
They want to make an example of him so any other Republican who wants to be reasonable will be afraid to do it if it's not in the PARTY's interests. I also wonder why the word McCarthyism just popped into my mind? I also notice that some are using the term reckless instead of careless, thereby trying to elevate the level of any mistake with email. That's just phony. It was recommended that no charges be filed because what happened didn't reach the necessary level of a crime.mrussel1 said:I heard this question earlier:
Mr Comey, how long have you been Director
3 years
How many cases have you personally been involved with?
10-20
Of those, how many did you have to testify before Congress after your decision?
None
These are clearly dangerous times and it's important for reasonable people to remember what America is about.
I read a joke the other day: "If Hillary and Donald were on sinking boat in the middle of the ocean and had to swim to shore, who would win??? America, America would win". Lol
"What difference does it make"-Hillary Clinton
0 -
Yep, pretty much fits the bill!mrussel1 said:
You should look up the meaning of the word 'atrocities'. You are grossly misusing it...PJPOWER said:
Meh, that doesn't mean I cannot keep the conversation about her atrocities alive and well.mrussel1 said:
Just vote for Trump and be done with it. Here's the thing... no one on this page is changing their mind on who they're voting for in November.PJPOWER said:
Her carelessness with her email usage pertaining to confidential information should disqualify her for any security clearances, a requirement for POTUS, disqualifying her for POTUS as welljosevolution said:
Really you are saying that she would be just as bad as Trump because there is no way I can be convinced that his qualified to be POTUS ...PJPOWER said:
So shit>shit? I'm yet to be convinced that she would do a better job.josevolution said:
No I'm not saying you said it but rather stating that this is it these two are what is left to choose from , if it's not her then it will be him and I'd say she is better for the job I wish we did have more viable choices !PJPOWER said:
Did I say that? Isn't this a Hillary thread? I think they both suck on almost the same level, I can say that with conviction. I'm just surprised at how many people love her in this thread.josevolution said:
And then you have Trump can you really say with total conviction that he would be less reckless or better fit to be President ...PJPOWER said:
Are we not about holding our representatives responsible for their carelessness and recklessness? If she is careless with her duties as Secretary of State, is it not safe to conclude that she would also be careless with her duties as the president? Reckless would be her throwing a book at a car driver's head...oh wait she did that too. She seems to display both reckless and careless behavior through many examples in the past. Have we not had enough of those presidents in the past?Kat said:
They want to make an example of him so any other Republican who wants to be reasonable will be afraid to do it if it's not in the PARTY's interests. I also wonder why the word McCarthyism just popped into my mind? I also notice that some are using the term reckless instead of careless, thereby trying to elevate the level of any mistake with email. That's just phony. It was recommended that no charges be filed because what happened didn't reach the necessary level of a crime.mrussel1 said:I heard this question earlier:
Mr Comey, how long have you been Director
3 years
How many cases have you personally been involved with?
10-20
Of those, how many did you have to testify before Congress after your decision?
None
These are clearly dangerous times and it's important for reasonable people to remember what America is about.
I read a joke the other day: "If Hillary and Donald were on sinking boat in the middle of the ocean and had to swim to shore, who would win??? America, America would win". Lol
"What difference does it make"-Hillary Clinton
"Atrocity"
əˈträsədē/
noun
plural noun: atrocities
an extremely wicked or cruel act, typically one involving physical violence or injury.
"war atrocities"
synonyms: abomination, cruelty, enormity, outrage, horror, monstrosity, obscenity, violation, crime, abuse;
Post edited by PJPOWER on0 -
Yeah, when did she commit a war atrocity or perpetrate violence? And please stick with something she was indicted for, not some bullshit from Breitbart.PJPOWER said:
Yep, pretty much fits the bill!mrussel1 said:
You should look up the meaning of the word 'atrocities'. You are grossly misusing it...PJPOWER said:
Meh, that doesn't mean I cannot keep the conversation about her atrocities alive and well.mrussel1 said:
Just vote for Trump and be done with it. Here's the thing... no one on this page is changing their mind on who they're voting for in November.PJPOWER said:
Her carelessness with her email usage pertaining to confidential information should disqualify her for any security clearances, a requirement for POTUS, disqualifying her for POTUS as welljosevolution said:
Really you are saying that she would be just as bad as Trump because there is no way I can be convinced that his qualified to be POTUS ...PJPOWER said:
So shit>shit? I'm yet to be convinced that she would do a better job.josevolution said:
No I'm not saying you said it but rather stating that this is it these two are what is left to choose from , if it's not her then it will be him and I'd say she is better for the job I wish we did have more viable choices !PJPOWER said:
Did I say that? Isn't this a Hillary thread? I think they both suck on almost the same level, I can say that with conviction. I'm just surprised at how many people love her in this thread.josevolution said:
And then you have Trump can you really say with total conviction that he would be less reckless or better fit to be President ...PJPOWER said:
Are we not about holding our representatives responsible for their carelessness and recklessness? If she is careless with her duties as Secretary of State, is it not safe to conclude that she would also be careless with her duties as the president? Reckless would be her throwing a book at a car driver's head...oh wait she did that too. She seems to display both reckless and careless behavior through many examples in the past. Have we not had enough of those presidents in the past?Kat said:
They want to make an example of him so any other Republican who wants to be reasonable will be afraid to do it if it's not in the PARTY's interests. I also wonder why the word McCarthyism just popped into my mind? I also notice that some are using the term reckless instead of careless, thereby trying to elevate the level of any mistake with email. That's just phony. It was recommended that no charges be filed because what happened didn't reach the necessary level of a crime.mrussel1 said:I heard this question earlier:
Mr Comey, how long have you been Director
3 years
How many cases have you personally been involved with?
