Imagine That -- I’m Still Anti-War
Comments
-
Taking back his words? I thought he didn't reference that particular conflict? I'm confused...Drowned Out said:
Pretty much. Placing blame on both Israel and Hamas could be interpreted as taking back his words, and he was having none of it.PhillyCrownOfThorns said:
The simple way to silence a lot of the outrage is to place blame on Israel and Hamas for putting people in harms way.Drowned Out said:
I agree that it does nothing to clarify the controversy. He basically continued his speech; let his words stand. He did make it clear it wasn't addressed to any one nation, but didn't absolve those who felt slighted. It seems like some people want a pass on their violence. He isn't biting.PhillyCrownOfThorns said:
So the release clarifies what for those who were upset?MayDay10 said:Great words. I'm sure people will twist it around as negative somehow... those people must work for Lockheed Martin
Good for him.
Anti war... $$ wasted... Peace and love!
Done. Story over
If his word offended someone's nationalist sensibilities, it might be time for a look in the mirror instead of lashing out.
9.29.96, 8.28.98, 9.1.00, 7.5.03, 9.30.05, 6.1.06, 6.19.08, 6.20.08, 6.24.08, 10.27.09, 10.28.09, 10.30.09, 5.20.10, 9.3.11, 9.4.11, 9.2.12, 7.19.13...
2013- Brooklyn2, Philly1, Philly2, NOLA0 -
He gave a broad anti-war speech that started this and people on both sides of one particular conflict lost their minds. I don't think assessing blame to both would stem the flow of their irrational thinking. Plus, it would give credibility to those who misinterpreted his original words.PhillyCrownOfThorns said:
Yes. I honestly do.JimmyV said:
Do you honestly believe that would silence any outrage? If anything that would only turn it up ten notches.PhillyCrownOfThorns said:
The simple way to silence a lot of the outrage is to place blame on Israel and Hamas for putting people in harms way.
.
why would it turn it up 10 notches? If he is anti-war and all-encompassing, like he said, then it's no big deal. Just say it.
___________________________________________
"...I changed by not changing at all..."0 -
I agree with everyone that this is well said and I'm sure everyone will agree it didn't even really need to be said as we fans know him. In fact I felt I've already said everything he wrote all week in defending him. I feel bad that it feels like the media possibly got to him and he felt the need to write this because the world needs more people like him speaking up; people with 100% pure goodness, hope, and faith in their hearts.0
-
For those that were upset because they thought he was ripping on Israel during the show, I don't think the comments today are going to change their feelings. They either believe that Ed was talking in generalities during the show or not. The letter today was a general anti-war letter but that doesn't mean that the emotional, off-the-cuff speech during the show wasn't specific either.Drowned Out said:
I agree that it does nothing to clarify the controversy. He basically continued his speech; let his words stand. He did make it clear it wasn't addressed to any one nation, but didn't absolve those who felt slighted. It seems like some people want a pass on their violence. He isn't biting.PhillyCrownOfThorns said:
So the release clarifies what for those who were upset?MayDay10 said:Great words. I'm sure people will twist it around as negative somehow... those people must work for Lockheed Martin
Good for him.
This is just how I see it analytically. I don't care who Ed was talking about during the show. His point is spot on that it is insane that in 2014 there is so much unneccesary war and bloodshed going on in the world.0 -
Well said EV!Austin, TX0
-
How are those who were offended not credible? It's how they felt...
And for some reason, Eddie felt the need to respond to some level of pressure.9.29.96, 8.28.98, 9.1.00, 7.5.03, 9.30.05, 6.1.06, 6.19.08, 6.20.08, 6.24.08, 10.27.09, 10.28.09, 10.30.09, 5.20.10, 9.3.11, 9.4.11, 9.2.12, 7.19.13...
2013- Brooklyn2, Philly1, Philly2, NOLA0 -
They aren't credible because they were offended by something that was never said. Both sides twisted his words to fit their own ideologies. I think placing blame on either or both side would have blown this up even further.
