9/11 Mysteries

MakingWaves · July 2007

El_Kabong wrote:

oh, cos you said:

When did they rig up the building?
How come no one saw them doing this?
How were they able to get away with rigging the building when I am sure it would have taken weeks?
How did they get behind the walls to the structural support without anyone working in the building seeing them do this?

I need someone to answer my questions with FACTS not theories you saw on youtube.

so, i guess it's better to just ignore it....?

can you plz point out some of these holes?

Ok, lets say that your power down theory is correct and from what i have read it was a power down of the South Tower. What about the North Tower and WTC7. Never a mention of those receiving a power down.

Read this, it should supply plenty of holes. But we have been through all of this before. http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc_power_down.html

jlew24asu · July 2007

Drowned Out wrote:

From my understanding, the tower's tenancy was so low that he was actually LOSING money, and would have over a 10 year period. Also from my understanding, b/c it was a money pit, and needed over a billion in retrofitting/repairs/asbestos removal (this was ORDERED, not something they wanted to do voluntarily), he only paid 15 million to take it over from the Port Authority.
He walked away with 5.7 billion...then split the money with the Port Authority and let them take over reconstruction....so he essentially was handed 2.85 billion for nothing. Before 9/11 he was losing money monthly, and was being forced to spend a billion on outdated buildings.

he was handed 2.85 billion because he had insurance. do you need a lesson on how insurance works?

this argument is such bullshit. so what you are saying is silverstein had a hand in organizing, planning, etc the 9/11 attacks so he can cash in his insurance policy ? he is a life long new yorker.

so really, are you saying he hand a hand in 9/11? if so, what role did he play?

there are a few of you jokers on here that firmly believe 9/11 was an inside job but will give NO specifics on who knew and did what.

what role did bush play? how bout cheney? did they call osama in the caves and all agree the 11th would be a good day?

grow a pair.

jlew24asu · July 2007

even flow? wrote:

It is the Cdn English that he must have a really hard time understanding, eh.

i'm sure you are another one who believes 9/11 was an inside job. can you tell me what you think of that day? who knew what? who planned out the attacks?

if all you can give is some childhood nursery rhyme, dont bother.

RolandTD20Kdrummer · July 2007

MakingWaves wrote:

Ok, lets say that your power down theory is correct and from what i have read it was a power down of the South Tower. What about the North Tower and WTC7. Never a mention of those receiving a power down.

Read this, it should supply plenty of holes. But we have been through all of this before. http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc_power_down.html

You gotta be kidding me. You don't think this could have planned this several months or years in advance?

You doubters just blow my mind. Too funny. You think the gov't is a sacred organization of honest god fearing people that walk on water.

It's just really incredibly naive.

even flow? · July 2007

jlew24asu wrote:

i'm sure you are another one who believes 9/11 was an inside job. can you tell me what you think of that day? who knew what? who planned out the attacks?

if all you can give is some childhood nursery rhyme, dont bother.

I don't need to prove anything to you. As I don't ask you to disprove anything to me. People have provided enough links since 912 on this board to go back and forth as it does everytime this comes up. What I am truly amazed by is the amount of Yanks who actually think the government was up to something that day. Shows that the tides turning and not all people will follow the given story without looking and listening to the government's jibe.

MakingWaves · July 2007

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

You gotta be kidding me. You don't think this could have planned this several months or years in advance?

No, not without too many people finding out or someone questioning why these people were going behind the walls to get the structure of the buildings. But the point that conspiracy theorists have pointed to was the power down. And from what I read they only mention a power down in one tower. So now part of the theory is "well it wasn't just that power down. It was done over months, possibly years". There isn't any proof of this being done over months and years. Just more and more assumptions being made.

even flow? · July 2007

MakingWaves wrote:

No, not without too many people finding out or someone questioning why these people were going behind the walls to get the structure of the buildings. But the point that conspiracy theorists have pointed to was the power down. And from what I read they only mention a power down in one tower. So now part of the theory is "well it wasn't just that power down. It was done over months, possibly years". There isn't any proof of this being done over months and years. Just more and more assumptions being made.

How many people are in the witness protection program?

MakingWaves · July 2007

even flow? wrote:

How many people are in the witness protection program?

Are you really suggesting that anyone who witnessed explosives being planted in the WTC towers are now in the witness protection program being protected by the government that tried to kill them?
I don't think so. Next arguement please.

