Are we still looking for Bin Laden?

12467…10

Comments

  • spiral out
    spiral out Posts: 1,052
    jlew24asu wrote:

    you live in your own little world. brainwashed by god knows who about such garbage. and i'm the one who doesnt have his facts straight. typical.

    Three words, Pot, kettle, black.
    Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!

    The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    spiral out wrote:
    So you are scared of some countries then.
    why are you talking to me personally? am I scared of some countries? no i'm not.

    I do not want to send in american troops into pakistan and risk thousands of them dying. that makes me scared of some countries?

    listen tini wini.

    i'm smart enough to know that invading pakistan is a very bad idea. 10 times worse then invading iraq. but call me scared I guess. whatever give u a little hard on.
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    spiral out wrote:
    Three words, Pot, kettle, black.
    you've been dying to use that for a while havent you?
  • RainDog
    RainDog Posts: 1,824
    jlew24asu wrote:
    Iraq was a small country with a small army? I didnt think so. regardless, what kind of bullshit is this? should we invade because we think bin laden is there? does anybody here know anything about pakistan ?
    I know that, until the invasion, the Pakistani government was one of, if not the only government that recognized the Taliban as the legitamate rulers of Afghanistan.

    And We Think has pretty much been the basis for our entire foreign policy of late. If you believed the war on Iraq was justified (not sure if you do - directed at the general "you"), then why not this?
  • Specifics
    Specifics Posts: 417
    jlew24asu wrote:
    I do ok. you know how many people already got a great laff from what you wrote? think about it.

    you people are really confusing me today. what the fuck are you talking about?

    is this an attempt at humor? might put someone in a coma you could be sued for? is that the punch line?


    what are we counting down?

    keep it comin buddy. you are pure senseless entertainment. wow, just wow.
    back to the drawing board huh tini wini?

    Whoaw calm down blood pressure boy! All your "office buddies" around again yes? u huh.
    Dont try to be hard on here, your a pussy.
    I sort of know where you're coming from, I was kind of like you once JLew, only i had balls and less mouth, and did it in real life not on here.
  • spiral out
    spiral out Posts: 1,052
    jlew24asu wrote:
    why are you talking to me personally? am I scared of some countries? no i'm not.

    I do not want to send in american troops into pakistan and risk thousands of them dying. that makes me scared of some countries?

    listen tini wini.

    i'm smart enough to know that invading pakistan is a very bad idea. 10 times worse then invading iraq. but call me scared I guess. whatever give u a little hard on.

    But you think invading iran is a good idea right?
    Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!

    The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    Specifics wrote:
    Whoaw calm down blood pressure boy! All your "office buddies" around again yes? u huh.
    Dont try to be hard on here, your a pussy.
    I sort of know where you're coming from, I was kind of like you once JLew, only i had balls and less mouth, and did it in real life not on here.
    is that a threat?
  • Specifics
    Specifics Posts: 417
    jlew24asu wrote:
    you've been dying to use that for a while havent you?

    I know it has lots of muslims, has some nukes, has Bin Laden for definite because you believe it, but only a modest production of oil.
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    spiral out wrote:
    But you think invading iran is a good idea right?
    no I think its a terrible idea. thanks for asking.
  • Specifics
    Specifics Posts: 417
    jlew24asu wrote:
    is that a threat?

    wow, i have upset you today huh tini wini, ok i'm sorry you DO have lots of office buddies! and you ARE SUPER brave and clever.

    really, from your posts i'd say you're absolutely nothing JLew, why would i threaten you in an internet chatroom.

    you have absolutely zero understanding to back up your memorised knowledge.
    at your age you should at least have some.

    anytime you're in London look me up, i wont threaten you then either.
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    RainDog wrote:
    I know that, until the invasion, the Pakistani government was one of, if not the only government that recognized the Taliban as the legitamate rulers of Afghanistan.
    but they dont recongize them anymore. and they have done some to assit in capturing al qaeda. can they do more? yes.
    RainDog wrote:
    And We Think has pretty much been the basis for our entire foreign policy of late. If you believed the war on Iraq was justified (not sure if you do - directed at the general "you"), then why not this?
    I do not think invading Iraq is/was justified.
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    Specifics wrote:
    wow, i have upset you today huh tini wini, ok i'm sorry you DO have lots of office buddies! and you ARE SUPER brave and clever.

    really, from your posts i'd say you're absolutely nothing JLew, why would i threaten you in an internet chatroom.

    you have absolutely zero understanding to back up your memorised knowledge.
    at your age you should at least have some.

    anytime you're in London look me up, i wont threaten you then either.
    thanks for the laughs.
  • Specifics
    Specifics Posts: 417
    jlew24asu wrote:
    thanks for the laughs.

    hey you learnt to spell my man, you get a smiley:)
  • even flow?
    even flow? Posts: 8,066
    jlew24asu wrote:
    ok so you are advocating sending troops into pakistan. I strongly disagree. does that mean I dont want to catch bin laden? no. I want him dead more then anybody. but i'm smart enough to realize going into pakistan is not the answer. but you believe bin laden to be innocent. why are you suggesting we invade pakistan to catch him?

    could be the dumbest thing I ever heard. makes no sense and is completely irrelevant to this discussion.

    again, tell me what facts i'm missing. you have yet to provide one.

