911 truth seekers argue among themselves

Options
«1345678

Comments

  • godpt3
    godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    These crazies drive me nuts. They have ZERO evidence to back up their claims and everything they say is utter giberish of second-hand claims.

    They're just as bad, if not worse, than the evangelicals who deny evolution.
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • as appossed to the governments story, who's story is full of iron clad evidence.
  • godpt3
    godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    as appossed to the governments story, who's story is full of iron clad evidence.

    I'm pretty sure the wreckage of 3 airliners trumps anything the conspiracy theorists can produce.
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • they tell us a big plane hit the pentagon and yet jamie macintyre of cnn said he saw no plane or pieces and ive never seen a picture any damn plane
  • gibbits
    gibbits Posts: 522
    they tell us a big plane hit the pentagon and yet jamie macintyre of cnn said he saw no plane or pieces and ive never seen a picture any damn plane

    Tell that to the people whos' families were on that plane.
  • godpt3 wrote:
    I'm pretty sure the wreckage of 3 airliners trumps anything the conspiracy theorists can produce.

    you talking about the scraps of wreckage at the Pentagon? or the scraps of the flight that went down and apparently vaporised on impact, despite the fact they found parts scattered for miles, which is far more consistent with a plane being shot down.
  • gibbits wrote:
    Tell that to the people whos' families were on that plane.

    who's to say that's how they met their deaths? as elaborated as it sounds, there is very little proof that THAT plane hit the pentagon.
  • people with common sense. welcome!
  • godpt3 wrote:
    I'm pretty sure the wreckage of 3 airliners trumps anything the conspiracy theorists can produce.
    wreckage? where? of exactly what type of plane?

    they say one had a pod on it on the von kliest video
  • I think it's hard to say there is ZERO evidence of a conspiracy, but they seem to take it too far. They're looking too far into it. Neither the conspiracy theories or the official 9/11 commission are very acurate and filled with holes.
  • hippiemom
    hippiemom Posts: 3,326
    they tell us a big plane hit the pentagon and yet jamie macintyre of cnn said he saw no plane or pieces and ive never seen a picture any damn plane
    From Skeptic Magazine:

    But if there is so much evidence that a plane crashed into the Pentagon, why did CNN correspondent Jamie McIntyre report that he could find none? The answer is that McIntyre did not report this at all, and the 9/11 Truth Movement is once again selectively manipulating evidence to fit their conclusions. When McIntyre noted that no debris from a plane was observable near the Pentagon, he was responding to a specific question asked by CNN anchor Judy Woodruff during the segment. Flight 77 came in flying very low, and there had been speculation that the plane might have struck the ground shortly before reaching the Pentagon. McIntyre’s response, when quoted in full, makes clear that he is saying that there was no evidence that the plane hit the ground before hitting the Pentagon, but he certainly does not deny that the plane struck the Pentagon itself.

    WOODRUFF: Jamie, Aaron was talking earlier — or one of our correspondence was talking earlier — I think — actually, it was Bob Franken — with an eyewitness who said it appeared that that Boeing 757, the American jet, American Airline jet, landed short of the Pentagon.

    Can you give us any better idea of how much of the plane actually impacted the building?

    MCINTYRE: You know, it might have appeared that way, but from my close-up inspection, there’s no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site is the actual site of the building that’s crashed in [emphasis added], and as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you can pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse [emphasis added].

    Note that McIntyre never questions that an airplane crash damaged the Pentagon, and indeed describes seeing many pieces of the aircraft around the crash site in an earlier section of the CNN transcript. Of course, this has not stopped conspiracy theorists from picking and choosing the evidence to push their own agendas.

    http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/06-09-11.html
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    who's to say that's how they met their deaths? as elaborated as it sounds, there is very little proof that THAT plane hit the pentagon.


    very little proof? are you people insane? where is the plane then?
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    wreckage? where? of exactly what type of plane?

    they say one had a pod on it on the von kliest video

    i'm not a huge fan of these types of websites but they do have pictures. take a peak

    http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1
  • was there ever a plane?
  • you talking about the scraps of wreckage at the Pentagon? or the scraps of the flight that went down and apparently vaporised on impact, despite the fact they found parts scattered for miles, which is far more consistent with a plane being shot down.


    this "vaporised"thing people say is the stupidiset thing ive heard in 30 years

    sounds like scinece fiction on art bell or something
  • jlew24asu wrote:
    very little proof? are you people insane? where is the plane then?

    Who knows? I remember seeing photos from the scene where they compared the wrecked parts of plane, and they were not from the plane that was supposed to have hit the pentagon, but were in fact parts of a much smaller military plane.
  • Has anyone seen ANY PARTS OF ANYTHING in the field in PA other than black grass?

    To accept anything our government says without question is insane. Our governments history demands we ask more questions, about everything, all the time.
    All that's sacred, comes from youth....dedications, naive and true.
  • spiral out
    spiral out Posts: 1,052
    Having watched the stupid BBC conspiracy documentary on sunday night, it really doesn't appear to be a boeing 757 that hit the pentagon.

    They freeze framed the only bit of the video showing whatever it was that flew into the pentegon, and it was too long and thin to be the nose of a boeing 757.

    How can two planes crash and disapear into thin air it just doesn't make sense.

    Also that must have been one amazing pilot to fly that low to the ground with out touching it.
    Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!

    The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
  • spiral out wrote:
    Having watched the stupid BBC conspiracy documentary on sunday night, it really doesn't appear to be a boeing 757 that hit the pentagon.

    They freeze framed the only bit of the video showing whatever it was that flew into the pentegon, and it was too long and thin to be the nose of a boeing 757.

    How can two planes crash and disapear into thin air it just doesn't make sense.

    Also that must have been one amazing pilot to fly that low to the ground with out touching it.

    You mean a hack middle eastern pilot who couldn't fly a small plane at aviation school couldn't do it, OR make an impossible turn over Washington airspace couldn't fly a plane inches off of the ground without leaving any marks.

    Yeah right, dream on hippie
  • spiral out
    spiral out Posts: 1,052
    You mean a hack middle eastern pilot who couldn't fly a small plane at aviation school couldn't do it, OR make an impossible turn over Washington airspace couldn't fly a plane inches off of the ground without leaving any marks.

    Yeah right, dream on hippie

    The second part of what your saying makes no sense.

    If it was a hack middle eastern pilot who couldn't fly a small plane at aviation school then how was he able to fly a boeing 757 so well?
    Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!

    The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.