Australia and NZ tour rumours going around Part 2 (No Bullshit)

1…18891890189218941895…4023

Comments

  • threefish10
    threefish10 Posts: 7,392
    Oz Jammer wrote:
    Has anybody else seen that Sony are releasing Ten & Vs as one package over here within the month?


    I already have both those albums
    condescending and sarcastic since 1980
  • Oz Jammer
    Oz Jammer Posts: 9,858
    threefish10 wrote:
    I already have both those albums

    I'd hope so :)
  • ozsmalltowngirl
    ozsmalltowngirl Posts: 14,362
    Oz Jammer wrote:
    Has anybody else seen that Sony are releasing Ten & Vs as one package over here within the month?
    Never heard of them?












    ;)
  • Oz Jammer
    Oz Jammer Posts: 9,858
    ozsmalltowngirl wrote:
    Never heard of them?

    Then I'd recommend that you buy them ;)
  • ozsmalltowngirl
    ozsmalltowngirl Posts: 14,362
    Oz Jammer wrote:
    Then I'd recommend that you buy them ;)
    really....so they're pretty good eh ? ;):D

    So why are they doing it anyway? seems a bit odd
  • Oz Jammer
    Oz Jammer Posts: 9,858
    ozsmalltowngirl wrote:
    So why are they doing it anyway? seems a bit odd

    $$$
  • ozsmalltowngirl
    ozsmalltowngirl Posts: 14,362
    Oz Jammer wrote:
    $$$
    who for ? Sony ? :rolleyes:
  • illegal pants
    illegal pants Posts: 13,471
    everyone heard all of into the wild? (or am i that behind?)

    lurve it :)

    yes, this is pearl jam related
    wah
  • threefish10
    threefish10 Posts: 7,392
    Oz Jammer wrote:
    $$$


    Yeah, like those crappy re-releases they did a year or so ago where they made the cd look like a vinyl

    like WTF, who cares.
    condescending and sarcastic since 1980
  • ozsmalltowngirl
    ozsmalltowngirl Posts: 14,362
    illegal_pants wrote:
    everyone heard all of into the wild? (or am i that behind?)

    lurve it :)

    yes, this is pearl jam related
    well gee.....no I have not?


    LOL!!!

    How are ya today Miss Pants? :)
  • ozsmalltowngirl
    ozsmalltowngirl Posts: 14,362
    threefish10 wrote:
    Yeah, like those crappy re-releases they did a year or so ago where they made the cd look like a vinyl

    like WTF, who cares.
    Hmmmmm, they would have been groovy, if done like that for the original release, but I'm not about to go and buy a CD I already have because it's yellow and looks like an LP .
    The first thing I always think when a band releases a 'Best Of' album is pretty much that they need some $$, but can't be fucked working on anything new :rolleyes:
  • Oz Jammer
    Oz Jammer Posts: 9,858
    illegal_pants wrote:
    everyone heard all of into the wild? (or am i that behind?)

    Yes, you ARE that far behind :)

    Geez, you HAVE been working hard haven't you :eek:
  • Oz Jammer
    Oz Jammer Posts: 9,858
    ozsmalltowngirl wrote:
    Hmmmmm, they would have been groovy, if done like that for the original release, but I'm not about to go and buy a CD I already have because it's yellow and looks like an LP .
    The first thing I always think when a band releases a 'Best Of' album is pretty much that they need some $$, but can't be fucked working on anything new :rolleyes:

    PJ's 'best of' came out just after PJ left Sony. Sony did the exact same thing with Silverchair too.

    Didn't stop me from buying the 2 of them though :o or Powderfinger's either :o
  • threefish10
    threefish10 Posts: 7,392
    ozsmalltowngirl wrote:
    The first thing I always think when a band releases a 'Best Of' album is pretty much that they need some $$, but can't be fucked working on anything new :rolleyes:


    i think most contracts a band get from a record label are for a certain amount of releases + a best of.

    and normally the record company own the right to the songs anyway so even years after a band has broken up or whatever the label can release a best of and the band see very little money from it.
    condescending and sarcastic since 1980
  • threefish10
    threefish10 Posts: 7,392
    Oz Jammer wrote:
    Didn't stop me from buying the 2 of them though :o or Powderfinger's either :o


    I didn't get fingerprints.
    condescending and sarcastic since 1980
  • threefish10
    threefish10 Posts: 7,392
    Oz Jammer wrote:
    PJ's 'best of' came out just after PJ left Sony.

    it was still part of their contract with sony though which i think was something like 6 studio 1 best of. i think they didn't have to do lost dogs but they did, which would have got sony some sales.
    condescending and sarcastic since 1980
  • ozsmalltowngirl
    ozsmalltowngirl Posts: 14,362
    Oz Jammer wrote:
    PJ's 'best of' came out just after PJ left Sony. Sony did the exact same thing with Silverchair too.

    Didn't stop me from buying the 2 of them though :o or Powderfinger's either :o
    Oh yeah.....I buy them all too....but that's just what I think when a band/singer/record company does it :)
  • ozsmalltowngirl
    ozsmalltowngirl Posts: 14,362
    threefish10 wrote:
    i think most contracts a band get from a record label are for a certain amount of releases + a best of.

    and normally the record company own the right to the songs anyway so even years after a band has broken up or whatever the label can release a best of and the band see very little money from it.
    yep...sucks :(
  • ozsmalltowngirl
    ozsmalltowngirl Posts: 14,362
    threefish10 wrote:
    it was still part of their contract with sony though which i think was something like 6 studio 1 best of. i think they didn't have to do lost dogs but they did, which would have got sony some sales.
    Thank goodness they did! Lost Dogs would have top be one of their best IMO :)
  • illegal pants
    illegal pants Posts: 13,471
    Miss Pants is trudging along

    how may days now Kylie? :D

    always working hard Rob ;)
    wah
This discussion has been closed.

Categories