And Eddie is a guy who still has another show to play in Europe. This will have died down by October but not by Friday. He had to respond somehow.___________________________________________
"...I changed by not changing at all..."0 -
People are being naive if they think his rant wasn't inspired by Israel/Palestine. It was the lead story on every news program the day he said this. But if he said anything about Israel/Palestine specifically, it would have taken away from the universality of his words. He did say many things that can be said about all 'dozen' conflicts, but when you talk about crossing borders and stealing land, it narrows the scope, and does point a finger at this as a cause of war. If the people who support crossing borders and stealing land are offended that they were called out...oh well. Again, good for him for not backing down from that. He speaks the truth.Post edited by Drowned Out on0
-
Neil Young did NOT cancel his show. The Israeli police cancelled it because of the unsafe conditions. Had it not been for the current violence, the show would have gone on...just as the Rolling Stones did, Justin Timberlake did, and many other of the biggest artists in the world.JimmyV said:How was playing Tel Aviv going to help? How would playing Tel Aviv help? Neil may have cancelled his show and pledged donations, but he did so only after a period of terrible publicity that the current conflict provided a ready-made excuse to mitigate. I like Neil, but I don't think he came out of this looking very good.
Neil Young came out of it fine. He was unable to play the show but he issued an eloquent statement and made donations to worthy charities on both sides. No doubt he will be back in the future.0 -
http://www.kshe95.com/news/real-rock-news/police-order-neil-young-cancel-israeli-gigJimmyV said:
I don't know the reasoning either, just that the safety reason provided the perfect excuse to walk away from a show that was turning controversial. I'm sure there are/were legitimate safety concerns.bootlegger10 said:
I'm not sure that Neil canceled it for any other reason than safety or if it was even Neil's call. I would think any large gathering of people in Israel would be a target right now and would be canceled.JimmyV said:How was playing Tel Aviv going to help? How would playing Tel Aviv help? Neil may have cancelled his show and pledged donations, but he did so only after a period of terrible publicity that the current conflict provided a ready-made excuse to mitigate. I like Neil, but I don't think he came out of this looking very good.
0 -
Exactly my point. The conflict provided good cover for him to walk away from playing a controversial show. Maybe he will be back in the future, maybe he won't. But, if hostilities had not flared up like this in the days before his scheduled show, maybe he would have gone ahead and caved to outside pressure and cancelled. Maybe he would have gone ahead and played. We'll never know.Luckytwn1 said:
Neil Young did NOT cancel his show. The Israeli police cancelled it because of the unsafe conditions. Had it not been for the current violence, the show would have gone on...just as the Rolling Stones did, Justin Timberlake did, and many other of the biggest artists in the world.JimmyV said:How was playing Tel Aviv going to help? How would playing Tel Aviv help? Neil may have cancelled his show and pledged donations, but he did so only after a period of terrible publicity that the current conflict provided a ready-made excuse to mitigate. I like Neil, but I don't think he came out of this looking very good.
Neil Young came out of it fine. He was unable to play the show but he issued an eloquent statement and made donations to worthy charities on both sides. No doubt he will be back in the future.
___________________________________________
"...I changed by not changing at all..."0 -
I have a feeling Ed's lil notebook/typewriter have been getting a good workout lately
one can only hope
Ed's a genuine dude and it comes thru clearly.
We need more people speaking out against injustice0 -
you know that 'oh noooo' feeling when one of your team scores an own goal? thats what this feels like...
Ed had only two realistic options in all this. Say fuckin nothing and stand by it. Or nail his colours to the mast and instead name all the countries he meant and both would have gotten him grief but respect too for expanding on his rant(which i agreed with verbatim).