10-20
Of those, how many did you have to testify before Congress after your decision?
None
These are clearly dangerous times and it's important for reasonable people to remember what America is about.
I read a joke the other day: "If Hillary and Donald were on sinking boat in the middle of the ocean and had to swim to shore, who would win??? America, America would win". Lol
"What difference does it make"-Hillary Clinton
"Atrocity"
əˈträsədē/
noun
plural noun: atrocities
an extremely wicked or cruel act, typically one involving physical violence or injury.
"war atrocities"
synonyms: abomination, cruelty, enormity, outrage, horror, monstrosity, obscenity, violation, crime, abuse;
0 -
No thanks, I'll stick with the things that she slithered around being indicted formrussel1 said:
Yeah, when did she commit a war atrocity or perpetrate violence? And please stick with something she was indicted for, not some bullshit from Breitbart.PJPOWER said:
Yep, pretty much fits the bill!mrussel1 said:
You should look up the meaning of the word 'atrocities'. You are grossly misusing it...PJPOWER said:
Meh, that doesn't mean I cannot keep the conversation about her atrocities alive and well.mrussel1 said:
Just vote for Trump and be done with it. Here's the thing... no one on this page is changing their mind on who they're voting for in November.PJPOWER said:
Her carelessness with her email usage pertaining to confidential information should disqualify her for any security clearances, a requirement for POTUS, disqualifying her for POTUS as welljosevolution said:
Really you are saying that she would be just as bad as Trump because there is no way I can be convinced that his qualified to be POTUS ...PJPOWER said:
So shit>shit? I'm yet to be convinced that she would do a better job.josevolution said:
No I'm not saying you said it but rather stating that this is it these two are what is left to choose from , if it's not her then it will be him and I'd say she is better for the job I wish we did have more viable choices !PJPOWER said:
Did I say that? Isn't this a Hillary thread? I think they both suck on almost the same level, I can say that with conviction. I'm just surprised at how many people love her in this thread.josevolution said:
And then you have Trump can you really say with total conviction that he would be less reckless or better fit to be President ...PJPOWER said:
Are we not about holding our representatives responsible for their carelessness and recklessness? If she is careless with her duties as Secretary of State, is it not safe to conclude that she would also be careless with her duties as the president? Reckless would be her throwing a book at a car driver's head...oh wait she did that too. She seems to display both reckless and careless behavior through many examples in the past. Have we not had enough of those presidents in the past?Kat said:
They want to make an example of him so any other Republican who wants to be reasonable will be afraid to do it if it's not in the PARTY's interests. I also wonder why the word McCarthyism just popped into my mind? I also notice that some are using the term reckless instead of careless, thereby trying to elevate the level of any mistake with email. That's just phony. It was recommended that no charges be filed because what happened didn't reach the necessary level of a crime.mrussel1 said:I heard this question earlier:
Mr Comey, how long have you been Director
3 years
How many cases have you personally been involved with?
10-20
Of those, how many did you have to testify before Congress after your decision?
None
These are clearly dangerous times and it's important for reasonable people to remember what America is about.
I read a joke the other day: "If Hillary and Donald were on sinking boat in the middle of the ocean and had to swim to shore, who would win??? America, America would win". Lol
"What difference does it make"-Hillary Clinton
"Atrocity"
əˈträsədē/
noun
plural noun: atrocities
an extremely wicked or cruel act, typically one involving physical violence or injury.