    I guess you were the only one who didnt know he was there. your kidding right?

    this is why I cant debate with you. you live in your own little world. brainwashed by god knows who about such garbage. and i'm the one who doesnt have his facts straight. typical.

    You are kidding right!

    Why?

    Provide some information please! :rolleyes:

    Sound bite seems right to me.

    See when a country says we will hand him over if you can provide information and you don't, surprise you don't get your prize. Then you invade. For your information usually when you can't cough up the proof something is wrong. And even a no it all Yank like you should be able to wrap your one way thinking around that. I think we all had a good idea where he was. The Taliban like myself and a huge amount of other people want some solid proof. I wish I was like you and believed everything the man gave me. My life would be simple and easy to live. Please hold my hand, I would be lost without the sound bite that is my life. You do provide entertaining, fun reading though. Glad you come by to spit out the Rep line. :D
    You've changed your place in this world!
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    even flow? wrote:
    You are kidding right!

    Why?

    Provide some information please! :rolleyes:

    Sound bite seems right to me.

    See when a country says we will hand him over if you can provide information and you don't, surprise you don't get your prize. Then you invade. For your information usually when you can't cough up the proof something is wrong. And even a no it all Yank like you should be able to wrap your one way thinking around that. I think we all had a good idea where he was. The Taliban like myself and a huge amount of other people want some solid proof. I wish I was like you and believed everything the man gave me. My life would be simple and easy to live. Please hold my hand, I would be lost without the sound bite that is my life. You do provide entertaining, fun reading though. Glad you come by to spit out the Rep line. :D
    you're going to have to help me out here. you are giving me shit for NOT advocating invading pakistan?

    and all this garbage coming from someone who firmly believes 9/11 was masterminded by the American government? no sir, I'm glad you post your bullshit here. gives me someone to laugh at.
  • my2hands
    my2hands Posts: 17,117
    of course we arent looking for him

    you have to keep the boogey man alive for all these dumb ass pussy fucking americans that tremble in fear.


    it is all a sham. too bad most are still buying the greatest con ever sold
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    my2hands wrote:
    of course we arent looking for him

    you have to keep the boogey man alive for all these dumb ass pussy fucking americans that tremble in fear.


    it is all a sham. too bad most are still buying the greatest con ever sold

    whats all a sham?
  • my2hands
    my2hands Posts: 17,117
    jlew24asu wrote:
    I sure hope so. from what I understand, he is in a place where we cant go. tribal areas of pakistan. even pakistan isnt allowed there.


    this is bullshit considering W has constantly stated that america will not ask for permission to protect itself. and obviously is not against using the military behind unfriendly borders

    we "cant" go into pakistan...give me a break

    one minute we are the greatest fuckin gpower ever that can stop civil wars and defeat an ideology with our military, then the next minute we cant find a 6'5 arab because of a tribal area? which one is it
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    my2hands wrote:
    this is bullshit considering W has constantly stated that america will not ask for permission to protect itself. and obviously is not against using the military behind unfriendly borders

    we "cant" go into pakistan...give me a break
    why is this so hard to understand?

    we CAN NOT go into pakistan. thats it. bottom line. america, even big bad W, can not go into pakistan without proof he is there and without starting a war with pakistan.

    is that what you want? will that shut you up? lets start another list of dead soliders from pakistan ok?
    my2hands wrote:
    one minute we are the greatest fuckin gpower ever that can stop civil wars and defeat an ideology with our military, then the next minute we cant find a 6'5 arab because of a tribal area? which one is it
    its both. we are the world's top super power and we can not catch a 6'5 arab.
  • even flow?
    even flow? Posts: 8,066
    jlew24asu wrote:
    you're going to have to help me out here. you are giving me shit for NOT advocating invading pakistan?

    and all this garbage coming from someone who firmly believes 9/11 was masterminded by the American government? no sir, I'm glad you post your bullshit here. gives me someone to laugh at.


    Why not invade Pakistan? It is called being able to see both sides of the story. Hey, maybe you can believe that can't be done, but not this poster. Unlike you who sees 911 as a flawless plan constructed from the depths of some caves half a world away and pulled off without a hitch. I tend to believe a different version of that day. As mentioned earlier........I can see both sides of the story. I have talked to many Americans and I know that they can stick to one story and not sway. Something about pride or inbreeding or something like that, that dosen't allow any outside influence.
    You've changed your place in this world!

Categories