Instead he chose the worst option. He did an immense backpeddalling 'here's what I meant to say' and for that he's going to get shit from every direction. I love the guy and even I dont buy it. And it'll especially come from the pro Israel side. They're gonna dance all over him for this. He's basically backed down and now is going to be accused of being a coward as well as an anti Semite and all those other bullshit words those guys like throwing at anyone who disagrees with them. Shouldn't have opened his mouth to reply to it at all. heart was in the right place as always, but stand by it and own it, name and shame and expand to include al those countries(including his own) or say nothing and his point still would stand.
him replying to this was poorly advised.0 -
eldarion75 said:
you know that 'oh noooo' feeling when one of your team scores an own goal? thats what this feels like...
Ed had only two realistic options in all this. Say fuckin nothing and stand by it. Or nail his colours to the mast and instead name all the countries he meant and both would have gotten him grief but respect too for expanding on his rant(which i agreed with verbatim).
Instead he chose the worst option. He did an immense backpeddalling 'here's what I meant to say' and for that he's going to get shit from every direction. I love the guy and even I dont buy it. And it'll especially come from the pro Israel side. They're gonna dance all over him for this. He's basically backed down and now is going to be accused of being a coward as well as an anti Semite and all those other bullshit words those guys like throwing at anyone who disagrees with them. Shouldn't have opened his mouth to reply to it at all. heart was in the right place as always, but stand by it and own it, name and shame and expand to include al those countries(including his own) or say nothing and his point still would stand.
him replying to this was poorly advised.0 -
So well said, but no wonder. You always write beautifully. Your daughters are so very lucky to have you as a role model. I loved what you said at the concert,(seen footage on FB, and media). You were absolutely right and I thought saying at the concert was perfect. The more people the better, so many don't have a clue as to whats going on in the world, and many just don't care anyway, because it doesn't affect them personally. We all need more people like you! " War, what is it good for? Absolutely nothing" . Love ya Ed!0
-
"Call me naïve.eldarion75 said:you know that 'oh noooo' feeling when one of your team scores an own goal? thats what this feels like...
Ed had only two realistic options in all this. Say fuckin nothing and stand by it. Or nail his colours to the mast and instead name all the countries he meant and both would have gotten him grief but respect too for expanding on his rant(which i agreed with verbatim).
Instead he chose the worst option. He did an immense backpeddalling 'here's what I meant to say' and for that he's going to get shit from every direction. I love the guy and even I dont buy it. And it'll especially come from the pro Israel side. They're gonna dance all over him for this. He's basically backed down and now is going to be accused of being a coward as well as an anti Semite and all those other bullshit words those guys like throwing at anyone who disagrees with them. Shouldn't have opened his mouth to reply to it at all. heart was in the right place as always, but stand by it and own it, name and shame and expand to include al those countries(including his own) or say nothing and his point still would stand.
him replying to this was poorly advised.
I’d rather be naïve, heartfelt and hopeful than resigned to say
nothing for fear of misinterpretation and retribution."
0 -
But we do know for sure. He did not walk away from the show. The Israeli authorities canceled it due to safety concerns. Otherwise, he was playing the show, something that had been repeatedly announced prior to the cancellation by Israeli authorities. Neil Young has played in Israel before (including with PJ minus Ed) and his statement makes it clear he will return. Roger Waters is an anti-Semite who, among other things, put the Star of David on a pig as a prop. It was clear for months that Neil Young was totally ignoring Waters on the issue, just as the Stones and countless others did. Waters finally went public against Young after he admitted that Neil was ignoring him.JimmyV said:
Exactly my point. The conflict provided good cover for him to walk away from playing a controversial show. Maybe he will be back in the future, maybe he won't. But, if hostilities had not flared up like this in the days before his scheduled show, maybe he would have gone ahead and caved to outside pressure and cancelled. Maybe he would have gone ahead and played. We'll never know.Luckytwn1 said:
Neil Young did NOT cancel his show. The Israeli police cancelled it because of the unsafe conditions. Had it not been for the current violence, the show would have gone on...just as the Rolling Stones did, Justin Timberlake did, and many other of the biggest artists in the world.JimmyV said:How was playing Tel Aviv going to help? How would playing Tel Aviv help? Neil may have cancelled his show and pledged donations, but he did so only after a period of terrible publicity that the current conflict provided a ready-made excuse to mitigate. I like Neil, but I don't think he came out of this looking very good.