"war atrocities"
synonyms: abomination, cruelty, enormity, outrage, horror, monstrosity, obscenity, violation, crime, abuse; 0 -
Emails =atrocities. Got it. Wonder what words are left for Stalin, Pot , Milosevic, and the like...super duper atrocities?PJPOWER said:
No thanks, I'll stick with the things that she slithered around being indicted formrussel1 said:
Yeah, when did she commit a war atrocity or perpetrate violence? And please stick with something she was indicted for, not some bullshit from Breitbart.PJPOWER said:
Yep, pretty much fits the bill!mrussel1 said:
You should look up the meaning of the word 'atrocities'. You are grossly misusing it...PJPOWER said:
Meh, that doesn't mean I cannot keep the conversation about her atrocities alive and well.mrussel1 said:
Just vote for Trump and be done with it. Here's the thing... no one on this page is changing their mind on who they're voting for in November.PJPOWER said:
Her carelessness with her email usage pertaining to confidential information should disqualify her for any security clearances, a requirement for POTUS, disqualifying her for POTUS as welljosevolution said:
Really you are saying that she would be just as bad as Trump because there is no way I can be convinced that his qualified to be POTUS ...PJPOWER said:
So shit>shit? I'm yet to be convinced that she would do a better job.josevolution said:
No I'm not saying you said it but rather stating that this is it these two are what is left to choose from , if it's not her then it will be him and I'd say she is better for the job I wish we did have more viable choices !PJPOWER said:
Did I say that? Isn't this a Hillary thread? I think they both suck on almost the same level, I can say that with conviction. I'm just surprised at how many people love her in this thread.josevolution said:
And then you have Trump can you really say with total conviction that he would be less reckless or better fit to be President ...PJPOWER said:
Are we not about holding our representatives responsible for their carelessness and recklessness? If she is careless with her duties as Secretary of State, is it not safe to conclude that she would also be careless with her duties as the president? Reckless would be her throwing a book at a car driver's head...oh wait she did that too. She seems to display both reckless and careless behavior through many examples in the past. Have we not had enough of those presidents in the past?Kat said:
They want to make an example of him so any other Republican who wants to be reasonable will be afraid to do it if it's not in the PARTY's interests. I also wonder why the word McCarthyism just popped into my mind? I also notice that some are using the term reckless instead of careless, thereby trying to elevate the level of any mistake with email. That's just phony. It was recommended that no charges be filed because what happened didn't reach the necessary level of a crime.mrussel1 said:I heard this question earlier:
Mr Comey, how long have you been Director
3 years
How many cases have you personally been involved with?
10-20
Of those, how many did you have to testify before Congress after your decision?
None
These are clearly dangerous times and it's important for reasonable people to remember what America is about.
I read a joke the other day: "If Hillary and Donald were on sinking boat in the middle of the ocean and had to swim to shore, who would win??? America, America would win". Lol
"What difference does it make"-Hillary Clinton
"Atrocity"
əˈträsədē/
noun
plural noun: atrocities
an extremely wicked or cruel act, typically one involving physical violence or injury.
"war atrocities"
synonyms: abomination, cruelty, enormity, outrage, horror, monstrosity, obscenity, violation, crime, abuse;0 -
I'm good with that, super duper atrocities sounds super duper!mrussel1 said:
Emails =atrocities. Got it. Wonder what words are left for Stalin, Pot , Milosevic, and the like...super duper atrocities?PJPOWER said:
No thanks, I'll stick with the things that she slithered around being indicted formrussel1 said:
Yeah, when did she commit a war atrocity or perpetrate violence? And please stick with something she was indicted for, not some bullshit from Breitbart.PJPOWER said:
Yep, pretty much fits the bill!mrussel1 said:
You should look up the meaning of the word 'atrocities'. You are grossly misusing it...PJPOWER said:
Meh, that doesn't mean I cannot keep the conversation about her atrocities alive and well.mrussel1 said:
Just vote for Trump and be done with it. Here's the thing... no one on this page is changing their mind on who they're voting for in November.PJPOWER said:
Her carelessness with her email usage pertaining to confidential information should disqualify her for any security clearances, a requirement for POTUS, disqualifying her for POTUS as welljosevolution said:
Really you are saying that she would be just as bad as Trump because there is no way I can be convinced that his qualified to be POTUS ...PJPOWER said:
So shit>shit? I'm yet to be convinced that she would do a better job.josevolution said:
No I'm not saying you said it but rather stating that this is it these two are what is left to choose from , if it's not her then it will be him and I'd say she is better for the job I wish we did have more viable choices !PJPOWER said:
Did I say that? Isn't this a Hillary thread? I think they both suck on almost the same level, I can say that with conviction. I'm just surprised at how many people love her in this thread.josevolution said:
And then you have Trump can you really say with total conviction that he would be less reckless or better fit to be President ...PJPOWER said:
Are we not about holding our representatives responsible for their carelessness and recklessness? If she is careless with her duties as Secretary of State, is it not safe to conclude that she would also be careless with her duties as the president? Reckless would be her throwing a book at a car driver's head...oh wait she did that too. She seems to display both reckless and careless behavior through many examples in the past. Have we not had enough of those presidents in the past?Kat said:
They want to make an example of him so any other Republican who wants to be reasonable will be afraid to do it if it's not in the PARTY's interests. I also wonder why the word McCarthyism just popped into my mind? I also notice that some are using the term reckless instead of careless, thereby trying to elevate the level of any mistake with email. That's just phony. It was recommended that no charges be filed because what happened didn't reach the necessary level of a crime.mrussel1 said:I heard this question earlier:
Mr Comey, how long have you been Director
3 years
How many cases have you personally been involved with?
10-20
Of those, how many did you have to testify before Congress after your decision?
None
These are clearly dangerous times and it's important for reasonable people to remember what America is about.
I read a joke the other day: "If Hillary and Donald were on sinking boat in the middle of the ocean and had to swim to shore, who would win??? America, America would win". Lol
"What difference does it make"-Hillary Clinton
"Atrocity"
əˈträsədē/
noun
plural noun: atrocities
an extremely wicked or cruel act, typically one involving physical violence or injury.
"war atrocities"
synonyms: abomination, cruelty, enormity, outrage, horror, monstrosity, obscenity, violation, crime, abuse;0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help