RolandTD20Kdrummer · July 2007

MakingWaves wrote:

No, not without too many people finding out or someone questioning why these people were going behind the walls to get the structure of the buildings. But the point that conspiracy theorists have pointed to was the power down. And from what I read they only mention a power down in one tower. So now part of the theory is "well it wasn't just that power down. It was done over months, possibly years". There isn't any proof of this being done over months and years. Just more and more assumptions being made.

Someone moves out, or you terminate the lease. Pick a floor disable the elevator from stopping at the floor, lock all access doors and do whatever for as long as you want. The occupancy rates were low due to the old technology in the building. They had lots of opportunity.

Were talking about people that benefitted billions and owned the buildings. They can do whatever they want and no none sees a thing i.e. building "renovations"

People think Oh that would take weeks to rig a building ...well they had 10 times that and more if they wanted it.

even flow? · July 2007

MakingWaves wrote:

Are you really suggesting that anyone who witnessed explosives being planted in the WTC towers are now in the witness protection program being protected by the government that tried to kill them?
I don't think so. Next arguement please.

Did I say anything that you just typed? I asked, "how many people are in the witness protection program?".

MakingWaves · July 2007

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

Someone moves out, or you terminate the lease. Pick a floor disable the elevator from stopping at the floor, lock all access doors and do whatever for as long as you want. The occupancy rates were low due to the old technology in the building. They had lots of opportunity.

Were talking about people that benefitted billions and owned the buildings. They can do whatever they want and no none sees a thing i.e. building "renovations"

People think Oh that would take weeks to rig a building ...well they had 10 times that and more if they wanted it.

Sounds like a good movie but just isn't realistic and where is the proof?

sonicreducer · July 2007

http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/wtc_062907.html

MakingWaves · July 2007

even flow? wrote:

Did I say anything that you just typed? I asked, "how many people are in the witness protection program?".

Ok, I apologize then. That is what i get for assuming.

I honestly have no idea how many people are in the witness protection program.

jlew24asu · July 2007

even flow? wrote:

I don't need to prove anything to you. As I don't ask you to disprove anything to me. People have provided enough links since 912 on this board to go back and forth as it does everytime this comes up. What I am truly amazed by is the amount of Yanks who actually think the government was up to something that day. Shows that the tides turning and not all people will follow the given story without looking and listening to the government's jibe.

I didnt think so.

even flow? · July 2007

jlew24asu wrote:

I didnt think so.

Didn't think about what?

Now you can go off on my typing as you offer fuck all to any conversation.

RolandTD20Kdrummer · July 2007

MakingWaves wrote:

Sounds like a good movie but just isn't realistic and where is the proof?

Proof? lol...

Whatever...obey and follow your false flag leadership . The 70% of the population, I think now, (just America) that think it was an inside job must all be crazy. Outside America it's higher.

SweetHarmonics · July 2007

Marvin Bush was involved with the firm that did the security for the WTC. That's enough reasonable doubt for some to opine that the rogue group could have gotten in and planted the explosives.

then there's this http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/thermite.html

jlew24asu · July 2007

even flow? wrote:

Didn't think about what?

Now you can go off on my typing as you offer fuck all to any conversation.

I didnt think you would give your opinion about who knew and did what on 9/11. you are convinced 9/11 was an inside job but wont give details.

RolandTD20Kdrummer · July 2007

SweetHarmonics wrote:

Marvin Bush was involved with the firm that did the security for the WTC. That's enough reasonable doubt for some to opine that the rogue group could have gotten in and planted the explosives.

then there's this http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/thermite.html

Totally. they had all the bases covered. The reason no one is talking is beacuse they all have blood on their hands. It's a cartel.

So how come no one in the mafia talks? Ever wonder?

I really wonder how people think sometimes.

MakingWaves · July 2007

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

Proof? lol...

Whatever...obey and follow your false flag leadership . The 70% of the population that think it was an inside job must all be crazy.

No, I don't think they are crazy. I just think they are wrong about the building being blown up and a missle hitting the pentagon and all of that type stuff.
If we want to discuss if the administration had knowledge prior to the attacks that something like this was going to happen and were too arrogant to think that it could happen and chose to do nothing, then I would probably agree with a lot of your points. But to me, this part of the theory is absurd.

Also, there are polls that say 70% of the population think it was an inside job and there are polls that say 70% don't believe it was. You can find a poll to fit anything you wish.

9/11 Mysteries

Comments

Categories