Neil Young came out of it fine. He was unable to play the show but he issued an eloquent statement and made donations to worthy charities on both sides. No doubt he will be back in the future.
0 -
0
-
I don't think anyone thinks Eddie Vedder is anti-Semite. And if they did, his statement clearly shows he is not. There is a huge distinction between Ed and Roger Waters.eldarion75 said:you know that 'oh noooo' feeling when one of your team scores an own goal? thats what this feels like...
Ed had only two realistic options in all this. Say fuckin nothing and stand by it. Or nail his colours to the mast and instead name all the countries he meant and both would have gotten him grief but respect too for expanding on his rant(which i agreed with verbatim).
Instead he chose the worst option. He did an immense backpeddalling 'here's what I meant to say' and for that he's going to get shit from every direction. I love the guy and even I dont buy it. And it'll especially come from the pro Israel side. They're gonna dance all over him for this. He's basically backed down and now is going to be accused of being a coward as well as an anti Semite and all those other bullshit words those guys like throwing at anyone who disagrees with them. Shouldn't have opened his mouth to reply to it at all. heart was in the right place as always, but stand by it and own it, name and shame and expand to include al those countries(including his own) or say nothing and his point still would stand.
him replying to this was poorly advised.
Roger Waters has used hateful rhetoric comparing Israel to the Nazis and suggesting they are conducting a second Holocaust (this is particularly ludicrous), put the Star of David on a pig as a prop, and is for a boycott that I don't even want to legitimize by actually discussing it seriously (fortunately the Rolling Stones, Neil Young, Justin Timberlake, and so many others do not take him seriously).
In the letter Ed says "call me naive" and I did just that the other day in talking to friends. Ed is clearly not a hater and I think today's letter shows that. Nobody should equate him with Roger Waters. But Ed has views that I disagree with and regard as overly-simplistic on this topic. Israel is surrounded by countries that would destroy it without a seconds hesitation if they could. Actions being taken now are extremely unfortunate but necessary, made abundantly clear by the fact that Hamas refused the cease fire that was proposed by the Egyptians. All civilian casualties are horrible and it is a moral quandary as Peres said yesterday but if Israel was really conducting themselves without any regard for civilians, tens of thousands of Palestinians would be dead, not 200.0 -
to that, id ask who's job is it he wants? Bruce's or Bono's?backseatLover12 said:
"Call me naïve.eldarion75 said:you know that 'oh noooo' feeling when one of your team scores an own goal? thats what this feels like...
Ed had only two realistic options in all this. Say fuckin nothing and stand by it. Or nail his colours to the mast and instead name all the countries he meant and both would have gotten him grief but respect too for expanding on his rant(which i agreed with verbatim).
Instead he chose the worst option. He did an immense backpeddalling 'here's what I meant to say' and for that he's going to get shit from every direction. I love the guy and even I dont buy it. And it'll especially come from the pro Israel side. They're gonna dance all over him for this. He's basically backed down and now is going to be accused of being a coward as well as an anti Semite and all those other bullshit words those guys like throwing at anyone who disagrees with them. Shouldn't have opened his mouth to reply to it at all. heart was in the right place as always, but stand by it and own it, name and shame and expand to include al those countries(including his own) or say nothing and his point still would stand.
him replying to this was poorly advised.
I’d rather be naïve, heartfelt and hopeful than resigned to say
nothing for fear of misinterpretation and retribution."
we're all good for both, thanks. I'm with him 100% in his initial rant but the reply to the outcry was unnecessary completely.
those people would rather not live in an open prison and in constant fear of imminent death, no amount of naivity good wishes or hope will alleviate that for them. even if it's from ed. and all us pj fans0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help